Siraj Haqqani: Latest Boogeyman in the US media. Who to blame next?

It used to be Osama Bin Laden. Now we hardly hear his name. Then it was Mullah Omar–a name for the history books also. Now its Siraj Haqqani all over the news channels, and in all the newspapers. Haqqani this, and Haqqani that, and Haqqani the other. Of course this week Haqqani is the root of all evil. Never mind that he has members in the Afghan parliament, never mind that the US has been negotiating with hom for the past few months–never mind that he used to be America’s biggest asset in Afghanistan against the USSR. Today he is the boogeyman, the root of all evil. As if the elimination of one person is going to make a pennies worth of difference in the ground realities of Afghanistan. Eric Schmitt of the New York Times is at it again. This morning he again began his nonsensical reporting from Bagram Air base.

Reading Mr. Schmitt, about this technology prowess and that new war technique, reminds many of the tall claims by General Motors about J Cars, and K-Cars, Saturn, and what not–philosophies which would make them the rulers of the world. Of course GMs claims are as hollow as those narrated by Mr. Schmitt in the New York Times.

It may be pedagogical to read about the latest rearrangement of the chairs on the deck of the Titanic, but surely these cosmetic changes have not made an iota of difference on the situation on the ground in Kabul or vicinity. It is true that hundreds of Pakhtuns have been killed and bombed. But is also true that thousands of new recruits have taken their place.

The only map that counts is the ISOC map which shows 80% of Afghanistan in the hands of the “Taliban” (which includes 38 insurgent groups–inncluding Mr. Haqqani’s).

Kandahar, Zabul, Hilmand, Orazgan Nooristan & Kunar. According to an ISoC report the US faces total collapse in Afghanistan. This is a map of Talibanistan: 2009 Afghan map showing Taliban control

BAGRAM AIR BASE, Afghanistan — Secretive branches of the military’s Special Operations forces have increased counterterrorism missions against some of the most lethal groups in Afghanistan and, because of their success, plan an even bigger expansion next year, according to American commanders.

The commandos, from the Army’s Delta Force and the Navy’s classified Seals units, have had success weakening the network of Sirajuddin Haqqani, the strongest Taliban warrior in eastern Afghanistan, the officers said. Mr. Haqqani’s group has used its bases in neighboring Pakistan to carry out deadly strikes in and around Kabul, the Afghan capital.

Guided by intercepted cellphone communications, the American commandos have also killed some important Taliban operatives in Marja, the most fearsome Taliban stronghold in Helmand Province in the south, the officers said. Marine commanders say they believe that there are some 1,000 fighters holed up in the town.

Although President Obama and his top aides have not publicly discussed these highly classified missions as part of the administration’s revamped strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, the counterterrorism operations are expected to increase, along with the deployment of 30,000 more American forces in the next year.

Bluster before Exit: Obama’s last hurrah—30,000 troops “for 18 months” then withdrawal by 2011

International Council of Security and Development (ISOC): Taliban control “virtually all” of Afghanistan

Michael Moore to President Obama

Obama’s mini surge: Withdrawal in 2011! as predicted by Rupee News
The increased counterterrorism operations over the past three or four months reflect growth in every part of the Afghanistan campaign, including conventional forces securing the population, other troops training and partnering with Afghan security forces, and more civilians to complement and capitalize on security gains.

American commanders in Afghanistan rely on the commando units to carry out some of the most complicated operations against militant leaders, and the missions are never publicly acknowledged.

Afghanistan:– Pakistan’s Eminent Domain 

“India supporting the terrorists in tribal areas & Balochistan” FM Qureshi India’s dark shadow on Afghanistan

Evidence against India-ISI Chief confronts Leon Panetta about stopping CIA/RAW Terror in Pakistan

The commandos are the same elite forces that have been pursuing Osama bin Laden, captured Saddam Hussein in Iraq in 2003 and led the hunt that ended in 2006 in the death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader in Iraq of the insurgent group Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia.

In recent interviews here, commanders explained that the special-mission units from the Joint Special Operations Command were playing a pivotal role in hurting some of the toughest militant groups, and buying some time before American reinforcements arrived and more Afghan security forces could be trained.

“They are extremely effective in the areas where we are focused,” said one American general in Afghanistan about the commandos, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the classified status of the missions.

Gen. David H. Petraeus, who is in charge of the military’s Central Command, mentioned the increased focus on counterterrorism operations in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Dec. 9. But he spoke more obliquely about the teams actually conducting attacks against hard-core Taliban extremists, particularly those in rural areas outside the reach of population centers that conventional forces will focus on.

“We actually will be increasing our counterterrorist component of the overall strategy,” General Petraeus told lawmakers. “There’s no question you’ve got to kill or capture those bad guys that are not reconcilable. And we are intending to do that, and we will have additional national mission force elements to do that when the spring rolls around.”

Senior military officials say it is not surprising that the commandos are playing such an important role in the fight, particularly because Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the senior American and NATO officer in Afghanistan, led the Joint Special Operations Command for five years.

In addition to the classified American commando missions, military officials say that other NATO special operations forces have teamed up with Afghan counterparts to attack Taliban bomb-making networks and other militant cells.

About six weeks ago, allied and Afghan special operations forces killed about 150 Taliban fighters in several villages near Kunduz, in northern Afghanistan, a senior NATO military official said.

Some missions have killed Taliban fighters while searching for Pfc. Bowe R. Bergdahl, who was reported missing on June 30 in eastern Afghanistan. The Taliban in July posted a video on jihadist Web sites in which the soldier identified himself and said that he had been captured when he lagged behind on a patrol. A second video was released on Friday.

“We’ve been hitting them hard, but I want to be careful not to overstate our progress,” said the NATO official, speaking on the condition of anonymity in order to describe the operations in detail. “It has not yet been decisive.”

In Helmand, more than 10,000 Marines, as well as Afghan and British forces, are gearing up for a major confrontation in Marja early next year. Brig. Gen. Larry Nicholson, the senior Marine commander in the south, said in a recent interview, “The overt message we’re putting out is, Marja is next.”

General Nicholson said there were both “kinetic and nonkinetic shaping operations” under way. In military parlance that means covert operations, including stealthy commando raids against specific targets, as well as an overt propaganda campaign intended to persuade some Taliban fighters to defect.

Military officials say the commandos are mindful of General McChrystal’s directive earlier this year to take additional steps to prevent civilian casualties.

In February, before General McChrystal was named to his current position, the head of the Joint Special Operations Command, Vice Adm. William H. McRaven, ordered a halt to most commando missions in Afghanistan, reflecting a growing concern that civilian deaths caused by American firepower were jeopardizing broader goals there.

The halt, which lasted about two weeks, came after a series of nighttime raids by Special Operations troops killed women and children, and after months of mounting outrage in Afghanistan about civilians killed in air and ground attacks. The order covered all commando missions except those against the top leaders of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, military officials said.

Across the border in Pakistan, where American commandos are not permitted to operate, the Central Intelligence Agency has stepped up its missile strikes by Predator and Reaperdrones on groups like the Haqqani network.

But an official with Pakistan’s main spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence directorate, or I.S.I., said there had also been more than 60 joint operations involving the I.S.I. and the C.I.A. in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and Baluchistan in the past year.

The official said the missions included “snatch and grabs” — the abduction of important militants — as well as efforts to kill leaders. These operations were based on intelligence provided by either the United States or Pakistan to be used against the Taliban and Al Qaeda, the official said.

“We can expect to see more U.S. action against Haqqani,” a senior American diplomat in Pakistan said in a recent interview.

The increasing tempo of commando operations in Afghanistan has caused some strains with other American commanders. Many of the top Special Operations forces, as well as intelligence analysts and surveillance aircraft, are being moved to Afghanistan from Iraq, as the Iraq war begins to wind down.

“It’s caused some tensions over resources,” said Lt. Gen. Charles H. Jacoby Jr., the second-ranking commander in Iraq.

By ERIC SCHMITT The New York Times. Officers at Bagram Air Base expect a major fight in Marja.

Richard A. Oppel Jr. contributed reporting from Islamabad, Pakistan.

Delhi’s worst nightmare: A “Taliban” (Pakhtun) government in Kabul

Obama’s new Grand bargain: More aid, intelligence cooperation & a few threats

Perpetual Mimitic War: Strategy for continued Failure in Afghanistan Obama’s Afghan surge without robust implementation of an “Exit Plan” is a ‘Straightjacket’ named quagmire & defeat

Can the drama of a Joe Biden’s “resignation” end the Afghan war fiasco?

Pakistan: Hillary Clinton still doesn’t have a clue

Pakistan: Why Ms. Clinton doesn’t get it Hillary Clinton admits to US support for Bin Laden & creation of Taliban

The rude US Ambassador Patterson in hot soup

“The best way to get out of Afghanistan fast is (for) people to think we’re staying.” Sen. John McCain of Arizona. 

“There is no military success ultimately to Afghanistan. Senator John Kerry Kerry Lugar Bill backlash: Pakistan rethinks Afghan policy & US alliance-Hit RAW hard in Afghanistan

Without speedy withdrawal–we are running the risk of replicating the fate of the Soviets” Mr. Brzezinski Brzezinski: Don’t start new wars. Use diplomacy in Pakistan

“Can Karzai get away with a stolen election”- Carter

Admiral Mullen is still wrong The crusty specious, Admiral is mistaken about Afghanistan

Obama’s Afghan timeout vs. Mullen’s surge

Afghan temp Surge: McChrystal malarkey hides incompetence of NATO, ISAF & US forces McChrystal right on India: Delhi must scale back Afghan operations

“Taliban’s Winning Strategy in Afghanistan”: Overcoming “culture of poverty”

The US occupation has not brought security to Afghan women Afghanistan’s Bravest Woman Malalai Joya: “Taliban are logistically & militarily growing stronger as each day dawns.” “Afghan women and men are not ‘liberated’ at all”

Bluster before exit: US capitulates to Afghan Taliban: Negotiating retreat schedule

The silent “K” in Holbrooke’s portfolio

AfPak countercurrents beyond the Oxus to AfPakAzUzbKazTurkKyr-istan

Tick Tock Tick Tock-2011: Obama’s shrinking Afghan timeline Truth not Orwellian propaganda: Best article on Afghanistan anywhere

US bluff: Other arduous US Supply Chain routes to Afghanistan not feasible

Afghanistan fiasco: Cleaning up the Am-Brit failures in Kabul again

Solutions to “Obama’s Vietnam”–AfPak

David Kilcullen incessant paranoid hallucinating Pakistanphobic rhetoric destroys his credibility Obama must avoid creating a backlash in neighboring Pakistan by heavy-handed U.S. military intervention there: David Kilcullen

Can Obama pull US out of the Afghan quicksand? Choosing China & Pakistan over Bharat (aka India)

NATO not buying the Obama Doctrine or surge after Surge?

Afghanistan & Pakistan: Can the US Prevail? No!

Fixing Afpak: Inability to implement exit strategy spells inevitable US military catastrophe in Kabul Obama’s sane policy should be implemented– Negotiate with the TalibanBetrayals, blackmail in Bakiyev– cloaking failure as success hiding the defeat, declaring victory, withdrawing from Afghanistan within 18 months

Obama’s new policy was supposed to be a Marshal Plan & end to bombing raids in Pakistan

Convincing the US tin ear of the Pakistani point of view

Rahm Emanuel blames the “Ho Chi Minh Trail” for Afghan defeat

Obama’s Neocon: Bruce Riedel’s rancid racism against Pakistan is bad US history Bigoted Bruce Riedel’s diatribes not valid for Pakistan & Afghanistan? Mr. Bruce Riedel’s irrational rhetoric exacerbated US-Pakistani relations

Obama team’s consensus: Much of Pakistan’s problems originate in Afghanistan

Obama advisor Weinbaum focus on talks resurrected in new Afghan strategy

Ahmed Rashid’s bad advice about Pakistan Afghanistan: Con man Ahmed Rashid sold the America down the river–and made a buck doing it

Afghan Surge fiasco: Ahmed Rashid’s bad advice
Obama adviser insights into Afghan policy: Result same old same old

Why troops surges in Afghanistan are doomed to failure?

Rand report: End GWOT. Defeat Al-Qaeda with police & Dollars Hindu Kush Curtain Call: The End Game in Afghanistan Harvard questions: Afghanistan Lost? Barnett Rubin & Maleeha Lodhi solutions to quagmire The Pakistani perspective: Peace deals only way to precipitate face saving for US & Obama’s smooth Exit strategy from Afghanistan

After NATO rejection Obama has few options left in Afghanistan Pakistan First by Shireen Mazari: The devastating affects of appeasing India and kowtowing to the USA

Pakistan to US: No pay-No play: Tough lessons in geography!

People talk glibly of ‘the total disarmament of the frontier tribes’ as being the obvious policy…but to obtain it would be as painful and as tedious an undertaking as to extract the stings of a swarm of hornets, with naked fingers.” Winston Churchill 

PEANUTS: Puny US Aid to Pakistan is too little too late. Marshall Plan, & Trade concessions missing

Graveyard of Empires: AfPak-TurkTaj-UzbKaz-AzKyr -istan Obama’s “Vietnam”: Khyber & Hindu Kush

Afghanistan:– Pakistan’s Eminent Domain 

“India supporting the terrorists in tribal areas & Balochistan” FM Qureshi India’s dark shadow on Afghanistan

Evidence against India-ISI Chief confronts Leon Panetta about stopping CIA/RAW Terror in Pakistan

Comments are closed.

Categories

Archives