US predatory nuclear mafia chomping at the bits for Indian Dollars

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate to: Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape Bookmark and Share Add to Technorati RSS feed: | RUPEE NEWS | October 3rd, 2008 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ | Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal | Dr. Colachal has correctly listed the reasons for the Indo-US deal. If there was ever a sucker it is the politician in Delhi. Delhi bankrolled the Post-USSR arms industry. As soon as Russia got back on its feet it refused to transfer technology and is now dumping the stripped down versions of Migs and SUs. The US Nuclear industry needs to money to develop the next generation of plants. New Delhi is there to provide the funding again. The US arms industry is also dumping failed aircraft like F-35s and F-22s and Delhi politicians are too happy to sign on the dotted line–with huge kickbacks offered to all those who sign.

The Nuclear deal also handcuffs the Indians and their Nuclear plants with intrusive inspections and a band on testing. Kissenger said it best. “relationships with the US are  dangerous or could be fatal”. Indian politicians are naive and do not comprehend the full nuances of dealing with the USA. In time they will learn.

Truth does not require political or ideological correctness, not even selectively. Democracies like USA and India have zero tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices. Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are as dangerous as “terrorism”. A nation that has enslaved free people is no democracy. ( There is some problem with India yahoo, pl bear with me if a mail is repeated or part missing)

Indo-USA: Is Cash payment delaying the “deal”?

USA is reeling under deveestating economic cruch and USA seeks world econmies, and Indian money, for a bailout. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice came to India to commemorate – but it seems not put her signature to – a historic deal that opens up U.S. nuclear trade with India. A signing ceremony that had been scheduled was dropped ostensibly because, according to U.S. officials, a series of administrative steps have yet to be taken in Washington following Senate approval of authorizing legislation last week. Rice was meeting here with top government officials, including Prime Minister Manmohan and political opposition leaders. Even without a signing ceremony during her visit, Rice said, “I’m going to draw a line under this” deal to strengthen and broaden the relationship. She said the agreement “removes for India a barrier to full integration on a whole range of technologies”. By 2050, India claims nuclear power is expected to provide 25% of the country’s electricity. India has limited coal and uranium reserves. Its huge thorium reserves – about 25% of the world’s total – are expected to fuel its nuclear power program long-term. The real purpose of nuclear energy, however, is to make more weapons to scare its neighbors. USA is keen to use India against China. Enemy’s enemy is a friend and that is the basis of Indo-US deal now. Other wise, why should the global terrorist USA suspect Iran of its nuclear energy ambitions?

ONE

In Washington Rice said she expects the civil nuclear cooperation agreement will trigger an across-the-board expansion of American-Indian relations. Rice said only administrative – not substantive – matters were delaying the signing of the agreement. Critics in India argue the constraints compromise their country’s right to conduct nuclear bomb tests. The deal, which has been approved by the UN’s nuclear watchdog the International Atomic Energy Agency, gives India access to US civilian nuclear technology and fuel in return for inspections of its civilian, but not military, nuclear facilities. It ends a boycott imposed by nuclear supplier states because India has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

President Bush has yet to sign the authorizing legislation, and once he does he is required to certify that the agreement with India is consistent with U.S. obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, designed to limit the spread of nuclear weapons. He must also certify that it is U.S. policy to cooperate with international efforts to further restrict transfers of technology related to uranium enrichment and the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel.

The US Senate approved the deal Sept 30, ending a three-decade ban on nuclear trade with Delhi to “liberate” itself from “the constraints of technology denial of 34 years”. The U.S. agreement on civil nuclear cooperation allows American businesses to begin selling nuclear fuel, technology and reactors to India in exchange for safeguards and U.N. inspections at India’s civilian – but not military – nuclear plants. Indian ruling regime has had a rough ride over the agreement in India from critics who say it will bring the country’s foreign policy too much under US influence.

A BBC world affairs correspondent says the deal is the best of a bad situation for some, including the IAEA, as it will subject India to a more substantial inspection regime than at present. But many say it undermines the NPT because it effectively acknowledges that India has nuclear weapons while not being a signatory to the treaty. They argue it sets a bad example for countries like Iran and will spark off a nuclear arms race in Asia.

The Bush administration has made the deal one of its key foreign policy achievements and hopes the agreement will bolster ties with India which were cooled during the Cold War. America has restricted nuclear co-operation with India since 1974, after it tested a nuclear weapon.

TWO

The Bush administration considers the deal a crowning achievement of the president’s second term in office and hopes his party candidate McCain would be his successor in White House. It could, however, turn out to be the last major diplomatic achievement of a presidency that is struggling in its final months on a number of other fronts, including a setback in relations with Russia after its invasion of Georgia and the prospect of a breakdown in a nuclear agreement with North Korea.

Throughout the Cold War, relations between India and the USA were chilly. In the past decade, however, ties have grown closer in a range of areas, including trade, energy and security. The United States is now India’s largest trading partner. U.S. opponents of the nuclear agreement say lawmakers rushed consideration of a complicated deal that could spark a nuclear arms race in Asia. The extra fuel the measure allows India to purchase, those critics say, could boost India’s nuclear bomb stockpile by freeing up its domestic fuel for weapons.

India says the deal is vital to meet civilian energy demands, but critics say it undermines efforts to control the spread of nuclear weapons. Increasingly, India figures into U.S. strategic interests in other ways, including its long standoff with neighboring Pakistan. The Pakistani government is concerned about US strengthening a terror state in the region and USA-India due would encircle Pakistan in future. USA wants to use India as a bargaining chip with Pakistan on its terror agenda in Pakistan.

THREE

Indo-US relations are bases on mutual suspicions and hatred. India flirts around Wessington with its newly acquired cash for military-nuclear relationship that would undermine US-Pakistan reactions. Speaking on her way to Delhi, Ms Rice said it was not certain whether she would sign the deal on her visit. It appears the USA now under severe economic depression and financial crisis affecting the global finances very badly, has received bulk of the sum pledged by India during the Singh visit to USA recently for the passage of the “deal”, and the remaining cash is supposedly cleared during the Rice visit to Delhi. USA seems to be annoyed that after the clearance by the US Senate of the bill, India has taken the matter as a “usual” matter is reluctant to pay the balance amount.

It sees India has pledged huge cash apart from support for US actions around the world. India is not trusted by the USA and other world nations, because it does not pay the retirement benefits to Muslim employees as promised by the government laws and rules. And, hence, Rice has been instructed by the Bush administration not to sign the finale until further orders.

India built its nuclear bombs outside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which it refuses to sign. It has faced a nuclear trade ban since its first atomic test in 1974; its most recent nuclear test blast was in 1998. Rice said she spoke Oct 03 morning with the administration’s chief nuclear envoy to North Korea, Christopher Hill, who was in Pyongyang this week to try to persuade the North Koreans to resume dismantling their nuclear problem in exchange for energy aid.

A nuclear weapons terror state that terrorizes Muslims in the subcontinent and kills Muslims in Kashmir on a regular basis, India has 14 reactors in commercial operation and 9 (nine) under construction. Nuclear power supplies about 3% of India’s electricity. It has amazed piles of nuclear and conventional weapons to threaten its neighbors, particularly Pakistan and China. While china is a UNSC veto member and an economic giant competing with Japan, Pakistan, ill-focused by India, has it has serious economic problems. And USA has exploited Islamabad’s weakness and terrorized the Muslims there. Anti-Islamic media continue to support the US-led terrroism in Muslim world.

———————–

Thank you

Yours Sincerely,

DR.ABDUL RUFF Colachal

Researcher in International Affairs,

South Asia

sajdfsldjf

7 Responses

  1. I need information about history of Indian Nuclear program. They consider it be 1005 indigenous. could you provide some information about it? they are quite allergic to pakistani links and can’t accept Pakistani research or information. bloody slaves.

    I participate on orkut.com. in international relation community someone quoted (an indian link – very credible for them) – http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/China_tested_nukes_for_Pakistan_gave_design/articleshow/3447459.cms
    .
    with this comment – What a disgrace for Pakistan.
    All this time they have been shouting about the Nuclear technology THEY developed.

    But, finally the cat is out of the bag.

    Could you provide information about their program? i have come across two links which are.
    .
    The stage for the nuclear co-operation between the two states was set when the Chairman of the Israeli Atomic Energy Commission visited India in 1962. The very same year two Indian scientists were sent to Israel on Israeli scholarships, (49) where the nuclear program was known as the bomb in the basement .
    .
    In 1974, India detonated a nuclear device. The detonation of the nuclear device however witnessed in the later years a spurt of Israeli efforts to widen the sphere of collaboration with the Indians.
    .
    The much trumpeted scare of the Islamic Bomb paved the way for India to conduct its nuclear tests at Pokhran on May 11th and 13th 1998 with a bomb later dubbed in political debate as BJP’s Hindu Bomb. There was speculation in the media that the Indian nuclear test of May 1998 was actually done to test the Israeli nuclear technology, as there are no testing grounds available in the Israeli territory. As the Financial Times of London stated, there was ‘hard evidence of Israeli Indian nuclear co-operation’ following disclosures in Tel Aviv newspapers that APJ Abdul Kalam, India’s nuclear weapon hero, had visited Israel twice in 1996 and in 1997.(50) Reports of such collaboration in the nuclear field was however denied by the Indian Defence Minister Jaswant Singh.
    .
    http://www.issi.org.pk/journal/2000_files/no_4/article/1a.htm

    It is pertinent to note that no nation can get a favorable deal from the US or international institutions unless it is endorsed by the American Zionist leadership. The Zionist leadership also helped India to grow its nuclear teeth.
    .
    “The Lebanese Press has splashed a report to the effect that Israeli atomic expert Mr. Bergmann was invited to India for preliminary talks to effect close cooperation between India and Israel in atomic research….“the Atomic Reactor at Kalpakkarm near Madras has been installed with the help of Israel. This disclosure was made at Calcutta by Dr. Homi Sethna, Director Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Bombay. He further told that the plutonium required by this center be obtained from Israel.” — Muhammad Hamid, 1978, The Unholy Alliance, Indo-Israel Collaboration Against the Muslim World, P. 34.
    .
    And today, India is the largest defense client of Israel.
    .
    India bought one third of Israel’s weapons exports in 2007, and in 2008, and inked an agreement with Israel to train its commandos.
    .
    “The sources said India has been purchasing an increasing amount of Israeli defense and security equipment. In 2007, the sources said, Israel’s defense export to India reached nearly 1.7 billion, about a third of total Israeli weapons sales abroad.
    .
    http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/unholy-alliance-hindutva-and-zionism-must-read/

    Thanks

    • The Times of India article quotes a person of questionable credibility who is saying that China tested a nuclear design FOR Pakistan in 1990— way before Pakistan’s tested its own device in 1998.

      If it was a stolen design from China, then why would China or Pakistan need to test it?

      Pakistan has over 50,000 Nuclear Scientists working on the Nuclear program. It started in 1964 and was given impetus in 1973 by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. Zia Ul Haq continued it as did Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif. There is absolute consensus on this program in all the parties. Musharraf operationalized it on missiles.

      Pakistan’s Nuclear program is based on a centrifuge process which is not the Chinese design. Pakistan’s nuclear program is based primarily on highly enriched uranium (HEU), which is produced at the A. Q. Khan research laboratory at Kahuta, a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility. The Kahuta facility has been in operation since the early 1980s. By the early 1990s, Kahuta had an estimated 3,000 centrifuges in operation, and Pakistan continued its pursuit of expanded uranium enrichment capabilities. The Chinese design was originally Plutonium based. Pakistan’s program is Uranium based, but Pakistan also has a Plutonium based program which has now grown in size and proportion. In the 1990s Pakistan began to pursue plutonium production capabilities

      Pakistan’s Nuclear program was a hodgepodge of technologies. Pakistan was under sanctions so the dual use parts were bought from various countries in small consignments. Gokal and the BCCI played a large part in this smuggling operation. If the plant had been stolen from China, the AQ Khan Network would not be needed, a few containers from Beijing via land route would have solved the issue

      Kalam Azad worked for the Scout Program at NASA. Much has been posted on this site about the program stolen by India. He stole secrets from NASA and originally offered them to Pakistan. When Pakistan refused he took the program to India. Indian Nuclear program began with Canadian help and then it was massively assisted by the Russians. India exploded its first device in 1973 based on the Russian design. Indian collaboration with Israel started right after independence but it was kept secret

      The whistleblower isn’t a think-tank academic or an unnamed official speaking on background. Thomas Reed, described as a former U.S ”nuclear weaponeer” and a Secretary of the Air Force (1976-77) writes in the latest issue of Physics Today that China’s transfers to Pakistan included blueprints for the ultrasimple CHIC-4 design using highly enriched uranium, first tested by China in 1966. A Pakistani derivative of CHIC-4 apparently was tested in China on 26 May 1990, he adds.

      Reed makes an even more stunning disclosure, saying Deng not only authorized proliferation to Pakistan, but also, “in time, to other third world countries.” The countries are not named. He also says that during the 1990s, China conducted underground hydronuclear experiments—though not full-scale device tests—for France at Lop Nur. ”

      http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20090310_1117.php

      A section of the Indian lobby will never accept the reality of the program. Begged, borrowed or stolen, the program keeps Indians at bay and they cannot cross the border. Don’t waste your energy. You cannot convince them, because they don’t want to believe the truth. There is no point in arguing with them.

      Pakistan’s Nuclear Arsenal Deterred Indian Retaliation, Former General Says Tuesday, March 10, 2009

      Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal deterred India from attacking extremist strongholds in Pakistani territory following the November terror strikes in Mumbai, said a former Indian army chief of staff (see GSN, Dec. 16, 2008).

      (Mar. 10) – Students protest last year’s terrorist attacks in Mumbai (Sajjad Hussain/Getty Images).
      “Do nuclear weapons deter? Of course, they do. Pakistan’s nuclear weapons deterred India from attacking that country after the Mumbai strikes,” retired Gen. Shankar Roychowdhury said.
      Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are secure for the time being, India’s delegate to the international Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission said Saturday.

      “By all indications, Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are in safe hands and under tight control….,” said retired Lt. Gen. Vasantha Raghavan (The Press Trust of India, March 9).

      They hate the Pakistani program and disparage it because it is the major impediment to expanding their borders to Uzbekistan.

      The point is Pakistan has a nuclear program and there is nothing that Bharat can do about it!

  2. The article noted that russia dumped outdated Sukhois to India. Please go and check first what is Sukhoi !!. This is the 4th generation most advanced military airplane currently in production.

  3. Ever wonder why the US does not use Nuclear technology for its own needs?

    Dumping old stale planes and plants will make you guys very happy. Good Luck. Hope your Chernobyls happen on your East Coast!

  4. India has no problem being in the so called 123 agreement trap for now. India is no hurry to test nukes, it will do business with the US for the next 40 years, when its economy would be the fourth largest in the world. At that point of time India would test as many nukes as it wants, and any talk of economic sanction against India would be a big joke.

  5. Mr. Syed:

    Thank you for visiting Rupee News, and thanks for the link. You may also enjoy the Rupee News Analysis published on September 9th, 2008

    http://rupeenews.com/2008/09/09/india-trapped-in-nuclear-proliferation-treatyban-on-future-tests/

    Best Regards

    Moin

  6. for more on Indo Us deal see:http://babusyed.blogspot.com/2008/07/whats-wrong-with-indo-us-nuclear-deal.html

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.