We don't really trust your country: Pakistanis to Hillary Clinton

Posted on 01 November 2009. Tags: We don't really trust your country

False ‘US claims on ephemeral Quetta Shura baseless’

Pakistani missiles defend Pakistani borders

Why Clinton is not getting through’ to Pakistanis-bad US policies

Truth from Pakistani people frustrates Clinton

Crafty Clinton’s Clueless Charm schemes crash in Pakistan

Reporting from Islamabad, Pakistan – Every time Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton tried to win over Pakistanis during her three-day charm offensive last week, they fired back a polite but firm message:

We don’t really trust your country.

Pakistan: Hillary Clinton still doesn’t have a clue

Pakistan: Why Ms. Clinton doesn’t get it Hillary Clinton admits to US support for Bin Laden & creation of Taliban

The rude US Ambassador Patterson in hot soup

No matter how hard Clinton tried to reassure audiences in Lahore and Islamabad with talk of providing economic aid where it’s needed most, Pakistanis seized on her visit as the perfect moment to lash out at a U.S. government they perceive as arrogant, domineering and insensitive to their plight.

At a televised town hall meeting in Islamabad, the capital, on Friday, a woman in a mostly female audience characterized U.S. drone missile strikes on suspected terrorist targets in northwestern Pakistan as de facto acts of terrorism. A day earlier in Lahore, a college student asked Clinton why every student who visits the U.S. is viewed as a terrorist.

The opinions Clinton heard weren’t the strident voices of radical clerics or politicians with anti-U.S. agendas. Some of the most biting criticisms came from well-mannered university students and respected, seasoned journalists, a reflection of the breadth of dissatisfaction Pakistanis have with U.S. policy toward their country.

In those voices what rang clear was a sense that Pakistan was paying a heavy price for America’s “war on terror.”

“You had one 9/11, and we are having daily 9/11s in Pakistan,” Asma Shirazi, a journalist with Geo TV, told Clinton during the Islamabad town hall meeting.

Clinton’s visit came at a time when Pakistanis’ suspicions about U.S. intentions in their country are at an all-time high.

A five-year, $7.5-billion aid package to Pakistan recently signed into law by President Obama has stoked much of the animosity. Measures in the legislation aimed at ensuring the money isn’t misspent have been perceived by Pakistanis as levers that Washington can use to exert control over their country.

Pakistanis also continue to be incensed by U.S. reliance on drone missile strikes to take out top Al Qaeda and Taliban commanders in Pakistan’s lawless tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan.

The CIA-operated drone strikes have killed at least 13 senior Al Qaeda and Taliban militants in the tribal areas in the last 18 months. But Pakistani government and military leaders say the strikes have also killed hundreds of civilians and amount to violations of Pakistan’s sovereignty.

At the Islamabad town hall meeting, a student from a university in Peshawar, a city shaken by a car bomb blast Wednesday that killed 118 people, summed up the anger over the drone attacks.

“What is actually terrorism in U.S. eyes?” the woman asked. “Is it the killing of innocent people in, let’s say, drone attacks? Or is it the killing of innocent people in different parts of Pakistan, like the bomb blast in Peshawar two days ago? Which one is terrorism, do you think?”

Pressed by the forum’s moderator whether she thought U.S. drone missile strikes were tantamount to terrorism, Clinton answered, “No, I do not.”

Clinton repeatedly acknowledged the mutual lack of trust that has held back the relationship, and she emphasized the Obama administration’s commitment to addressing crucial issues for Pakistanis that reach beyond terrorism, such as shoring up Pakistan’s beleaguered electricity grid and improving schools and healthcare.

Pakistanis, however, clearly remained unconvinced that Washington was as interested in improving the quality of life in Pakistan as it was in tracking down terrorists. And on several occasions during her trip, Clinton was confronted by Pakistanis who blamed the previous U.S. administration’s policies in Afghanistan for the militancy now wreaking havoc across Pakistan.

“Look, Madam Secretary, we are fighting a war that is imposed on us,” journalist Shirazi told Clinton. “It’s not our war. That was your war, and we are fighting that war.”

Assessments of Clinton’s trip in Saturday’s Pakistani newspapers were gloomy.

“One cannot help feeling that [Clinton's trip] was an abortive exercise,” remarked an editorial in the Nation, another English-language newspaper, “and she went away fully conscious of that failure.” Clinton in Pakistan encounters widespread distrust of U.S.LA Times By Alex Rodriguez November 1, 2009 alex.rodriguez@latimes.com, The Los Angeles Times

International Council of Security and Development (ISOC): Taliban control “virtually all” of Afghanistan

Obama rejects McChrystal’s surge: Withdrawal Inevitable in 2011! Perpetual Mimitic War: Strategy for continued Failure in Afghanistan Obama’s Afghan ‘Strategy’ without an “Exit Plan” is a ‘Straightjacket’ named quagmire & defeat

Can the drama of a Joe Biden’s “resignation” end the Afghan war fiasco?

Pakistan: Hillary Clinton still doesn’t have a clue

Pakistan: Why Ms. Clinton doesn’t get it Hillary Clinton admits to US support for Bin Laden & creation of Taliban

The rude US Ambassador Patterson in hot soup

“The best way to get out of Afghanistan fast is (for) people to think we’re staying.” Sen. John McCain of Arizona.

“There is no military success ultimately to Afghanistan. Senator John Kerry Kerry Lugar Bill backlash: Pakistan rethinks Afghan policy & US alliance-Hit RAW hard in Afghanistan

We are running the risk of replicating the fate of the Soviets” Mr. Brzezinski Brzezinski: Don’t start new wars. Use diplomacy in Pakistan

“Can Karzai get away with a stolen election”- Carter

Admiral Mullen is still wrong The crusty specious, Admiral is mistaken about Afghanistan

Obama’s Afghan timeout vs. Mullen’s surge

Afghan Surge: McChrystal malarkey hides incompetence of NATO, ISAF & US forces McChrystal right on India: Delhi must scale back Afghan operations

“Taliban’s Winning Strategy in Afghanistan”: Overcoming “culture of poverty”

The US occupation has not brought security to Afghan women Afghanistan’s Bravest Woman Malalai Joya: “Taliban are logistically & militarily growing stronger as each day dawns.” “Afghan women and men are not ‘liberated’ at all”

Bluster before exit: US capitulates to Afghan Taliban: Negotiating retreat schedule

The silent “K” in Holbrooke’s portfolio

AfPak countercurrents beyond the Oxus to AfPakAzUzbKazTurkKyr-istan

Tick Tock Tick Tock-2011: Obama’s shrinking Afghan timeline Truth not Orwellian propaganda: Best article on Afghanistan anywhere

US bluff: Other arduous US Supply Chain routes to Afghanistan not feasible

Afghanistan fiasco: Cleaning up the Am-Brit failures in Kabul again

Solutions to “Obama’s Vietnam”–AfPak

David Kilcullen incessant paranoid hallucinating Pakistanphobic rhetoric destroys his credibility Obama must avoid creating a backlash in neighboring Pakistan by heavy-handed U.S. military intervention there: David Kilcullen

Can Obama pull US out of the Afghan quicksand? Choosing China & Pakistan over Bharat (aka India)

NATO not buying the Obama Doctrine or surge after Surge?

Afghanistan & Pakistan: Can the US Prevail? No!

Fixing Afpak: Inability to define exit strategy spells inevitable US military catastrophe in Kabul Obama’s sane policy lost? Negotating with the Taliban Betrayals, blackmail in Bakiyev cloaking failure as success hiding the defeat declaring victory withdrawing from Afghanistan within 12 months

Obama’s new policy was supposed to be a Marshal Plan & end to bombing raids in Pakistan

Convincing the US tin ear of the Pakistani point of view

Rahm Emanuel blames the “Ho Chi Minh Trail” for Afghan defeat

Obama’s Neocon: Bruce Riedel’s rancid racism against Pakistan Are bigoted Bruce Riedel’s diatribes still valid for Pakistan & Afghanistan? Mr. Bruce Riedel’s irrational rhetoric exacerbates US-Pakistani relations

Growing consensus in the Obama team: Much of Pakistan’s problems originate in Afghanistan

Obama advisor Weinbaum focus on talks & Reconciliation got lost in blood and gore.

Ahmed Rashid’s bad advice about Pakistan Afghanistan: Did Ahmed Rashid sell the American down the river?

Afghan Surge fiasco: Ahmed Rashid’s bad advice
Obama adviser insights into Afghan policy: Result same old same old

Why troops surges in Afghanistan are doomed to failure?

Rand report: End GWOT. Defeat Al-Qaeda with police & Dollars Hindu Kush Curtain Call: The End Game in Afghanistan Harvard questions: Afghanistan Lost? Barnett Rubin & Maleeha Lodhi solutions to quagmire The Pakistani perspective: Peace deals only way to precipitate face saving for US & Obama’s smooth Exit strategy from Afghanistan

After NATO rejection Obama has few options left in Afghanistan Pakistan First by Shireen Mazari: The devastating affects of appeasing India and kowtowing to the USA

Pakistan to US: No pay-No play: Tough lessons in geography!

People talk glibly of ‘the total disarmament of the frontier tribes’ as being the obvious policy…but to obtain it would be as painful and as tedious an undertaking as to extract the stings of a swarm of hornets, with naked fingers.” Winston Churchill