Sergeant Major Mohandas Gandhi "Recruiter-in-Chief" extended UK colonialism and British Raj

Gandhi did not bring the British Empire to its knees—they had already decided to leave. By supporting the war “Recruiter-in-Chief”, Sergeant Major Gandhi extended colonialism, and sent thousands to their death as cannon-fodder.

Gandhi condones Zulu massacres and defends the British. Aug 4 1906

By supporting the British in the Boer War, their war against the Zulus, and the World Wars, Mr. Gandhi actually extended the life of the Empire and enhanced their ability to hold on to the Subcontinent. Using Mr. Gandhi as the self-proclaimed “Recruiter-In-Chief” help send thousands of People to the war effort of the British.

Gandhi did not bring the British Empire to its knees—they had already decided to leave.

“It costs us millions to keep Gandhi in poverty” Sarojini Naidu Friend of Gandhi

Map of the British empire with hundreds of states in the Subcontinent

Map of Pakistan that was proposed

Gandhi vehemently supported the prolongation of the British Raj in South Asia. He was a loyal citizen of the British Empire, which he thought was the most benevolent in the world. He wanted to perpetuate the Empire–so he coerced Indians to go and fight for the empire..he as its “Recruiter In Chief”.

Mr. Gandhi was firmly opposed to independence..the entire spectrum wanted independence,e Jinnah, Ambedkar, Akali Dal, the Muslim League, Jamiat e Ulema Hindh, the RSS and the Jan Sangh—only Gandihi wanted “dominion status” based on on British overlordship.

This bitter divide split the Congress between Gandhi and Nehru. Here is Gandhi asking Nehru “to Go Slow”–a euphimism for continue the British Raj.

I have not been able to find the letters on the internet–but Jaswant Singh narrates them in his book Jinnah. they are listed on Pages 158-161 (hardcopy).

Page 159: In a letter dated January 4, 1928, he [Gandhi] told Nehru..’you are going to fast’….’you should have taken time to think and become acclimated. Most of the resolutions you framed and got carried could have been delayed for a one year. Your plunging into the Republican army was a hasty step….’but I do not mind these acts of yours [badly timed, ill-judged resolutions] so much as I mind your mischief-makers and hooligans. I do not know whether you still believe in Non-violence. But even if you have altered your view, you could not think that unlicensed and unbridled violence is going to deliver the country. If careful observation of the country in the light of your European experiments can convince you of the error of the current ways and means, by all means enforce your views, but please do form a disciplinary committee

“On January 1928, Gandhi responded to Nehru’s denail of the Gandhian self. he tells Nehru that he mush have historically suppressing his tru self al these years. he is free to ‘revolt againsg me’. The article criticizing Nehru and the work of the Madras annual session were a misfire all around. ‘I had to notion of the terrible extent of [our] differences’. Whou you were in state [of self-supression], you overlooked the very things which appear to you now as my serious blemishes’. Similar criticisms on previous occasions were noticed because while you [were] under stupefaction, these things did not jar you as they do now…’the differences between you and me appear to me to be so vast and racial that there seems no meeting ground between us.

Page 159: An angry Nehru replied on 11 January 1928: It amazes me to find you using langauge which appears to be wholly unjustified…you have….specially slected some resolutions for…criticism and condemnation…You have referred to discipline..

Nehru then cut to the substance…’you have described the Independence Resolution ‘hastily conceived and thoughtlessly passed”..no stretch of language can justify the use of the words “hastily conceived..thoughtlessly passed”…a demand of independence and all that implies has come to mean a great deal for me and I attach more importance to it than to almost anything else..I doubt if anyone outside a small circle understands your position..

Nehru then turned to the more general questions of Gandhi’s ideas and leadership, questions which bear more directly on the modernity–post modernity divide. ‘You know how intensely I have admired you and believed in you as a leader… I have done so spite of that fact I hardly agreed with anything that some of your previous publications–India Home Rule [Hind Swaraj] etc–contained. I felt and feel that you were and infinitely greater then your little books. Since you have come out of prison [Feb. 1924] something seems to have gone wrong…You…repeatedly changed your attitude…most of us were left utter bewilderment…I have asked you many times what you expected in the future and you answers have been far from satisfying..you..said that..you expected the khadi movement to spread rapidly…the miracle has not happened..I am beginning to think if we are to wait ’till khadi becomes universal in India, we shall have to wait a ’till the Greek Kalends…out khadi work is almost wholly divorced from politics…What then can be don? You say nothing..you only criticize and no helpful lead comes from you…

Page 160: Nehru then turns to worldview..”Reading many of your articles in Young India, –your autobiography etc.– I have often felt how very different my ideals were from yours…You midjudge greatly, I think the civilization of the West and attach too great importance to its many failings..I nehing think that the so called Ramraj was very good in the past, nor do I want it back. I think that western or rather industrial civilization is bound to conquer India…Everybody knows these defects and the utopia and social theories are mend to remove them

..I doubt very much if the fundamentally causes of poverty are touched by [your remedy of village employment and constructive work]…You do not say a word against the semi-feudal zamidari [landlord] system…or against the capitalist exploitation of both the workers and the consumers.

Gandhi was not non-violent. Gandhi was Sergent Major in the British Army. He supported all the British wars, Boer, Zulu, Kaffir, WW1 and WW2. He threatened the British –”if we had the atom bomb we would use it against Britian”. He urged the government of Bharat (aka India) to wage war on Pakistan.

Martin Luther King used Thoreau, not Gandhi. As stated earlier–Dr. King did not follow fasting or filling the jails as they would not have worked in the USA. Dr. King thus followed Thoreau not Gandhi—despite the claims of the missionary who wanted to use Gandhi to convert all of Bharat to Christianity. The title “Mahatma” was to fool the poor Hindus into believing that Gandhi was an incarnation of Christ–this is how they converted thousands of Hindus to Christianity. All this is well document by Dr. Watson in his books

in the 60s, the hippy generation had no knowledge about the true colors of Gandhi–so there was some euphoria. The truth as it becomes more and more available will further eliminate all vestiges of the nonsense that has been accumulated.

The article is reflective of the broken down education system in India and elsewhere. Some get their history lessons from strange places? ….The Neocon abridged Encyclopedia edited by the RSS racists?

Read the books by Gandhis grandsons and read Wolpert.Even the BJP has rejected Gandhi. Gandhi did not bring the British empire to its knees.

The British empire teetering on bankruptcy had no choice and had already decided to leave

The exhausted British had already decided to leave all her colonies after the 2nd world war. Gandhi first introduced Hindu religious symbols to the Secular Indian National Congress and then tried to make all of India succumb to a racist Hindu Rajha rule.

Mr. Gandhi’s support for the British wars (Boer, Zulu, Word War) actually extended the life of the empire. They could have been kicked out of the Subcontinent decades before 1947, but for the obsequious Mr. Gandhi who “loved the empire.”

Gandhi’s only role in South Africa was to support the British wars. Gandhi was a failure in South Africa and a failed attorney in Bombay. Gandhis sole contribution to history was to make 150 million Muslims of India subservient to the Hindus. Attempts to make another 300 million subservient continue. He was very racist and the record shows his racist comments about the natives.

Gandhi won a medal from the British for his service in the British wars.

This was the Gandhi view of the Africans. Another post lists all the racist comments that he had made towards the Africans.

Is “India” is a failed state? After 60 years 560 states could not be put together as a “nation”

After 60 years. Cracks still showing in a Balkanized India

Mr. Gandhi was a total failure in South Africa. His sole gain was to ask his fellow Indians to support the British war efforts. He was imported into India by the bigoted Birla machinery to introduce religion symbols of a secular party called the Indian National Congress.

Gandhi’s political failures, his marketing gimmicks, his cartoonish monk clothes, his personal inadequacies, his sexual perversion, his illicit affairs with Western and Indian women, his pedophilia, his love affair with public display of enemas, and his tolerance of Patel and the Hindu bigots of the RSS and Jan Sangh are all enumerated even in Indian history books. His two grandsons recently discuss all these aspects in recent books.

He repeatedly called Hitler “a friend” and then says, it is not just a ceremonial greeting. He told the Jews to commit mass suicide.

Gandhi used to beat his wife up routinely and did not eliminate the caste system in India. Gandhi slept naked with his niece and other women to prove that he could control his manliness. Take a minute. Learn about the real leaders of the Subcontinent, Abdul Sattar Edhi, Shah Waliullah, Moinuddin Chisti, Qadir Khan, Abdus Salaam, Iqbal, Jinnah, Moudoodi, and Sir Syed.

Mohandas Gandhi failed leadership in politics and Gandhis domestic violence and weird sexual perversion. Source: Two Gandhi grandsons. Mohandas- a true story of a man, his people and an empire, on Mahatma Gandhi” by former Parliamentarian and writer Mr. Rajmohan

These penury stricken Indians still live the same way. The Untouchables are at the bottom end of the ladder. Ms. Maywati the Dalit leader calls Mr. Gandhi as the worst enemy of the Dalits.

The real question that perplexes Muslims is how could Arabs be India’s friend?

Mr. Syed’s sycophantic fantasies about Mr. Mohandas Gandhi’s character and accomplishments are based on the broken education system of the Middle East which regurgitates India’s marketing Inc. propaganda as history to the gullible Arab youth.

Mr. Mandela was incarcerated for belonging to the South African National Congress, a party shunned by Mr. Gandhi. Mr., King must have learned his orgies from Gandhi. Mr. Gandhi was a total failure in South Africa. His sole gain was to ask his fellow Indians to support the British war efforts. He was imported into India by the bigoted Birla machinery to introduce religion symbols of a secular party called the Indian National Congress.

Gandhi’s political failures, his marketing gimmicks, his cartoonish monk clothes, his personal inadequacies, his sexual perversion, his illicit affairs with Western and Indian women, his pedophilia, his love affair with public display of animas, and his tolerance of Patel and the Hindu bigots of the RSS and Jan Sangh are all enumerated even in Indian history books. His two grandsons recently discuss all these aspects in recent books.