Hindu Anti-Semitism: Indian Commandos ignore & kill Jews? Deep rooted hatred of Jews in Gujarat & India

Posted on November 30, 2008 by Moin Ansari

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | RUPEE NEWS | November 30th, 2008 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ

For the past two decades Government of India has enjoyed good relations with the Government of Israel. This Indo-Israel government to cooperation has matured into a very profound relationship at the defense and industrial sectors. However there is little people to people contact. There is much suspicion of Jews in India. The Right Wing BJP, the RSS and others worships Hitler and admires the philosophy of the Nazis. There is rampant Antisemitism that exists not in the rank and file of the Indian Army but in the general population. Was this antisemitism responsible for the delay in looking at the Chabad House? Was the seething Antisemitism responsible for ignoring the please of the Jewsih hostages imprisoned in the Chabad House. Israelis and Mossad agents are a target in many volatile areas of the world. There have been many terrorist attacks in India. India has 89 insurgencies raging in most of its districts. It has a very violent Naxalite insurgency.

“The RSS and Mossad are responsible. They killed Hemant Karkare (Mumbai ATS Chief) to send a message that you cannot investigate the Mossad-RSS angle,” – Gautam Adhikari

Israel too eager to build a coalition with a country that hates Israel’s enemies may be in for the surprise of a lifetime that goes beyond confusion, negligence, incompetence and inefficiency in Mumbai.

Onlookers at the Nariman House were allowed to watch from a few feet away, hampering police operations. A night counterattack was nixed, reportedly because it was too dark: The attackers had night-vision goggles, the police didn’t.

Conventional theory suggests that commandos move quickly once there’s indication that hostages are in imminent danger in hopes of getting at least a few out alive. Yet days passed until, in the end, all hostages at the center were killed.

“You can wait, but you use that wait to engage the terrorists and plan,” said Yoram Schweitzer, an international terrorism expert at Tel Aviv’s Institute for National Security Studies. “Then you engage them quickly, with shock — prepare for a maximum one- to two-minute strike.“LA Times. November 30th, 2008

Mr. Narendar Modi the leader of the Hindu Rightist groups has been a great admirer of Hitler and curriculums in Gujarat prise Hitler and his policies. Mr. Modi’s has been denied a visa to the USA and is not allowed to enter America. Gandhi adored “friend” Hitler: Today BJP Modi use Nazi policies

Gandhi told Hitler that the start of his letter with “My friend” was not just ceremonial, he meant it. Gandhi says..”That I address you as a friend is no formality”

Governer Bobby Jindal funded by Anti-Semetic Terrorisists Modi & Hindu fundamentalist Modi in “India” funded by US Gujeratis Bobby Jindal supported by and supports Indian Hotel Association. The same Association supports Modi Christians in India raped & murdered by Hinduists supported by network in the US Indian Hotel Association hosts Modi after US deneid him visa

Many Israelis feel that it is reprehensible that the India’s Government would not provide any security to the Chabad Center in Mumbai. Was Anti-Jewishness responsible for the lack of security at the Niraman House.

  • Israeli counterterrorism experts are critical of how Indian security forces handled last week’s terror attacks in Mumbai, especially their raid on the local Chabad center, Nariman House. Haaretz
  • Above all, the attack is a “huge failure of the Indian defence establishment, surprised in the heart of their financial capital Jerusalem Post
  • “In hostage situations, the forces are supposed to first assemble at the scene and begin collecting intelligence. In this case, it appears that the forces showed up at the scene and immediately began exchanging fire with the terrorists instead of first taking control of the area,” noted a former official in the Shin Bet’s security unit in The Jerusalem Post.
  • Shin Bet is Israel’s general internal security agency, while more famous Mossad handles overseas intelligence. Haaretz, another major Israeli newspaper, noted how in the first several hours after the Mumbai incidents, the response of the Indian authorities was “slow, confused and inefficient”. As a result, the first forces sent to the scene were “inexperienced local police officers, who suffered many casualties”.

Mumbai Terror: Israel security experts in the Shin Bet and the press call Indian forces lackadaisical, unprofessional, incompetent, untrained, slow, confused and inefficient. Why were helicopters used to storm the building of the Narmian House? The noise of the chopper would have given the terrorists a clear indication of the arrival of the SWAT team. The way they fell on the rooftop thud, thud, giving the terrorists enough time to execute their evil plans.

Masked Indian commandos dropped from helicopters Friday onto the roof of a Jewish centre in Mumbai where Muslim militants were holed up, possibly with hostages, as sharpshooters kept up a steady stream of fire.Masked Indian commandos dropped from helicopters Friday onto the roof of a Jewish centre in Mumbai where Muslim militants were holed up, possibly with hostages, as sharpshooters kept up a steady stream of fire. (Siddhartha Babaji/Associated Press)

The chopper hovering over a two story building makes great news feed, however it adds no value to the any hostage rescue. The choppers are too noisy and give ample warning to the hostage taking criminals. Security analysts believe that a better approach would have been to try to engage the hostage takers and then storm the small building by stealthily and silently climbing on to the roof of the building. It took the commandos 12 hours to strom the building. Why did it take so long?

Though the hotels are huge, the Jewish center is located in a five-story building, known as Nariman House, which should have made for a far easier recovery operation. When commandos were dropped on the roof Saturday morning by helicopter, the craft made three sorties, removing any element of surprise.

“These are Jews,” Sahni said. “It’s very clear they were not going to be allowed to live by these people. This tiny building should’ve been taken in the first few minutes.”

Onlookers at the Nariman House were allowed to watch from a few feet away, hampering police operations. A night counterattack was nixed, reportedly because it was too dark: The attackers had night-vision goggles, the police didn’t. LA Times. November 30th, 2008. Systemic failure seen in India’s response to attacks, 6:40 PM PST, November 30 2008

The picture above is very revealing. To the untrained eye, the soldier is showing professionalism by hangin on to the rope. In actuality, the picutre displays total incompetence.

1) The chopper should not be used in a situaion where the soldiers can get to the top of the building by other means.

2) The man is literally hanging on to the rope. It is not a controlled descent.

3) Coming down the rope is a complex matter which requires intensive training. This commandos who dropped on the top fo the Chabad House were untrained. Please note the dangling feet of the commandos. They are supposed to be tightly wrapped aound the boot of the commando so that he controls his fall not only with his hands but also wit his feel.

4) After repeatedly watching the video of the commandos dropping on the roof of the Chabad House we saw the India commandos literally drop by force of gravity and were literally hangin on to the ropes without any control.

5) An experienced commando has stop his fall on the rope at any time. These commndos just dropped showing a total lack of training.

This PR exercise was very revealing not only about the state of the Indian nation, but also about the readiness of the Indian armed forces, particularly the commandos who are supposed to the elite.

There is a historical precedence to leadership of India showing insensitivity towards Jews in general and Israel in particular. For example Jews have always been unable to understand the insane advice given by Mohandas Gandhi to all Jews to commit suicide. Mohandas Gandhi’s letters to Hitler are a matter or record. Jews in general, who know about this side of Mohandas Gandhi are appalled at his attempt to befriend Hitler. In numerous letters Mohandas Gandhi called him friend. In one letter he overemphases the fact that his calling Hitler a “friend” is not just common courtesy, he really means it.

A plethora of information is now coming out of many sources shedding light on the life of Mr. Gandhi and his support for the British war machine, his disdain for the Africans in South Africa and his advice to invade Kashmir, and his suggestion to the Sikhs to not let their swords rust is contrary to the image of the pervert marketed in the West. ”We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents.” Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi of India to Adolph Hitler of Germany

Gandhi’s wrote letters to his friend Hitler and supported him. Gandhi’s horrific advice to Jews—Commit mass suicide. “We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents.” Gandhi to Hitler

JERUSALEM, Israel – Israeli counterterrorism experts are critical of how Indian security forces handled last week’s terror attacks in Mumbai, especially their raid on the local Chabad center, Nariman House…. the Indians failed to contain the attacks and raided Nariman House too lackadaisically.

Maj. Gen. (ret.) David Tzur, a former commander of the police’s counterterror unit Yamam, who now runs a security consulting firm, acknowledged that when terrorists attack more than seven sites simultaneously, “it’s very hard to handle.”…However, he said, this excuse did not apply to the much smaller Nariman House. The 12-hour battle to liberate the building was “unreasonable,” he said, because “there’s no chance in the world that captives will survive an incident that doesn’t end within minutes of the break-in.”

The Indians, he added, apparently assumed the hostages had already been killed.

Col. (res.) Lior Lotan, formerly a senior officer in the army’s elite Sayeret Matkal unit, said the Indians had operated as if there were no hostages.

“When you’re rescuing captives, you enter fast, with maximum force, and try to reach the hostages as quickly as possible, even at the price of casualties,” he said. “Here, they operated much more cautiously.”

Television pictures from Nariman House also raised questions about the professionalism of the Indian forces. For instance, it is not clear why the area was not cleared of bystanders, or why the comparatively risky option of a helicopter-borne assault was chosen.

Moreover, the explosion that blew in the ground-floor door occurred before soldiers landed on the rooftop, whereas for maximum effect, they should have occurred simultaneously, the Israelis said. Crown Heights and haaretz

Mohandas Gandhi’s Failed Leadership in Politics, and Gandhi’s Domestic Violence and weird Sexual Perversion in his private life| NEW YORK | RUPEE NEWS | March 8th, 2008 | Various authors: Rahul Gandhi, Arun Gandhi, Dr. Singh, Dr. Watson, Saijorni Naidu, D.r Bose, Time Magazine etc: The so called prophet of non-violence had some really nasty things to say about the Jews, and his support for the Booer and British wars was a slap in the face of “ahimsa” (non-violence).

Israel is apparently furious at the handling of the Chabad House. In carefully crafted messages the Israelis have lambasted the Indian establishment.

On Thursday afternoon, events at Mumbai Chabad House took a dramatic turn. Indian security forces, in a strategy reminiscent of Russian operations in the face of similar kidnappings, are not allotting time to negotiate with the terrorists. Against a challenge of these proportions, the Indians opted to immediately storm the target sites, even at the price of the lives of hostages.

Israel has traditionally handled hostage situations differently. Frequent use of negotiations has not led to surrender to terrorist demands, but to their weakening, and the acquisition of valuable intelligence for rescue units. In the Mumbai hotels, the scenario was very different. Elite Indian commando forces battled dozens of hostage-takers in urban territory with the bodies of the victims lying on hallway floors.

But at Chabad House, maybe because it was a smaller site, the Indians opted to delay storming the building.The delay in storming the building apparently allowed time for Israeli involvement in analyzing the tactical conditions and exploiting expertise in negotiating with hostage-takers. The Israeli army has a detailed plan for rescuing hostages abroad, but it is unlikely India would have allowed it. Why did the attackers also choose a Jewish target? A senior researcher at the Institute for Counter-Terrorism, Lior Lotan, says that Chabad House was a secondary target, a hit on the “Smaller Satan” while attacking the “Great Satan,” the “Crusaders,” Western tourists and relations between the West and Indian authorities…

The delay in storming the building apparently allowed time for Israeli involvement in analyzing the tactical conditions and exploiting expertise in negotiating with hostage-takers. The Israeli army has a detailed plan for rescuing hostages abroad, but it is unlikely India would have allowed it. Why did the attackers also choose a Jewish target? A senior researcher at the Institute for Counter-Terrorism, Lior Lotan, says that Chabad House was a secondary target, a hit on the “Smaller Satan” while attacking the “Great Satan,” the “Crusaders,” Western tourists and relations between the West and Indian authorities.

Dr. Yoram Schweitzer of Tel Aviv University’s Institute for National Security Studies says Al-Qaida’s interest in Israel has increased over the years. Since 2002, there have been a series of attacks on Jews and Israelis, from the attack in Mombasa, Kenya, to Katyusha rockets fired into Israel from Jordan and Lebanon. Also the broad security cooperation between Israel and India increased motivation for the attack. ANALYSIS / Israel cannot defend against attacks such as one at Mumbai Chabad house By Amos Harel

“Only a degree removed from the animal.” Also, “Kaffirs are as a rule uncivilized – the convicts even more so. They are troublesome, very dirty and live almost like animals.” – Mar. 7, 1908 (Reference: CWMG, Vol VIII, pp. 135-136) Mohandas Gandhi’s description of black inmates:

There have been conflicting reports about the Israeli involvement. Many military analysts are claiming that after the fiasco at the Chabad House, the Isrealis sent in commandos which helped the incompetent Indian commandos. Apparently the terrorists were running circles around the Indians. The Terrorists knew the hotels inside out, while the commandos did not even have the floor plans of the hotels.

MUMBAI: Israel is known for its uncompromising response to terror. Some of its security experts were quoted in media reports as saying that Indian counter-terrorism forces failed to gather sufficient intelligence before engaging the terrorists. The criticism may intensify, with the death of the five Jewish hostages inside Nariman House.

“In hostage situations, the forces are supposed to first assemble at the scene and begin collecting intelligence. In this case, it appears that the forces showed up at the scene and immediately began exchanging fire with the terrorists instead of first taking control of the area,” noted a former official in the Shin Bet’s security unit in The Jerusalem Post.

Shin Bet is Israel’s general internal security agency, while more famous Mossad handles overseas intelligence.Haaretz, another major Israeli newspaper, noted how in the first several hours after the Mumbai incidents, the response of the Indian authorities was “slow, confused and inefficient”. As a result, the first forces sent to the scene were “inexperienced local police officers, who suffered many casualties”.

According to the Jerusalem Post, Israeli defence minister Ehud Barak spoke to Indian National Security adviser MK Narayanan and offered help “in an advisory capacity and in any other way, humanitarian or professional”. The Haaretz reports says that the Indian government was not interested in high profile security assistance from Israel. “Throughout the day, the (Israel’s) Homefront Command prepared to send an aid delegation to India, but efforts were halted when it became clear that India was not enthusiastic about the prospect,” it said.

The paper goes on to note that the attack “indicates careful planning, effective implementation and control over a large number of subcells”. Above all, the attack is a “huge failure of the Indian defence establishment, surprised in the heart of their financial capital and apparently missing the terrorists’ arrival by boat from Pakistan,” it added.

Paying rich tributes to the brave police officers who died while attempting to stop the attack, the paper says that when the dust settles, the higher-ups in Indian intelligence will have a lot of explaining to do. Israelis fault approach of local forces, 30 Nov 2008, 2357 hrs IST, Girish Kuber, ET Bureau. Economic Times India Times

Publicly the Israelis are a bit shy about criticizing the Indians. Privately they are absolutely furious. The Indians, stung by the Israeli criticism and media bad mouthing reacted angrily to the Israel’s negativei commentary of the Indian operations.

Indian media have reacted angrily to criticism from Israeli defense officials of the Indian commando operation against the terrorists who took control of Chabad house in Mumbai.

Eight hostages inside the center were killed, including Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife Rivka. All of the victims were Jewish, Israeli or both. They accuse Israel of casting doubt on the effectiveness of their “brave” Indian commandos, and claim that Israel has a bad record in hostage-rescue operations, aside from the successful Operation Entebbe in 1976.

Eli Blotserkovski, the political envoy to the Israeli embassy in New Delhi, told Haaretz, “This emphasizes the need for all the international community, not just India and Israel, to act in a coordinated manner against terrorism.”

Another Israeli diplomat in India said Israel needs to be careful not to criticize India.

“Particularly in the present situation we have an important strategic relationship with them and we stand with them in a shared struggle against terrorism,” he said.Indian media react angrily to Israeli criticism of Chabad rescue operation By Anshel Pfeffer, Haaretz Correspondent

Anyone having an iota of knowledge including Gandhi, was practically an accomplice to Hitlers crimes. However, while not giving up on the chance of converting Hitler to more peaceful ways, Gandhi was not that mild in judging the crimes Hitler had already committed. In particular, he criticized the already well-publicized Nazi conviction that the strong have a right to subdue the weak:

“But your own writings and pronouncements and those of your friends and admirers leave no room for doubt that many of your acts are monstrous and unbecoming of human dignity, especially in the estimation of men like me who believe in human friendliness. Such are your humiliation of Czechoslovakia, the rape of Poland and the swallowing of Denmark. I am aware that your view of life regards such spoliations as virtuous acts. But we have been taught from childhood to regard them as acts degrading humanity.”

“But ours is a unique position. We resist British imperialism no less than Nazism.” To Gandhi, British imperialism is closely akin to Nazi imperialism: “If there is a difference, it is in degree. One-fifth of the human race has been brought under the British heel by means that will not bear scrutiny.”

In outlining his position vis-a-vis British imperialism, Gandhi at once explained his attitude vis-a-vis Nazism: “Our resistance to it does not mean harm to the British people. We seek to convert them, not to defeat them on the battle-field.”

India: Why are Hindus violently assaulting Christians? Rupee News for the past several years has been discussing the Indian support for terrorists in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal and Pakistan. India has been playing with fire. Goyem: India support for Frankensteins will create blowback. it appears that the analysis of Rupee News was correct.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate to: Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape Bookmark and Share Add to Technorati RSS feed: | RUPEE NEWS | November 30th, 2008 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ |

Filed under: Current Affairs | Tagged: , , ,

« US Presidential Oath: Will Obama use middle name “Husein”? Pakistani response to “India’s Cold start strategy”: Limited strikes against targets vs Hot War leading to Nuclear Armageddon »

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.