The entire Indian establishment has been lying about the Pokhran duds for a decade

There is so much confusion about the Pokhran duds that defense analysts cannot make head or tail about the claims and counter-claims. This much is certain. The Bharati tests were a fizzle and this places their entire “nuclear’ program under a shadow of doubt. because the bombs are untested, the bombs on top of the missiles are also duds. The fact that the Agni, Nag, Trishul and Brahmos missiles are duds anyway is besides the point. Even if Bharat had good missiles, the firecrackers on top of them would simply fizzle without an explosion. The Times of India report and the articles by the lead Indian scientists like K Santhanam make it crystal clear that the Slumdog powers slumdog bombs don’t work. 

NEW DELHI: Undeterred by the manner in which government agencies came down on him for his remarks on Pokhran-II, former DRDO scientist and project director for India’s 1998 nuclear tests K Santhanam has accused former NSA Brajesh Mishra of trivialising the hydrogen bomb test result by declaring it successful on the basis of a voice vote which comprised officials like defence service chiefs who had no understanding of the technical aspects of the test.

Santhanam was the first official involved in Pokhran-II to have described the hydrogen bomb test as a failure and on Thursday he carried his argument further by stating that there were serious differences between the yields for the thermonuclear (TN) test as measured by BARC and as measured by DRDO.

Santhanam said that there was a meeting convened by Mishra after the tests to sort out these differences and that this is where he called for a voice vote to break the deadlock. Apart from several scientists like AEC chairman R Chidambaram, BARC director Anil Kakodkar and scientific advisor to defence ministry APJ Abdul Kalam, all defence chiefs were also present in the meeting. Santhanam suggested that the voice vote went in favour of Chidambaram and Kalam because those who had no knowledge about the TN test went along with the government line. In any case, said Santhanam, Mishra concluded by stating that he would go by what Chidambaram had to say.

When contacted by TOI, Mishra vehemently denied that there was any such voice vote. “There was a meeting held in the PMO but there was no such voice vote. Santhanam of course expressed some reservations in the meeting about the test result and there were differences between him and Kalam. However, Kalam was his boss and he laid all doubts to rest in an interview to a government news agency on September 22, 1998, that the test was successful with a 45 KT yield,” said Mishra.

“I don’t know why Santhanam is making such statements. The AEC scientists explained all aspects of the test in the meeting and the matter should have ended,” he added.

In his column in a daily, Santhanam also rubbished Chidambaram’s claim that he did not have any information about the weapon design saying that DRDO was involved in all seismic measurements and it was also aware of the BARC readings. He said that DRDO was assigned the responsibility of instrumentation and that its seismic sensors were of international standards.

Santhanam emphasised that if the TN test had really been successful with a yield of 50 KT, it would have left a crater at least 70 metres in diameter because the fission bomb test with only a 25 KT yield had left a 25-metre diameter crater. The hydrogen bomb test instead left just a minor depression and no crater. ‘NSA trivialized nuke test result’ TNN 18 September 2009, 04:10am IST. Times of India report.

  • Indian Army chief Malik unsure about Nukes doubts Kalam
  • Comedy of errors: IAF bombs Gandhi canal in Jaisalmir-India
  • The entire Indian establishment has been lying about the Pokhran duds for a decade
  • India’s Pokhran duds blow up 11 years later: Huge political fallout
  • India’s ‘98 Nuclear duds complicate 123 deal with USA and CTBT signing

    The Delhi Dud Report videoIndian duds in Pokhran: Dr. Santhanam exposes nuclear fizzle

     How Abdul Kalam stole US secrets for Delhi’s rockets

    Rust bucket Arihant: Delhi’s clunky, noisy Soviet era Charlie class tub assembled from Russian submarine kit

    India’s Bullock Cart Space program Made in USA & Russia

    More Duds: The fiasco of the IAFs Mig 29s

    The Delhi Dud Report on Indian Defense: Arms that don’t work

    Rust bucket Arihant: Delhi’s clunky, noisy Soviet era Charlie class tub assembled from Russian submarine kit

    Delhi Duds: The fiasco of the IAFs Mig 29s

    The Delhi Dud Report on Indian Defense: Arms that don’t work

    Indian Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA), continues to falter even after 25 yearsTejas 1983: A dismal failure which became obsolete in the design phase

     

    Helicopters for India?The Admiral Gorshkov ripoff

     

    How Abdul Kalam Stole US secrets for Delhi’s rockets Delhi’s Tejas World Record: 500th Flying coffin crashes

    Russian FGFA: Tricolor paint

    Junk jets for JapanMore Flying coffins?

     

    $10 billion for which plane?

    F-16s or F-35s

    Lockheed’s bait and switch

    Moscow sale to Delhi: Russian Mig 35s are simply Mig 29s with new decalsDelhi’s missiles

     

    Brahmos: Faster than the speeding bullet

    Abject failure in indigenous arms production forced Delhi to buy weapons without Transfer of Technology

    After Moscow’s grounding, when will Delhi ground the New Flying Coffins?

    Delhi’s deeply frozen Israeli Missiles: Windfall profits for Delhi politicians but no BaraksUnmitigated failure: Indian Tejas scrapped. New Snecma plane?

     

    Aircraft Carrier “Admiral Gorshkov”: Delhi wanted a Lada, & now demands a Mercedes

    Junk jets for Japan

    More Flying coffins?

    $10 billion for which plane?

    F-16s or F-35s

    Lockheed’s bait and switch

    Moscow sale to Delhi: Russian Mig 35s are simply Mig 29s with new decals

    Delhi’s missiles

    Brahmos: Faster than the speeding bullet

    Abject failure in indigenous arms production forced Delhi to buy weapons without Transfer of Technology

    After Moscow’s grounding, when will Delhi ground the New Flying Coffins?

    The CAG Report on Indian duds video

    Who is responsible for the duds in the Bharati Defense establishment. VIDEO

    Duds in the Bharati Defense establishment. Part II VIDEO

    Leave a Reply

    Categories

    Archives