Why did Ghaddari refuse to buy Uranium from Kazakhstan?

Despite sanctions and tremendous pressure for the past 30 years, successive Pakistani governments have refused to sign the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Pakistan’s principled stand is that it will not sign the NPT unless India signs it. India like Israel also have refused to sign the treaty which favors existing nuclear powers and does not allow new members to join the nuclear club. Can Zardari’s survive attempted Nuclear surrender?Kazakhstan is a very important country of Central Asia and any links created with that brotherly country would have paid dividends in spades. Kazakhstan needs to be brought into the orbit of commerce and currency and enticed with trade and barters.

A government source referred to a Central Asian nation without naming it during an off-the-record conversation. She was most probably referring to Kazakhstan.

Kazakhstan has the world’s largest reservoirs of uranium and will soon become its biggest producer. Pakistan is the world’s seventh declared nuclear power and has an ambitious civilian nuclear energy program meant to help fuel Pakistan’s economic growth. The country’s biggest stock exchange at Karachi has been one of the best performing markets in Asia for the most part of this decade, fetching high profit margins for Pakistani and foreign investors. Pakistan cannot continue growth without more energy.

The deal apparently preceded the agreement India signed with Kazakhstan in January 2009 in which New Delhi reportedly agreed to buy up to 2,500 tons of uranium. International Analyst Network

Govt turned down uranium deal with Kazakhstan’ * Pakistan did not buy nuclear fuel because of budgetary constraints

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | ??????? ????? | ???? | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ??????? | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Military Strategy | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  ???????? ????? RUPEE NEWS  | May 13th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | ????? ????? | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

LAHORE: The government refused last year to sanction the purchase of uranium from Kazakhstan citing budgetary constraints, according to a report published on the International Analyst Network website on Tuesday.

According to the unconfirmed report, negotiators from Afghanistan and Pakistan had reached an agreement on the sale of nuclear fuel from the uranium-rich Kazakhstan to Pakistan “some time around late 2008”. Daily Times Monitor

Pakistan has been trying to purchase Uranium from various sources. It has been an uphill battle. Recently Kazakhstan agreed to sell Pakistan Uranium. This was a golden opportunity to create kinks in the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) regime which sanctions sale of atomic material to countries.

An unidentified government source cited in the article “referred to a Central Asian nation” but did not name it. “She was most probably referring to Kazakhstan,” according to the author of the report.

The reported agreement “apparently preceded” an agreement between India and Kazakhstan in January 2009 in which New Delhi agreed to buy up to 2,500 tonnes of uranium.

The Pakistan-Kazakhstan agreement did not violate any international laws because Pakistan has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, but the report says the only problem was “the usual opposition from US and Britain, and Australia”.

“This was Pakistan’s opportunity to break [a] fake embargo imposed by the US,” the report says. “But President Zardari refused to authorise the release of funds for the deal citing budgetary constraints.” The report says nuclear energy is essential to sustain Pakistan’s growing economy, and that the Pakistani government’s move could “possibly prove to be a blunder that Pakistan might regret in the future”. Daily Times Monitor

Mr. Asif Zardari, the old Mr. 10% and(whose new nick name is Ghaddari did not show any interest in the purchase of Uranium would would have been very useful in the Chasma project and in producing electricity for Pakistan.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | ??????? ????? | ???? | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ??????? | Notizie di Rupia | The Dawn | Military Strategy | Strategic Thinking and Policy Institute | Failed States | Pakistan Historian | Gandhi Unmasked | PAKISTAN LEDGER |  ???????? ????? RUPEE NEWS  | May 13th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | ????? ????? | Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Mr. Zardari and his acolyte Mr. Haqqani, the US representative in Washington masquerading as the Pakistani ambassador did not oppose the sale of Nuclear material to Bharat (aka India). The entire staff was changed at the UN and the Foreign Office and all plans in the pipeline to oppose the sale of Atomic material to Delhi were shelved. Now the PPPP government has decided not to purchase Uranium. The purchase would have defied the NPT and the NSGand established a precedent and created links with Kazakhstan’pulling into the energy corridor that extends from Gwader to Central Asia. Creative financing should have been established allowing the Kazakhs access to the warm waters of the Arabian Sea.  Kazakhstan needs a lot of goods and services which Pakistan offers. For example JF-17 Thunders could be bartered with the Kazakhs, or Al-Khalid tanks could be exchanged. Additionally, Kazakhs students could be allowed to study in the Marine Academy and the Military Academy.

There there was the strange interview with Mr. Wolf Blitzer. When asked if US officials would be provided information about the location of Pakistani Nuclear weapons, the flustered Mr. Zardari gave a strange answer. “This information has ben previously provided to the US officials.”As CNN broke for a commercial brake, and then came back, disconcerted Mr. Zardari looked agitated and then claimed that “this information was on a need to know basis”. When pressured by Mr. Wolfowitz about what he means, he said that the “US officials will be informed on a need to know basis.”

During the entire interview, President Zardari did not say “its none of your business”, or “this is Pakistan’s problem” or that “Pakistan is a sovereign state”.

  • US and Pakistani officials have begun behind-the-scenes talks aimed at achieving a greater US role in securing Pakistan’s nuclear materials
  • a proposal to ship some highly enriched uranium to the United States for disposal,Now there is a report by the Boston Globe reproduced by The Nation.
  • However, the new measures under consideration would for the first time give the United States access to some of Pakistan’s nuclear ingredients.
  • Two of the key proposals under discussion are a joint program to secure or destroy radioactive materials

The National Assembly should step and and over rule Mr. Zardari’s obsequious behaviour.

There are other indications that something fishy is going on in Islamabad, where a government brought to power through an American-style regime-change is cooperating in what appears to be at least a freeze on Pakistani nuclear capabilities if not an outright rollback.

For example, while President Zardari was in the U.S. last week, U.S. officials leaked to the Boston Globe that Mr. Zardari’s aides are secretly negotiating the transfer of enriched Pakistani uranium to the U.S. for disposal. Pakistani newspaper The Nation described the leak as Nuclear Surrender in an editorial on May 7. International Analyst Network

The question being asked by the analysts is “how long can Zardari survive”. The tsunami of protests will await him when he returns from Washington. His faustian deal will not survive. He will have to cancel the deal he has made with Washington. It will not be allowed to stand.

IF the Boston Globe report is any way close to the truth, Pakistani officials are in talks with the US about its demand to fly the stock of highly enriched uranium Islamabad possesses to the US, to be disposed of there. That demand is based on the Americans’ consuming fear that the dangerous stuff could fall into the hands of militants, who are, they believe, knocking at the door of Islamabad and would like to use it against the US on gaining control of the reins of government in Pakistan. The newspaper cites two unnamed Administration officials with direct knowledge of the discussions to secure Pakistani weapons. Another story on a survey underlines that 87 percent of Americans are “somewhat concerned” and 60 percent “very concerned” about the security of these weapons. President Obama’s National Security Advisor General James Jones has told BBC that though he has been assured by Pakistan Army about the safety of nuclear weapons, Washington needed further guarantees since “the world would like to know…that there’s absolute security and transparency.”

Much to the surprise of the Pakistani nation, which would under no circumstances countenance any compromise on the nuclear assets so vital to our survival in the hostile climate we live in, the Boston Globe reports that officials from Islamabad have shed their secretiveness about the programme and are willing to cooperate. They feel that they have a reason to do so in the face of the threatening inroads of the militants, the report adds. That, if true, is indeed a serious matter. There is no reason for us to open up on this highly sensitive issue before any foreign power and no one should ever be allowed to even discuss the possibility of our surrendering the most potent weapon of security. The US, which spared no stratagem it could think of to scuttle Pakistan’s nuclear programme while it was under way, finds it hard to stomach the reality that it tested the weapon successfully as a tit-for-tat to India. Islamabad rightly ignored Washington’s pressure to demonstrate that it possessed adequate deterrence, and it proved the deterrence value by warding off the possibility of an Indian attack when it had kept amassed troops on Pakistan’s international borders for 10 months in 2002. Strange for an exponent of non-proliferation to have gone out of the way to offer New Delhi the forbidden nuclear technology, calling it “civilian”, that would undoubtedly help strengthen its arsenal. The Nation. Nuclear surrender? Published: May 7, 2009

Crescent daggers
Pakistan’s “214 Subs” made in Karachi 5th Generation Su-35 spinoffs made in China as J-11s
Pakistan rapidly moving beyond basic JF-17 Thunders. The J-10s J-11s and newer versions of JF-17

Jointly Redesigned and upgraded Chinese J-10Bs built in Pakistan as FC-20s to be operationalized before 2015
The Pakistani hawks in the sky: Y-89 AWACS
Nothing succeeds like success: Hataf, Ghauri, Babar, Abdali missiles

JF-17 Thunders: Designed, built and operationalized in a record time of 4 years. Custom built for Pakistani needs The impact of Pakistan’s first indigenous JF-17 Thunder Squadron deployment

Serial production of JF-17 Thunder expedited:30-50 per year to 100 per annum
Beyond the Pakistani made JF-17 Thunder Fighter Plane, Chinese made J-10s.PAF next acquisition the J-11s?
Pakistan defense based on missile nuclear deterrent Hataf, Shaheen Babar and Abdali Hamza: Pakistan’s Augusta class Subs made in Karachi Pakistan’s 500 Al-Khalid tanks have been in production since 2001. Next generation tanks exported via IDEAS Pakistani made UAVs: Uqaab & Jasoos

3 New shipyards support Pakistani ship building & Frigates

Pakistan’s F-22 Frigates made in Karachi Chinese SAMs S-300s for Pakistan When with Iranian S-300s be operational? Why did Pakistan buy fewer F-16s?

PAF: Nuclear armed deterrent to hegemony

Pakistan already has a Nuclear Deal with China! India tried to raise expectations to portend failure!

IAF vs PAF: Defined by IAF

Tanks: Bharati Arjun vs. Pakistani Al Khalid

Russian 5th generation Su 35s spinoff of Su 27 Made in China as J-11

China achieves techonological independence in arms production

Russian Arms–Made in China

With $30 Billion China building Jxx 5th Generation Fighter

Pakistan’s 250 JF-17s, 50 F-16: Indias panicky “concern”

Indian missile failures

Why doesn’t Russia transfer plane technology to India?

When will Delhi ground the New Flying Coffins?

Indo Russian bickering disputes delay FGFA to stretch target in 2017

How Abdul Kalam stole US NASA secrets for India

Indian Airforce crying wolf? or facing shortage of jets?

Indian Airforce crying wolf? or facing shortage of jets?

South Asia Air Forces: PAF counters IAF strategy

The declining Indo-Russian relationship leaves Delhi scrambling for new arms sources—but they come with strings

Pakistan’s as Nuclear power: 250 bombs

Pakistan’s Plutonium based Tritium H-Bombs deter Indian agression

Pakistan Space Agency (SUPARCO) to launch 3 satellites in 3 years

Pakistan indigenous Satellite launch Vehicle & PakSat launch in 2011

8 Responses to “Why did Ghaddari refuse to buy Uranium from Kazakhstan?”

  1. pakazad says:

    salam!
    yaar moin u did not reply of my last post im very worried why isnt there any rally or protest against ghadari as it was for the chief justice iftikhar.wat has happened to pak ppl specially pak army i heared before that these nuclear arms are under direct army possesions now this ghaddari and that harami haqqani are trying to make pakistan weak i say hang both of them asap plz reply me

    • Moin Ansari says:

      Nabil:

      Mr. 10% Ghaddari is having fun in Europe while Pakistan bleeds. His antics are being noted. He has cut the funidng for Pakistan’s Nuclear program and wants to allow Indian trucks to rumble thorugh the freeways.

      Where is the lawyers movement? Why don’t Pakistanis protest

      • pakazad says:

        moin:
        first thing wat is army doing why are they keep watching this bullshit.man when will pakistani learn we dont need american support it is bcoz of supporting them we are deep mess plus our government did every thing to please those bastard and in return they are doing every thing to please india.
        secondly wat indian trucks to rumble through wat free way i havent come through this article can u send me the link bro.
        thanx

  2. Salam Moin.

    I love your site and the awesome articles full of info on it.
    I clicked on this article after reading the title with “Ghaddari” LOLZ
    Zardari+Gaddar=Gardari
    I have been using this term “Gardari” for like 2 years now (made it up myself, seriously). and very happy its catching on LOLZ its popular on geopakistani.com/forums and seem people use it youtube also …
    PLZ come and join us Pakistanis on geopakistani.com/forums and share your insight and articles there also.

    Pakistan Zindabad
    Allah-Hafiz

  3. RAZA says:

    Dear Ansari,

    You are doing a good job. Keep it up. I find a lot of truth in your investigative jounalism.

    keep up the good work.

    GOD BLESS YOU

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Categories

Archives