Did Haqqani convince US “to watch” Nawaz Sharif?

Why is Mr. Haqqani participating in the discussion on the judges? Whose interests is he representing? Isn’s Mr. Haqqani the Pakistani Ambassador to the US? Shouldn’t be be preparing for his new assignment? Doesn’t he have enough to do? Perhaps he brings the all important Neocon point of view on the judges!
Is Mr. Haqqani a Neocon mole in Islamabad? A Western Oriental Gentleman (WOG) came to the USA in 2002. He noticed that there was a huge opportunity in making a deal with Faust and selling Islamphobia to the naive and scared American public. In the grand tradition of \Is Mr. Haqqani as Pakistan’s Ambassador to the USA a security risk? Is Mr. Husain Haqqani a US citizen? His interests are making money and supporting the Neocon cause disqualifies him from representing Pakistan. As Pakistan’s ambassador to the USA, his deep links with the think tanks will jeopardize national security. There was a huge outcry on importing the last Prime Minister from the USA, and Mr. Zardari as well as Mr. Sharif said, that this would never happen in their administration. They are kind of correct, because they are not importing Mr. Haqqani, they are simply giving him a new title. His loyalties will remain with those who have written him huge paychecks.Pakistan’s Neocon Ambassador to the USA has been part of the Ultra Right Wing establishment of the US Think Tank industry. From The Carnegie Institure, The Hudson Institute, AIPAC (American Israeli Polical Action Committee) to JINSA (Jewish Institute of National Security Afairs), Mr Haqqani even worked with Steven Shwartz the known Islamphobe.

Husain Haqqani The portrayal of DMS (Dead Muslim Scholars) as progenitors of all evil in the world is a growth industry in America. Mr. Haqqanis writings linking DMSs to 911 and future events is exactly what is depicted in Mr. Geert Wilder’s balderdash “Fitna”. If Fitna is blasphemy, Mr. Haqani’s sacrilegious writings also create psychopathic paranoia in the intellectual circles of America. What is worse, Mr. Haqqani’s writings are then quoted as “fact” to create discriminatory laws, illegal surveillance and creates the case to end Habeas Corpus via the “Patriot Act” Laws.Mr. Haqqani was present in the negotiations between Mr. Sharif and Mr. Zardari in London. Congressman Shiela Jackson’s comments on “watching” Mr. Nawaz Sharif is directly part of the campaign of the PPP to discredit the PMLN and its ethnic politics. Mr. Nawaz Sharif and is party has been painted as a “hothead” with links to the Anti-American forces in the region. The PMLN has been billed a “fundamentlaist party”. There is nothing new in these portrayals. Mr. Haqqani has been painting a bleak picture of Pakistan for the past decade. What is new is the fact that now Mr. Haqqani speaks for the government of Pakistan.

Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz SharifPakistan: Nawaz needs to be watched, US house panel told 08-05-2008 yBy Anwar IqbalWASHINGTON, (Dawn): A US congressional panel was told on Wednesday that while the PPP was doing a good job in Pakistan, former prime minister Nawaz Sharif needed to be watched.

Nawaz Sharif leader of the PMLN“We should applaud PPP,” Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee told the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “They are trying to work with Sharif but they are more of a problem than PPP.”

Ms Lee chairs the Pakistan Caucus on Capitol Hill and is seen in the US Congress as an authentic voice on Pakistan with close links to the establishment in Islamabad.

Reviewing the current political situation in Pakistan, Ms Lee told the panel that the “PPP wants to govern” and “we should give them the chance to do so.”

Congresswoman Lee said that she had spoken to President Pervez Musharraf who also wanted to work with the new government but “Sharif has to be watched”.

Ms Lee claimed that the PPP recognised “toppling Musharraf is not valuable” because “Musharraf has extensive experience” of dealing with terrorism.

“I see no reason in moving forward in actions against Musharraf,” she added.

The congresswoman also supported the constitutional package the PPP is working on and its efforts to engage tribal militants for seeking a negotiated settlement to insurgency in the region.

The PPP, she said, “did the right thing” in moving to restore the judges and the agreement they make with tribal militants would be different from previous deals because “the PPP is doing the negotiations from a position of power”.

The House panel held a full committee hearing on Pakistan, with a special focus on insurgency in the tribal area.

Two main witnesses – Assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke and US Ambassador to UN Thomas Pickering – told the committee that the United States needed to substantially increase its aid package for the tribal region.

“We need a massive economic programme,” said Ambassador Pickering. “Not the pathetic $750 million we have promised over the next five years half of which will never leave the US.”

The witnesses described the emergence of an elected government in Pakistan as “a defining point” and urged the United States to develop a comprehensive plan to defeat violent extremism in the country with the help of democratic forces.

Mr Holbrooke, who is often tipped as the next secretary of state, said America should speak “in a clear voice “that the best thing for Pakistan is democracy.”

The US, he said, was spending billions of dollars in Afghanistan but has allocated “just a faction” of that for Fata.

Ambassador Pickering said that in the tribal area the United States might have to spend money on “things that may not pass the mustard.”

Explaining his point, he said: “It is better to spend $100,000 on renting a tribal than spending $100 million on killing him and his tribesmen.”

Responding to a question by the committee’s chairman, Congressman Howard L. Berman, Ambassador Pickering said the US should make it clear to Pakistan what sort of deal would be acceptable in Fata.

“We should not end up in a situation where we are handed over a deal and told take it or leave it,” he said.

Both witnesses urged the committee to form an oversight panel for monitoring the situation in the tribal region.

Mr Holbrooke praised the proposal to establish reconstruction opportunity zones in the region, and said that it should get “high attention” of the committee.

He told the panel that it was wrong to stereotype Pakistan as “the most dangerous nation in the world because it is not.”

Ambassador Pickering said “Pakistan needs to be encouraged to regain physical control in the Fata” but another witness, General James Jones, a former Nato chief, said while it was a good proposal “it is not so simple and easy” to achieve this goal.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.