This article was written in 2008–it is as valid today as it was in 2008. The points raised have once again come to haunt the Obama Administration. Instead of police action the Obama Administration has continued the policies of the Bush Administration. The resistance has grown. Let’s Speak the Truth About Afghanistan. The psychophanitc US media toes the line doled out to the Washington Press Gallery.
NEW YORK — During his triumphant European tour, Senator Barack Obama again urged NATO’s members to send more troops to Afghanistan and called the conflict there, “the central front in the war on terror.” Europe’s response ranged from polite evasion to downright frosty. If Obama had “listened” he could have learned something
It is unfortunate that Obama has adopted President George Bush’s misleading terminology, “war on terror,” to describe the conflict between the United States and anti-American groups in the Muslim world. Like many Americans, he and his foreign policy advisors are sorely misinformed about the reality of Afghanistan. Rand report: End GWOT. Defeat Al-Qaeda with police & Dollars
- Hindu Kush cul de sac: Why are we in Afghanistan?
- Obama’s Exit strategy: Negotiating with the “Taliban” (Pakhtuns)
- Fixing AfPak expedites the inevitable union between Pakistan and Afghanistan India’s worst nightmares come true: Long term strategic malaise
Americans were not interested in disrupting the Kabul-based fountainhead of terrorism in Balochistan nor do they want to allocate the marvellous predator resource to neutralise the kingpin of suicide bombings against the Pakistani military establishment now hiding near the Pak-Afghan border.
In the strongest evidence-based confrontation with the American security establishment since the two countries established their post-9/11 strategic alliance, Pakistani officials proved Brahamdagh Bugti’s presence in Afghan intelligence safe houses in Kabul, his photographed visits to New Delhi and his orders for terrorism in Balochistan.
We wanted to know when our American friends would get interested in tracking down the terrorists responsible for hundreds of suicide bombings in Pakistan and those playing havoc with our natural resources in Balochistan while sitting in Kabul and Delhi”
One understands Obama’s need to respond with martial élan to rival John McCain’s chest-thumping about “I know how to win wars.” Polls put McCain far ahead of Obama when it comes to being a war leader. But Obama’s recent proposal to send at least 7,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan, and his threats to attack Pakistan’s territory, and warnings about Islamabad’s nuclear forces, show poor judgment and lack of knowledge.
The United States is no longer “fighting terrorism” in Afghanistan, as Bush, Obama and McCain insist. The 2001 U.S. invasion was a legitimate operation against al-Qaeda, a group that properly fit the role of a “terrorist organization.” But, contrary to the White House’s wildly inflated claims that Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda was a worldwide conspiracy, it never numbered more than 300 hard core members. Bin Laden and his jihadis long ago scattered into all corners of Pakistan and elsewhere. Only a handful remain in Afghanistan.
Today, 80,000 U.S. and NATO troops are waging war against the Taliban. Having accompanied the mujahidin fighting the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan during the 1980′s, witnessed the birth of Taliban, and penned a book about the Afghan struggle, “War at the Top of the World,” I can attest that Taliban is not a terrorist organization as the U.S. and its allies wrongly claim. Think Tank: Rand refutes failed US policy against Al-Qaeda
Taliban was created in the early 1990′s during the chaos and civil war that engulfed Afghanistan after the Soviet invaders were driven out. Drawn from Pashtun tribes of southern Afghanistan, who make up half that nation’s population, Taliban was a religious movement that took up arms to battle the Afghan Communists, stop the wide-scale rape of Afghan women, and halt banditry and the drug trade. Both Pakistan and the U.S. secretly aided Taliban.
The ranks of Taliban were filled with young religious students — “talibs” — and veteran mujahidin fighters whom the U.S. had armed and hailed as “freedom fighters.” By 1996, Taliban took Kabul, driving out the Northern Alliance, the old rump of the Afghan Communist Party and its Russian-backed Tajik and Uzbek tribal supporters. Taliban, most of whom were mountaineers, imposed a draconian medievalist culture that followed traditional Pashtun tribal customs and Islamic law.
The U.S. quietly backed Taliban for possible use in Central Asia, against China in the event of war, and against Iran, a bitter foe of the Sunni Taliban. U.S. energy giants Chevron and Unocal negotiated gas and oil pipeline deals with Taliban. In 2001, Washington gave $40 million in aid to Taliban until four months before 9/11. The U.S. only turned against Taliban when, at Osama bin Laden’s advice, it gave a major pipeline deal to an Argentine consortium rather than an American one.
Everything that happens in Afghanistan is based on tribal politics. Taliban came from the heart of the Pashtun tribal grouping, the world’s largest tribe which also accounts for up to 20% of Pakistan’s population. Tribal and clan loyalties trump all political alliances.
The Taliban leadership had nothing to do with 9/11, a plot that, according to European prosecutors, was hatched in Germany and Spain, not Afghanistan. Nor did it have anything to do with subsequent attacks ascribed to al-Qaeda. After 9/11, Secretary of State Colin Powell vowed to published a White paper demonstrating Osama bin Laden’s culpability in the attacks. Curiously, the promised paper was never issued.
Osama bin Laden was a national hero of the anti-Soviet struggle, wounded six times in battle. Taliban’s collective leadership, in keeping with the Pashtun code of hospitality and honor, refused U.S. demands to hand over bin Laden until Washington issued a proper extradition request with evidence of bin Laden’s guilt and promised him a fair trial. Washington refused to go through legal channels and, instead, invaded Afghanistan.
Fast forward to 2008. Today, U.S. and NATO forces are not fighting “terrorists” in Afghanistan but a loose alliance of Pashtun warrior tribes whose resistance to foreign occupation is legendary. They are descendants of the same Pashtun mountain warriors who battled Alexander the Great, the Mongols, the British Empire and the Soviet Union. All these invaders were eventually defeated.
Former U.S.-backed mujahidin “freedom-fighters,” like the legendary Jallal Haqqani and Gulbadin Hekmatyar, have also joined Taliban in resisting foreign occupation.
The war now being waged in Afghanistan by the U.S. and NATO closely resembles 19th century colonial “pacifications” in which a puppet ruler is installed, a native mercenary army (“sepoys”) hired to fight, and western troops sent to crush rebellious tribesmen who refuse to follow the diktat of the imperial power.
Equally important, the real objective of the ongoing U.S. occupation of Afghanistan became recently evident. The U.S.-installed Karzai regime in Kabul finally singed a long-discussed pipeline deal that will bring energy south from the new gas and oil Klondike of the Caspian Basin through Afghanistan to Pakistan’s coast and India.
As the perceptive writer Kevin Phillips notes, U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan — and Iraq — have become “pipeline protection troops.”
Barack Obama and John McCain had better look carefully before plunging deeper into the Afghan morass. In Afghanistan, we are not fighting “terrorists” but a medieval tribal people who just want to be left alone. This is an ugly little war about oil and gas, not freedom, democracy, or woman’s rights. Every village we bomb, every wedding party our air powers massacres, brings new recruits to Taliban and its allies.
Even the secretary general of NATO, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, said last April that there could be no military solution to the war in Afghanistan, only a political one. That means negotiating with Taliban and political inclusion for the Pashtun people. But President Bush and candidates McCain and Obama are not listening.
International Council of Security and Development (ISOC): Taliban control “virtually all” of Afghanistan 
Obama rejects McChrystal’s surge: Withdrawal Inevitable in 2011!
Perpetual Mimitic War: Strategy for continued Failure in Afghanistan 
Obama’s Afghan ‘Strategy’ without an “Exit Plan” is a ‘Straightjacket’ named quagmire & defeat
Pakistan: Hillary Clinton still doesn’t have a clue
Pakistan: Why Ms. Clinton doesn’t get it 
Hillary Clinton admits to US support for Bin Laden & creation of Taliban
“The best way to get out of Afghanistan fast is (for) people to think we’re staying.” Sen. John McCain of Arizona.
We are running the risk of replicating the fate of the Soviets” Mr. Brzezinski 
Brzezinski: Don’t start new wars. Use diplomacy in Pakistan“Can Karzai get away with a stolen election”- Carter 
Admiral Mullen is still wrong 
The rude Admiral Michael Mullen is wrong on Afghanistan 
Obama’s Afghan timeout vs. Mullen’s surge
McChrystal malarkey on Afghanistan hides incompetence of NATO, ISAF & US forces 
McChrystal wants India to scale back Afghan operations
“Taliban’s Winning Strategy in Afghanistan”: Overcoming “culture of poverty” 
The US occupation has not brought security to Afghan women 
Afghanistan’s Bravest Woman Malalai Joya: “Taliban are logistically & militarily growing stronger as each day dawns.” “Afghan women and men are not ‘liberated’ at all”US capitulates to Afghan Taliban: Negotiating retreat schedule 
AfPak countercurrents beyond the Oxus to AfPakAzUzbKazTurkKyr-istan 
Tick Tock Tick Tock-2011: Obama’s shrinking Afghan timeline 
Truth not Orwellian propaganda: Best article on Afghanistan anywhereUS bluff: Other arduous US Supply Chain routes to Afghanistan not feasible 
Afghanistan fiasco: Cleaning up the Am-Brit failures in Kabul again
Solutions to “Obama’s Vietnam”–AfPak
David Kilcullen incessant paranoid hallucinating Pakistanphobic rhetoric destroys his credibility 
Obama must avoid creating a backlash in neighboring Pakistan by heavy-handed U.S. military intervention there: David Kilcullen
Can Obama pull US out of the Afghan quicksand? Choosing China & Pakistan over Bharat (aka India)
NATO not buying the Obama Doctrine or surge after Sruge?
Afghanistan/Pakistan: Can the US Prevail? No!
Fixing Afpak: Inability to define exit strategy spells inevitable US military catastrophe in Kabul 
Obama’s sane policy lost? Negotating with the Taliban 
Betrayals, blackmail in Bakiyev cloaking failure as success hiding the defeat declaring victory withdrawing from Afghanistan within 12 months
Obama’s new policy was supposed to be a Marshal Plan & end to bombing raids in Pakistan
Convincing the US tin ear of the Pakistani point of view 
Obama’s Neocon: Bruce Reidel’s rancid racism against Pakistan 
Are bigoted Bruce Reidel’s diatribes still valid for Pakistan & Afghanistan? 
Mr. Bruce Reidel’s irrational rhetoric exacerbates US-Pakistani relations
Growing consensus in the Obama team: Much of Pakistan’s problems originate in Afghanistan
Obama advisor Weinbaum focus on talks & Reconciliation got lost in blood and gore. 
Afghanistan: Gen. Petraeus’ Pakistani advisers: Indians jittery 
Obama adviser insights into Afghan policy: Result same old same old
Why troops surges in Afghanistan are doomed to failure?Rand report: End GWOT. Defeat Al-Qaeda with police & Dollars 
Hindu Kush Curtain Call: The End Game in Afghanistan 
Harvard questions: Afghanistan Lost? Barnett Rubin & Maleeha Lodhi solutions to quagmire 
The Pakistani perspective: Peace deals only way to precipitate face saving for US & Obama’s smooth Exit strategy from Afghanistan
After NATO rejection Obama has few options left in Afghanistan 
Pakistan First by Shireen Mazari: The devastating affects of appeasing India and kowtowing to the USAPakistan to US: No pay-No play: Tough lessons in geography!
People talk glibly of ‘the total disarmament of the frontier tribes’ as being the obvious policy…but to obtain it would be as painful and as tedious an undertaking as to extract the stings of a swarm of hornets, with naked fingers.” Winston Churchill
PEANUTS: Puny US Aid to Pakistan is too little too late. Marshall Plan, & Trade concessions missing 
Graveyard of Empires: AfPak-TurkTaj-UzbKaz-AzKyr -istan 
Obama’s “Vietnam”: Khyber & Hindu Kush
Afghanistan:– Pakistan’s Eminent Domain
