Pakistan, Russia move closer

Russia trip, Apr 2008 - 57

Russia trip, Apr 2008 – 57 (Photo credit: Ed Yourdon)

President Putin canceled his visit to Pakistan at the last moment. The Bharati punditry was ecstatic. The newspapers from Delhi to Deccan applauded in unison while the leftist wannabe elite in Islamabad got ample ammunition to deride the Pakistani foreign policy. Friends who get great pleasure when bad news emanates from Islamabad made it a point to send us the links.  Commentators on this site were besides themselves.

The euphoria was a bit pre-mature. Now that the dust is settling down, the news from the Volga is not all that bad for Pakistan. As a matter of fact, the news is good coming from the Russian Ministry of Defence.

It seems that Russia is ready to sell arms to Pakistan, but in deference to Delhi’s sensibilities, Moscow will initially sell Islamabad equipment which is dual use. It is clear that Moscow already sells the RD-93 engine to Pakistan albeit it is through China. Pakistan can now expect direct sales from Moscow.

Kommersant Sergei Strokan, has written an article “Pakistan and Russia move closer toward military cooperation.”

  • Anatoly Serdyukov (???????? ?????????? ???????...

    Anatoly Serdyukov (???????? ?????????? ????????), Russian Minister of Defense (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

    He quotes Ruslan Pukhov, director of the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies says “Russia no longer intends to please India by refusing to cooperate militarily with Pakistan – a country that holds serious sway over the situation in Central Asia and Afghanistan.”

  • “Pakistan exerts huge influence over the country. Moscow is racking its brains over how to ensure the safety and security of the southern borders of the CIS when U.S. and NATO troops finally pull out of Afghanistan. If Russia continues to snub Pakistan in favor of India, it would ultimately run contrary to the interests of Russia’s security,” Pukhov said.

Russia is expected to assist Pakistan in upgrading the Steel Mills, and providing roads and rail assistance in connecting Tajikistan with Pakistan. Some MOUs have also been signed on energy.

  • “Russia is unlikely to sell Islamabad an air defense system or fighter aircraft,” said Pukhov. “Still, dual-use systems, such as the Mi-17 helicopter, could be supplied, in addition to combat training and the exchange of military experts.”
Russia trip, Apr 2008 - 72

Russia trip, Apr 2008 – 72 (Photo credit: Ed Yourdon)

The news emanating from the Caucus mountains is that Russia want to get closer to Pakistan because Islamabad holds tremendous influence on Afghanistan and the former Turkish states of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan etc. It is to be noted that Pakistan has a border with Tajikistan –were it not for the Wakhan corridor–which was illegally handed over to Afghanistan to create a buffer between the IVC successor state of Pakistan and the USSR.

Joshua Kucera has also written an artcile–”Fearing Afghanistan, Russia Gets Closer To Pakistan”.

  • Russian Ministry of Defense, in an interview with Kommersant:
  • “India remains Moscow’s most important partner in the area of [military-technical cooperation], both in terms of volume and potential. Yet Delhi’s attempts to diversify its supplies of new weapons – increasingly from Western countries – are making Russia flinch. Moscow has explained to Delhi, in no uncertain terms, that it can also diversify its military-technical ties by means of a rapprochement with Pakistan.”

Press reports emanating from Russia seem to indicate that Russia is keenly interested in building ties with Pakistan. A regional block could be the end result. Moscow already has set up the Dushambe 4 with Tajikistan and Afghanistan. The SCO is another vehicle which unites Pakistan with Russia.

  • The Hindu, in a piece headlined “Growing Russia-Pakistan ties a reality that India will have to live with” quotes an unnamed Russian diplomat saying as much:
  • “India could have been more loyal to Russia in the field of military and technical cooperation and saved it from the disagreeable situation in which Moscow on its own has to search for markets to sell military equipment meant for Delhi,” said another Russian diplomat. The consolation: even in the most optimistic scenario, the diplomat asserted, military cooperation between Russia and Pakistan would remain insignificant and would not alter the balance of power in the region.
  • But Afghanistan is perhaps the key driver in the Russia-Pakistan rapprochement, writes Sadhavi Chauhan in an analysis for OpenDemocracy:
  • While Pakistan’s deteriorating relations with the US have led it to look for new regional allies, Russia’s increased closeness to Islamabad is primarily motivated by the situation in Pakistan and around. As the US prepares to curtail its presence in Afghanistan by 2014, Russia fears that state failure in that country will cause a spillover of Islamic fundamentalism into Central Asia, and from there into the southern regions of Russia. Having just dealt with Islamist secessionist movements in Chechnya and the South Caucasus, this is not a scenario that Russia would welcome.
  • In this context, while Russia is aware of Islamabad’s role in fomenting international terrorism, it realises that any successful resolution of the problems associated with Afghanistan must involve Pakistan. A cancelled presidential visit cannot change the relevance of this, or of Russia’s goal, in enhancing ties with Pakistan, of securing greater cooperation on counter terrorism.
  • Pukhov agrees:
  • “Pakistan exerts huge influence over the country. Moscow is racking its brains over how to ensure the safety and security of the southern borders of the CIS when U.S. and NATO troops finally pull out of Afghanistan. If Russia continues to snub Pakistan in favor of India, it would ultimately run contrary to the interests of Russia’s security.”
  • And Russian defense minister Anatoly Serdyukov, visiting New Delhi this week, assured Indians that Moscow would continue to be on their side, reports the Economic Times:
  • He was asked if there was any change in Russian policy of not arming India’s adversaries. “I will make a very short comment that we have not had any change in our legislation whatsoever,” Russian defence Minister Anatoly Serdyukov told reporters here at a joint press conference with Indian Defence Minister AK Antony.
  • So it looks like Putin will be making that trip to Islamabad one of these days.

 

7 Responses to “Pakistan, Russia move closer”

  1. AKS says:

    Russia And India Have Been Close Friends For Many Years. Currently, India Is Very Much Capable Enough To Fight It’s Own Battles Without Anybody’s Help. True Friendship Is Tested In Bad Times. Whether Russia’s Decision To Choose Pakistan As A New Friend Is Correct Or Not, Only Time Will Prove This . Russia Purely Means Business With Pakistan And Nothing Else. Pakistan Is Only Taking Advantage As They Know That Russia Does not Share Good Relationship With America. And The Relationship Between America And Pakistan Have Also Soured. PAKISTAN IS A VERY SLY FRIEND. RUSSIA SHOULDN’T FORGET THIS.

  2. Akhbar Navees says:

    >>Russia Purely Means Business With Pakistan And Nothing Else.

    It is anything but!….Pravda says “Pakistan can make Russia queen of Asia”

    Economic collaboration is just a side-show.

    >>Pakistan Is Only Taking Advantage As They Know That Russia Does not Share Good Relationsh

    Pakistan wants a regional solution

  3. Dr Abdul jamil khan says:

    Pakistan too vital for Russia:
    This was the very reason why Pakistan was lured into anti ussr alliance. Pakistan’ location confirms what counts in real state bussiness: 3 items–locations,location,location. Look at communist’s manefesto and Lenin’s ideas abt islam. The entire ” socialism” is distillate of “Islam of Prophet” and not of Racist shiaism ( copy of judaic racism)or wahabi or military dictatorships; Look at education in Former USSR’s muslim republics or even communist Kerala(india)–100%-as prophets had wished.
    With india it was a reactionary transactional love of conveniance. BJP/Hindutva brigade is realitic in assessment: islam andd communism are 2 sides of one coin;they hate all lefties, romilla thaper and Delhi’s JNU plus The hindu-sane/humane newspaper
    WEhatever, pakistan certainely needs to bring in ” prophet’s islam”–start out with free compulsory education upto 10th grade;same level,same medium/same syllabus. rest will follow

  4. Dev says:

    ok , let Russia tread the path of friendship with a terrorist nation . This would be the biggest mistake of the century by Russians . I am sure Russians have something else in mind which Pakistan will realize after 50 years ….

  5. Akhbar Navees says:

    Very good! You have made your point. Now you need to get it across to the people who care. We don’t!

    We simply report the news.

    Please write to:

    President Putin
    Kremlin, Moscow
    Russia

  6. Akhbar Navees says:

    Most Indian Muslim elitists seem to think that the Central Asian Republics ruled by the USSR have achieved some sort of Nirvana because they were able to read Lenin’s books.

    In fact nothing or the sort happened. Penury stricken Tajikistanis are no better off than anyone else, plus they are alcoholics and cannot produce anything intellectual or manufacture anything worth buying.

    So much for “education” for the sake of education. I would stack up devout Pakistani Muslims anytime against the so called educated in Tajikistan, Israel or other countries. Many of the so called “illiterates” have more information than those with degrees.

    Case in point: Bharat has alarming levels of hunger like that of Eritria despite the so called advances, while Pakistan does not. Bharat has “alarming rates” of hunger in Gujarat (for Muslims). whereas it is supposed to Bharat’s most advanced state

  7. kishwar haseen says:

    You are absolutely correct. 9-11 was a false-flag to steal the trillions worth minerals of Afghan people.

    The stated objectives are never the same as the actual objectives, otherwise, the soldiers would rebel and not fight as mercenaries.

    It is fascinating that all the calls for 9-11 as a FRAUD have come out of the INNARDS of the MILITARY, one most prominent being Professor and Dr Alan Sabrosky. He has been so clear as to go on the MEDIA of Iran and stated it without ambiguity.

    But the Odious Mueller of the FBI has not stated it and still involved in prolonging the false-flag myth by giving visas to imbeciles from Bangladesh, most recently. The imbecile was provided with a switch. Perhaps, we provide a switch to Madoff that opens the safe of the federal reserve bank.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives