Who is hiding in the US Embassy in Islamabad? The hood of Gitmo
Pakistan’s foreign minister has rejected the proposed appointment of the former U.S. commander of the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba as the top defense liaison to Pakistan. VOA’s Barry Newhouse reports from Islamabad the criticism comes as a U.S. newspaper reports the Pentagon has dropped the planned assignment of Army Major General Jay Hood. VOA
Criticism of General Hood in the Pakistani news media was unrelenting after the Pentagon announced on March 13 that he would take over the post.
Guantanamo Bay, or “Gitmo” is America’s Gulag, where prisoners are kept without being of any crime. They are also not tried or pronounced guilty by any court of law. General Jay Hood was at the helm of affairs when the Quran was repeatedly disecrated, and strange, horrible and “Nazi like” sexual perversions were practiced on on prisoners on a consistant basis. There is a huge discusison in America whether threateneing people with guard dogs, or waterborading constitutes torutre. However the world calls it torture. The butcher of Gitmo’s assignment to Islamabad has been quietly cancelled and he will not be headed to Pakistan. There was intense pressure on Pakistani politicians not to accept him at the US embassy. General Hood would have been a lightning rod for all those who dislike America’s war in Iraq.
“Guantánamo Bay itself has become a symbol of injustice, torture and abuse of Islam, and sending a commanding officer from there to Islamabad begs the question: What is the message coming out of the Pentagon for Pakistanis by this insensitive act?” Shireen M. Mazari, director general of the Institute of Strategic Studies, a research group in Islamabad financed by Pakistan’s foreign office, wrote on March 20 in The News, one of the largest English-language newspapers in Pakistan.
Dr. Mazari added, “Equally important, given that host governments always have a choice of refusing a nominee — and many Western countries have exercised that right in the diplomatic nominees of the Pakistan government — why has the Pakistan government chosen to silently accept what the U.S. military dishes out, with no thought to the sensitivities of its own people?” NY Times
Pentagon Drops Post in Pakistan for Top General By ERIC SCHMITT
WASHINGTON – When the Pentagon announced in March that Maj. Gen. Jay W. Hood would become the senior American officer based in Pakistan, it reflected the military’s aim to put a crisis-tested veteran in a critical job at a pivotal time in the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan’s tribal areas.
But nearly two months later, the military has quietly canceled the assignment of General Hood, a 33-year Army veteran who was excoriated in the Pakistani news media for one of his previous jobs: commander of the United States prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
During General Hood’s command from 2004 to 2006, military authorities force-fed with tubes detainees who were engaging in hunger strikes at the Guantánamo prison, a step they justified as necessary to prevent the prisoners from committing suicide to protest their indefinite confinement. Also during General Hood’s tenure, reports that an American guard may have desecrated a Koran stirred wide protests in the Islamic world.
The decision to withdraw General Hood’s assignment has not been announced, but it appears to reflect the widening shadow that the military prison at Guantánamo is casting over American foreign policy. While the United States considers Pakistan a close ally in its counterterrorism efforts, the accounts by Pakistanis who have returned to Pakistan after being held at Guantánamo Bay have added to anti-American sentiment in the country.
Several leading Pakistani military and foreign affairs commentators denounced General Hood’s selection in recent weeks, calling on their new government to block his appointment. In interviews this week, American military officials said they had reluctantly concluded that General Hood’s effectiveness could be seriously hindered, and that his personal safety might even be at risk if he were to take up the post.
About 65 detainees at Guantánamo Bay have been repatriated to Pakistan, according to Cmdr. Pauline Storum, a military spokeswoman.
It is not clear whether Pakistan’s new government requested that the appointment be canceled. But on Thursday, a spokesman for the Pakistani Foreign Ministry, Mohammed Sadiq, told reporters that the government was “fully cognizant of the public sentiments and sensitivities regarding the reported transfer of General Hood to Islamabad,” and he added, “We hope to address this matter of public interest in the best possible manner.”
Asked about the withdrawal of the appointment, an American military spokesman sought Thursday to put the best face on an awkward situation. “General Hood is being considered for a different, equally important job in the Centcom headquarters,” said Capt. James Graybeal, chief spokesman for the United States Central Command, which oversees military affairs in Pakistan.
General Hood did not return e-mail messages or a telephone call to his office on Thursday.
General Hood, who served in the 1991 Persian Gulf war and in Kosovo, had been expected to become chief of a division of the United States Embassy in Islamabad known as the Office of the Defense Representative to Pakistan. The office has about two dozen people and oversees military relations with Pakistan, including training and equipment.
Until a few years ago, a colonel typically directed the office. But in a sign of Pakistan’s strategic importance in the Bush administration’s campaign against terrorism after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the job was upgraded to that of a two-star general. The current head of the office, Maj. Gen. James R. Helmly, had been scheduled to leave at the end of May. No replacement for General Hood has been named.
Two senior Defense Department officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the issue involves personnel decisions, expressed chagrin that General Hood’s selection had not been evaluated more carefully.
Under General Hood’s command, and after consultations with senior Pentagon officials, American guards at Guantánamo Bay used forceful methods in dealing during 2006 with detainees who engaged in hunger strikes. They strapped them into “restraint chairs,” sometimes for more than two hours at a time, to feed them through tubes and prevent them from deliberately vomiting afterward.
General Hood, who took command of the detention center at Guantánamo Bay in March 2004, shortly before the Abu Ghraib scandal in Iraq broke, sought to put a more human face on it. He was credited by lawyers for the prisoners and human rights groups with having improved the treatment of detainees, and it was soon after he took over that some of the most severe interrogation methods were curtailed.
But he also had to deal with the fallout of a report in Newsweek asserting that a military inquiry was expected to find that a Koran had been flushed down a toilet at the detention center. The magazine later retracted the article, but the military inquiry concluded that a soldier had inadvertently splashed urine on a Koran. The magazine’s original assertion led to riots in Pakistan and Afghanistan that left at least 17 people dead.
Criticism of General Hood in the Pakistani news media was unrelenting after the Pentagon announced on March 13 that he would take over the post.
“Guantánamo Bay itself has become a symbol of injustice, torture and abuse of Islam, and sending a commanding officer from there to Islamabad begs the question: What is the message coming out of the Pentagon for Pakistanis by this insensitive act?” Shireen M. Mazari, director general of the Institute of Strategic Studies, a research group in Islamabad financed by Pakistan’s foreign office, wrote on March 20 in The News, one of the largest English-language newspapers in Pakistan.
Dr. Mazari added, “Equally important, given that host governments always have a choice of refusing a nominee – and many Western countries have exercised that right in the diplomatic nominees of the Pakistan government – why has the Pakistan government chosen to silently accept what the U.S. military dishes out, with no thought to the sensitivities of its own people?”
Obama rejects McChrystal’s surge: Withdrawal Inevitable in 2011! 
Perpetual Mimitic War: Strategy for continued Failure in Afghanistan 
Obama’s Afghan ‘Strategy’ without an “Exit Plan” is a ‘Straightjacket’ named quagmire & defeat
Can the drama of a Joe Biden’s “resignation” end the Afghan war fiasco? 
Pakistan: Hillary Clinton still doesn’t have a clue
Pakistan: Why Ms. Clinton doesn’t get it 
Hillary Clinton admits to US support for Bin Laden & creation of Taliban
The rude US Ambassador Patterson in hot soup 
“The best way to get out of Afghanistan fast is (for) people to think we’re staying.” Sen. John McCain of Arizona. 
“There is no military success ultimately to Afghanistan. Senator John Kerry 
Kerry Lugar Bill backlash: Pakistan rethinks Afghan policy & US alliance-Hit RAW hard in Afghanistan
We are running the risk of replicating the fate of the Soviets” Mr. Brzezinski 
Brzezinski: Don’t start new wars. Use diplomacy in Pakistan
“Can Karzai get away with a stolen election”- Carter 
Admiral Mullen is still wrong 
The crusty specious, Admiral is mistaken about Afghanistan
Obama’s Afghan timeout vs. Mullen’s surge 
Afghan Surge: McChrystal malarkey hides incompetence of NATO, ISAF & US forces 
McChrystal right on India: Delhi must scale back Afghan operations
“Taliban’s Winning Strategy in Afghanistan”: Overcoming “culture of poverty” 
The US occupation has not brought security to Afghan women 
Afghanistan’s Bravest Woman Malalai Joya: “Taliban are logistically & militarily growing stronger as each day dawns.” “Afghan women and men are not ‘liberated’ at all”
Bluster before exit: US capitulates to Afghan Taliban: Negotiating retreat schedule 
The silent “K” in Holbrooke’s portfolio 
AfPak countercurrents beyond the Oxus to AfPakAzUzbKazTurkKyr-istan 
Tick Tock Tick Tock-2011: Obama’s shrinking Afghan timeline 
Truth not Orwellian propaganda: Best article on Afghanistan anywhere
US bluff: Other arduous US Supply Chain routes to Afghanistan not feasible 
Afghanistan fiasco: Cleaning up the Am-Brit failures in Kabul again 
Solutions to “Obama’s Vietnam”–AfPak
David Kilcullen incessant paranoid hallucinating Pakistanphobic rhetoric destroys his credibility 
Obama must avoid creating a backlash in neighboring Pakistan by heavy-handed U.S. military intervention there: David Kilcullen
Can Obama pull US out of the Afghan quicksand? Choosing China & Pakistan over Bharat (aka India)
NATO not buying the Obama Doctrine or surge after Surge?
Afghanistan & Pakistan: Can the US Prevail? No!
Fixing Afpak: Inability to define exit strategy spells inevitable US military catastrophe in Kabul 
Obama’s sane policy lost? Negotating with the Taliban
Betrayals, blackmail in Bakiyev cloaking failure as success hiding the defeat declaring victory withdrawing from Afghanistan within 12 months
Obama’s new policy was supposed to be a Marshal Plan & end to bombing raids in Pakistan
Convincing the US tin ear of the Pakistani point of view 
Rahm Emanuel blames the “Ho Chi Minh Trail” for Afghan defeat 
Obama’s Neocon: Bruce Riedel’s rancid racism against Pakistan 
Are bigoted Bruce Riedel’s diatribes still valid for Pakistan & Afghanistan? 
Mr. Bruce Riedel’s irrational rhetoric exacerbates US-Pakistani relations
Growing consensus in the Obama team: Much of Pakistan’s problems originate in Afghanistan
Obama advisor Weinbaum focus on talks & Reconciliation got lost in blood and gore.
Ahmed Rashid’s bad advice about Pakistan 
Afghanistan: Did Ahmed Rashid sell the American down the river?
Afghan Surge fiasco: Ahmed Rashid’s bad advice 
Obama adviser insights into Afghan policy: Result same old same old
Why troops surges in Afghanistan are doomed to failure?
Rand report: End GWOT. Defeat Al-Qaeda with police & Dollars 
Hindu Kush Curtain Call: The End Game in Afghanistan 
Harvard questions: Afghanistan Lost? Barnett Rubin & Maleeha Lodhi solutions to quagmire 
The Pakistani perspective: Peace deals only way to precipitate face saving for US & Obama’s smooth Exit strategy from Afghanistan
After NATO rejection Obama has few options left in Afghanistan 
Pakistan First by Shireen Mazari: The devastating affects of appeasing India and kowtowing to the USA
Pakistan to US: No pay-No play: Tough lessons in geography!
People talk glibly of ‘the total disarmament of the frontier tribes’ as being the obvious policy…but to obtain it would be as painful and as tedious an undertaking as to extract the stings of a swarm of hornets, with naked fingers.” Winston Churchill 
PEANUTS: Puny US Aid to Pakistan is too little too late. Marshall Plan, & Trade concessions missing 
Graveyard of Empires: AfPak-TurkTaj-UzbKaz-AzKyr -istan 
Obama’s “Vietnam”: Khyber & Hindu Kush
Afghanistan:– Pakistan’s Eminent Domain 
