WASHINGTON: US Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry on Tuesday said he was “very wary” of sending more American troops to the region.

Kerry says the lessons of that war suggest that more troops should not be sent to Afghanistan without a clear exit plan.

He said the US could not afford and its people would not accept a full nation-building effort in Afghanistan. Reuters

The US is expected to announce a significant surge of up to 45,000 extra troops for Afghanistan after Gordon Brown said that 500 more British troops would be sent to the country. President Barack Obama’s administration is understood to have told the British government that it could announce, as early as next week, the substantial increase to its 65,000 troops already serving there. The decision from Mr Obama comes after he considered a request from General Stanley McChrystal, the US commander in Afghanistan, to send tens of thousands of extra American troops to the country. Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, the Chief of the Defence Staff, said: “I don’t want to put words in the mouths of the Americans but I am fairly confident of the way it is going to come out.” An announcement next week could coincide with a meeting of NATO defence ministers in Bratislava, Slovakia, due next Thursday and Friday.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs dismissed the claims, after President Obama met with his war council for the fifth time to map out a new strategy in Afghanistan. “I would not put any weight behind the fact that a decision has been made, when the President has yet to make a decision,” he told reporters in Washington

“I’ve seen the report. It’s not true, either generally or specifically. The president has not made a decision.” But Ministry of Defence sources indicated that the British Government had been told to expect a substantial increase in the number of of American troops. Earlier Gordon Brown announced the British force in Afghanistan would increase to 9,500 but was told by former defence secretary John Hutton that he should have sent more troops to Afghanistan six months ago. Mr Hutton said it would have been “much more helpful” to the British mission if the Prime Minister had listened to military calls for a larger force earlier this year.

Mr Brown previously blocked a military request for almost 2,000 extra troops for Afghanistan. Gen Sir Richard Dannatt, the former Army chief who is now advising the Conservatives, said that decision left the force fighting with “part of one arm tied behind its back”. Mr Hutton was defence secretary at the time of the earlier troop request. He resigned from the Cabinet in June. He made it clear that he wanted the earlier deployment plan to go ahead and suggested that blocking it had undermined the British mission.

The Prime Minister “should follow the military advice”, Mr Hutton said. “I think it would have been much more helpful had we had the additional troops there six months ago.” Defence sources disputed this view, insisting that there were not enough trained troops to deploy at the time. But Mr Hutton’s words overshadowed Mr Brown’s announcement in the Commons that he would increase the force in Afghanistan, taking British numbers there to 9,500.

As The Daily Telegraph reported last week, a total of 1,000 more British soldiers will go to Helmand province. Five hundred will be new troops from Britain. The remainder is a British battle group currently deployed in Kandahar province under international command. The Prime Minister said the Kandahar battle group was being redeployed “to meet the changing demands of the campaign, which require greater concentration of our forces in central Helmand”. He said he supported the new deployments “in principle”, saying that before the troops could be sent, certain conditions must be met. Those terms were that soldiers were properly equipped, that the Afghan government promised more forces to Helmand and that Nato allies bore more of the burden in Afghanistan. David Cameron, the Conservative leader, mocked Mr Brown’s “condition”. He said: “Won’t many people think: isn’t it the Government’s responsibility to make sure they have that necessary equipment? And might they also ask: why is it that after eight years we are still playing catch-up on equipment?”. (The Daily Telegraph)

International Council of Security and Development (ISOC): Taliban control “virtually all” of Afghanistan

Obama rejects McChrystal’s surge: Withdrawal Inevitable in 2011!

Perpetual Mimitic War: Strategy for continued Failure in Afghanistan Obama’s Afghan ‘Strategy’ without an “Exit Plan” is a ‘Straightjacket’ named quagmire & defeat

Pakistan: Hillary Clinton still doesn’t have a clue

Pakistan: Why Ms. Clinton doesn’t get it Hillary Clinton admits to US support for Bin Laden & creation of Taliban

The rude US Ambassador Patterson in hot soup

“The best way to get out of Afghanistan fast is (for) people to think we’re staying.” Sen. John McCain of Arizona.

We are running the risk of replicating the fate of the Soviets” Mr. Brzezinski Brzezinski: Don’t start new wars. Use diplomacy in Pakistan“Can Karzai get away with a stolen election”- Carter

Admiral Mullen is still wrong The crusty specious, Admiral is mistaken about Afghanistan

Obama’s Afghan timeout vs. Mullen’s surge

Afghan Surge: McChrystal malarkey hides incompetence of NATO, ISAF & US forces McChrystal right on India: Delhi must scale back Afghan operations

“Taliban’s Winning Strategy in Afghanistan”: Overcoming “culture of poverty”

The US occupation has not brought security to Afghan women Afghanistan’s Bravest Woman Malalai Joya: “Taliban are logistically & militarily growing stronger as each day dawns.” “Afghan women and men are not ‘liberated’ at all”Bluster before exit: US capitulates to Afghan Taliban: Negotiating retreat schedule The silent “K” in Holbrooke’s portfolio

AfPak countercurrents beyond the Oxus to AfPakAzUzbKazTurkKyr-istan

Tick Tock Tick Tock-2011: Obama’s shrinking Afghan timeline Truth not Orwellian propaganda: Best article on Afghanistan anywhereUS bluff: Other arduous US Supply Chain routes to Afghanistan not feasible

Afghanistan fiasco: Cleaning up the Am-Brit failures in Kabul again

Solutions to “Obama’s Vietnam”–AfPak

David Kilcullen incessant paranoid hallucinating Pakistanphobic rhetoric destroys his credibility Obama must avoid creating a backlash in neighboring Pakistan by heavy-handed U.S. military intervention there: David Kilcullen

Can Obama pull US out of the Afghan quicksand? Choosing China & Pakistan over Bharat (aka India)

NATO not buying the Obama Doctrine or surge after Surge?

Afghanistan & Pakistan: Can the US Prevail? No!

Fixing Afpak: Inability to define exit strategy spells inevitable US military catastrophe in Kabul Obama’s sane policy lost? Negotating with the Taliban Betrayals, blackmail in Bakiyev cloaking failure as success hiding the defeat declaring victory withdrawing from Afghanistan within 12 months

Obama’s new policy was supposed to be a Marshal Plan & end to bombing raids in Pakistan

Convincing the US tin ear of the Pakistani point of view Obama’s Neocon: Bruce Riedel’s rancid racism against Pakistan Are bigoted Bruce Riedel’s diatribes still valid for Pakistan & Afghanistan? Mr. Bruce Riedel’s irrational rhetoric exacerbates US-Pakistani relations

Growing consensus in the Obama team: Much of Pakistan’s problems originate in Afghanistan

Obama advisor Weinbaum focus on talks & Reconciliation got lost in blood and gore. Afghanistan: Did Ahmed Rashid sell the American down the river?

Afghan Surge fiasco: Ahmed Rashid’s bad advice
Obama adviser insights into Afghan policy: Result same old same old

Why troops surges in Afghanistan are doomed to failure?Rand report: End GWOT. Defeat Al-Qaeda with police & Dollars Hindu Kush Curtain Call: The End Game in Afghanistan Harvard questions: Afghanistan Lost? Barnett Rubin & Maleeha Lodhi solutions to quagmire The Pakistani perspective: Peace deals only way to precipitate face saving for US & Obama’s smooth Exit strategy from Afghanistan

After NATO rejection Obama has few options left in Afghanistan Pakistan First by Shireen Mazari: The devastating affects of appeasing India and kowtowing to the USAPakistan to US: No pay-No play: Tough lessons in geography!

People talk glibly of ‘the total disarmament of the frontier tribes’ as being the obvious policy…but to obtain it would be as painful and as tedious an undertaking as to extract the stings of a swarm of hornets, with naked fingers.” Winston Churchill

PEANUTS: Puny US Aid to Pakistan is too little too late. Marshall Plan, & Trade concessions missing

Graveyard of Empires: AfPak-TurkTaj-UzbKaz-AzKyr -istan Obama’s “Vietnam”: Khyber & Hindu Kush

Afghanistan:– Pakistan’s Eminent Domain

India’s dark shadow on Afghanistan