- Indian Army chief Malik unsure about Nukes doubts Kalam
- Comedy of errors: IAF bombs Gandhi canal in Jaisalmir-India
- The entire Indian establishment has been lying about the Pokhran duds for a decade
- India’s Pokhran duds blow up 11 years later: Huge political fallout
- India’s ‘98 Nuclear duds complicate 123 deal with USA and CTBT signing
The scientist who is at the forefront of the row over the alleged failure of India’s 1998 thermonuclear test said on Monday that the country needs a “series of thermonuclear bomb tests” in order to be able to “protect the nation’s security” from China.
“We are totally naked vis-À-vis China which has an inventory of 200 nuclear bombs, the vast majority of which are giant H-bombs of power equal to 3 million tonnes of TNT,” a note circulated by K. Santhanam, former Chief Adviser (Technologies) of the Defence Research Development Organisation, at a press conference addressed by him said.
Mr. Santhanam reiterated his earlier claim that the thermonuclear device had been a failure, “totally incapable of weaponisation,” and urged the government to lift the unilateral voluntary moratorium on testing announced in May 1998.
The scientist, who represented the DRDO at the Pokhran-II tests, disputed National Security Adviser M.K. Narayanan’s recent contention that he (Santhanam) had no idea of what he was talking about and did not have access to all the data. The NSA, he said, “is barking up the wrong tree.”
Mr. Santhanam pointed to China’s stockpile of nuclear weapons and asked whether India would prefer using the 3,500-km Agni-III missile with a 25-kiloton fission warhead as the core of its credible minimum deterrence, instead of mounting a larger warhead.
As to what prompted him to raise the issue 11 years down the line, Mr. Santhanam said interpreting the test results took time but he had given a confidential report to the government towards the end of 1998.
He said the government could consider setting up a panel of independent and eminent retired scientists to evaluate the 1998 test data and prepare a confidential report.
Asked whether he had factored in the international consequences of India testing afresh, Mr. Santhanam said it was for the government to weigh the political, economic and strategic costs. The “pain of testing” was unlikely to be as severe as it was being made out. “In any case, it [testing] was better than our current situation of dar dar ke marna (dying out of fear),” he said. Hindu ‘Naked’ India needs ‘series of tests’ to deal with China: Santhanam New Delhi Bureau. Keywords: K Santhanam, NSA, M K Narayanan, thermonuclear tests, DRDO
The Delhi Dud Report videoIndian duds in Pokhran: Dr. Santhanam exposes nuclear fizzle
How Abdul Kalam stole US secrets for Delhi’s rockets
India’s Bullock Cart Space program Made in USA & Russia
More Duds: The fiasco of the IAFs Mig 29s
The Delhi Dud Report on Indian Defense: Arms that don’t work
Delhi Duds: The fiasco of the IAFs Mig 29s
The Delhi Dud Report on Indian Defense: Arms that don’t work
Indian Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA), continues to falter even after 25 yearsTejas 1983: A dismal failure which became obsolete in the design phase
Helicopters for India?The Admiral Gorshkov ripoff
How Abdul Kalam Stole US secrets for Delhi’s rockets Delhi’s Tejas 
World Record: 500th Flying coffin crashes
Junk jets for JapanMore Flying coffins?
Moscow sale to Delhi: Russian Mig 35s are simply Mig 29s with new decalsDelhi’s missiles
Brahmos: Faster than the speeding bullet
After Moscow’s grounding, when will Delhi ground the New Flying Coffins?
Delhi’s deeply frozen Israeli Missiles: Windfall profits for Delhi politicians but no BaraksUnmitigated failure: Indian Tejas scrapped. New Snecma plane?
Aircraft Carrier “Admiral Gorshkov”: Delhi wanted a Lada, & now demands a Mercedes
Moscow sale to Delhi: Russian Mig 35s are simply Mig 29s with new decals
Brahmos: Faster than the speeding bullet
After Moscow’s grounding, when will Delhi ground the New Flying Coffins?
The CAG Report on Indian duds video
Who is responsible for the duds in the Bharati Defense establishment. VIDEO
On the one hand, this whole “Naked India” issue is being blown way out of proportion–the bomb did not fizzle and it was no “dud” (fireworks fizzle; everyone agrees this one yielded an explosion bigger than the one the destroyed Hiroshima). We have not been de-fanged.
On the other hand it is cause for us to consider the real problems with a nuclear approach. I’ve written about this at length (and as much humour as I could muster, given the subject) here:
http://www.greenlightdhaba.org/2009/09/naked-india-will-well-tested-bomb-make.html
Do stop by for another perspective.
Hari