Tag Archive | "Hussain Haqqani"

Mr. Hussain Haqqani's nationality

Hussain Haqqani: The most reviled Ambassador anywhere

Go Haqqani Go! “Haqqani is a traitor”! Haqqani hecklers speak for Pakistan

Hussain Haqqani: The most reviled & hated ambassador anywhere Hussain Haqqani: dangerous 5th column or selfish opportunist

Haqqani not a dual national’

WASHINGTON: Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States Hussain Haqqani has never had, and never applied for, the nationality of another country, a spokesman of the Pakistani embassy in Washington said on Thursday. Commenting on statements by some members of the National Assembly on dual nationality of Pakistani officials, the embassy spokesman said such comments would never have been made if facts were ascertained beforehand. Ambassador Haqqani lived and taught in the US for some years as a non-US citizen, like many Pakistanis working abroad, before being appointed an ambassador in 2008, he said, adding that under the international law, no one can serve as an ambassador to a country of which he is a citizen. He said Haqqani is a Pakistani citizen by birth and holds only the Pakistani nationality. app

  • Fire Haqqani now!… for supporting US attacks on Pakistan
  • Hussain Haqqani is responsible for air strikes againt Pakistan
  • Afghan cauldron:-Bubble bubble toil & Indian trouble: Resistance to hegemony
  • Hussain Haqqani: AIPAC meeting that hosted Hussain Haqqani who spoke the Neocon language and did not present the Muslim point of view. He did not defend Muslims or Paksitanis, instead he repeated the Neocon rhetoric. Husien Haqqani once again exposed himself. For the past decade he has not been defending Pakistanis, Islam or Muslims. he has in fact been one of the foremost critics of Pakistan and Muslims. Over the years Mr. Haqqani’s “scholarship” is “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury” signifying nothing. Mr. Haqqani is not rally well educated or accomplished in anything but schmooze and opportunism. A former die hard Jamat e Islami member, then a virulent opponent of the PPP, Mr. Haqqani graduated to become a paid mule of the Neocons. He did not do any original research. Most of his “thoughts’ can be found in the scholarship of Dr. Steve Emersen, Dr. Daniel Pipes and Mr. Robert Schwartz. Some of these and others participated in the Islamphobic events held on campuses in 2007

    Mr. Husain Haqqani not only spoke at AIPAC events he published papers were anit-Pakistran, anti-Muslims and anti-Islam. Husien Haqqani once again exposed himself. For the past decade he has not been defending Pakistanis, Islam or Muslims. he has in fact been one of the foremost critics of Pakistan and Muslims. Over the years Mr. Haqqani’s “scholarship” is “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury” signifying nothing. Mr. Haqqani is not rally well educated or accomplished in anything but schmooze and opportunism. A former die hard Jamat e Islami member, then a virulent opponent of the PPP, Mr. Haqqani graduated to become a paid mule of the Neocons. He did not do any original research. Most of his “thoughts’ can be found in the scholarship of Dr. Steve Emersen, Dr. Daniel Pipes and Mr. Robert Schwartz. Some of these and others participated in the Islamphobic events held on campuses in 2007

    Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | ??????? ????? | ???? | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ??????? | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | ???????? ????? | Moin Ansari | ???? ??????? |  ????? ????? |  April 10th, 2009 | 

    THE HUSSAIN HAQQANI PAGE: 

    Go Haqqani Go! “Haqqani is a traitor”! Haqqani hecklers speak for Pakistan 

    Husein Haqqani’s headache: Another leading line of thinking among Pakistan watchers places the blame more on the Pakistani Embassy in Washington, and particularly Amb. Hussain Haqqani (shown rubbing his face above during State Department talks in February) and the Washington lobbyists on his payroll, who were involved in crafting the legislation but are seen to have dropped the ball in preparing their own countrymen — and particularly the Pakistani military — for its release, and explaining the conditions on the aid. 

    Hussain Haqqani: The most reviled & hated ambassador anywhere Hussain Haqqani: dangerous 5th column or selfish opportunist 

    Mr. Haqqani is the Pakistani Ambassador to the USA. As ambassador, Haqqani will essentially act as a “prime minister representative to the USA,” –a job diametrically opposite of what he was doing. Pakistani Americans hopes he is sent back to Sri Lanka. 

  • Fire Haqqani now!… for supporting US attacks on Pakistan
  • Hussain Haqqani is responsible for air strikes againt Pakistan
  • Afghan cauldron:-Bubble bubble toil & Indian trouble: Resistance to hegemonyA Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. His credentials were pretty weak an MA from The University of Karachi. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of “Orientalism”, this new FOB (Fresh of the boat) man jumped on the Neocon bandwagon and stabbed the Civil Rights Movement in the heart. Mr. Hussain Haqqani’s incorrect, false and incendiary statements caused havoc with the normal functioning of the great American Democracy. Hackles were raised. If a man named Hussian said this, it must be true. If a Pakistani said this it must have veracity. 
     
      

      

     

     

    Husain Haqaani: Which flag does he owe allegiance to? The Pakistani specific language used in the Kerry Lugar Bill is reflective of the ides and views of Mr. Haqqani as clearly stated in his book on Pakistan titled “Pakistan: Between Mosque And Military”. Page 191-192 of his book clearly state that the ISI and the Army does not help US interests. His statements in the Carnegies Endowment also reflect the opinions of Mr. Haqqani–all a matter of public record. Husien Haqqani once again exposed himself. For the past decade he has not been defending Pakistanis, Islam or Muslims. he has in fact been one of the foremost critics of Pakistan and Muslims. Over the years Mr. Haqqani’s “scholarship” is “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury” signifying nothing. Mr. Haqqani is not rally well educated or accomplished in anything but schmooze and opportunism. A former die hard Jamat e Islami member, then a virulent opponent of the PPP, Mr. Haqqani graduated to become a paid mule of the Neocons. He did not do any original research. Most of his “thoughts’ can be found in the scholarship of Dr. Steve Emersen, Dr. Daniel Pipes and Mr. Robert Schwartz. Some of these and others participated in the Islamphobic events held on campuses in 2007 

    A rebuttal to Mr. Haqqani: US policy and Pakistan’s drift.  

    Over the years, Mr. Haqqani has written a lot against Pakistan. This is a rebuttal. This rebuttal was also submitted to Mr. Haqqani personally. Upon Mr. Haqqani’s request his part of the mail excahnge has been deleted.

      

     

    We wrote a while back “naun sau choohay kha keh billee haj ko chalee” (after doing 900 wrongs, he has gone for pilgrimage to wash his sins away). Mr. Husain Haqqani has been siting in the lap of the Neocons disparaging Islam and vomiting against Pakistan for the best part of a decade. Now he is rewarded with an Ambassadorial position to represent Pakistan. 

    Husain Haqqani traitor poster: Husien Haqqani once again exposed himself. For the past decade he has not been defending Pakistanis, Islam or Muslims. he has in fact been one of the foremost critics of Pakistan and Muslims. Over the years Mr. Haqqani’s “scholarship” is “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury” signifying nothing. Mr. Haqqani is not rally well educated or accomplished in anything but schmooze and opportunism. A former die hard Jamat e Islami member, then a virulent opponent of the PPP, Mr. Haqqani graduated to become a paid mule of the Neocons. He did not do any original research. Most of his “thoughts’ can be found in the scholarship of Dr. Steve Emersen, Dr. Daniel Pipes and Mr. Robert Schwartz. Some of these and others participated in the Islamphobic events held on campuses in 2007 

    Articles on Ambassador Hussain Haqqani are listed here: 

    HUSAIN HAQQANI: The most reviled Ambassador in the world. Is he the US spokesman? 

    Rebuttal to Mr. Haqqani’s book  

    Appendix (Source www.MakePakistanBetter.com

  • Who’s responsible for the KL Pakistan aid bill fiasco?
  • All Segments of Pakistani society oppose Kerry Lugar & condemn PPPP subservience
  • Resistance to Kerry Lugar bill grows in Pakistan
  • Islamabad resists larger U.S. footprint in Pakistan
  • Kerry Lugar Bill: The passage, rejection by Pakistan, and inevitable revision–huge defeat for Delhi
  • Hussain Haqqani: The most reviled & hated ambassador anywhere
  •  Hussain Haqqani: dangerous 5th column or selfish opportunist
  • Is the Kerry Lugar Bill dead?–rejection imminent!
  • Kerry Luger rejection: Some questions for US Congress.
  • Selective Amnesia of Americans: Pakistan is the most mistreated friend in the world
  •  Kerry-Lugar Peanuts: 50% of US Aid fills pockets of US consultants  
  • Pakistani winds send shivers up US spine
  • India intelligence: “‘the aim of RAW is to keep internal disturbances flaring up and the ISI preoccupied so that Pakistan can lend no worthwhile resistance to Indian designs in the region.”Conservative Foundations against Islam

    A number of wealthy conservative foundations are primary bankrollers of the Neo-Cons and right – wing think-tanks. A grand total of 83 research grants totaling over $4.5 million dollars are supplied to groups and researchers involved in anti-Islamic research. The following foundations currently offer financial support of anti-Islamic research: The Earhart Foundation, The Shelby Cullom Davis Foundation, The Smith Richardson Foundation, The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, and The John M. Olin Foundation. The chart below links some specific research individuals with their funding foundation.

  • Name of Primary researcher  Amount $  Funder 
    Alexander Alexiev  $75,000  Shelby Cullom Davis Foundation 
    Hillel Fradkin  $173,800  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    David Cook  $150,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Nazeer Ahmed  $50,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Zachary Abuza  $65,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Timur Kuran  $164,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Nelly Lahoud  $9,000  Earhart Foundation 
    Hussain Haqqani  $100,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Steven Emerson  $250,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Zeyno Baran  $110,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Sultan Tepe  $60,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Cheryl Barnard  $100,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Graham Fuller  $15,000  Earhart Foundation 
    Ibrahim Abu-Rabi  $20,000  Earhart Foundation 
    Fawaz Gerges  $143,000  Smith Richardson Foundation 
    Ahmad Mousalli  $100,000+  Earhart Foundation 
  •   

    http://www.turkses.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1408&Itemid=36 

    For Smith Richardson grants: Click the link below 

    http://www.srf.org/grants/grantsdb.php?username=&lg=1 

    Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC  

      

    Assessing Strategic Competition in Southern Asia  $ 50,000  

    Ashley Tellis will research and write a book on the dynamics 

    of the strategic competition in South Asia involving India, 

    China, and Pakistan. He will assess Indian, Pakistani, and 

    Chinese strategic goals and explore how they are pursuing 

    those goals through the development of military and other 

    Capabilities. 

      

    Developing a New U.S. Policy toward Pakistan  $175,000  

    Husain Haqqani will lead an effort to develop new ideas for 

    U.S. policy toward Pakistan. He will organize working groups 

    of U.S. and Pakistani experts and commission papers. He will 

    write a blueprint for a U.S. policy to encourage Pakistan to 

    adopt a more moderate and democratic political system. The 

    Project’s findings will appear in a series of monographs and 

    a policy report 

    World Organization for Resource Development and Education 

    Washington, DC 

    International Conference of Moderate Muslim Scholars Policy Makers $ 50,000  

    Nazeer Ahmed will organize a conference of religious, 

    Political, and academic leaders to discuss democracy and 

    Islam. The project’s findings will appear in a report.Yale 

    Flow of information is huge which requires a book, it is better to copy and keep in records; it will help you in future when Hussain Haqqani will put another mask on his face or West will kick out such fraudulent financial beneficiaries. He is assigned to work as ambassador at US by Zardari to facilitate in sucking money from West, it looks like joke that children adopt hobbies like ticket collecting, or coin collecting etc but Zardari has hobby of money collecting, making money by any means, billions of dollars did not help Benazir in her life. 

    Earthman 

    International Professor  

      

    Following links and references are not new but important and worth watching  

    1. Video Haqqani: Display of a slavish, defeatist mentality Part 1 & 2 

    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/2008/11/01/haqqani-display-of-a-slavish-defeatest-mentality.html 

    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/2008/11/02/haqqani-display-of-a-slavish-defeatist-mentality-part-2.html 

    2. I am up for sale! Husain Haqqani- An agent of the anti Islam/anti Pakistan forces 

    http://pkdemocrat.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/a-prostitute-called-husain-haqqanian-agent-of-the-jews/ 

    3. American talent and Celebrity Network 

    http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/ 

    4. Mr. Neocon goes to Washington 

    http://rupeenews.com/most-popular-articles/mr-neocon-goes-to-washington-from-pakistan/ 

    5. Mr. Chips (Haqqani) goes to Washington
     

    http://rupeenews.com/2008/04/11/mr-potato-chips-goes-to-washington-neocon-from-pakistan/ 

    6. Video (try to open in real player) 

    rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/ter/ter112707_pakistan.rm 

    7. Blogs: foreign Policy 

    http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/search/node/haqqani 

    8. An example for the Arab world (interview) 

    http://www.resetdoc.org/EN/Haqqani-interview.php 

    9. Post-mortem of Farahnaz Isphahani and Hussain Haqqani  

    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=5905&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 

    10. Hussain Haqqani is under influence of Ispahani. 

    http://www.attocknews.com/content/view/1018/168/ 

    11. Iran,India and Afghanistan defeated Pakistan -More Ispahanis 

    http://www.makepakistanbetter.com/Why_how_what_forum.asp?GroupID=5&ArticleID=3944 

    12. Hussain Haqqani Propaganda – Citibank links 

    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/2008/11/01/hussain-haqqani-propaganda-%e2%80%93-citibank-links.html 

    13. A comprehensive look on Husain Haqqani published by rupeenews (worth reading)  

    http://rupeenews.com/2008/04/16/husain-haqqani-dangerous-5th-column-or-selfish-opportunist/ 

    14. Series of four posts 

    Postmortem of Farahnaz Isphahani and Hussain Haqqani 

    http://www.attocknews.com/content/view/975/168/ 

    Hussain Haqqani Propaganda – Citibank links 

    http://www.makepakistanbetter.com/Why_how_what_forum.asp?PageNo=&GroupID=1&ArticleID=4243 

    Hussain Haqqani is under influence of Ispahani. 

    http://www.makepakistanbetter.com/Why_how_what_forum.asp?GroupID=1&ArticleID=3904 

    Iran,India and Afghanistan defeated Pakistan -More Ispahanis 

    http://www.makepakistanbetter.com/Why_how_what_forum.asp?GroupID=5&ArticleID=3944 

  • Posted in Current Affairs, Pak CAComments Off

    How long can Hussain Haqqani survive?

    WASHINGTON – In the midst of mounting attacks against him in the Pakistani media and by politicians, Ambassador Husain Haqqani has denied that he was going to be shifted to another job.

    “Nobody in the government at any level has broached the subject of my going to any other job or any other role so far,’’ Haqqani, the Pakistan envoy to the United States, was quoted as saying in the course of a dispatch in The Boston Globe.

    The dispatch said that Haqqani was fighting for his political survival, accused of something that can tank a government career in Pakistan: being too “pro-American.’’

    Referring to criticism being heaped on Haqqani, the Globe said Pakistani military officials have sought his dismissal. The attacks have been so nasty that Haqqani has filed a defamation lawsuit against a leading Pakistani newspaper (The Nation), it noted.

    “If he returned home, friends say, his safety could be threatened.

    “It’s brutal,’’ Michael Krepon of the Henry L. Stimson Center, a Washington-based think tank, was quoted ass saying in the report

    Ironically, the Globe said, the recent spate of criticism stems from Haqqani’s role in shaping a $7.5 billion, five-year US aid package (the Kerry-Lugar Bill) to Pakistan that aims to strengthen the friendship between the countries.

    “The furor (over the conditions set in the bill) has exposed a dangerous, continuing struggle between Pakistan’s powerful military, which Haqqani criticized as a professor (at Boston University), and the fledgling, democratically elected government.

    “The [Pakistani] military clearly has decided that it would like to have him removed,’’ the newspaper quoted an unnamed US congressional aide.

    A Boston University was cited as saying that Haqqani was welcome to return early from his two-year sabbatical, which is slated to end next June, but that he has not raised the issue. Haqqani has maintained ties to Boston University and continues to advise a student pursuing a doctorate who is defending her dissertation this month.

    “Haqqani has a reputation for emerging victorious from political warfare in Washington and Islamabad, it said calling him “charming and shrewd …

    “While at BU, Haqqani finished his book ‘Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military,’ which detailed the troublesome alliance between Pakistan’s military and radical Islamists groups”. In the book, he argued that the United States should use its aid to break the cycle of military dictatorship in Pakistan.

    “In 2008, Pakistan’s military leaders stepped aside and allowed for the election of a new civilian government. Ali Asif Zardari, the husband of the late Bhutto, became Pakistan’s new president and sent his friend Haqqani to Washington.

    “Already on a first-name basis with many key congressmen, the professor quickly became an influential figure, a frequent visitor to the White House and Capitol Hill. An avid Red Sox (baseball team) fan who is more likely to wear an expensive suit than a loose-fitting traditional shalwar kamiz, Haqqani captivated US audiences with speeches about Pakistan’s woes.

    “But his role in Washington has long caused consternation among those who say he is out of touch with Pakistan and too American in his point of view. Although his wife, a former CNN producer, holds a seat in Pakistan’s parliament, Haqqani hasn’t returned to Islamabad for eight months”.

    “Many Pakistanis say that they think he is too close to Washington, that he has spent too much time outside the country, that he doesn’t understand the demands of the Pakistani people,’’ said Daniel Markey, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who said complaints about Haqqani came up frequently during his meetings in Pakistan last week.

    Haqqani’s failure to predict or prepare for the outrage in Pakistan over the language in Kerry’s aid package “may be an example of that,’’ Markey said. “The embassy should have known that some people were going to try to make hay of it, and headed that off in advance.’’

    But Samina Ahmed, an Islamabad-based analyst for the International Crisis Group, said the attacks on Haqqani were carefully orchestrated by the military to weaken the government he represents. She predicted more will come.

    “These are the first rumblings of the storm,’’ she was quoted as saying. “This is the beginning of the military trying to take down this civilian government.’’The Nation. Shireen Mazari

    Posted in Current Affairs, Pak CA, US CA, US Int Rel., US PoliComments Off

    Shireen Mazari exposes Hussain Haqqani

    Washington DC – Ambassador Haqqani has been appearing on many fora in the US before and after he became ambassador for Pakistan. A study of his remarks reveals an interesting perspective he has on Pakistan and the Muslim World. For instance, on April 1, 2005, Cleveland Jewishnews.com quoted Haqqani as having stated: “Muslim world’s problems are much bigger than antagonism to Israel, Jews and Militancy.” He went on to hold the Saudis responsible for almost every problem.

    Given how Saudi Arabia is one of Pakistan’s most critical allies, apart from the deep emotive bond between the two Muslim nations, this statement would hardly have gone down well before either Pakistanis or Saudis. But this anti-Saudi theme has been a particular favourite of the ambassador’s. For instance, on an earlier occasion, on March 2, 2004, at the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs he declared that “ Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are two of the US’s most difficult allies … They are not allies at all … but sources of trouble … The fact that (an al Qaeda terrorist) feels so comfortable with Pakistani intelligence officers … is a source of worry in itself.”

    Haqqani was also a frequent guest speaker at forums which have been set up by separatists in the US and Canada. His statements in such forums are interesting. For instance, at the Nov 6, 2006 meeting of the World Sindhi Institute, his remarks included his view that “Pakistan is not historical, like France or India, it is a constitutional state. Pakistan was created in hurry and its greatest support was from those areas which did not become part of Pakistan later. So the idea emerged that used Islam as a unifying bond.” Then he went on to add that “Sindhis have a liberal religion” as if somehow the attempt to use Islam as a symbol of unity was opposed by them!

    Again, at the same meeting, he explained, “India has 23 national languages but Pakistan was pressing hard for Urdu. Pakistan’s elite decided Islam would be unifying and India an enemy.” He also went on to deride Pakistan further by declaring that “Pakistan is a rent seeking unit from the US, may it be Russia or terrorism, they are available as the most allied ally.” Finally, he attacked the settlers of Balochistan, now the target of killings in that province, by demanding that “Punjabis in Balochistan should learn to respect Balochis and should not side with the government. The way the Army did not help Biharis who took the wrong side and are still there at the mercy of Bengalis. Either you can come back on tanks or on trains as POWs.”

    A month later, on December 5, 2006, at the CARR Center for Human rights Policy, Haqqani again gave his view that “Pakistan has become a rented state; it is benefiting from its geographic location. As per the declassified documents, Ayub Khan said, ‘Our army can be yours, if you pay the right price’. We perform certain services and in return get economic benefits.”

    Much later, at the Asia Society, New York, on March 27, 2007, with reference to military aid to Pakistan, he expressed the view that “military aid, none of the arsenals, has any relevance to countering Al-Qaeda.” He did state the obvious when he said, on the same occasion, “US pressure is there to do more, which is being resented by people of Pakistan. They see it as American’s war.” Now which of these quotable quotes of Haqqani’s made it apparent to the Zardari regime that he would be the ideal representative of Pakistan’s interests in the US?

    Posted in Current Affairs, Pak CAComments Off

    the-traitor-poster-with-hh: Husain Haqqani traitor poster

    Haqqani grows a backbone? Defiantly calls US aid bill intrusive & inadequate

    Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | ??????? ????? | ???? | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ??????? | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | ???????? ????? | Moin Ansari | ???? ??????? |  ????? ????? |  April 7th, 2009 |

    Mr. Haqqani is making the right noises in Washington. Many ask why? What has influenced the Ambassador that he is for the first time talking about Pakistani interests. This is so unlike Mr. Haqqani. Why is he speaking up for what is right for Pakistan? We are flabbergasted, surprised and very skeptical about his pronouncements. Is he trying to save his job, or is the con man trying to refashion his image?

    Pakistanis of course do not trust the man at all. After all it was Mr. Haqqani who was instrumental in getting Mr. Zardari where he is. Using his wife’s connections he got Mr. Zardari introduced to the right people in Washington.

    Mr. Haqqani’s track record is a testement to his evil designs against Pakistan.

    the-traitor-poster-with-hh: Husain Haqqani traitor posterAnalysts are bewildered by this change of demeanor by the Pakistani Ambassador who has changed colors many times before. He used to be part and parcel of the Jamat e Islami, an organization that he has severly criticized. Mr. Haqqani was also opposed to the PPPP and its leader Ms. Benazir Bhutto. He then joined Mr. Zardari as an advisor and finally became the Ambassador to the US. Even after becoming an Ambassador he kept up the rhetoric against Pakistan in various forums using the pronoun “us” and “we” while calling himself an American. This turn of events in Washington has caught most by surprise, and wonder if this is a trick and part of a conspiracy on the part of Mr. Haqqani to somehow sabotage Pakistan again.

    Husain Haqqani traitor posterWill the real Mr. Hussain Haqqani stand up please!

    Hussain Haqqani: The most reviled & hated ambassador anywhere Which flag is he loyal to?

     Hussain Haqqani: dangerous 5th column or selfish opportunist

    Pakistanis hate Mr. Haqqani so much that reporters actually asked the question “Why is Mr. Haqqani working against Pakistani interests“?

    ISLAMABAD, April 6 (Xinhua) – Pakistan on Monday rejected reports over its ambassador to the United States, saying it has confidence in the envoy. “Ambassador Husain Haqqani is Pakistan’s principal interlocutor with Washington and the Government has full confidence in him,” said Foreign Ministry spokesman Abdul Basit in a statement released. Basit made the remarks in response to a question regarding accusations against Pakistani Ambassador to the United States Husain Haqqani that “he is working against Pakistan’s interests”.  

    Mr. Hussain Haqqani has been made fun of in the Pakistani media as “the US Ambassador to Pakistan based in Washington”. It was hard to recognize the speeches made by the Pakistani Ambassador to the Washington.

    The Pakistani ambassador to the US is eating his own words and reading a script which contradicts everything that he stands for. Mr. Haqqani now stands opposed to American drone bombing, something he had justified in an interview with Kashif Abbassi on GEO TV. Mr. Haqqai is also asking for more American aid, something he had opposed.

    Husain Haqqani gay traitor cartoonThis correspondent has copious emails from Mr. Haqqani in which he opposed the Pakistani military and the Pakistani intelligence services. In many of these emails Mr. Haqqani opposed US Aid to Pakistan.

    We have severly criticized Mr. Haqqani. He is not very popular in Pakistan. Hussain Haqqani: The most reviled Ambassador anywhere

    Once again there’s talk of fixing Afghanistan and Pakistan. Please do not fix us,’ said the ambassador in a joint appearance with his Afghan counterpart at a Washington think-tank, the Atlantic Council.

    ‘The world is not a problem for America to fix. The world is a place for the Americans to understand.’

    He also defended the Inter-Services Intelligence Agency (ISI), an institution seen by civilian quarters in Islamabad as too intrusive and too politicized.

    ‘It is important that the institutions that are to be partners in this (anti-terrorism) effort do not start feeling under attack, whether it is ISI or the Pakistani military,’ he said.

    ‘Mistakes have been committed on all sides. But this lack of trust will be addressed by talking to us, not by beating down on us.’

    Mr Haqqani said that the Pakistanis these days were very concerned about an ‘unbridled indictment’ of their security services, giving no credit to Pakistan for the efforts that have been made.

    ‘We lost a lot of people along the border with Afghanistan. We have become a major victim of terrorism. More Pakistanis have died as a result of terrorist incidents in the last two years than in any other country.’

    Diplomatic observers noted that Pakistan’s new defiant posture is not an instant flare up of sentiments on the part of the Pakistani leaders.

    The change of mood followed a collective decision of the government and the security establishment to adopt a tough posture.

    No blank cheques urged Americans not to attach ‘intrusive’ conditions to the aid they offer.Haqqani HusainWASHINGTON: Pakistan’s new found defiance against the United States was on full display in Washington on Thursday evening when Ambassador

    When President Barack Obamaannounced his new strategy for Pakistan and Afghanistan late last month, telling Islamabad not to expect blank cheques from Washington, Ambassador Haqqani welcomed it as a step in the right direction.

    He said Washington had consulted closely with Islamabad on formulating the policy and it was not formed in the clouds.

    But on Thursday, he appeared offended with President Obama’s reprimand that the US will no more write blank cheques. ‘We will not accept a blank cheque, nor would we write any,’ said the Pakistani envoy.

    Aid package

    Mr Haqqani, who until Thursday was all praise for a $7.5 billion aid package, trumpeting its introduction in the US Congress last week as a show of support for democracy in Pakistan, appeared much less enthusiastic while talking about the same package at the seminar.

    Referring to the US government’s decision to dole out hundreds of billions of dollars to mismanaged corporations and risk-taking Wall Street brokers, the ambassador said Washington should re-think its priorities.

    ‘A company at the verge of failure is quite clearly able to get a bigger bailout than a nation that has been accused of failure,’ Mr Haqqani said. ‘That’s something that in this town needs a review.’

    He said investments in Pakistan’s schools and infrastructure to help battle Al Qaedaand home-grown terrorists would be worth the money.

    Pakistan and Afghanistan, where the US is re-focusing efforts to fight the resurging Taliban and terrorism, deserve more than ‘some failed insurance company or some car company whose achievement is that they couldn’t make cars that they could sell,’ he said.

    Mr Haqqani said Pakistan will ask for its own ‘Marshall Plan’ – up to $30 billion in aid from its allies at the ‘Friends of Pakistan’ meeting in Tokyo on April 17.

    Restrictions on Pakistan

    The Pakistani ambassador was also unhappy with the metrics and conditions attached to the aid to Pakistan, saying that they were too ‘intrusive.’

    He urged Congress to revisit the bill and remove some of the recommended restrictions. Pakistan, he said, the importance of using the money accountability and effectively.

    ‘But there is a difference between accountability and intrusiveness. And that is something that needs to be understood,’ he said.

    Regional contact group

    The ambassador also opposed President Obama’s suggestion to form a regional contact group for fighting extremists in the Pak-Afghan region, saying that such groups had been formed in the past as well but they did not succeed.

    ‘It is much better for us to be able to engage bilaterally with various regional powers instead of trying to create a new institutional mechanism which could run into some kind of logjam because there will be too many people, too many ideas.’

    He explained that one of the reasons behind the many problems in the border areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan since 1979 is that too many external actors have been involved.

    ‘Al Qaedais an external actor. Al Qaedais not something that is indigenous to Pakistan and Afghanistan. These are people who came from outside, withan outside idea.’ Dawn

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. His credentials were pretty weak– an MA from The University of Karachi. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of “Orientalism”, this new FOB (Fresh of the boat) man jumped on the Neocon bandwagon and stabbed the Civil Rights Movement in the heart. Mr. Hussain Haqqani’s incorrect, false and incendiary statements caused havoc with the normal functioning of the great American Democracy. Hackles were raised. If a man named Hussian said this, it must be true. If a Pakistani said this it must have veracity.

    A rebuttal to Mr. Haqqani: US policy and Pakistan’s drift. Over the years, Mr. Haqqanihas written a lot against Pakistan. This is a rebuttal. This rebuttal was also submitted to Mr. Haqqani personally. Upon Mr. Haqqani’s request his part of the mail excahnge has been deleted.

    We wrote a while back “naun sau choohay kha keh billee haj ko chalee” (after doing 900 wrongs, he has gone for pilgrimage to wash his sins away). Mr. Husain Haqqani has been siting in the lap of the Neocons disparaging Islam and vomiting against Pakistan for the best part of a decade. Now he is rewarded withan Ambassadorial position to represent Pakistan.

    Drone attacks

    The ambassador said that Pakistan was not happy with the drone attacks because they did not show sufficient regard for Pakistan’s national sovereignty. ‘It will be easier for Pakistanis to accept the American technology being used to take out terrorists if it is done in partnership with Pakistan.’

    There’s also concern on collateral damage, he said, explaining that the loss of life angers the people and provides opportunity to al-Qaeda for waging its propaganda.

    ‘The point is working out a mechanism whereby our concerns about sovereignty and collateral damage are addressed. We consider the US as partner and we expect them to consider us as partners,’ he said. Dawn.

    HUSAIN HAQQANI: The most reviled Ambassador in the world. Is he the US spokesman?

    Rebuttal to Mr. Haqqani’s book

    Appendix (Source www.MakePakistanBetter.com)

    Conservative Foundations against Islam

    A number of wealthy conservative foundations are primary bankrollers of the Neo-Cons and right – wing think-tanks. A grand totalof 83 research grants totaling over $4.5 million dollars are supplied to groups and researchers involved in anti-Islamic research. The following foundations currently offer financial support of anti-Islamic research: The Earhart Foundation, The Shelby CullomDavis Foundation, The Smith Richardson Foundation, The Lyndeand Harry Bradley Foundation, and The John M. Olin Foundation. The chart below links some specific research individuals with their funding foundation.

    Name of Primary researcher

    Amount $

    Funder

    Alexander Alexiev

    $75,000

    Shelby Cullom Davis Foundation

    Hillel Fradkin

    $173,800

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    David Cook

    $150,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Nazeer Ahmed

    $50,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Zachary Abuza

    $65,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Timur Kuran

    $164,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Nelly Lahoud

    $9,000

    Earhart Foundation

    Hussain Haqqani

    $100,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Steven Emerson

    $250,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Zeyno Baran

    $110,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Sultan Tepe

    $60,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Cheryl Barnard

    $100,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Graham Fuller

    $15,000

    Earhart Foundation

    Ibrahim Abu-Rabi

    $20,000

    Earhart Foundation

    Fawaz Gerges

    $143,000

    Smith Richardson Foundation

    Ahmad Mousalli

    $100,000+

    Earhart Foundation

     

    http://www.turkses.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1408&Itemid=36

    For Smith Richardson grants: Click the link below

    http://www.srf.org/grants/grantsdb.php?username=&lg=1

    Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC

    Assessing Strategic Competition in Southern Asia $ 50,000

    Ashley Tellis will research and write a book on the dynamics

    of the strategic competition in South Asia involving India,

    China, and Pakistan. He will assess Indian, Pakistani, and

    Chinese strategic goals and explore how they are pursuing

    those goals through the development of military and other

    Capabilities.

    Developing a New U.S. Policy toward Pakistan $175,000

    Husain Haqqani will lead an effort to develop new ideas for

    U.S. policy toward Pakistan. He will organize working groups

    of U.S. and Pakistani experts and commission papers. He will

    write a blueprint for a U.S. policy to encourage Pakistan to

    adopt a more moderate and democratic political system. The

    Project’s findings will appear in a series of monographs and

    a policy report

    World Organization for Resource Development and Education

    Washington, DC

    International Conference of Moderate Muslim Scholars Policy Makers $ 50,000

    Nazeer Ahmed will organize a conference of religious,

    Political, and academic leaders to discuss democracy and

    Islam. The project’s findings will appear in a report.Yale

     

    Flow of information is huge which requires a book, it is better to copy and keep in records; it will help you in future when Hussain Haqqaniwill put another mask on his face or West will kick out such fraudulent financial beneficiaries. He is assigned to work as ambassador at US by Zardari to facilitate in sucking money from West, it looks like joke that children adopt hobbies like ticket collecting, or coin collecting etc but Zardari has hobby of money collecting, making money by any means, billions of dollars did not help Benazir in her life.

     

    Earthman

    International Professor

    Following links and references are not new but important and worth watching

     

    1. Video Haqqani: Display of a slavish, defeatist mentality Part 1 & 2

    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/2008/11/01/haqqani-display-of-a-slavish-defeatest-mentality.html

    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/2008/11/02/haqqani-display-of-a-slavish-defeatist-mentality-part-2.html

    2. I am up for sale! Husain Haqqani- An agent of the anti Islam/anti Pakistan forces

    http://pkdemocrat.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/a-prostitute-called-husain-haqqanian-agent-of-the-jews/

    3. American talent and Celebrity Network

    http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/

    4. Mr. Neocon goes to Washington

    http://rupeenews.com/most-popular-articles/mr-neocon-goes-to-washington-from-pakistan/

    5. Mr. Chips (Haqqani) goes to Washington

    http://rupeenews.com/2008/04/11/mr-potato-chips-goes-to-washington-neocon-from-pakistan/

    6. Video (try to open in real player)

    rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/ter/ter112707_pakistan.rm

    7. Blogs: foreign Policy

    http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/search/node/haqqani

    8. An example for the Arab world (interview)

    http://www.resetdoc.org/EN/Haqqani-interview.php

     

    9. Post-mortem of Farahnaz Isphahani and Hussain Haqqani

    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=5905&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

    10. Hussain Haqqani is under influence of Ispahani.

    http://www.attocknews.com/content/view/1018/168/

    11. Iran,India and Afghanistan defeated Pakistan -More Ispahanis

    http://www.makepakistanbetter.com/Why_how_what_forum.asp?GroupID=5&ArticleID=3944

    12. Hussain Haqqani Propaganda – Citibank links

    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/2008/11/01/hussain-haqqani-propaganda-%e2%80%93-citibank-links.html

    13. A comprehensive look on Husain Haqqani published by rupeenews (worth reading)

    http://rupeenews.com/2008/04/16/husain-haqqani-dangerous-5th-column-or-selfish-opportunist/

    14. Series of four posts

    Postmortem of Farahnaz Isphahani and Hussain Haqqani

    http://www.attocknews.com/content/view/975/168/

    Hussain Haqqani Propaganda – Citibank links

    http://www.makepakistanbetter.com/Why_how_what_forum.asp?PageNo=&GroupID=1&ArticleID=4243

    Hussain Haqqani is under influence of Ispahani.

    http://www.makepakistanbetter.com/Why_how_what_forum.asp?GroupID=1&ArticleID=3904

    Iran,India and Afghanistan defeated Pakistan -More Ispahanis

    http://www.makepakistanbetter.com/Why_how_what_forum.asp?GroupID=5&ArticleID=3944

    Posted in Current Affairs, Pak CA, US Int Rel., US PoliComments (0)

    English: Photograph of Hussain Haqqani

    Haqqani garbage about Muslim Americans: Rebuttal to Loudmouthed Orio. Refuting traitors nonsense

    English: Photograph of Hussain Haqqani

    Image via Wikipedia

    It was hoped that after Mr. Haqqani was given the ambassadorship he would turn a new leaf. However he remains the turncoat traitor that he has always been. Even today he speaks to the think tanks as a representative American and often uses the pronoun “we” and “us” to describe himself as a fellow American. There is nothing wrong with being an American. However when you are the ambassador of Pakstian, then one should represent the Pakistani point of view.

    It has recently come to light that Mr. Haqqani orchestrated the UN resolution against Pakistan giving the PPPP government the fig leaf to attack Pakistanis and implement the Neocon agenda in a hurry before President Obama takes  office in Washington.

    • http://rupeenews.com/2008/04/11/pakistans-new-ambassador-to-usa-hh-an-embarresment-for-all/
    • http://rupeenews.com/2008/04/11/mr-potato-chips-goes-to-washington-neocon-from-pakistan/
    • http://rupeenews.com/2007/11/27/us-policy-and-pakistan%e2%80%99s-drift-a-rebuttal-to-mr-haqqani/
    Husien Haqqani once again exposed himself. For the past decade he has not been defending Paksitanis, Islam or Muslims. he has in fact been one of the foremost critics of Pakistan and Muslims. Over the years Mr. Haqqani’s “scholarship” is “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury” signifying nothing. Mr. Haqqani is not rally well educated or accomplished in anything but schmooze and opportunism. A former die hard Jamat e Islami member, then a virulent opponent of the PPP, Mr. Haqqani graduated to become a paid mule of the Neocons. He did not do any original research. Most of his “thoughts’ can be found in the scholarship of Dr. Steve Emersen, Dr. Daniel Pipes and Mr. Robert Schwartz. Some of these and others participated in the Islamphobic events held on campuses in 2007.

    Mr. Haqqani’s narrative is “to blame Muslims and Pakistanis first”. He regurgitates the what sells. Right now Islamphobia is a growth industry so he writes and says what his target audience wants to hear. And who is the targeted audience? His audience consists of the Hudson Institute, AIPAC and JINSA from whom he received huge paycheck and speaking fees. Rupee News has listed the  actual monies that Mr. Haqqani has received which is public information.

    Husain Haqqani, a Pakistani diplomat and adviser to Prime Minister Bhutto is the co-chair of Hudson’s Centre on Islam, Democracy and the Future of the Muslim World. The Washington, D.C.-based Hudson Institute has its own of think-tanks with a diverse mix of Neoconservatives and Pakistani Neocons.  Hudson Institute’s CID was established by Hillel Fradkin, a Neocon signatory to the PNACs (Project for New American Century), letter to the President Bush urging war against Iraq. It also equated the Palestinian Authority with Al-Qaeda.

    At a Hudson Institute conference in Washington last year, the Muslim scholar Zeyno Baran spoke about how the radical Muslim Brotherhood has established front groups in the US to mask and mainstream its Islamist ideology. Baran said:

    Now, when we engage with Islamist organizations, either in conferences or government outreach programs, that is seen as endorsing that group and gives them legitimacy and empowers this sort of Islamism to become much more legitimate in the eyes of, let’s say American Muslim groups. If groups like CAIR or ISNA, Council on American Islamic Relations, CAIR, or the Islamic Society of North America, the two indicted coconspirators in the Holy Land trial case that I’m sure you all know about, and I believe you mentioned it briefly in your introduction, when those groups are invited to events with U.S. government, then most of the American Muslim groups who don’t really understand these issue think that they are the legitimate representative organizations and they need to be supporting them. And instead of then having sort of non-Islamist networks being formed, many of the Muslims feel that this sort of the non-Islamist Muslims feel that there’s really nowhere for them to go since the government is not reaching out to them, and since through decades of funding, institutional networking, creating of organizations, the Brotherhood and its affiliates have been taking over, or starting to take over the mainstream, that is the answer when some of you say, where are the real moderate Muslims, why aren’t they speaking up, and that is partly the reason why they don’t speak up because they don’t think that there is really any interest or really opportunity for them.

    Also on the panel was Islamic scholar Husain Haqqani, who recounted the history of how the Muslim Brotherhood took over mainstream Muslim institutions in the US. I reproduce his remarks below, not only because they are important to keep in mind when many Americans prefer to believe that CAIR, ISNA and the other mainstream Muslim organizations pursue a benign agenda, but also because Dr. Haqqani is now Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States.

    Pakistan’s New Ambassador: Traitor or Naïve fool? Rupee News has tried to ascertain if Mr. Haqqani is naive,  just an opportunists, a pawn in the hands of the “doers and shakers”, or part of a diabolical conspiracy to place Manuchrian candidates in positions of power within the Pakistani government.

    Remarks by Husain Haqqani:

    Let me begin by saying that this morning we all heard about the Muslim Brotherhood’s history, but to set the stage for my discussion of the Muslim Brotherhood’s politicization of Islam in America, I would like to begin by just a few direct quotes from the work of the Muslim Brotherhood’s founder, Hassan al-Banna to explain the world view of the Muslim Brotherhood as the movement sees it.

    In one of his writings, Hassan al-Banna claims Muslims should strive for the Muslim individual, Muslim family, Muslim nation, Muslim government and a state that should be able to lead the Islamic governments, should be able to unite the dispersed Muslims, should be able to regain their honor and superiority, should be able to recover their lost lands, their usurped regions and their occupied territories. Then it should be able to raise the flag of Jihad and the call towards Allah until the entire world is benefited by the teachings of Islam. Addressing members of the Muslim Brotherhood, he writes: Always remember that you have two basic objectives: number one, that the Islamic
    country should be free from all foreign control, for freedom is the natural right of every man which can be denied only by an oppressive dictator; second, although the concept of freedom is very different (just in case anybody is wondering), in this free land, a free Islamic government should be established, which should act according to the Islamic commands and enforce its collective system, declare its right principles as operative and popularize among the people its message which is based on wisdom. As long as the government is not established, all Muslims will be guilty, and for any slackness and carelessness in this connection will have to be accountable before Allah.

    Mr. Potato-Chips goes to Washington:-Neocon from Pakistan. The “wannabee goras” see no impact of the historical issues to Pakistani and other Muslims societies, and squarely lay the blame on internal factors which are depicted as “triba”, agressive, bent of world domination and have an intense hatred of the West. Mr. Haqqani seems to adhere to the cliche “They hate us because of our freedoms.

    Following this, there is the Muslim Brothers’ concept of a pledge of allegiance, and here there are six points to which the allegiance is undertaken.

    1. First, that a person who takes the oath of allegiance to the Brotherhood acknowledges that he would build up an Islamic personality, his body should be strong, his character should be firm, his thinking should be mature and balance. Also, he should be capable of earning his living and be resourceful, his belief should be on the right lines and his prayers should be selfless, he should be keen for his progress as an individual, and mindful of his time, all his affairs should be organized and his existence should be beneficial for others to the best possible extent. These are the duties of every Muslim Brother individually.
    2. The second point is that the Brother should establish a Muslim family, where Islamist ideals triumph over loyalty to his family-members. The Brother should be able to make them prepared to be respectful to the Islamic etiquette in their private lives and to follow it. He should give to his sons and his servants the best available training and instruct them in Islamic teachings. This is the duty of a Muslim Brother in relation to his family.
    3. The third point holds that he should work to reform society. He should popularize among people the righteous living, prohibit evil deeds and encourage good ones, exalt virtue and a competitive spirit in performing good deeds. He should induce the people to “color their whole living in the Islamic hue.” This is the duty of the Muslim Brotherhood, of every Brother individually, as well as the responsibility of the entire Jama’ah of the Brotherhood.
    4. Fourth, a Muslim Brother should free his country from every foreign, non-Islamic control. He should not allow any other political, spiritual or economic power to step into his country.
    5. The fifth point, is that the Brother should reform the government until the government is, in the true sense of the word, Islamic. Further, the government should be able to perform its duty and responsibility as a servant for the entire Muslim Umma.
    6. The sixth principle states that the Muslim Brotherhood collectively should work to restore the international position of the Muslim Umma. For this purpose it will be necessary free the occupied Muslim lands. It should restore its honor and superiority, promote its civilization and culture anew. A new spirit of oneness and unity should be instilled in the Muslim Umma until the entire Umma is unified, and in this way, the crown and throne of the caliphate of the world may be regained.
    7. The last principle relates to how the strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood has been operationalized in the United States. According to the seventh principle, the Brotherhood should function as a teacher, and guide the whole world.
    8. In sum, the first stage concerns the individual and the family, then the Muslim society, then the Muslim states and governments and finally, the entire world. The Brotherhood should thus spread the message of Islam to every nook and cranny of the world in such a way that the invigorating sight of obedience to Allah may be seen.

    Mr. Haqqani refuses to mention a few of the issues. Hasan Al Banna’s pan-Arab message was not unique on earth. His message was anti-colonial and anti-Orientalist. His message was echoed by many moderates in the Muslims world and many non-Muslims as well. For example Lawrence of Arabia helped the Arabs gain independence from the Turks on the message of Arab Nationalsism. The Christian secular Baathist party united Egypt, Syria and Iraq under the banner of Arabism.

    Mr. Haqqani also fails to mention the fact that the rise of the Ikhwan Ul Muslimeen was at the peak of the cold war. While the Socialist Gamal Abul Nasser was a pawn of the Soviet Union the CIA needed to keep his popular rise to power in check. At the time the CIA helped Banna and Syed Qutub in gaining popularity so that Egypt would not totally fall into the lap of the USSR.

    These outlined principles are the objectives, method and message of the Muslim Brotherhood as defined by its own founder. As Hillel pointed out, the Brotherhood was created in 1928. What has happened since then, especially in the United States and what has been the U.S.’s linkage with the Muslim Brotherhood is the topic of my presentation.

    Muslims started arriving in the United States as immigrants. It is true that there was an indigenous Muslim community, especially among African-Americans long before, but immigrant Muslims arrived in significant numbers since the 1950s. The number became more significant after the 1960s. In the 1950s, the people who came here were either students at American institutions of learning, colleges, universities, or students who completed their education and decided to pursue the American dream. So they were not people who came here to Islamize the United States. They happen to be Muslims who came here, and when they came here, certain needs arose.

    They needed a mosque to pray in, they needed to find halal food, as they had children and settled down here, they needed education for their children which would emphasize their religious and cultural background, they needed to arrange and organize marriages, burials, and various other things according to Islamic rituals. Then, as some of them discovered the concept of certain economic practices being questioned by some theologians in the Muslim world, they began to worry about how to be able to have banking arrangements that were not entirely interest-based.

    Mr. Haqqani uses a string of pearl strategy. He publishes excepts and “partial views” of history. These half-truth bring him profits from some quarters, but impact his capability both as a teacher and a diplomat. He tries to link unrelated events into a web of deceit and lies. He may not realize that my making a buck he actually impacts the lives and livelihood of millions of Muslims in America and beyond. He is not doing America or Pakistan any favors. In fact his nonsense is hurting America’s popularity around the world.

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. His credentials were pretty weak an MA from The University of Karachi. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of “Orientalism”, this new FOB (Fresh of the boat) man jumped on the Neocon bandwagon and stabbed the Civil Rights Movement in the heart. Mr. Hussain Haqqani’s incorrect, false and incendiary statements caused havoc with the normal functioning of the great American Democracy. Hackles were raised. If a man named Husien said this, it must be true. If a Pakistani said this it must have veracity.

    What irked Pakistani Americans most about Mr. Haqqani’s writings were his insinuations innuendo and portrayal of false history about Islam in America. His most egregious offense was to cast doubt on the loyalty of Muslims in America. His portrayal of terrorists cells and sleeper cells mirrored the writings of Dr. Emersen, Robert Spencer, David Harowitz, Michelle Milkin and others the worst Islamphobes in the planet. For example Mr. Haqqani’s article with the innocuous title “The Politicization of American Islam” is a ticking time bomb for American Muslims. It is exactly these type of writings that have encouraged Michelle Malken to write “The Case for internment”, a book that propounds the thesis that the internment of innocent American citizens who happened to be Japanese

    However he has more than skeletons in his closet. He is a closet full of skeletons. For the past decade his sordid connections with the Neocons and their think tanks created this tsunami of Islamphobic rhetoric that eventually turned into a crescendo of Anti-Pakistan balderdash

    These were their concerns. These concerns were taken advantage of by the Muslim Brotherhood, which had its own agenda in mind, outlined earlier.

    Four things happened simultaneously in the 1950s.

    1. First, the Muslim Brotherhood needed cadres. It realized that since their message was global, the cadres should be global as well, and they were looking for talented people. Now where could one find a better talent pool than among Muslims who were receiving higher education in places like the United States? Thus, the first step was for the Brotherhood to recognize that Muslims studying in the States were suited for its aims.
    2. Second, the Muslims who had come to the United States as students or professionals starting out their pursuit of the American dream needed certain services, related to prayer, religious obligations, Sunday school or the Muslim equivalent of a Sunday school for their children. Their needs were recognized, and the Muslim Brotherhood recognized that its need for cadres and the Muslim community’s need for services could actually coincide if they made it work that way.
    3. The third thing that happened was that Saudi Arabia had emerged on the global scene, and wanted to gain influence among the world’s Muslims. Hermann Eilts, who was director of the Center for International Relations at Boston University and who used to be an Arabist in the State Department and served as ambassador to Egypt and Saudi Arabia among other places, talked about how as early as the late 1940s, Hassan al-Banna and some of his closest associates used to travel to Saudi Arabia, which was not the Saudi Arabia of today. At that time, it was still coming out of the shadows of the early Saudi sort of Wahhabi non-modernist beginnings. And yet, Eilts claims that the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt in particular had ties with the Saudis, and the Saudi deputy finance minister at the time who happened to be from Sudan, was responsible for providing money for the Muslim Brotherhood as part of the influence that coincided with the American agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood. Consequently, all they had to do was persuade the Saudis that the European and American side of things was also significant and worth the investment.
    4. The fourth thing, which set the stage for what we are experiencing today, is the United States entering the Cold War. As it often happens, the U.S. was still trying to find its way in a complex world, and the people who were looking at that world were not necessarily fully aware of its complexity. A binary approach was adopted, designed to contain communism by preventing Muslim countries from emerging and newly independent Muslim countries from becoming friends of the Soviets. Essentially, anyone who could help in this project was deemed a useful partner.

    Mr. Haqqani’s fantasies put together a maze that is based on total lies. His venom against Muslims in general, Saudis and Pakistanis in particular impresses only his masters. His masters voice is not only totally discredited, the American people have voted against the proponents of these views. America has voted for a new prophet of peace and the Neocons have been voted out of office. Mr. Husain Haqqani has been siting in the lap of the Neocons disparaging Islam and vomiting against Pakistan for the best part of a decade. Now he is rewarded with an Ambassadorial position to represent Pakistan.

    Name of Primary researcher Amount $    Funder

    Alexander Alexiev $75,000 Shelby Cullom Davis Foundation

    Hillel Fradkin $173,800 S mith Richardson Foundation

    David Cook $150,000 Smith Richardson Foundation

    Nazeer Ahmed $50,000 Smith Richardson Foundation

    Zachary Abuza $65,000 Smith Richardson Foundation

    Timur Kuran $164,000 Smith Richardson Foundation

    Nelly Lahoud $9,000 Earhart Foundation

    Hussain Haqqani $100,000 Smith Richardson Foundation

    Steven Emerson $250,000 Smith Richardson Foundation

    Zeyno Baran $110,000 Smith Richardson Foundation

    Sultan Tepe $60,000 S mith Richardson Foundation

    Cheryl Barnard $100,000 Smith Richardson Foundation

    Graham Fuller $15,000 Earhart Foundation

    Ibrahim Abu-Rabi $20,000 Earhart Foundation

    Fawaz Gerges $143,000 Smith Richardson Foundation

    Ahmad Mousalli $100,000+ Earhart Foundation

     

    Source

    http://www.aipac.org/Publications/PressAIPACStatements/PC_07_Advisory_7_WEB_FINAL_03.09.07.pdf

     

     

    http://www.srf.org/databank/documents/12_doc.pdf

    As a result, the Saudis were becoming a key ally of the United States, while the Muslim Brotherhood were allies of the Saudis. So in the Cold War context, the Brotherhood was a ‘good guy’.

    Then, an idea was proposed to find a Muslim Billy Graham. Naturally, somebody who grew up in Wisconsin or Wyoming and brought up a Lutheran or Baptist and has not clue about the intricacies of the theology or the complex ideological divisions within the world of Islam, the person they were going to find was the one who himself wanted to be identified as the Muslim Billy Graham, and was looking for resources to allow him to carry his crusade. Unsurprisingly, one of the people who showed up to fill that role was a man by the name of Said Ramadan, who was married to Wafa al-Banna, the daughter of Hassan al-Banna. Thus, he met with the president of the United States in the Oval Office, as a potential Muslim Billy Graham who was going to mobilize the Muslims of the world against evils such as atheism and communism.

    Then, Iraq fell into the Ba’ath rule and later on came under communist influence. This rendered the Cold War paradigm very important, and the intelligence community started paying attention to the Muslim Brotherhood, for it had the potential of being a major sources of influence against the spread of communism.

    Said Ramadan, positioning himself very cleverly, started building up the institutional mechanism of the Brotherhood. He traveled to Pakistan and forged an alliance with the Islamists in Pakistan, especially that Jamaat-e-Islami led by Abul A’la
    Maududi. Ramadan had so much influence in Pakistan that when the World Muslim Congress was first held, Ramadan published one of his first books and got the then prime minister of Pakistan (a Westernized man whom Truman adored) to write the preface of the book. In other words, a secular guy writing the preface of an Islamist book shows that the real issue was for the Muslims to show that they were united with the West against communism. Putting it crudely, the Muslim notion at the time was- if you can give us a few dollars to help fight the commies, so much the better, guns can come later.

    Said Ramadan set up the Islamic center in Geneva in 1961, and in 1962 Prince Faisal Abdul Aziz helped create the Muslim World League, also known as Rabita al-Alam al-Islamia, which is now based in Mecca. Looking at the founding fathers of the Muslim World League is helpful to our understanding of radical Islam today. The key places where radical Islam has flourished, are places where people linked to the Rabita came from. A few examples would be: Said Ramadan himself, Egyptian in origin, Abul A’la Maududi, Pakistani, Haj Amin al-Husaini, Palestinian, Sibghatullah Mujadidi of Afghanistan, Mohammed ibn Ibrahim al-Shehr, the Saudi Grand Mufti, and Abdul Rahman Yahya al-Iryani of Yemen. This was the basic formation.

    Once the Rabita came into being, it became a major funding source for radical Islamic projects all over the world. One of the first organizational structures to emerge in the United States, considering that the Muslim population was comprised of either young professionals or students, was the Muslim Students Association. Its founder was Berzinji who was a Iraqi Kurd associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. Two other people came up, Ahmad Tutungi and Hishameth Taleb, both of whom were married to Berzinji’s sisters, and this kind of family network emerged. Other institutions were then created, like the World Assembly of Muslim Youth. The Muslims Students Association of America became the pivot of an international Islamic federation of student organizations.

    The MSA did a remarkable thing from the point of the view of the Muslim Brotherhood: they got funding for a massive translation project of all the major texts of radical Islam, Qutb’s books, Maududi’s books, Hassan al-Banna’s books and articles of others belonging to the network. These texts were translated into 70 languages and made available to every Muslim center or mosque that was emerging. Consider young Muslims who came to the States- engineers studying in Oklahoma or Michigan or elsewhere. These students may want to learn about their faith. Thanks to the MSA, Muslim texts became available in prayer halls, free of charge and translated into every language. Turkish students can read Qaradawi for example in Turkish, Indians in Hindi, Pakistanis in Urdu and so on.

    Then, the Muslim Student Association started inviting people from the Muslim world, and among the people who came to the States were Abul A’la Maududi, Abul Hassan Ali Nadwi, Yusuf al-Qaradawi. They all came to deliver lectures, which are of particular interest. While the American government at that time supported what it considered anti-communist crusaders, which they were, the lectures delivered in the US were about the impending clash between Islam and the West. Evidently, the Brothers were preparing for this clash down back in the 1970s. Maududi’s writings and speeches in America are very strong on this, Nadwis, Qardawis, it’s all about how the Westernized way of life is not going to be the salvation and Islamized – so instead of modernizing the Muslim world, we have to Islamize the modern world. That was the agenda.

    Mr. Haqqani’s delusions do not end by blaming the charitable organizations like the Rabita. He continues his diatribes against any and all Muslims organization in America and beyond. He sees evil in the eye of any and all Muslims.Mr. Haqqani’s statements and article fanned the wave of Islamphobia which ended up affecting the lives, and livelihood of thousands of Muslims. It was because of this sort of Islamphobic drivel that thousands of Pakistanis were packed up in C-130s and sent back to Pakistan. If they were lucky the spent a few nights in the rape and sodomy centers  of 3rd world and Eastern European torture centers. If they were unlucky many of these Pizza Delivery people ended up in Gitmo. If they were unlucky they ended up in satellite prison systems in Egypt and Jordan’s notorious “mukhabarrat”. For these unlucky souls Abu Ghraib would be a picnic. Many of these horror stories are listed in “Civil Rights in Peril” and hundreds of other Human rights and Amnesty International reports.

    In a nutshell, this is how it happened:

    • ’60s and ’70s massive publication program,
    • ’70s and ’80s, the America Project became a major source of fundraising in the Gulf region.
    • After 1973, the Gulf countries became rich with petroleum dollars.
    • Then, of course, came the 1980s when Jihad came about in Afghanistan, and that also enabled them to create networks that were designed for raising funds.
    • These networks include charities of various kinds, so by the 1990s these still seemed relatively benign, as the notion was that they are still “on our side”- while they talk about Western civilization needing to the pulled down, they are still not a threat to us.

    Even now, for example like Graham Fuller, who was head of Middle East analysis at the National Intelligence Council, even now he maintains that there is no clash of interest between radical Islam and the United States, and a State Department official said about the Taliban in 1995, “the Taliban will probably develop like the Saudis… there will be pipelines and there will be an emir and there will be no parliament, and lots of Sharia law. I think the United States can live with that.” So that was the attitude when the Muslim Brotherhood created the networks that have dominated the U.S.

    There are four influences on the Muslim community of this Muslim Brotherhood expansion in the United States.

    1. First was that most of the leading figures in the Muslim community ended up being people from the Muslim Brotherhood or people influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood. They had the money, they had the resources, they had the connections. Consider a small town in Auburn, Alabama that needs a little mosque. Who is going to pay for the mosque? This kind of help came from the Muslim Brotherhood. Many people became disproportionately influence. The Muslim community as a whole is very diverse. It includes people with Sufi background, Shi’as, etc. The emergence of the leadership ended up identifying the Muslim Brotherhood people as the leaders.
    2. Second, the mosques and organizations all ended up, or most of them ended up under Muslim Brotherhood control.
    3. The third impact was that the Muslim agenda ended up being defined by the Muslim Brotherhood, and this was a highly political agenda. Instead of Muslims like me who consider Islam their religious faith, this ended up being people who describe Islam as a political and social ideology, so Islam is ideology and Islam is faith, the distinction became blurred because of the way the organizational structure was created.
    4. And the fourth was the marginalization of traditional Islam within the Muslim community of the United States, the kind of people who want to say their prayers but get on with the business of life, who want to have a relationship with God, but do not want to think of it as a political agenda. That’s where the politicization came.

    The impact on the American mainstream, and four quick points:

    1. number one, the American media and academia. Since they are looking to understand Islam, they found it more convenient to approach Islam through the Muslim Brotherhood’s politicized version. If you look at even Islamic studies in the United States, a lot of scholars look at the people the Brotherhood quotes. You don’t here about certain scholars. Only now some people are doing some research on Sufi traditions or non-radical versions of Islam.
    2. It’s similar to Christian Evangelicals defining Christianity, not allowing other sects and groups to actually define it. There is pluralism within the Christian tent, big tent. The process is similar here is well. The Muslim Brotherhood’s version is now the official one. So if CNN is looking for a spokesman for the Muslims, they are going to go to any of the organizations associated with the Brotherhood to provide speakers. So then you have the others who turn around and say, where are the moderate Muslims? The point is that the moderate Muslims do not control the organizational structures out of which spokesmen are born. They are quiet.
    3. The fourth impact on the American mainstream was that converts to Islam, as Islam started winning converts in the United States, the new converts were more likely to be influenced by radical Islam than by traditional Islam. So whether it’s the prison ministry of Muslims, or whether it’s the Chaplaincy in the military, et cetera, all of it is influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood sufficiently for Muslim Brotherhood views to be the prism through which Islam is viewed by these new converts to Islam. Now, even critics of radical Islam are affected by the Muslim Brotherhood’s notion that there is only one Islam. The plurality of Islam and the pluralism within Islam is totally ignored as a result. Haqqani on Muslim Brotherhood’s real agenda: 6:48 AM Tue, Dec 02, 2008 | Rod Dreher

    Rupee News has exposed Mr. Haqqani in several articles. Most people will be appalled by his hysterical diatribes against people based on their faith and their national origins. He can get away with it because he has now been anointed by Mr. Zardari as the Pakistani Ambassador to the USA. Mr. Haqqani should have been defending the innocent. He was like Nero watching Rome Burn. Mr. Haqqani was not just a spectator, he was an active participant on the crusade on Muslims in the West.

    The portrayal of all DMS (Dead Muslim Scholars) as progenitors of all evil in the world is a growth industry in America. Mr. Haqqanis writings linking DMSs to 911 and future events is exactly what is depicted in Mr. Geert Wilder’s balderdash “Fitna”. If Fitna is blasphemy, Mr. Haqani’s sacrilegious writings also create psychopathic paranoia in the intellectual circles of America. What is worse, Mr. Haqqani’swritings are then quoted as “fact” to create discriminatory laws, illegal surveillance and creates the case to end Habeas Corpus via the “Patriot Act” Laws.

    Semantics are extremely important. We strenuously objected to Mr. Haqqani’s usage of Quranic words for nafarous purposes. He continues to use the words giving succor to the enemy, but also encouragin appartichiks like Mr. Shaharyar to “monkey say monkey do” follow in his footsteps and use the same blasphemous wordings. Mr. Haqqani should be aware that blasphemy is still an offense in Pakistan and congucating Quranic terms to portray ignoble people is blasphemy. When Pakistani territory is called a “safe haven”, instead of a hideout, it creates paranoia in Washington.

    Save/SharePost to MySpace!

    Posted in Current Affairs, Pak CA, S. Asia History, US CA, US Int Rel.Comments (4)

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of \

    Is Haqqani treachery Zardari's treason?

    There is a pattern. Every weeks weeks a new revelation comes to light about the Zardari Administraiton. It is a matter of record that Mr. Haqqani wrote the instrusive conditions into the Kerry Lugar Bill. By adding Presseler type of conditionality into the bill Mr. Haqqani opened Pakistan up to severe sanctions. It has recently come to light that Mr. Haqqani orchestrated the UN resolution against Pakistan giving the PPPP government the fig leaf to attack Pakistanis and implement the Neocon agenda in a hurry before President Obama takes  office in Washington.

    Indeed, Abdullah Haroon has committed the crime of treason against Pakistan by telling the UNSC, without any legal evidence or proof, that it should impose UN sanctions for the Mumbai attacks on JuD and Pakistani citizens based in Pakistan. Therefore, Haroon must be booked for treason, kicked out of the Pakistan Mission to the UN and prosecuted in an independent court of law for libelous defamation
    against a Pakistani organization and Pakistani citizens.

    PPP President Asif Ali Zardari appointed Abdullah Haroon, an incompetent politician and a failed diplomat, as the PPP’s “Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations” in New York, USA, on 3 September 2008, to stop any journalistic criticism against PPP leaders by the Dawn Media Group (DMG), because Abdullah Haroon is the elder brother of Hameed Haroon, the CEO of DMG; Publisher of the DAWN rag, DWS, Herald, Spider, Aurora, The Star; and producer of the Dawn News TV. The controversial, meritless appointment of Abdullah Haroon is a classical example of the PPP government corruption, nepotism and bribery to the DMG of Karachi, Pakistan.

    Now read the following excerpts from the Asia Times Online news report to further understand the PPP’s sinister conspiracy against the JuD and the Pakistan Army: “Karachi [Pakistan] – The United Nations Security Council’s declaration this week of the Pakistani group Jamat-ud-Dawah [JuD] as a front for the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), which is [illegally and maliciously] banned as a terrorist organization, marks
    a major setback for Pakistan’s military establishment.
    “The UN has [unlawfully and maliciously] subjected Jamat-ud [Dawah] to sanctions as a terrorist group, including an asset freeze, travel ban and arms embargo. Jamat claims it is a charity organization separate from the LeT, which has been [illegally, maliciously and fraudulently] linked [without any lawful proof or evidence] to the devastating attack on Mumbai [India] last  month [November 2008] in which close to 200 people died.

    Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | ??????? ????? | ???? | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ??????? | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | ???????? ????? | RUPEE NEWS | December 9th, 2008 | Moin Ansari | ???? ??????? | ????? ????? |

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of \

    Husien Haqqani once again exposed himself. For the past decade he has not been defending Pakistanis, Islam or Muslims. he has in fact been one of the foremost critics of Pakistan and Muslims. Over the years Mr. Haqqani’s “scholarship” is “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury” signifying nothing. Mr. Haqqani is not rally well educated or accomplished in anything but schmooze and opportunism. A former die hard Jamat e Islami member, then a virulent opponent of the PPP, Mr. Haqqani graduated to become a paid mule of the Neocons. He did not do any original research. Most of his “thoughts’ can be found in the scholarship of Dr. Steve Emersen, Dr. Daniel Pipes and Mr. Robert Schwartz. Some of these and others participated in the Islamphobic events held on campuses in 2007.

    Mr. Haqqani’s narrative is “to blame Muslims and Pakistanis first”. He regurgitates the what sells. Right now Islamphobia is a growth industry so he writes and says what his target audience wants to hear. And who is the targeted audience? His audience consists of the Hudson Institute, AIPAC and JINSA from whom he received huge paycheck and speaking fees. Rupee News has listed the actual monies that Mr. Haqqani has received which is public information.

    “The Pakistani [PPP] ambassador in Washington, Husain Haqqani, and Pakistan’s [PPP] Permanent Representative at the United Nations, [Abdullah] Hussain Haroon, took a pro-active role in soliciting the international community to help Pakistan. They got their message across and the UN aimed at the core of the discord by explicitly naming Jamat-ud [Dawah]. On Thursday, the sidelining of the [Pakistan] military establishment was complete. These developments are significant that the [Pakistani] military establishment, which has for so long dominated the affairs of state in Pakistan, has been outmaneuvered by the political [PPP Terrorist Mafia] Government.”

    Husain Haqqani, a Pakistani diplomat and adviser to Prime Minister Bhutto is the co-chair of Hudson’s Centre on Islam, Democracy and the Future of the Muslim World. The Washington, D.C.-based Hudson Institute has its own of think-tanks with a diverse mix of Ceoconservatives and Pakistani Neocons.  Hudson Institute’s CID was established by Hillel Fradkin, a Neocon signatory to the PNACs (Project for New American Century), letter to the President Bush urging war against Iraq. It also equated the Palestinian Authority with Al-Qaeda.

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of \At a Hudson Institute conference in Washington last year, the Muslim scholar Zeyno Baran spoke about how the radical Muslim Brotherhood has established front groups in the US to mask and mainstream its Islamist ideology. Baran said:

    Now, when we engage with Islamist organizations, either in conferences or government outreach programs, that is seen as endorsing that group and gives them legitimacy and empowers this sort of Islamism to become much more legitimate in the eyes of, let’s say American Muslim groups. If groups like CAIR or ISNA, Council on American Islamic Relations, CAIR, or the Islamic Society of North America, the two indicted coconspirators in the Holy Land trial case that I’m sure you all know about, and I believe you mentioned it briefly in your introduction, when those groups are invited to events with U.S. government, then most of the American Muslim groups who don’t really understand these issue think that they are the legitimate representative organizations and they need to be supporting them. And instead of then having sort of non-Islamist networks being formed, many of the Muslims feel that this sort of the non-Islamist Muslims feel that there’s really nowhere for them to go since the government is not reaching out to them, and since through decades of funding, institutional networking, creating of organizations, the Brotherhood and its affiliates have been taking over, or starting to take over the mainstream, that is the answer when some of you say, where are the real moderate Muslims, why aren’t they speaking up, and that is partly the reason why they don’t speak up because they don’t think that there is really any interest or really opportunity for them.

    Also on the panel was Islamic scholar Husain Haqqani, who recounted the history of how the Muslim Brotherhood took over mainstream Muslim institutions in the US. I reproduce his remarks below, not only because they are important to keep in mind when many Americans prefer to believe that CAIR, ISNA and the other mainstream Muslim organizations pursue a benign agenda, but also because Dr. Haqqani is now Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States.

    Pakistan’s New Ambassador: Traitor or Naïve fool? Rupee News has tried to ascertain if Mr. Haqqani is naive,  just an opportunists, a pawn in the hands of the “doers and shakers”, or part of a diabolical conspiracy to place Manuchrian candidates in positions of power within the Pakistani government.

    Remarks by Husain Haqqani:

    Let me begin by saying that this morning we all heard about the Muslim Brotherhood’s history, but to set the stage for my discussion of the Muslim Brotherhood’s politicization of Islam in America, I would like to begin by just a few direct quotes from the work of the Muslim Brotherhood’s founder, Hassan al-Banna to explain the world view of the Muslim Brotherhood as the movement sees it.

    In one of his writings, Hassan al-Banna claims Muslims should strive for the Muslim individual, Muslim family, Muslim nation, Muslim government and a state that should be able to lead the Islamic governments, should be able to unite the dispersed Muslims, should be able to regain their honor and superiority, should be able to recover their lost lands, their usurped regions and their occupied territories. Then it should be able to raise the flag of Jihad and the call towards Allah until the entire world is benefited by the teachings of Islam. Addressing members of the Muslim Brotherhood, he writes: Always remember that you have two basic objectives: number one, that the Islamic country should be free from all foreign control, for freedom is the natural right of every man which can be denied only by an oppressive dictator; second, although the concept of freedom is very different (just in case anybody is wondering), in this free land, a free Islamic government should be established, which should act according to the Islamic commands and enforce its collective system, declare its right principles as operative and popularize among the people its message which is based on wisdom. As long as the government is not established, all Muslims will be guilty, and for any slackness and carelessness in this connection will have to be accountable before Allah.

    Mr. Potato-Chips goes to Washington:-Neocon from Pakistan. The “wannabee goras” see no impact of the historical issues to Pakistani and other Muslims societies, and squarely lay the blame on internal factors which are depicted as “triba”, agressive, bent of world domination and have an intense hatred of the West. Mr. Haqqani seems to adhere to the cliche “They hate us because of our freedoms.

    Following this, there is the Muslim Brothers’ concept of a pledge of allegiance, and here there are six points to which the allegiance is undertaken.

    1. First, that a person who takes the oath of allegiance to the Brotherhood acknowledges that he would build up an Islamic personality, his body should be strong, his character should be firm, his thinking should be mature and balance. Also, he should be capable of earning his living and be resourceful, his belief should be on the right lines and his prayers should be selfless, he should be keen for his progress as an individual, and mindful of his time, all his affairs should be organized and his existence should be beneficial for others to the best possible extent. These are the duties of every Muslim Brother individually.
    2. The second point is that the Brother should establish a Muslim family, where Islamist ideals triumph over loyalty to his family-members. The Brother should be able to make them prepared to be respectful to the Islamic etiquette in their private lives and to follow it. He should give to his sons and his servants the best available training and instruct them in Islamic teachings. This is the duty of a Muslim Brother in relation to his family.
    3. The third point holds that he should work to reform society. He should popularize among people the righteous living, prohibit evil deeds and encourage good ones, exalt virtue and a competitive spirit in performing good deeds. He should induce the people to “color their whole living in the Islamic hue.” This is the duty of the Muslim Brotherhood, of every Brother individually, as well as the responsibility of the entire Jama’ah of the Brotherhood.
    4. Fourth, a Muslim Brother should free his country from every foreign, non-Islamic control. He should not allow any other political, spiritual or economic power to step into his country.
    5. The fifth point, is that the Brother should reform the government until the government is, in the true sense of the word, Islamic. Further, the government should be able to perform its duty and responsibility as a servant for the entire Muslim Umma.
    6. The sixth principle states that the Muslim Brotherhood collectively should work to restore the international position of the Muslim Umma. For this purpose it will be necessary free the occupied Muslim lands. It should restore its honor and superiority, promote its civilization and culture anew. A new spirit of oneness and unity should be instilled in the Muslim Umma until the entire Umma is unified, and in this way, the crown and throne of the caliphate of the world may be regained.
    7. The last principle relates to how the strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood has been operationalized in the United States. According to the seventh principle, the Brotherhood should function as a teacher, and guide the whole world. 
    8. In sum, the first stage concerns the individual and the family, then the Muslim society, then the Muslim states and governments and finally, the entire world. The Brotherhood should thus spread the message of Islam to every nook and cranny of the world in such a way that the invigorating sight of obedience to Allah may be seen.

    Mr. Haqqani refuses to mention a few of the issues. Hasan Al Banna’s pan-Arab message was not unique on earth. His message was anti-colonial and anti-Orientalist. His message was echoed by many moderates in the Muslims world and many non-Muslims as well. For example Lawrence of Arabia helped the Arabs gain independence from the Turks on the message of Arab Nationalsism. The Christian secular Baathist party united Egypt, Syria and Iraq under the banner of Arabism.

    Mr. Haqqani also fails to mention the fact that the rise of the Ikhwan Ul Muslimeen was at the peak of the cold war. While the Socialist Gamal Abul Nasser was a pawn of the Soviet Union the CIA needed to keep his popular rise to power in check. At the time the CIA helped Hasan Al Banna  in gaining popularity so that Egypt would not totally fall into the lap of the USSR.

    These outlined principles are the objectives, method and message of the Muslim Brotherhood as defined by its own founder. As Hillel pointed out, the Brotherhood was created in 1928. What has happened since then, especially in the United States and what has been the U.S.’s linkage with the Muslim Brotherhood is the topic of my presentation.

    Muslims started arriving in the United States as immigrants. It is true that there was an indigenous Muslim community, especially among African-Americans long before, but immigrant Muslims arrived in significant numbers since the 1950s. The number became more significant after the 1960s. In the 1950s, the people who came here were either students at American institutions of learning, colleges, universities, or students who completed their education and decided to pursue the American dream. So they were not people who came here to Islamize the United States. They happen to be Muslims who came here, and when they came here, certain needs arose.

    They needed a mosque to pray in, they needed to find halal food, as they had children and settled down here, they needed education for their children which would emphasize their religious and cultural background, they needed to arrange and organize marriages, burials, and various other things according to Islamic rituals. Then, as some of them discovered the concept of certain economic practices being questioned by some theologians in the Muslim world, they began to worry about how to be able to have banking arrangements that were not entirely interest-based.

    Mr. Haqqani uses a string of pearl strategy. He publishes excepts and “partial views” of history. These half-truth bring him profits from some quarters, but impact his capability both as a teacher and a diplomat. He tries to link unrelated events into a web of deceit and lies. He may not realize that my making a buck he actually impacts the lives and livelihood of millions of Muslims in America and beyond. He is not doing America or Pakistan any favors. In fact his nonsense is hurting America’s popularity around the world.

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. His credentials were pretty weak an MA from The University of Karachi. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of “Orientalism”, this new FOB (Fresh of the boat) man jumped on the Neocon bandwagon and stabbed the Civil Rights Movement in the heart. Mr. Hussain Haqqani’s incorrect, false and incendiary statements caused havoc with the normal functioning of the great American Democracy. Hackles were raised. If a man named Husien said this, it must be true. If a Pakistani said this it must have veracity.

    What irked Pakistani Americans most about Mr. Haqqani’s writings were his insinuations innuendo and portrayal of false history about Islam in America. His most egregious offense was to cast doubt on the loyalty of Muslims in America. His portrayal of terrorists cells and sleeper cells mirrored the writings of Dr. Emersen, Robert Spencer, David Harowitz, Michelle Milkin and others the worst Islamphobes in the planet. For example Mr. Haqqani’s article with the innocuous title “The Politicization of American Islam” is a ticking time bomb for American Muslims. It is exactly these type of writings that have encouraged Michelle Malken to write “The Case for internment”, a book that propounds the thesis that the internment of innocent American citizens who happened to be Japanese

    However he has more than skeletons in his closet. He is a closet full of skeletons. For the past decade his sordid connections with the Neocons and their think tanks created this tsunami of Islamphobic rhetoric that eventually turned into a crescendo of Anti-Pakistan balderdash

    These were their concerns. These concerns were taken advantage of by the Muslim Brotherhood, which had its own agenda in mind, outlined earlier.

    Four things happened simultaneously in the 1950s.

    1. First, the Muslim Brotherhood needed cadres. It realized that since their message was global, the cadres should be global as well, and they were looking for talented people. Now where could one find a better talent pool than among Muslims who were receiving higher education in places like the United States? Thus, the first step was for the Brotherhood to recognize that Muslims studying in the States were suited for its aims.
    2. Second, the Muslims who had come to the United States as students or professionals starting out their pursuit of the American dream needed certain services, related to prayer, religious obligations, Sunday school or the Muslim equivalent of a Sunday school for their children. Their needs were recognized, and the Muslim Brotherhood recognized that its need for cadres and the Muslim community’s need for services could actually coincide if they made it work that way.
    3. The third thing that happened was that Saudi Arabia had emerged on the global scene, and wanted to gain influence among the world’s Muslims. Hermann Eilts, who was director of the Center for International Relations at Boston University and who used to be an Arabist in the State Department and served as ambassador to Egypt and Saudi Arabia among other places, talked about how as early as the late 1940s, Hassan al-Banna and some of his closest associates used to travel to Saudi Arabia, which was not the Saudi Arabia of today. At that time, it was still coming out of the shadows of the early Saudi sort of Wahhabi non-modernist beginnings. And yet, Eilts claims that the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt in particular had ties with the Saudis, and the Saudi deputy finance minister at the time who happened to be from Sudan, was responsible for providing money for the Muslim Brotherhood as part of the influence that coincided with the American agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood. Consequently, all they had to do was persuade the Saudis that the European and American side of things was also significant and worth the investment.
    4. The fourth thing, which set the stage for what we are experiencing today, is the United States entering the Cold War. As it often happens, the U.S. was still trying to find its way in a complex world, and the people who were looking at that world were not necessarily fully aware of its complexity. A binary approach was adopted, designed to contain communism by preventing Muslim countries from emerging and newly independent Muslim countries from becoming friends of the Soviets. Essentially, anyone who could help in this project was deemed a useful partner.

    Mr. Haqqani’s fantasies put together a maze that is based on total lies. His venom against Muslims in general, Saudis and Pakistanis in particular impresses only his masters. His masters voice is not only totally discredited, the American people have voted against the proponents of these views. America has voted for a new prophet of peace and the Neocons have been voted out of office. Mr. Husain Haqqani has been siting in the lap of the Neocons disparaging Islam and vomiting against Pakistan for the best part of a decade. Now he is rewarded with an Ambassadorial position to represent Pakistan.

    • Name of Primary researcher  Amount $        Funder
    • Alexander Alexiev $75,000  Shelby Cullom Davis Foundation
    • Hillel Fradkin $173,800  Smith Richardson Foundation
    • David Cook  $150,000 Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Nazeer Ahmed  $50,000 Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Zachary Abuza  $65,000  Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Timur Kuran  $164,000  Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Nelly Lahoud  $9,000  Earhart Foundation
    • Hussain Haqqani  $100,000  Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Steven Emerson  $250,000  Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Zeyno Baran  $110,000  Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Sultan Tepe  $60,000  Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Cheryl Barnard  $100,000  Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Graham Fuller  $15,000  Earhart Foundation
    • Ibrahim Abu-Rabi  $20,000  Earhart Foundation
    • Fawaz Gerges  $143,000  Smith Richardson Foundation
    • Ahmad Mousalli  $100,000+  Earhart Foundation

    Mr. Husain Haqqani not only spoke at AIPAC events he published papers were anit-Pakistran, anti-Muslims and anti-IslamAIAPC meeting that hosted Hussain Haqqani

    Source

    http://www.aipac.org/Publications/PressAIPACStatements/PC_07_Advisory_7_WEB_FINAL_03.09.07.pdf

    Mr. Carnegie\'s association with Anti-Muslim thinktanks

    http://www.srf.org/databank/documents/12_doc.pdf

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of \As a result, the Saudis were becoming a key ally of the United States, while the Muslim Brotherhood were allies of the Saudis. So in the Cold War context, the Brotherhood was a ‘good guy’.

    Then, an idea was proposed to find a Muslim Billy Graham. Naturally, somebody who grew up in Wisconsin or Wyoming and brought up a Lutheran or Baptist and has not clue about the intricacies of the theology or the complex ideological divisions within the world of Islam, the person they were going to find was the one who himself wanted to be identified as the Muslim Billy Graham, and was looking for resources to allow him to carry his crusade. Unsurprisingly, one of the people who showed up to fill that role was a man by the name of Said Ramadan, who was married to Wafa al-Banna, the daughter of Hassan al-Banna. Thus, he met with the president of the United States in the Oval Office, as a potential Muslim Billy Graham who was going to mobilize the Muslims of the world against evils such as atheism and communism.

    Then, Iraq fell into the Ba’ath rule and later on came under communist influence. This rendered the Cold War paradigm very important, and the intelligence community started paying attention to the Muslim Brotherhood, for it had the potential of being a major sources of influence against the spread of communism.

    Said Ramadan, positioning himself very cleverly, started building up the institutional mechanism of the Brotherhood. He traveled to Pakistan and forged an alliance with the Islamists in Pakistan, especially that Jamaat-e-Islami led by Abul A’la
    Maududi. Ramadan had so much influence in Pakistan that when the World Muslim Congress was first held, Ramadan published one of his first books and got the then prime minister of Pakistan (a Westernized man whom Truman adored) to write the preface of the book. In other words, a secular guy writing the preface of an Islamist book shows that the real issue was for the Muslims to show that they were united with the West against communism. Putting it crudely, the Muslim notion at the time was- if you can give us a few dollars to help fight the commies, so much the better, guns can come later.

    Said Ramadan set up the Islamic center in Geneva in 1961, and in 1962 Prince Faisal Abdul Aziz helped create the Muslim World League, also known as Rabita al-Alam al-Islamia, which is now based in Mecca. Looking at the founding fathers of the Muslim World League is helpful to our understanding of radical Islam today. The key places where radical Islam has flourished, are places where people linked to the Rabita came from. A few examples would be: Said Ramadan himself, Egyptian in origin, Abul A’la Maududi, Pakistani, Haj Amin al-Husaini, Palestinian, Sibghatullah Mujadidi of Afghanistan, Mohammed ibn Ibrahim al-Shehr, the Saudi Grand Mufti, and Abdul Rahman Yahya al-Iryani of Yemen. This was the basic formation.

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of \Once the Rabita came into being, it became a major funding source for radical Islamic projects all over the world. One of the first organizational structures to emerge in the United States, considering that the Muslim population was comprised of either young professionals or students, was the Muslim Students Association. Its founder was Berzinji who was a Iraqi Kurd associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. Two other people came up, Ahmad Tutungi and Hishameth Taleb, both of whom were married to Berzinji’s sisters, and this kind of family network emerged. Other institutions were then created, like the World Assembly of Muslim Youth. The Muslims Students Association of America became the pivot of an international Islamic federation of student organizations.

    The MSA did a remarkable thing from the point of the view of the Muslim Brotherhood: they got funding for a massive translation project of all the major texts of radical Islam, Qutb’s books, Maududi’s books, Hassan al-Banna’s books and articles of others belonging to the network. These texts were translated into 70 languages and made available to every Muslim center or mosque that was emerging. Consider young Muslims who came to the States- engineers studying in Oklahoma or Michigan or elsewhere. These students may want to learn about their faith. Thanks to the MSA, Muslim texts became available in prayer halls, free of charge and translated into every language. Turkish students can read Qaradawi for example in Turkish, Indians in Hindi, Pakistanis in Urdu and so on.

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of \Then, the Muslim Student Association started inviting people from the Muslim world, and among the people who came to the States were Abul A’la Maududi, Abul Hassan Ali Nadwi, Yusuf al-Qaradawi. They all came to deliver lectures, which are of particular interest. While the American government at that time supported what it considered anti-communist crusaders, which they were, the lectures delivered in the US were about the impending clash between Islam and the West. Evidently, the Brothers were preparing for this clash down back in the 1970s. Maududi’s writings and speeches in America are very strong on this, Nadwis, Qardawis, it’s all about how the Westernized way of life is not going to be the salvation and Islamized – so instead of modernizing the Muslim world, we have to Islamize the modern world. That was the agenda.

    Mr. Haqqani’s delusions do not end by blaming the charitable organizations like the Rabita. He continues his diatribes against any and all Muslims organization in America and beyond. He sees evil in the eye of any and all Muslims.Mr. Haqqani’s statements and article fanned the wave of Islamphobia which ended up affecting the lives, and livelihood of thousands of Muslims. It was because of this sort of Islamphobic drivel that thousands of Pakistanis were packed up in C-130s and sent back to Pakistan. If they were lucky the spent a few nights in the rape and sodomy centers  of 3rd world and Eastern European torture centers. If they were unlucky many of these Pizza Delivery people ended up in Gitmo. If they were unlucky they ended up in satellite prison systems in Egypt and Jordan’s notorious “mukhabarrat”. For these unlucky souls Abu Ghraib would be a picnic. Many of these horror stories are listed in “Civil Rights in Peril” and hundreds of other Human rights and Amnesty International reports.

    In a nutshell, this is how it happened:

    • ’60s and ’70s massive publication program,
    • ’70s and ’80s, the America Project became a major source of fundraising in the Gulf region.
    • After 1973, the Gulf countries became rich with petroleum dollars.
    • Then, of course, came the 1980s when Jihad came about in Afghanistan, and that also enabled them to create networks that were designed for raising funds.
    • These networks include charities of various kinds, so by the 1990s these still seemed relatively benign, as the notion was that they are still “on our side”- while they talk about Western civilization needing to the pulled down, they are still not a threat to us.

    A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of \Even now, for example like Graham Fuller, who was head of Middle East analysis at the National Intelligence Council, even now he maintains that there is no clash of interest between radical Islam and the United States, and a State Department official said about the Taliban in 1995, “the Taliban will probably develop like the Saudis… there will be pipelines and there will be an emir and there will be no parliament, and lots of Sharia law. I think the United States can live with that.” So that was the attitude when the Muslim Brotherhood created the networks that have dominated the U.S.

    There are four influences on the Muslim community of this Muslim Brotherhood expansion in the United States.

    1. First was that most of the leading figures in the Muslim community ended up being people from the Muslim Brotherhood or people influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood. They had the money, they had the resources, they had the connections. Consider a small town in Auburn, Alabama that needs a little mosque. Who is going to pay for the mosque? This kind of help came from the Muslim Brotherhood. Many people became disproportionately influence. The Muslim community as a whole is very diverse. It includes people with Sufi background, Shi’as, etc. The emergence of the leadership ended up identifying the Muslim Brotherhood people as the leaders.
    2. Second, the mosques and organizations all ended up, or most of them ended up under Muslim Brotherhood control.
    3. The third impact was that the Muslim agenda ended up being defined by the Muslim Brotherhood, and this was a highly political agenda. Instead of Muslims like me who consider Islam their religious faith, this ended up being people who describe Islam as a political and social ideology, so Islam is ideology and Islam is faith, the distinction became blurred because of the way the organizational structure was created.
    4. And the fourth was the marginalization of traditional Islam within the Muslim community of the United States, the kind of people who want to say their prayers but get on with the business of life, who want to have a relationship with God, but do not want to think of it as a political agenda. That’s where the politicization came.

    The impact on the American mainstream, and four quick points:

    1. number one, the American media and academia. Since they are looking to understand Islam, they found it more convenient to approach Islam through the Muslim Brotherhood’s politicized version. If you look at even Islamic studies in the United States, a lot of scholars look at the people the Brotherhood quotes. You don’t here about certain scholars. Only now some people are doing some research on Sufi traditions or non-radical versions of Islam.
    2. It’s similar to Christian Evangelicals defining Christianity, not allowing other sects and groups to actually define it. There is pluralism within the Christian tent, big tent. The process is similar here is well. The Muslim Brotherhood’s version is now the official one. So if CNN is looking for a spokesman for the Muslims, they are going to go to any of the organizations associated with the Brotherhood to provide speakers. So then you have the others who turn around and say, where are the moderate Muslims? The point is that the moderate Muslims do not control the organizational structures out of which spokesmen are born. They are quiet.
    3. The fourth impact on the American mainstream was that converts to Islam, as Islam started winning converts in the United States, the new converts were more likely to be influenced by radical Islam than by traditional Islam. So whether it’s the prison ministry of Muslims, or whether it’s the Chaplaincy in the military, et cetera, all of it is influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood sufficiently for Muslim Brotherhood views to be the prism through which Islam is viewed by these new converts to Islam. Now, even critics of radical Islam are affected by the Muslim Brotherhood’s notion that there is only one Islam. The plurality of Islam and the pluralism within Islam is totally ignored as a result. Haqqani on Muslim Brotherhood’s real agenda: 6:48 AM Tue, Dec 02, 2008 | Rod Dreher

    Rupee News has exposed Mr. Haqqani in several articles. Most people will be appalled by his hysterical diatribes against people based on their faith and their national origins. He can get away with it because he has now been anointed by Mr. Zardari as the Pakistani Ambassador to the USA. Mr. Haqqani should have been defending the innocent. He was like Nero watching Rome Burn. Mr. Haqqani was not just a spectator, he was an active participant on the crusade on Muslims in the West.

    The portrayal of all DMS (Dead Muslim Scholars) as progenitors of all evil in the world is a growth industry in America. Mr. Haqqanis writings linking DMSs to 911 and future events is exactly what is depicted in Mr. Geert Wilder’s balderdash “Fitna”. If Fitna is blasphemy, Mr. Haqani’s sacrilegious writings also create psychopathic paranoia in the intellectual circles of America. What is worse, Mr. Haqqani’swritings are then quoted as “fact” to create discriminatory laws, illegal surveillance and creates the case to end Habeas Corpus via the “Patriot Act” Laws.

    Semantics are extremely important. We strenuously objected to Mr. Haqqani’s usage of Quranic words for nafarous purposes. He continues to use the words giving succor to the enemy, but also encouragin appartichiks like Mr. Shaharyar to “monkey say monkey do” follow in his footsteps and use the same blasphemous wordings. Mr. Haqqani should be aware that blasphemy is still an offense in Pakistan and congucating Quranic terms to portray ignoble people is blasphemy. When Pakistani territory is called a “safe haven”, instead of a hideout, it creates paranoia in Washington.

    Statement of Pakistai Ambassador

    http://www.pakun.org/statements/Security_Council/2008/12092008-01.php

    INFORMATION PRESS – News Views Media – USA – Chief Editor: Journalist SYED ADEEB
    ==================================================
    Haroon-Haqqani Urged UN to Impose Sanctions on Pakistani NGOs: Asia Times
    PPP Envoy to UN Abdullah Hussain Haroon Must be Booked for Anti-
    Pakistan Treason.

    (InformPress.com) – PPP envoy to the United Nations (UN) Abdullah Hussain Haroon and PPP envoy to the USA Husain Haqqani cunningly urged the United Nations Security  Council (UNSC) to impose UN sanctions on Pakistan’s social welfare organization, Jamat-ud-Dawah (JuD), and Pakistani citizens to falsely and maliciously frame, blame and defame them in Civil Terrorism against State Terrorism of the Terrorist Mafia State of India, according to a news report of the Asia Times Online (“Pakistan’s military takes a big hit”, by Syed Saleem Shahzad, 13 December 2008, Hong Kong, China.)

    On 9 December 2008, in his official written statement to the UNSC, Abdullah Hussain Haroon strongly urged the UNSC to impose UN sanctions on JuD and its Pakistani leaders. Haroon wrote:

    “I would also like to give you a few glimpses of steps taken today in Pakistan: The [PPP] Government of Pakistan has already initiated investigations on its own pertaining to the allegations of involvement
    of persons and entities in the Mumbai attacks. After the designation of Jamat-ud-Dawah (JuD) under 1267, the [PPP] Government on receiving communication from the [UN] Security Council shall proscribe the JuD and take other consequential actions, as required, including the freezing of [JuD] assets.”

    The above statement of Abdullah Haroon proves that Haroon mischievously encouraged the UNSC to impose UN sanctions on JuD and its Pakistani leaders without presenting any legal evidence or proof
    against the JuD to the UNSC.

    Abdullah Haroon also wrote: “A plan is being prepared to ensure effective government supervision as required for various welfare organizations. An intelligence led operation strongly supported by law
    enforcement agencies is already underway to arrest the individuals alleged to be involved in the Mumbai attacks. No training camps for Lashkar-e-Tayyaba [LeT] or any entity of this nature shall be allowed
    on the territory of Pakistan. The above measures, which are in process, constitute further proof of Pakistan’s determination to take action and not to allow its territory to be used for terrorism.
    Pakistan Government’s ability and capacity to take strong measures requires the understanding and full support of its friends at the United Nations and its Security Council. In addition to our proposal
    of a Joint Commission and investigations, we have now proposed to India to receive the highest possible level delegation from Pakistan to sort out these affairs.”

    The above statement of Abdullah Haroon also proves that Haroon told the UNSC, without any lawful proof or evidence, that both the JuD and the LeT are behind the Mumbai attacks of November 2008.
    On 10 December 2008, after hearing and reading the false and malicious statements of Abdullah Haroon against JuD and LeT, the so-called UN “Security Council Al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee” imposed the UN sanctions (assets freeze, travel ban and arms embargo, etc.) on JuD, LeT, “Al Rashid Trust”, “Al-Akhtar Trust International”, Muhammad Saeed, Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, Haji Muhammad Ashraf and Mahmoud Mohammad Ahmed Bahaziq.

    Indeed, Abdullah Haroon has committed the crime of treason against Pakistan by telling the UNSC, without any legal evidence or proof, that it should impose UN sanctions for the Mumbai attacks on JuD and Pakistani citizens based in Pakistan. Therefore, Haroon must be booked for treason, kicked out of the Pakistan Mission to the UN and prosecuted in an independent court of law for libelous defamation
    against a Pakistani organization and Pakistani citizens.

    PPP President Asif Ali Zardari appointed Abdullah Haroon, an incompetent politician and a failed diplomat, as the PPP’s “Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations” in New York, USA, on 3 September 2008, to stop any journalistic criticism against PPP leaders by the Dawn Media Group (DMG), because Abdullah Haroon is the elder brother of Hameed Haroon, the CEO of DMG; Publisher of the DAWN rag, DWS, Herald, Spider, Aurora, The Star; and producer of the Dawn News TV. The controversial, meritless appointment of Abdullah Haroon is a classical example of the PPP government corruption, nepotism and bribery to the DMG of Karachi, Pakistan.

    Now read the following excerpts from the Asia Times Online news report to further understand the PPP’s sinister conspiracy against the JuD and the Pakistan Army: “Karachi [Pakistan] – The United Nations
    Security Council’s declaration this week of the Pakistani group Jamat-ud-Dawah [JuD] as a front for the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), which is [illegally and maliciously] banned as a terrorist organization, marks
    a major setback for Pakistan’s military establishment.

    “The UN has [unlawfully and maliciously] subjected Jamat-ud [Dawah] to sanctions as a terrorist group, including an asset freeze, travel ban and arms embargo. Jamat claims it is a charity organization separate from the LeT, which has been [illegally, maliciously and fraudulently] linked [without any lawful proof or evidence] to the devastating attack on Mumbai [India] last  month [November 2008] in which close to 200 people died.

    “Pakistani [PPP] President Asif Ali Zardari and his diplomatic corps based in Washington and New York had lobbied hard to counter efforts by the Pakistani military establishment to protect its strategic
    assets, as Islamabad [Zardari-Gillani Ruling Mafia] wants a real clampdown on the LeT and Jamat-ud [Dawah].

    “It has got its way…. Within 24 hours of the UN announcement, Pakistan [Zardari-Gillani Terrorist Mafia] carried out raids on Jamat-ud [Dawah] offices throughout the country. [JuD President Professor
    Muhammad] Saeed and other [JuD] leaders have been placed under [illegal] house arrest, while several Jamat leaders have gone underground.

    “The Pakistani media were given directives to label the Mumbai attack a conspiracy hatched by India’s Research and Analysis Wing [RAW], Israel’s Mossad and the US’s Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] to
    tighten the noose around Pakistan. While the War Criminal] George W. Bush Administration was assured by [Pakistan] Army Chief [General] Ashfaq Parvez Kayani that action would be taken against the LeT, the [PPP Terrorist Mafia] Government was advised by the military to make a distinction between Jamat-ud [Dawah] and the LeT.

    “The Pakistani [PPP] ambassador in Washington, Husain Haqqani, and Pakistan’s [PPP] Permanent Representative at the United Nations, [Abdullah] Hussain Haroon, took a pro-active role in soliciting the
    international community to help Pakistan. They got their message across and the UN aimed at the core of the discord by explicitly naming Jamat-ud [Dawah]. On Thursday, the sidelining of the [Pakistan]
    military establishment was complete. These developments are significant that the [Pakistani] military establishment, which has for so long dominated the affairs of state in Pakistan, has been
    outmaneuvered by the political [PPP Terrorist Mafia] Government.”

    \However, out of the 16-paragraphs-long speech of Abdullah Hussain Haroon, titled “Threats to International Peace and Security”, only his following words make some sense: “I would request my friends in India to recall that when the Friendship Samjhota Express was burnt down with Muslim passengers killed on their way to Pakistan, fingers were pointed hastily at Pakistan but later it was proved that an Indian Army Colonel [Shrikant Prasad Purohit] was involved. We are all aware
    that the [Hindu- Occupied] Kashmir situation is the root cause of all problems between India and Pakistan. Would it not be a good time to do away with the root cause by pledging to resolve it with deeds and actions….

    [Information Press - www.InformPress.com - USA - Sunday, 14 December
    2008]
    Internet-Web Links:
    (1) Failure of Diplomacy or Deliberate Decision in Islamabad?
    http://www.thenews.com.pk/print1.asp?id=151649
    (2) UN Security Council Should Pass Judgments Based on Real Facts, Not
    False Propaganda of Indian-Hindu Terrorist Tyrants and Corrupt
    Mercenary (Kanjer) Media (CMM) of India
    http://www.jamatdawah.org/news_detail.php?news_id=784
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2008/12/081211_saeed_presser_si.shtml
    –> UNSC Bans Dead Jamat-ud-Dawah (JuD) Leader
    http://www.thenews.com.pk/print3.asp?id=18915
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2008/12/081212_lashkar_ashraf_dead.shtml
    JuD: http://www.jamatdawah.org
    (3) Statement by Abdullah Hussain Haroon, PPP’s Representative to the
    United Nations, in the UN Security Council Open Debate on “Threats to
    International Peace and Security” – 9 December 2008, New York, USA
    http://www.pakun.org/statements/Security_Council/2008/12092008-01.php
    (4) Four Pakistani Citizens Added to UN Terrorism Sanctions List
    http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=29272
    http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2008/sc9527.doc.htm
    (5) Mumbai Terror Attack – Further Evidence of the Anglo-American-
    Mossad-RSS Nexus
    http://www.countercurrents.org/misra031208.htm
    (6) Mumbai Terror Attacks – The Israeli Mossad Angle
    They killed Hemant Karkare, chief of the police anti-terrorist squad
    in Mumbai, to send a message that you cannot investigate the Mossad-
    RSS angle
    http://www.twf.org/News/Y2008/1127-Mumbai.html
    (7) Chabad Lubavitch’s Dangerous Game
    Attacking Mumbai and World Economy
    http://eaazi.blogspot.com/2008/12/chabad-lubavitch-dangerous-game.html
    (8) Karkare Investigations into Indian Army-Hindu Terrorist Nexus
    Caused Mumbai Carnage
    –> Hindustan Atma Ghataki Pathak members carried out suicidal mission
    in Mumbai, India, on 26-29/11/2008, to derail Karkare investigations
    into Indian Military-Hindu Terrorism nexus.
    http://www.dailymailnews.com/200812/06/news/dmboxitem.html
    http://www.jamatdawah.org/news_detail.php?news_id=783
    (9) Sooper Media: http://soopermedia.wordpress.com
    (10) DW: http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com
    Ten Hindi Words Tell Who Were Those Real Terrorists of Mumbai, India
    http://www.dictatorshipwatch.com/2008/12/12/ten-words-tell-who-were-those-terrorists.html
    http://www.ummatpublication.com/2008/12/14/lead14.html
    =================================================
    InformPress.com Newsletter Publication Date: Sunday, 14 December 2008
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/informpress
    http://groups.google.com/group/reportpress
    INFORMATION PRESS – News Views Media – http://www.InformPress.com -
    U.S.A.
    ==================================================

    Monitoring & Reversing Anti-Americanism-Some Solutions Ugly Americanism in Pakistan Kerry-Lugar Peanuts: 50% of US Aid fills pockets of US consultants Senator John Kerrys confusion about Afghanistan

    Pakistanis Continue to Reject wrong war policies of the U.S

    Rolling back Anti-Americanism in South Asia: Building bridges with Pakistan

    Pakistan needs FTA, ROZ & end to high Tariffs from US, EU & Japan

    Anti-Americanism in Pakistan is actually an Anti-war movement!

    PEANUTS: Puny US Aid to Pakistan is too little too late. Marshall Plan, & Trade concessions missing

    Reconstruction Opportunity Zones and FTA with USA End rendition. Find Missing Pakistanis. Repatriate Dr. Afia Gitmo is the best recruiting tool Bush could have gifted the terrorists
    Prisoner 650: Dead Nation wants sister Dr. Aafia Siddiqui freed Selective Amnesia of Americans: Pakistan is the most mistreated friend in the world

    Selective Amnesia of Americans: Pakistan is the most mistreated “friend” in the world. The post Obama era must be different

    How long can the wink wink nod nod farce of deadly drones go on The Headlines about Pakistan in the media: Understanding the Rupert Murdock, Neocon & Hunduvata doomsayer machine which is running scared of defeat and retreat

    US aid to Pakistan should be Non-Transactional grants not loans An FTA and elimination of tariffs on Pakistani textiles would enable Pakistan to export $15 worth of textiles. Better than any aid package this would reverse extremism

    In a lopsided policy the US wasted $143 Billion in aid to Afghanistan and gave Pakistan $5 Billion. Egyptian loans of around $38 Billion were forgiven. Pakistani losses due to GWOT calculated by the US DOD were $20 Billion per year in 2001. These losses have quadrupled. Aid to Pakistan is less than aid to Afghanistan. This has to be balanced with need. The US uses Pakistani infrastructure to transport supplies without building or even maintaining the roads.

    Joe Biden triples US aid to Pakistan:-too little too late. Aid should be 20 times that number to compensate for usage of bases, roads and lost opportunity. Aid should create projects not be given to corrupt politicians. Reverse tracking should ensure that aid is not syphoned by corrupt politicians to Swiss accounts Needs of the Pakistan nation: These basics have to be addressed to win the hearts and minds of Pakistanis

    Afghanistan-Pakistan forgotten by Joe Biden

    How to help poor Pakistanis, avoid enriching corrupt officials and save US taxpayer money. Eliminate trade barriers on Pakistani goods

    Holbrooke facing Khyber Poltergeist & Ganges hobgoblin

    Pakistan’s “Do More” list to the USA

    Trade First not Aid First

    Reversing Anti-Americanism: Rising resistance to US imperialistic policies in Pakistan

    Pakistan: An historic realignment/

    Posted in Current Affairs, Pak CAComments (0)

    Mr. Lal Krishna Advani the great bigot of the BJP.

    Advani: Peace process for "India Pakistan confederation"

    Mr. Lal Krishna Advani the great bigot of the BJP. The purpose of the peace process is to form a confederation between India and Pakistan. This was stated by Indian leader Advani which represents the thoughts of the majority of the Indians and the Indian leadership.

    The hawks in the Pakistani body politics understand that the “peace process” is a ruse to eliminate the Radcliff line and build the “Akhand Bharat” from Kabul to Raj Kalhani (a mythical land East of Bali, Indonesia. The US right now wants India and Pakistan together to confront China.

    The doves in Pakistan don’t have a clue and think that the peace process will lead to peace and prosperity.

    Hindustan will be divided. Kashmir will become Pakistan.This is the slogan of the Kashmiris since 1940. This is the slogan of the Kashmiris since 1940

    THE CHARISMATIC ZULFIQAR ALI BHUTTO WAS HATED IN WASHINGTON :  The youngest Foreign Minister of Pakistan, the mercurial Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was building Pakistani bridges with China. He wanted to close the US base in Pakistan, which he succeed in doing. President Johnson told President Ayub Khan  ”Bhutto must Go! Bhutto must Go!”. Soon thereafter Bhutto resigned a created the Pakistan Peoples Party.

    The favourite slogan, the one that caught on during the May 1968 fête in France was “it is forbidden to forbid”. There is nothing to forbid the youth of Europe to reject both communism and capitalism. What will they build in the absence of both systems? Will their concept of building a new structure with a new philosophy mean willful self-destruction? This sounds insane but the youth of Europe is not insane. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto A letter from the Death Cell (2007)] p. 15  p. 20

    BHUTTO’S UNIQUE BRAND OF ISLAMIC SOCIALISM APPEALED TO THE PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN: Bhutto was “Left leaning” and a Socialist. President Johnson wanted President Ayub Khan to fire Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. Bhutto launced a movement and forced Ayub Khan to resign. disappointed with the Americans after 1965, President Ayub Khan wrote a book called “Friends Not Masters” for America. Bhutto wrote a book called “Myth of Independence” in which he wanted to eliminate American influences on Pakistan.After 1971 Bhutto was elected Prime Minister and started Pakistan’s nuclear program.

    “We badly need to gather our thoughts and clear our minds. We need a political ceasefire without conceding ideological territory.We need a ceasefire to bury dead thoughts and to overcome fatigue. The modus vivendi has to be honourable and above board. Both sides have lost or, should I say, neither side can win. During the ceasefire a combination of existing forces might create a new order or a new equation between existing forces. Whatever the formula, it cannot be evolved on the battlefield of the old or new cold wars. The new international order has to emerge through the demands of a Third World summit conference. The answer to the North-South conflict, which is more serious than the East-West conflict, has to be found honestly and with unimpeachable integrity. Genuine disarmament will not come on its own or by platitudes at special sessions of the United Nations on disarmament, although, I was among the first to propose such a conference eighteen years ago. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto A letter from the Death Cell (2007)] p. 15  p. 28

    Zulfiqar Ali BhuttoThat threat and his judicial murder has repurcussions today on Pakistan US relationsThat threat and his judicial murder has repurcussions today on Pakistan US relationsHenry Kissinger

    KISSINGER THREATENED BHUTTO: In May 1974 India exploded a Nuclear device which it called “peaceful”. Following India’s explosion, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto pledged to press ahead with Pakistan’s nuclear program.

    “We will eat grass… “Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s Referring to financing the Pakistani Nuclear program. 

    Insistence on Kashmir will do Pakistan no good: Advani By Nayyara Rahman

    Mr. Lal Krishna Advani the great bigot of the BJP. NEW DELHI, April 19: Senior leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party and leader of the opposition in the Indian parliament L.K. Advani has said that Pakistan’s insistence on describing Kashmir as the core issue “would not achieve anything”.

    Mr. Lal Krishna Advani the great bigot of the BJP. In an exclusive interview with DawnNews TV, Mr Advani spoke of communalism in India, his party’s role in national politics and the prospects of peace between India and Pakistan.

    The BJP leader said although he encouraged the Composite Dialogue between the two countries, he believed that other issues, like information and commerce, should precede Kashmir. “Kashmir later,” he said.

    However, he remained optimistic that although the Kashmir problem would take time to resolve, a day would come when India and Pakistan would form a confederation, to solve the issue.

    In comments pertaining to the Agra Summit, Mr Advani said he was ‘incorrectly’ blamed for its failure by President Pervez Musharraf. Far from being the cause behind its failure, he said, he was in fact one of the architects of the summit.

    According to Mr Advani, it was President Musharraf’s inflexibility that led to the summit’s failure. “Musharraf just would not admit that there is any such thing like terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir, or in Punjab, which has been inspired by him or his country. And he maintained that what was happening in Jammu and Kashmir or in other parts of the country… cannot be called terrorism. It is a ‘freedom struggle’ of the people of Jammu and Kashmir for their own freedom.”

    Mr Advani stressed that cross-border terrorism was a serious bone of contention in the India-Pakistan peace process. While agreeing that militancy had decreased along the borders, he said it could be attributed to the Joint Statement reached by India and Pakistan, and was still there in the country. He was of the view that until this problem was dealt with, there could be no progress on the peace process.

    When asked why diplomacy was not initially used to solve the Kargil crisis, he said that it was not diplomacy that resolved the issue, but intervention by the United States. He believed that it was a ‘war of a kind’ in which ‘Pakistan refused to accept its own dead bodies’ and implied that Pakistan had capitulated before the US while India had not.

    The former deputy prime minister also spoke at length about his party’s communal image and its role in nationhood. He implied that religion was inherent in any democracy, since ‘religion is a considerable part of life’, and anyone not subscribing to the view could live in a ‘communist country’.

    “The role of religion is not much. But it is considerable in life. In a democracy religion is important. In a communist state, it isn’t.”

    He consistently denied accusations of playing the communal card, but was less successful in projecting a non-communal image of his party. When asked to comment about his support for Chief Minister Narendra Modi, after the ‘post-Godhra’ riots, instead of defending his actions he quoted the onslaught India’s Sikh community faced after Indira Gandhi’s assassination in 1984.

    “They were not riots. Not a single Hindu was killed. About 3,500 Sikhs were killed. Congress said, ‘So what? When a huge tree falls, the earth is bound to shake.’

    “How can I find fault with the [Gujarat] government then? I am bound to say that this is not fair to the Gujarat government and this is why I defend it.” Furthermore, he said, the votes spoke for themselves.

    Responding to whether the Gujarat killings followed an ‘action-reaction’ logic to Godhra, he said he agreed to the suggestion to some extent.

    When asked if Pakistan’s ‘Islamic Republic’ status bothered India, he said, “A theocratic state does bother us… it does.” But he insisted that Jinnah was inherently a secular leader, and had his 11th August, 1947 speech been implemented, Pakistan too would be a secular state.

    Mr Advani said his party’s hard-line resolution on Pakistan following his 2006 visit to the country, was because Jinnah’s speech ‘was pushed beneath the carpet’.

    The most striking moment of the interview, however, was when Mr Advani, in his own words, clarified his stand on Ayodhya for the first time. He said that while he stood by the Ayodhya Movement, and embraced it, he was saddened by the demolition of the Babri Mosque.

    BJP’s subsequent electoral victory, he said, was because the Ayodhya Movement, and not the demolition, reflected the people’s aspirations. “I believe a temple should have been built at the site. But the demolition disturbed me.”

    It would have been interesting to see how a mosque and a temple could have co-existed on exactly the same spot in Ayodhya.

    Posted in Current Affairs, Pak CAComments (0)

    Pakistan: Foreign Investment increases exponentially: $8 Billion from Qatar, Muscat

    The Pakistani Stock Market is the worlds fastest growing stock market in 2008. In 2007 despite earthquakes and elections the Pakistani Stock Market reached records heights. Qatari, Muscat, Saudi, UAE, Arab, Chinese, Malaysian, and other Asian investment in Pakistan is increasing exponentially. Western investment is also expected to increase with the new aid package with the USA. The FTA with China, the new plans in energy, defense, train, pipelines will further enhance the pace of growth. With UAEs Emaar heavily entrenched in Pakistan homes (pun intended), it is investing $28 Billion in building two islands near Karachi. Additionally other Arab investments are coming to totally transform Manora and the Hawkesbay area into a “mini Dubai”. The FTA with Malaysia and Qatar will bring new benefits to Pakistan by opening up ASEAN, UAE and Arab markets. With the Iran Pakistan pipeline in the works, and the Tukmenistan Pakistan pipeline being planned, and the $7 Billion package from the USA, Pakistani exports will increase dramatically. Pakistan is also ready to export Al-Khalid tanks and JF-Thunder fighter jets to friendly countries which is a boom to the export industry and also to the 2nd and 3rd tier manufacturers in Pakistan. The Pakistani IT industry is expected to reach $11 Billion within a few years. This baseline will improve the track to make it into a robust industry. An FTA with the USA has not been approved, but Pakistan is working on the plans to convince the Americans on expanding the Reconstruction Opportunity Zones (ROZ)  from the border areas, FATA to all of NWFP and Baluchistan. 

    Now the latest news from Qatar and Muscat informs us that another $8 Billion will be invested in Pakistan. The exponential affect of these huge investments will further expedite the growth of Pakistan’s indigenous entrepreneurs and have a trickle down effect on increasing the growth.

    Qatar, Muscat to invest $8 bn in Pakistan Updated at: 2040 PST, Saturday, April 19, 2008

    ISLAMABAD: Qatar will invest 5 billion dollars in Pakistan while Muscat 2.75 billion dollars in various projects in Balochistan.

    This was stated by ambassadors of Qatar, Jordon and Muscat during their meeting here with Federal Minister for Finance, Revenue, Economic Affairs and Statistics, Senator Ishaq Dar.

    Hamad Ali Al-Hanzab, Ambassador of Qatar said that Qatar would be investing in all US $ 5 billion in Pakistan.

    He said that Qatar has launched Islamic Taqaful Insurance Company in Pakistan and hoped that more investment would be made in the financial sector to tap Pakistan’s investment potential for the mutual benefit of the two countries.

    The two sides also agreed to convene the meeting of Joint Ministerial Commission at the mutually convenient dates.

    Dr. Saleh Ahmed Aljawarneh, Ambassador of Jordan proposed convening of the meeting of the Joint Economic Ministerial Commission and the meeting of Joint Business Council to increase economic cooperation between the two countries.

    He informed the Finance Minister that Free Trade Agreement (FTA) wasexpected to be signed in August between the two countries.

    The two sides also reviewed the cooperation in the fields of agriculture and railways. Possibilities of Joint venture in manufacturing of phosphate fertilizer was also discussed.

    The Ambassador of Muscat, Mohamed Said Mohamed Al-Lawati discussed role of Pak-Oman Investment Company in promotion of economic cooperation between the two countries.

    He said Muscat by financing various projects has been instrumental in accelerating development in Balochistan.

    It was also noted that Pak-Oman micro finance is playing a positive role in poverty alleviation in Pakistan.

    The two sides agreed to accelerate implementation of various projects in Balochistan costing around US $ 27.5 million being financed through grant from Muscat.

    The two sides also noted positive development of purchase of 65 percent shares by Pak-Oman Joint Investment company of World Call shares, its interest in telecommunication and power sector.

    The Muscat Ambassador also expressed the interest to develop tourism in Balochistan.

    Finance Minister, Senator Ishaq Dar assured the envoys of his full cooperation for promoting increased economic cooperation

    Posted in Current Affairs, Pak CAComments (1)

    This new Pope? Whats his problem?

    We loved Pope John Paul. This new one..what's his problem?

     This new Pope? Whats his problem?Mr. Gratzinger disliked by Jews, Muslims, and Protestants

     

     

    This new Pope? Whats his problem?Pope, Papa John Paul the 2nd beloved by Jews and Muslims

     

    We would like to respond to the Pope’s recent message denigrating the prophet Muhammad and misinterpreting Islam and misunderstanding jihad (self control).

    This new Pope? Whats his problem?Papa John Paul. May God Bless his soul. He was a saint and did much for harmony among the religions.

    1) John Paul II was the embodiment of the love of Jesus and he endeared people to him and Catholicism. Praying to the common God and joint prayers were a fantastic manifestation of our common humanity. Any other direction will alienate Muslims, Christians and Jews away from each other.

    2) Arab armies never conquered or stayed in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, or Bangladesh, where 80% of all Muslims reside. Arab armies did reach the Indus, but Mohammad bin Qasim quickly withdrew. The conversions for a vast majority of Muslims (who now live in Asia)was by Sufis and traders and by example and because Islam was LOGICAL and simple…pray to one God.

    3) In the 7th century, Arab armies comprised of less than 25,000 able bodied men as soldiers, out of a population of 50,000. It is a physical impossibility to spread Islam to millions with such a small army or by force of arms. Muslims could not have spread Islam through the sword from Arabia to Morocco and destroyed the Byzantine and Roman empires, if Islam did not have grass level appeal based on “Arianism” (unity of God), which was never actually eliminated even though Emperor Constantine had imposed trinity at the Council of Nicea in 325AD.

    4) The idea of holy war or jihad (which is about defending the community or at most about establishing rule by Muslims, not about imposing the faith on individuals by force) is also not a Quranic doctrine. The doctrine was elaborated much later, on the Umayyad-Byzantine frontier, long after the Prophet’s death. In fact, in early Islam it was hard to join, and Christians who asked to become Muslim were routinely turned away. The tyrannical governor of Iraq, al-Hajjaj, was notorious for this rejection of applicants, because he got higher taxes on non-Muslims. Arab Muslims had conquered Iraq, which was then largely pagan, Zoroastrian, Christian and Jewish. But they weren’t seeking converts and certainly weren’t imposing their religion. http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/09/15/18311787.php 5) But there have been many schools of Islamic theology and philosophy. The Mu’tazilite school maintained exactly what the Pope is saying, that God must act in accordance with reason and the good as humans know them. The Mu’tazilite approach is still popular in Zaidism and in Twelver Shiism of the Iraqi and Iranian sort. The Ash’ari school, in contrast, insisted that God was beyond human reason and therefore could not be judged rationally. (I think the Pope would find that Tertullian and perhaps also John Calvin would be more sympathetic to this view within Christianity than he is).As for the Quran, it constantly appeals to reason in knowing God, and in refuting idolatry and paganism, and asks, “do you not reason?” “do you not understand?” (a fala ta`qilun?)http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/09/15/18311787.php

    6) The idea of holy war or jihad (which is about defending the community or at most about establishing rule by Muslims, not about imposing the faith on individuals by force) is also not a Quranic doctrine. The doctrine was elaborated much later, on the Umayyad-Byzantine frontier, long after the Prophet’s death. In fact, in early Islam it was hard to join, and Christians who asked to become Muslim were routinely turned away. The tyrannical governor of Iraq, al-Hajjaj, was notorious for this rejection of applicants, because he got higher taxes on non-Muslims. Arab Muslims had conquered Iraq, which was then largely pagan, Zoroastrian, Christian and Jewish. But they weren’t seeking converts and certainly weren’t imposing their religion. http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/09/15/18311787.php
    7) Did the Pope have selective amnesia about tolerating the holocaust, sprinkling holy water on the marching Nazi soldiers, directing the crusades, supporting the ethnic cleansing of native Americans, supporting conquistador invasions, administering the Spanish inquisition, encouraging colonialism to civilize the natives, and finding quotes in the Bible to support slavery.

    7) Finally, that Byzantine emperor that the Pope quoted, Manuel II? The Byzantines had been weakened by Latin predations during the fourth Crusade, so it was in a way Rome that had sought coercion first. And, he ended his days as a vassal of the Ottoman Empire. http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/09/15/18311787.php

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Crusade

    This new Pope? Whats his problem?This new Pope? Whats his problem?8) Emperor Manuel II Paleologos of the Byzantine Empire did not agree with the Vatican. He wrote the quote during the siege of Constantinople.
    9) The propaganda against our prophet has been waged for centuries, and Muslims keep growing. The more they send crusades, the more Islam grows.

    10) [2:62] Those who believe (in the Qur’an), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians– any who believe in God and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. ‘

    11) This is one of the best responses that I have seen: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/spiritual-niggers-islam_b_29663.html

    12) “As Politi points out, the underlying question now facing the Church is the following: ‘Does Ratzinger want to deal with the Islamic world as merely a cultural partner, or is he willing to recognise that Islam should enjoy the same status as Christianity?”(© 2006 dpa – Deutsche Presse-Agentur, http://news.monstersandcritics.com/europe/article_1202570.php/Pope_Benedicts_Islam_blunder_undermines_dialogue)

    13) “Rather than rail at the pope’s characterization of Islam, Muslims might have responded as follows: “Excuse me, Your Holiness, but did we hear you say that you represent a religion of reason, whereas Allah is a god of unreason? Do you not personally eat the body and blood of your god – at least things that you insist really are his flesh and blood – every day at Mass? And you accuse us of unreason!”"

    Regarding Benedict XVI’s statement that the characterization of the Prophet Mohammed did not reflect his “personal opinion”: In 1938, at the peak of Stalin’s terror, a Muscovite called the KGB to report that his parrot had escaped. The KGB officer said, “Why are you calling us?” The Muscovite averred, “I want to state for the record that I do not share the parrot’s political opinions.” (http://atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/HI19Aa02.html)

    In one of the most conceited statements of the century, the Pope full of hubris said he was sorry because his remarks had been misunderstood. e said that deeply sorry” that Muslims were offended. This is not an apology, it is an indictment on Muslims who were unable to comprehend his message. Therefore the onus of the problem is on the Muslims still.In one of the most conceited statements of the century, the Pope full of hubris said he was sorry because his remarks had been misunderstood. e said that deeply sorry” that Muslims were offended. This is not an apology, it is an indictment on Muslims who were unable to comprehend his message. Therefore the onus of the problem is on the Muslims still.

    In one of the most conceited statements of the century, the Pope full of hubris said he was sorry because his remarks had been misunderstood. e said that deeply sorry” that Muslims were offended. This is not an apology, it is an indictment on Muslims who were unable to comprehend his message. Therefore the onus of the problem is on the Muslims still.I miss John Paul 11 (papa) who did so much for Muslim-Catholic and Catholic-Jewish dialogue. Such grace, such beuty, such class. In spite of the fact that John Paul apologized to the Jews for the inquisition, but did not apologize to the Muslims for the Crusades or the inquisition, he was near and dear to Muslim hearts. Pope Benedict should not have made the remarks, and he needs to withdraw them, apologize properly and make restitution to Muslims around the world. He should also apologize for historical wrongs against Muslims, including, the crusades, colonialism, and the inquisition.

    May God forgive the sins of the Pope and may he find enlightenment. God Bless him.
    GreenPeaceIslam

    Posted in Current Affairs, Pope, VaticanComments (0)

    "Change Pakistan into Anti-Insurgency force":-Biden's Price for US AID

    Change Pakistan Army to Insurgency force:-Biden’s Price for tripling US AID

    Joe Biden wants to triple the aid to Pakistan but it may be too little too late.Senator Jospeh Biden and other members of the US adminstration want to transform the entire Pakistan Army from a Defense force into an Anti-Insurgency force compliant to the wishes of the US goverment. For this Senator Biden and the Democratic Congress are willing to triple the Non-military aid to Pakistan. US again offers peanuts in aid. Reject and negotiate upThis means that Pakistan would be eneligible to purchase any more F-16s or ships or helicopters, unless the equipment is needed to fight Al-Qaida. Wish list of Pakistani people. Brookings finally realizes that Pakistan is not being taken over by the extremists. Invoice for Defeating terror, Securing Pakistani Nukes $150 Billion per annum.

    Afghanistan-Pakistan forgotten by Joe Biden.The aid offered by Mr. Biden and the US Congress is not enough. It is inadequate and it has too many strings attached to it. Pakistan responds to Pentagon demands. Review Pakistan USA relationship.

    On many occasions, Pakistan had requested predator drones, all terrain vehicles, AWACS and choppers for the border area. However this request was turned down. The Pakistan Frontier Constablary does not have adequate arms and still uses WW2 vintage equipment. A request was made to upgrade the FC and provide it with helipcopters. This was also denied. Selective amnesia of Americans. Pakistan is the most mistreated friend of America. The post Benazir era must be different

    Mr. Biden has repeatedly made speeches about transforming the US-Pakistan relationship from a transactional relationship (Pakistan US Relations should be normal not transactional ) into a mutually benefiail long term strategic partnership. Pakistan US Relations should be normal not transactional. Mr. Biden than turns around and asks Pakistan to destroy the structure of its armed forces and change it into a anit-insurgency force. What he and others like him really want to do is to outsource the GWOT to the Pakistani soldiers. This would be a purely transactional relationship with based upon master to slave directions.

    Pakistan has genuine defense needs. She lives in a difficult neighborhood, and she was dismembered by force of arms while the allies CENTO, SEATO and the USA stood by. America has to rethink India policy

    As such, Biden proposes, the US should make it a priority to help Pakistan train and reorganise its military. He also believes that Washington must convince Pakistanis that it cares about their needs and not just for its own narrow interests. “That happens to be the best way to secure the support of the … for our priorities, starting with the fight against Al Qaeda and the fight for Afghanistan. If Afghanistan fails or Pakistan falls prey to fundamentalism, both countries will pay a heavy price. And America will suffer a terrible strategic setback. I believe it is still within our power to shape a different, better future,” the senator has said. By Khalid Hasan Daily Times

    Hands off Pakistan is the slogan on the Pakistan news media. Pakistanis want to hear “Thank You” from the ingrate Americans. Nothing is good enough!

    Pakistan-China-Russia:- An historic realignment

    Posted in Current Affairs, Pak CA, US PoliComments (0)

    Categories

    Archives