Liaqat Ali Khan: The real founder of Pakistan when Quaid was sick

The 61st death anniversary of Khan Liaquat Ali Khan is observed on October 16. He was one of the greatest Pakistanis and his fist kept the enemies shaking in his boots. He liberated Azad Kashmir.

 

The last Mir of Khairpur (George Ali Murad Kha...

The last Mir of Khairpur (George Ali Murad Khan) with the First Prime Minister of Pakistan, Liaqat Ali Khan (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Nawabzada Liaquat Ali Khan was, of course, the Prime Minister of Pakistan from August 15, 1947, but it was in the wake of the Quaid’s demise that his leadership capabilities were put to test, And it is during the next three years (1948-51) that his multi-faceted and compelling personality emerges the most conspicuously.
To say that Liaquat was the first PM means saying a great deal. It means that he enjoyed Jinnah’s confidence to the optimal level – a no mean achievement in itself. His confidence meant that Jinnah had found him sincere, able, hardworking and true to the cause Jinnah espoused. Hence, Jinnah’s description of Liaquat as his “right hand” man and, by implication, his political heir.

 

  • English: Nawabzada Liaquat Ali Khan, Prime Min...

    English: Nawabzada Liaquat Ali Khan, Prime Minister of Pakistan (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

    It also means that except for the Quaid himself, Liaquat stood foremost in the galaxy of Muslim leadership in India at that forking moment in history.

  • Jinnah had picked out Liaquat in 1936 when he got him elected as General Secretary of the All India Muslim League at its Bombay session. This office Liaquat held for 11 years, the most critical period in Muslim India’s history since 1857.
  • He was also the longest serving General Secretary of the AIML, even out-serving the legendry Sir Wazir Hasan.
  • This was, however, only the beginning of his career as an all-India leader, next only to Jinnah. He would become Deputy Leader of the Muslim League Party in the Central Assembly and member of the Committee of Action, both in 1943, Chairman of the Central Parliamentary Board in 1945 and leader of the Muslim League bloc in the interim government in October 1946, before being named as Pakistan’s Prime Minister in August 1947.

These were some of the highest offices a Muslim could occupy in pre-partition India. What is remarkable about Liaquat is that he did it with singular success and distinction. The 1937-47 decade was, however, a period of apprenticeship for him, a period when his abilities, his intellectual prowess and honesty, his steadfastness to the cause he avowedly stood for, were tried and tested. And he did make the grade. That’s why he was catapulted into the highest executive slot.

  1. Liaquat Ali Khan, Prime Minister of Pakistan, ...

    Liaquat Ali Khan, Prime Minister of Pakistan, speaking in New Orleans, 1950. Prime Minister Ali Khan, of Pakistan, speaks at a New Orleans Citizens’ Committee dinner. From photograph album, “Visit of his Excellency Liaquat Ali Khan, Prime Minister of Pakistan, to the United States of America, May 3 to May 26, 1950.” (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

    In terms of his political acumen, three major events stand out. First, at the Meerut Divisional Conference in March 1939, he propounded partition as the most rational solution to India’s constitutional problem. Coming on the heels of the Sindh Provincial League Conference’s resolution of October 1938, this came as a shot in the arm to the proponents of partition, especially since a more concrete sense, Liaquat represented Central League’s thinking as the issue.

  2. Second, in his interview with Sir Stafford Cripps in December 1939, he proposed three options – the provincial option (i.e, each province be given the option to join in Indian federation or not), a loose confederation with a limited centre, and outright partition between Hindus and Muslims. Remarkably though, these three options constituted the basics of the three major British proposals during the 1940s – the Cripps Plan (1942), the Cabinet Mission Plan (1946) and the Mountbatten Plan (1947).
  3. Third, in his talks with Bhulabhai Desai, leader of the Congress Party in the Central Assembly in 1944, he proposed parity between Congress and the League in any future set-up at the centre, and it became the core point in the Desai-Liaquat formula. This was the first time this cardinal principle which the League had long demanded in any coalition set-up, but was stoutly denied, had been conceded by the Congress at any level. Once lifted beyond the pale of controversy, this key provision became the basis for the quota of seats for Hindus and Muslims/Congress and the League in the subsequent Wavell (1945) and interim government (1946) proposals. Thus, Liaquat’s contribution assumes a milestone status in getting the principle of parity accepted.

Jinnah was, reportedly, a little “unhappy” about Liaquat having contracted the “Pact” behind his back (since he lay ill at Matheran), but was fully alive to both its significance and its long-term implications. He therefore, accepted Liaquat’s “explanation’’ and exonerated him of any “breach of trust”, which Sir Yamin Khan alleges in his Nama-i-A’amaal. This was in sharp contrast to the treatment that Bhulabhai Desai had received at the hands of his Congress colleagues.

  • Photograph of President Truman and Prime Minis...

    Photograph of President Truman and Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan of Pakistan in Washington during the Prime… – NARA – 200197 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

    Though blessed by Gandhi in his talks with Liaquat at the time, and despite his critical contribution in the INA trials (1945) and getting the prosecution charges of “treason” quashed, Desai was even denied a Congress ticket in the 1945-46 elections. Soon after, Desai, despite his great services to the Congress, died, broken-hearted – unwept, unsung, and unhonoured.

  • However, the acid test for Liaquat came in the wake of Jinnah’s death in September 1948. Some American circles, for instance, speculated whether the desire for a separate existence among Muslims would survive the catastrophic event, Even George Bernard Shaw wrote to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru on September 18, l948:

“I am wondering whether the death of Jinner (Jinnah) will prevent you from coming to London. If he has no competent successor you will have to govern the whole Peninsula.” But during the next three years Liaquat proved to be more than a competent successor. He belied the assumption that Pakistan would collapse once it had to face the problems by itself without the guidance of the Great Leader.

  • Liaquat Ali Khan (at right) of Pakistan visits...

    Liaquat Ali Khan (at right) of Pakistan visits New Orleans, 1950. Prime Minister Ali Khan and his wife are welcomed at New Orleans Airport. Garlands of flowers greet the distinguished Prime Minister Ali Khan, of Pakistan, and his wife, Begum Liaquat Ali Khan, at New Orleans Airport. From photograph album, “Visit of his Excellency Liaquat Ali Khan, Prime Minister of Pakistan, to the United States of America, May 3 to May 26, 1950.” (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

    Liaquat was, of course, the political heir, but to fill in the vacuum caused by the founding father’s death was by no means easy. More so, because in the wake of his death came the Indian invasion and occupation of Hyderabad.

  • The nation was downcast, in view of India’s consistently aggressive track record coupled with Pakistan’s deficiency in respect of armour and armed forces, but Liaquat raised its dropping morale by taking a bold stand at this juncture.
  • “In the event of an attack on Pakistan,” he declared, “myself, my colleagues and every Pakistani will shed his last drop of blood in defending every inch of the soil of Pakistan.” Thus, the nation came to regain its self-confidence.
  • During the next three years, India, besides mounting a war of attrition, created several problems, designed to throttle Pakistan. In September 1949, came the Indian refusal to recognise the unaltered value of the Pakistani rupee when India devalued its own currency. This led to a trade deadlock, and Pakistan was put to severe economic strain since India was then by far the largest buyer of Pakistani jute, the country’s premier cash crop.
  • Then, early in 1950, the repercussions, though mild, in East Pakistan to large-scale communal riots in West Bengal soured relations between the two dominions all the more. The Indian PM talked of using “other methods” to pressurise Pakistan into accepting the Indian viewpoint; India also got its troops massed within easy striking distance of Pakistan. Despite lurking dangers and uncalled for provocation, Liaquat remained calm and unruffled, proceeded to New Delhi for direct talks with Nehru, and drew up the Minorities Pact of April 1950.
Vice President Alben Barkley explains the 1948...

Vice President Alben Barkley explains the 1948 version of the Vice President’s seal to Prime Minister Ali Khan of Pakistan and his wife. Pictured left to Right are Prime Minister Ali Khan, Begum Liaquat Ali Khan and Vice President Alben Barkley. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Again, in July 1951, India massed its troops on West Pakistan’s borders, without any ostensible reason or provocation. While Liaquat galvanised the people internally to stand as a solid phalanx against Indian designs, he simultaneously induced several western countries to pressurise India into pulling back its troops.

Meanwhile, he consolidated what had already been accomplished in Jinnah’s lifetime, enlarged upon it and carried forward the process of building Pakistan. Thus, he accomplished a good deal in making Pakistan a going concern and growing enterprise. Internally, Pakistan was politically stable, and though still short of resources, economically buoyant and burgeoning. Internationally, it had carved out for itself a place in the comity of nations and at international fora, it was courted by the big powers, as indicated by an invitation to Liaquat by both Moscow and Washington.

“Three years of Liaquat Ali Khan’s leadership,” said Sir Olaf Caroe, one-time Governor of the NWFP (now Khyber Pakhtukhwa), “carried Pakistan through difficulty and crisis to the achievement of a degree of political stability rare in any democratic country…of economic prosperity beyond her rosiest dreams, and of an honoured placed in the affairs of nations.” Liaquat Ali Khan: Hero and legend By Prof Sharif Al-mujahid | Published: October 17, 2010.

3 Responses to “Liaqat Ali Khan: The real founder of Pakistan when Quaid was sick”

  1. Dr Abdul jamil khan says:

    LIAQAT ALI an ALIGARIAN:
    Thanks for a refocuss on pakistan’s leaders spacially on the products of Aligarh movement(AM) of Sir syed ahmed khan(SSK). Pakistanis assume that SSK planted the seeds for pakistan and they are correct though SSk was for hindu/muslim friendship and united free huindustan , whenever.HIs Aligarh coll was open to all and 7/33 trutees were hindus; this i write to contrast ” hindu college” 1816) 60 yrs older, at calcutta was “EXCLUSIVE for HINDUS ONLY”.1000s of hindu bengali from here wanted to ” administer/rule ” india under cover of British aryan brothers. JL Nehru too had noted this developement. SSK took stand against it and British accepted. Bengali hindus went crazy with terrorism but govt did not relent but gave them a party to ventilate;Congress was borne.
    SSK created the fundamental awareness for modern english education among muslim as to become the ” co administrater/rulers” of future india and formalised a role model–that is still alive.
    In that SSK/AM meliev/culture, came Mr liaqat ali,the student and graduated( 1914) with a politically active group comprised of Nawab of bhopal ( famous muslim leaguer), Rashid ahmed siddiqui, famous urdu writer and M A Ghani ( my wife’s father), univ hockey captain and later DIG police-Bhopal. Readers must note that modern education antedates aigarh as Bombay and Calcutta muslims had opened colleges in reaction to HINDU coll by 1826 BUT AM initiated the political movement ending in pakistan.
    Much before AM or even Hindu coll, Readers may have read abt ” Aryan brotherhood of Hindus and British” of 1790s that had formulated a ” aryan/hindu india” that drove hindu revivalism, that later on had openly threatend muslims with” convert/kill/expell compaign” ala spainish inquisition–all referenced in my book.IT is SSK/aligarh that had stood out against it.Powerfull hindu nationalism at this stage even had suggested partition of india. They had to have an exclusive hindu nation–Pakistan may be seen as a default by some –and me as well. Muslims leaders were frustrated right from SSK on wards. In this background leaders likes of IQBAL, JINNAH, and Liaqat ali had their turn. Liaqat ali, himself from north, married to a hindu lady ( Rana niece of famous Congress leader G B Pant, a home minister later) had the same idea as of Jinnah of united india with safegaurds for muslims. BUT as said, HINDUS wanted a hindu nation, their heart desire;though they posed as ” secular”.FOR them freedom was a necessity from both MUSLIMS and British.
    Interestingly, not well known, is the boundries of pakistan as proposed by a HINDU leader Lala Lajpat rai–lion of punjab;In this he even preemted choudhary Rehmat ali. In 1924, he proposed, a bisected bengal and punjab as muslim homeland; the following yr he became the president of hindu mahasabha(1925). The idea of pakistan’s boundries was initiated by MR RAI according to Stephen Hay asso prof at univ of calif, santa barbara USA.(Modern india and pakistan-p161)
    Thus while giving credits to pple for birth of pakistan–we need to remember that greatest credit goes to ” hindu nationalist” and then to Aligarh movements–that nursed leaders like Liaqat ali khan who had really steered pakistan movement and country of pakistan. Thank you for a refocuss on his life specially his endeaver in pak-US alliace.

  2. Akhbar Navees says:

    Excellent article. Wonderful thoughts, and beautiful historical facts

    I could not find the Savarkar maps. http://communalism.blogspot.com/2011/12/upcoming-seminar-vd-savarkar-on-maps.html

    Published.

    PS: Please try not to use SSK type of acronyms, seimi-colons (;) and slashes (/). It doesn’t save much time and makes it very hard for the reader to read.

    I had to send an hour reformatting the excellent and brilliant thoughts that you put in the article

  3. Dr Abdul jamil khan says:

    Thanks; i see ur labour in the new article. Still learing english from aligarh traditions.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives