Did Pakistani PM Gillani grope Sherry Rehman?

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate to: Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape Bookmark and Share Add to Technorati RSS feed: | RUPEE NEWS | March 23rd, 2008 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | اخبار روپیہ | The charismatic, competent, dynamic, beautiful, smart and intelligent, Sherry Rehman is one of the rising stars of the Pakistan Peoples Party but also of Pakistan. She is a rising star and the star in the Crescent and Star. We endorsed her for the post of Prime Minister this time. She is now the Information Minister. That job could not have gone to a better person.

APOLOGIZE OR DENY: Was this move an inadvertent mistake or was it something that just happened. The expression on Ms. rehman’s face at the tail end of th clip really shows her disgust. She has not resigned and continues to work with the Prime Minsiter, so she has taken this in stride. Obviously she will not be caught dead in close quarters with the Multani.

Many say that the great Makhdoom did not know what was going on. If that is the case than it shows bad judgement on the part of the Chief Executive who should have taken good care to protect Ms. Rehman. Of course if he knew what has happened then he should apologize. Our fourm is open. We have not heard from the great Makhdoom. The silence is deafneing!

What is most disconcerting is the other elbow (Mr. Gilani’s right hand) which is also up to no good.

DANGEROUS CURVES: MAKHDOOM GILANI HAS SEEN THIS: It has been learnt through reliable sources that Prime Minister Gilani has visited this site and/or seen this footage.

  • Sex: One in 3 US wives get some on the side
  • Bilawal Bhutto being naughty? Do pictures say it all?
  • SEX LIFE OF INDIRA GANDHI OF INDIA: The Indian Matahiri:- Indira’s tryst with seduction
  • Sex Antics of Mohandas Gandhi: His Failures, Pedophilia, Adultery, Incest, Sexual Perversion & Fetishes
  • Is Geo TV a CNN affiliate or is it the psy-ops wing of the CIA?
  • Khumb Mela India: 60 million filthy naked drunk Indian sadus
  • Kashmala Tariq turns up heat! Bites more than she can chew?
  • India as a Space power!
  • Prostitution in Pakistan a Chinese Russian Franchise
  • Sex in space: How would it be? Did Cosmonauts Elena Kondakova & Valery Polyakov carry on carnal cosmic coupling? Did astronauts Jan Davis & Mark Lee cyber consummate their marriage in the 62-mile-high club?
  • FREEDOM OF ARM, AND SLIGHT OF HAND? Mr. Gilani has said that he was not aware and never realized that he “accidentally” he touched Ms. Rehman, till he saw this footage.

    The PM was questioned by CNN a reporter on 27th April about this incident. Talking about this footage, he suddenly started laughing.

    Rupee News when reporting this, did not make any judgement on this issue. Everything is within the realm of possibility. However watch both his hands…the one on the right is also up to no good. Also watch Zardari’s right shoulder.

    Of course the event does not rise to the level of high crime of Misdemenor like the Sex antics of Mr. Mohandas Karmchan Gandhi or Jawaharlal Nehru or Indira Gandhi, but surely where there is smoke there is fire. Mr. Gilani may be totally innocent or he may not be. Please give us your feedback after reading the antics of the Gandhis (See at bottom of this post).

  • Sex life of Mohandas Gandhi, his failures and sexual perversion
  • Sex life of Indira Gandhi
  • Nehru was Gay! Affair with Edwina also
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttxc9wLX75o

    Nominate Sherry Rehman for new Prime Minister of PakistanCan S.Yousuf Raza Gillani as PM keep the PPPP together?Razia phuns gayee ghundoun main?

    Can S.Yousuf Raza Gillani as PM keep the PPPP together?She was appointed by the Pakistan Peoples Party as a Member of the National Assembly after the 2002 election to the seat NA-309, Women Sindh-II. She was one of the fourteen women in Reserved Seats from Sindh Province, six of whom were appointed by the PPPP Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians as their share in proportion to their elected MNAs.

    Did Syed Makhdoom Gillani grope Sherry Rehman? or is he just a liberal Prime Minister?

    Please see the left hand of the Prime Minister which is not where it should be.

    Did Syed Makhdoom Gillani grope Sherry Rehman? or is he just a liberal Prime Minister? Did Mr. Zardari also shove her in sensitive area.?

    The expression on Sherry Rehman’s face shows surprise, frustration and pure disgust.

    Did Syed Makhdoom Gillani grope Sherry Rehman? or is he just a liberal Prime Minister?

    Sherry Rehman between the devil and the deep sea. She is Groped and “Ghassa” (shoved) on the other side.

    Did Syed Makhdoom Gillani grope Sherry Rehman? or is he just a liberal Prime Minister?

     

    Ms. Rehman is wishing she wasn’t here. Notice the frustration on the facial features.

    The charismatic, competent, dynamic, beautiful, smart and intelligent, Sherry Rehman is one of the rising stars of the Pakistan Peoples Party but also of Pakistan. We endorsed her for the post of Prime Minister this time. She is now the Information Minister. That job could not have gone to a better person.

    Further scrutiny of the still pictures show that the right hand of Mr. Gillani is also very busy.

    Did Syed Makhdoom Gillani grope Sherry Rehman? or is he just a liberal Prime Minister?

    In this picture the right hand of Mr. Gillani it is being pushed back after the right “grope”. Note the unnatural angle of the hand when the lady is pushing back his right hand.

    Further scrutiny of the still pictures show that the right hand of Mr. Gillani is also very busy. In this picture it is being pushed back after the “grope”. Note the unnatural angle of the hand when the lady is pushing back his right hand.

    A New Pakistani Film…Starring Ifti, Mush….

    If what is shown in these pictures is true, we condemn it in the strongest terms, and the PM of Pakistans owes our horo a profound and profuse apology. Ms. Sherry Rehman should not have to endure this sorty of male chauvanistic prigishness.

    Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

    41 Responses

    1. [...] raza gillani, on April 29th, 2008 at 4:24 am [...]

    2. intentional act it is.. no doubts abt it…
      mr pm may be doin it vry often while in cover bt tht day he jus forgot abt the place he was at..

      sherry com’n chicks act intelligent.. dont be spot whn cams are at ya.. got it?! need more guidance hit me at 03452661970 :))

    3. Extremely interesting !
      I was just browsing for updates and came to this poll
      regarding Sherry.
      The comment by wild pigeon.lol
      Princess kido’s comment is so accurate as per circulation of jiyalaas in Pakistan.
      Being a woman myself ,I feel harrassed though working in a hostile envoirnment which Mr.Mukhdoom carries but what else can we expect from feudals .
      I still condemn the action and in this particular case I condemn both,Sherry and Mukhdoom because what hapens in their bedrooms or personal life we do not need to know that .
      When they are out on street when they are representing people they should know how to carry themselves.
      Ms.Sherry Rehman I would like to ask which Pakistani woman and culture she represents?
      Even in Europe and USA such action would have been taken to court but Sherry remained silent.
      What does it spell out regarding Sherry ,no brains and no beauty and no grace.

    4. How is the weather in Peshawar these days? If you give us your real name and correct email address, we will give you the email address of the editor.

      Moin

    5. :) well with due appology but stil as it is ture so i am sharing it with you guys.

      For Ms Sherry this is a small thing not something which she minds as recently according to some sources, a video has been shot by concerned quarters wherein Madam Sherry has been shot while sleeping with a big gun.

      My appology but thats the inside news making rounds these days.
      (note: can i have the contact or email of Mr Moeen Ansari as i am big fan of his and looking for him contact for too long)

      Thank you

    6. Sir actually I Irtiza has posted this but this is the article of Dr Shabbir….which he emailed me…..So i wanted a reply to it thats why I pasted it….

      thanks again…I ll surely copy paste all this to him….

    7. Dr. Shabir Chaudhry:

      Thank you for your feedback. All your comments resemble the typical Indian line on the history of independence. There is nothing new about this line of biased pro-India, anti-Pakistan, anti-Iqbal and Anti-Jinnah theory. We have been having these discussion for the past 30 years on soc.culture.pakistan. Nothing new or earth-shattering in any of your arcane comments.

      ADMIN NOTE: This discussion should happen on the pertinent article–either under the Pakistan page or under “Why we created Pakistan”. http://rupeenews.com/2007/11/27/why-we-created-pakistan-the-pakistan-ideology/
      We will transfer this discussion there also
      We can also carry on this discussion in http://www.pakhistorian.wordpress.com. THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT PAGE TO HAVE THIS DISCUSSION.

      First of all “Northwest” always included Kashmir, Agra, Lucknow and Delhi etc.

      Your mention an excerpt of the Dr. Iqbal’s Allahbad address without ref to context. that speech of course is dated 1930. the Lahore resolution was passed in 1940. the evolution of the Lahore resolution and the acceptance of the Cabinet Mission plan are milestones in the history of the evolution of Pakistan. One cannot go back and pick up old documents to justify Indian occupation of Kashmir. See Nehru’s commitment which clearly accept the disputed status of Kashmir. Brining up 1930 document is like brining up the Cripps Plan and justify British continuation of colonialism because under the Cripps plan the INC accepted British sovereignty over the Subcontinent.

      Pakistan was formed on the basis of the Two Nation Theory under which all Muslim majority areas were to belong to Pakistan. Kashmir is a Muslim majority area

      Of course we disagree with all your theory and have already rebutted the points in two of our articles.

      1) Why we created Pakistan
      http://rupeenews.com/2007/11/27/why-we-created-pakistan-the-pakistan-ideology/
      2) There was not partition
      http://rupeenews.com/2008/04/24/there-was-no-partition-for-britain-indian-empire-included-somalia-iraq-burma-singapore-etc-for-the-french-india-included-vietnam-indo-china-for-the-dutch-india-included/
      2) Three phases of Alama Iqbal
      http://rupeenews.com/2007/11/27/shair-e-mashriq-hakeem-e-ummat-sir-dr-alama-mohammed-iqbal-three-phases-of-a-visionary/
      3) India is a misnomer.
      http://rupeenews.com/moins-articles/india-is-a-misnomer-the-british-indian-empire-included-india-iraq-burma-etc/
      3) Nehru’s promises on Kashmir
      http://rupeenews.com/2007/12/10/nehurs-commitement-to-people-of-kashmir-and-various-un-implemented-resolutions-on-kashmir/
      4) UN resolutions on Kashmir
      http://rupeenews.com/2007/12/10/nehurs-commitement-to-people-of-kashmir-and-various-un-implemented-resolutions-on-kashmir/
      5) Proof that the Article of accession was a forgery
      http://rupeenews.com/2007/12/07/kashmir-does-the-article-of-accession-exist/

      Our site has Chaudhry Rehmat Ali’s PAKISTAN posted in many places on and in many articles. All of them show Kashmir as part of Pakistan

      You have identified yourself as Irtiza. Perhaps there is some confusion. You later sign the comment as Dr. Chaudhry. to be honest and show integrity, kindly sign on under your real name so that we can have a meaningful discussion.

      There are many anecdotes about…we don’t want to get into those in this discussion of history..however if you want to venture in that direction here are the links.

      India has lost all moral authority to rule Indian occupied Kashmir. It never had any legal authority.
      http://rupeenews.com/2008/10/21/kashmir-ki-mandi-rawalpindi-tijarat-to-bahana-hai-rawalpindi-to-jana-hai/

      We will place a point by point rebuttal of your points on the page:
      http://rupeenews.com/2007/11/27/why-we-created-pakistan-the-pakistan-ideology/

    8. Irtiza sahib aslamo alaykam. you claimed that K of Pakistan represents Kashmir. I wrote this article some years ago in response to someone like you. Now knowing you I know it will not have any affect on you because you and your colleagues have tunnel vision, but I hope that it might help some others to understand word Pakistan represents; and in any case what is its position after fall of East Paksiatn

      Dr Shabir Choudhry

      K of Pakistan

      As promised I have analysed the “K” of Pakistan. You are welcome to comment.

      K of Pakistan

      Shabir Choudhry

      Director, Institute of Kashmir Affairs

      Two K’s, in their own way, are very important to Pakistan, and both have caused enormous problems for Pakistan as well. One such “K” is of Karachi, and the other “K” is of Kashmir. In the following article I will only concentrate on the “K” of Kashmir. I will endeavour to explain and analyse the”K” of Pakistan, as many people think it is “K” of Kashmir, and its inclusion indicates that the founders of Pakistan wanted Kashmir to be part of Pakistan.

      First of all there is no evidence that founders of Pakistan, including Allama Iqbal, before the creation of Pakistan ever demanded that Kashmir should be part of the proposed Muslim State – Pakistan. The idea of Muslim State was put forward by Allama Iqbal in his famous speech in Allahbad, which is known as “Khutba E Allahbad”. In this there is no mention of Kashmir or any of the Princely States, Allama Iqbal said:

      I would like to see provinces of Punjab, North-West Frontier, Sind and Balochistan merged together to form a country, either within the British Raj or out of it..

      Source: translation from’ Pakistan Naagzeer Tha’ Pakistan 560, by Syed Qasim Riaz

      It is clear that there is no mention of Kashmir here. Allama Iqbal is talking about provinces of the British India. It must be remembered here that the British Raj in India consisted of two units: British India which was directly ruled by the British, and the Princely States which were semi- autonomous, and had separate arrangements with the British through different treaties. The much- talked division on communal lines or Two Nations Theory was related to the British India only.

      It was Choudhry Rehmat Ali who first coined the word Pakistan, not Allama Iqbal, as some people believe. Choudhry Rehmat Ali was a student in England at that time, and was very much influenced by the Pan Islamic Movement. As a young student he was not fully aware of the legal and constitutional position of Princely States and the British India.

      Whereas Allama Iqbal was fully aware of this legal position and its implications if Kashmir had been included in the demand of a Muslim state. Similarly those who passed, (Muslim League and Mohammed Ali Jinnah) the “Pakistan Resolution” were aware of this legal position, and did not include Kashmir in their demand of a Muslim State. The Lahore Resolution, which at times is called Pakistan Resolution, reads:

      “.That the areas in which the Muslims are numerically in a majority as in the North – Western and Easter zones of India, should be grouped to constitute independent states in which the constitutional units shall be autonomous and sovereign”.

      This Resolution, as we all know, was passed in 1940, and Pakistan emerged as an independent State on 14 August 1947. No where between these two dates Mohammed Ali Jinnah, President of Muslim League or any other Muslim League leader demanded that Kashmir should be part of their demand for Pakistan. Between 1940 and August 1947, literally hundreds of speeches were made by different League leaders, and dozens of resolutions were passed by the Muslim League, and at no time they demanded that Kashmir should be part of their demand for Pakistan.

      Even at time they knew Kashmir had Muslim majority and that it was adjacent to proposed Pakistan territory, with all its routes, but they did not demand for its inclusion in Pakistan. One wonders why? The answer is very simple. They all knew that it was the British India which was to be divided, and the Two Nations Theory was not applicable to the Princely States whether they had Muslim majority or not.

      Mahatama Gandhi, clever as he was, realised the “K” of Pakistan, and its apparent ambiguity, wrote a letter to Mr Jinnah on 15 September 1944, and asked:

      Pakistan is not mentioned in the Lahore Resolution, does its structure equals its formation,ie, Punjab, Afghanistan, Kashmir, Sind and Balochistan?

      He further asked: If your scheme of work is put in practice then what will happen to those Muslims who are subjects of Princely States?

      To which Mohammed Ali Jinnah replied on 15 September 1944:

      The word Pakistan is not mentioned in the Resolution, but this word is equal to that, and is used in place of Lahore Resolution.

      To the second question, he said:
      The Resolution deals with the British India only and does not apply to the Princely States.

      Source: (translation) details of this could be seen in, “Letters of Qaaid E Azam’ by Syed Qasim Mehmood; ‘Manzil ba Manzil’ by Sharif Ul Din Pirzada, and, ‘Indo Pak Relations’ page 44, by Siser Gupta

      Mountbatten also spoke on the topic and said on 25 July 1947 in the Chamber of Princes:..

      The Indian Independence Act releases the States from all their obligations to the Crown. The States will have complete freedom – technically and legally they become independent”.

      Mr Jinnah in reply to a question regarding the status of Princely States said on 17 June 1947:

      .. After the lapse of Paramountcy the Princely States would be constitutionally and legally sovereign states, and free to adopt for themselves any course they wished. It is open to the States to join the Hindustan Constituent Assembly or decide to remain independent. In my opinion they are free to remain independent if they so desire”.

      In the presence of this formidable evidence there should be no need to provide any further explanation, but it is unfortunate that people have their own way of defining these statements. Their argument is that it may be the legal position, but Mr Jinnah only made a political statement, as he was fighting the British and the Hindus. His real aim was to include Kashmir in Pakistan.

      May be that is what he wanted, but that is not what he said in his statements before the Partition of India. Even if he had desired that, it still does not change the legal and constitutional position of either Kashmir or demand for Pakistan. He desired Muslim and Hindu unity but it did not happen; he wanted whole of Punjab and whole of Bengal for Pakistan, and that did not happen either.

      So why is that something for which he has not expressed clearly, must be included in Pakistan, because, according to some, Pakistan cannot survive without it. Whereas an area which was legal and constitutional part of Pakistan, East Pakistan, was lost, and Pakistan still survives, and apparently there seems to be no regret over its lost.

      Let us go back to the formation of word Pakistan. It is claimed that “P” is for Punjab; “A” for Afghan; “K” for Kashmir; “S” Sind and “Tan” from Balochistan (tan).

      The “K” of Kashmir has been discussed above in detail, and we know that legally and constitutionally it could not have been part of the new state-Pakistan. Nor the founders of Pakistan demanded it.

      Now we analyse some of the other letters. If “A” stands for Afghanistan- an independent country at that time, how could it become a part of this new proposed state? Some argue that it reflects Pathans of North – West Province. When we carefully look at this, even this does not make sense because this area has never been called Afghan; nor people of this area are known as Afghans, rather they are known as “Pukhtoons”. On the other hand, Bengal was part of demand for Pakistan, but it was not part of the formation of word Pakistan, as there is no “B” anywhere in the word Pakistan.

      What the above discussion means is that the word “Pakistan” did not reflect the areas to be included in the new state. Rather Choudhry Rehmat Ali wanted to produce a name which rhymed with Hindustan, as India was known at that time. Another evidence to support the above view is the map which he produced for the future of the Sub- Continent. In his map, he had Hindustan, Pakistan, Usmanistan (for Hyderabad Daccan), Bangalistan (for Bengal) Rajistan, Guruistan for some other areas, and Kashmir and Afghanistan are shown separate.

      The above debate makes more sense when you look at it in the background that fundamentalist Hindus called Muslims “Maleechh”-meaning impure; and demanded that either they convert to their original faith-Hinduism or go back to Arab. Many Muslims also thought of Hindus as impure, and in response to the above they proposed that Hindustan for Hindus – impure people; and Pakistan for “Pak people”, meaning pure people.

      The above discussion proves that Choudhry Rehmat Ali, when he proposed the name, did not care too much about the boundary of the new state. What he wanted was a state for Muslims, where “Pak people” (pure people) could live the way they want. Let us assume for a moment that Kashmir had another name, not Kashmir, I strongly believe that name of new country still would have been “Pakistan”, because of the above reasons.

      It is believed that people, because of their political and other agendas, manipulate the word “K” to deprive Kashmiris of their independence, and want to expand the borders of Pakistan to Kashmir in order to compensate the loss of East Pakistan. Another view is that the Pakistani establishment needs a Kashmir issue for their survival, and they are using the “K” to manipulate people. And this manipulation has been so effective that people of Pakistan has forgotten the loss of East Pakistan, if ever they considered it as a loss, but they are emotional about Kashmir even though it is not part of Pakistan; nor it was part of the demand for Pakistan.

      Shabir Choudhry

      Telfax: 020 8597 4782

      Mobile: 07941 295 327

      Email.drshabirchoudhry@gmail.com

      need help….I don’t have that knowledge about history….Is this true or??

    9. Pegeon:

      Thanks for all your comments. This one was very funny!

      Keep coming back and spread the word!

      Best Regards

      Moin

    10. To be honest I did not see any breast at all so plz dont blame poor PM.Miss Rehman seriously needs boob job.

    11. In wake of all the problems and tradegies faced by our beloved country Pakistan,it is requested to all to observe a 5 minutes silence on 23rd SEPTEMBER AT 8 Pm..Spend this time praying for all the lost lives and for a better future..Put ALARMS on ur mobile phones..Maybe ASTAGHFAAR is what this Country needs right now..PLZ PLZ Forward this to as many people as u can before it’s too late…23 RD SEPTEMBER 8 PM…Our Allah is very Near to us..just feel and pray..He will Definately listen, accept our prayers and Astaghfaar..As we being gud muslim we should have faith in Him

    12. No comments over this whole issue…Well people we dn’t know wht actually happened out there between them..it’s only Allah who is aware of any man’s/woman’s intentions..if they r at fault they will be questioned..So i think we should not not be judgemental about this..just pray whtever happens in future should be in our favour..Our Pakistan needs our support..we need to remain united..plz pray together for the betterment of Pakistan..No PM can do anything for our country but if we pray to Allah..He will never dissapoint us..Inshallah..just keep faith in Allah..I am so much depressed by the bomb blast incidents happening..even In this holy month of Ramazan they didn’t respect..the bombers r just not muslims..if they think they r doing jehad and will get paradise..so mind it no man can enter heaven if he/she has killed a person..and over here the bombers kill so many..so no chance..Inshallah they will pay for their deeds..i will again say that we can pray atleast..plz join hands together..thanx

    13. We support Ms. Shah. She has voiced her correct opinions elequently.

    14. Dear Mr.Saeed
      I wish if all woman could have the luxury of staying at home.World by large is not Saudi Arabia where Sheikhs have built palaces for the wives (present and x)and neither everyone has Itefaq foundaries.
      In present times woman has to work ,school fee,electricity bills,medicine and cost of life?
      Home life is beautiful the responsibility of office job or house hold are same.For modern woman life has become impossible,run the house,perform at job and look good on top of it and give time to children and keep an eye on husband.
      Can woman survive this?
      I TAKE YOUR REMARK AS EXTREMELY HOSTILE AND IGNORANT:
      you are saying we the man will do what ever we want you woman should expect worst when you step out or stay in the house.
      You seem to be one of those perverts who keep their wives under locks and think rest of the woman are available for groping.

    15. bohut shram ki bat hay….aisay logun ky hath main mulk ki bagdor nahi deni chahiye………

    16. If Sheri Rahman comes to the politics of Pakistan then she will bear shuch insults,; For the modesty of a woman “HOUSEWIFE STATUS” IS THE BEST.

    17. omer, on September 3rd, 2008 at 6:19 am Said:
      it wasn’t an accident by any means, I lost all kinds of respect for this fake makhdoom. Pervert Paindoo Puppet PM. hey I got a new abbreviation for the PPP PM

      ***** MIND YOU OMER JEEE PAINDOS ARE NOT LIKE HIM THEY ARE BETTER THEN HIM …. AT LEAST THEY KNW HOW TO RESPECT WOMEN*****

    18. Embarasing!!!!!!!!
      Embarasing!!!!!!!!
      Do we have such a kind of leaders!!!!
      The person whoz doing this shit with his party member nt deserve to be a PM…
      how he can protect our nation, pakistani women..
      shame full…..

    19. very sadly when I was in Pakistan this mentality of man and attitude has stopped from participating in many things.I have no regrets but I do cheer and deeply respect woman like Fatimah Jinah,Benazir,Asma Jahangir,Madeeha Gohar and many more who do dare to lead and work in a very hostile envoirnment.

    20. In any politics of third world country or first world…….when a woman leaves a house and stands in the front row ,she should know what to expect……..
      Sherry seems completely disgusted and left embaraced ,SHE SHOULD HAVE SHUN HIS HAND ,and should have questioned excuse me???????
      Than MR.STUPID PRIME MINISTER would have understood the mistake there and than and would have appologised.
      My sympathy to Sherry where woman does not expect that MAN can never see the brain or intellect but always treat woman as an object…….does not matter who ever it is……..
      BUT for any future reference :Sherry DO STAND THERE AND question the bastard in the public………Pakistani public is very nice in joutian marnai main……………
      If woman would ignore it ,it sends out a wrong message.
      AND DEAR MEN OF PAKISTAN:
      Do not think that Pakistani woman is naive or if Sherry is bright and charming personality she is inviting all of you to have a good look at her……
      No !!!!!!She si out to do a job as were rest of men and woman MR.Gillani shame on you……………coming from a party where the woman was a leader shows you have learnt nothing.

      Pakistani woman should strongly protest on this …..HE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO BE THE PRIME MINISTER what message is he sending to the families,that do not send your daughters ,wives out to study ,to work BECAUSE BEHIND EVERY MAN YOUSAF RAZA GILLANI IS SITTING WITH NO CONTROL OR MANNERISM……….

      I have been to several protests and rallies in LONDON,not only that I travel everyday on overcrowded tube but no one touches anyone………….

      what we have seen above is disgusting ,shameful and if Sherry is quite at least I expect Mr.Zardari to question him on this(as if he has some decency)
      ADVICE FOR SHERRY:if u want to be a politician first learn to look into the eyes of man and ask him to STOP LOOKING AT YOUR BREASTS.

      BEING WOMAN we should not be ashamed of our gender and this discrimination and harassement is unexceptable.

    21. it wasn’t an accident by any means, I lost all kinds of respect for this fake makhdoom. Pervert Paindoo Puppet PM. hey I got a new abbreviation for the PPP PM :D

    22. It is just by accident. In a public meeting such things do happen. Let us not make mountain out of the mole.

    23. A pimp in history is Minister in present…. A minister in present would be some thing more than this…..Sheery Rehman should be ashamed of herself ……

    24. its simple he did it, but y in public? such a illogical guy.

    25. Gilani is no baby. He knows what he was upto. But he is stupid not to realise that camera eye is “not fake”.

    26. This is crowded place and i don’t think Mr Gillani really busy with pressing her boobs.it’s just by chance

    27. Inaugurated by a former state minister,( SMAIRA MALIK) Cat House had a dance floor, a bar and ‘special rooms’ for guests. Police said they had also seized computers and identity cards of several people from the premises.

      The residents said that drunken men and women were regularly seen coming out of the club and there were brawls almost every day. “We faced great problems because of this and couldn’t venture out of our homes for an evening stroll,” said Nasir Farooq, a resident.

      Another resident, wanting not to be identified, said that loud music and noise coming out of the club had made life troublesome for them. “It used to get worse on weekends,” she pointed out while appreciating the police raid. “They have done well to close down the place but I think the police acted late,” she said.

    28. 53 taken into custody in raid on ‘Cat House’
      Monday, March 10, 2008
      Islamabad

      The Islamabad Police took into custody 53 people — 19 women and 34 men — including an MNA-elect of Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), in the wee hours of Sunday.

      A police team conducted a raid on the ‘Cat House’ in Sector F-10/3, and arrested 53 people. Illegal weapons and a huge quantity of liquor were also recovered on the occasion, police said.

      A controversy was created when the raiding team arrested participants of the marriage ceremony of a South African, Chukwa Kelly, and Turana Ajiyewa despite they produced proof of their marriage.

      Later, police freed PPP leader Abdul Qayyum Jatoi, elected from Muzaffargarh (NA-180), and his friends on the alleged pressure of a powerful political figure.

      SSP Syed Kaleem Imam received information that some influential people had been running the ‘Cat House’ at House no. 221, Street 3, Sector F-10/3. The ‘informer’ told him that people go there for liquor and women provided by the owner of the nightclub.

      Acting on the tip-off, Syed Kaleem Imam directed DSP (Industrial Area Circle) Farhat Kazmi to take up the case and supervise the raiding team, police said.

      DSP Farhat Kazmi and SHO (Shalimar) Ghulam Baqar, along with a heavy contingent of police, conducted a raid on the ‘Cat House’ on Saturday night. The police spokesman said that as many as 53 people, including 19 women, who were dancing and drinking liquor, were shifted to the Shalimar Police Station.

      Police took three people — Abdul Qayyum Jatoi (MNA-elect of PPP), son of Nazar Muhammad and his friends, Muhammad Sarfaraz, son of Abdul Qadir, and Muhammad bin Saleh, son of Muhammad bin Umar — to the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences for their medical check-up at about 3.15 a.m. Later, all three were released.

      SSP Syed Kaleem Imam, when contacted by ‘The News,’ said that the people arrested from outside the ‘Cat House’ were freed after questioning. He said that the MNA-elect was arrested when he was standing outside the house. When asked that nobody, except for the MNA-elect, was released and all of them have been sent to jail, he said, “Let me check.”

      The SSP said that police arrested six foreign women — three Chinese and three Russians — among total of 20 belonging to different cities of the country.

      He said that Zafar Shahid, an influential person, had been running the ‘brothel’ with the help of powerful people.

      Police have registered cases under Sections 371-A+B, 496-B PPC, 14 Foreigners Act, 13/20/65 AO and 3/4 Hadd.

      The police spokesman said that the raiding team recovered 66 bottles of liquor, 88 tins of beer as well as one 7-mm gun, one 12-bore gun, three 222 and one 44-bore guns with bullets.

      As many as 19 women and 31 men (excluding MNA and his friends) have been shifted to jail and they would be freed after producing bail bonds before the court of law.

    29. Why Sherry Rahman appear Sexy?
      Sherry Rahman why remains sexy. She should appear in graceful dress, and should not wear a sexy dress. It is she who has compelled the poor PM to rub his hands over her breasts.

    30. Thank you for your feedback. If you had read the article you would have seen that Mr. Gilani admitted to the incident but does not remember the grope…err mistake.

      According to you, “its OK to grope:, but not OK to report it”

      If you would be kind enough to identify the artilces you have read, it would help us identify the image issue.

    31. just a propaganda… and this blog is all about that. Just trying to make bad image of india and pakistan. No truth in all that. Every one knows that. We are not silly dude!

    32. Its unfortunate to our country that a prime minister which is considered most dignified among other politicians is a person of such a character. Gilani is also named as the former husband of Nahid Akhtar ( the former Singer)

    33. DANGEROUS CURVES:It has been learnt through reliable sources that Prime Minister Gilani has visited this site and/or seen this footage.

      FREEDOM OF ARM, AND SLIGHT OF HAND?Mr. Gilani has said that he was not aware and never realized that he “accidentally” he touched Ms. Rehman, till he saw this footage.

      The PM was questioned by CNN a reporter on 27th April about this incident. Talking about this footage, he suddenly started laughing.

      Rupee News when reporting this, did not make any judgement on this issue. Everything is within the realm of possibility. However watch both his hands…the one on the right is also up to no good. Also watch Zardari’s right shoulder

      Inability to read and write is surely a reflection of the education level and the writing skills of the writer. The profanity used sheds light on the family background of the commentator.

    34. wtf… dis is all crap…. some mada [mis spelt profanity deleted] made dis video to stain the name of pakistan

    35. he never pressed it, the thing that he is doin aint pressing dude…. its a crowded place n with the rush n push sucbh things are prone to happen

    36. HOTA HAI
      DUNYA HAI
      CHALTA HAI

    37. Yousuf Raza Gillani tu shakal hi se bhooka lag raha tha.
      us ko sharm nai hai kya bakwaas tu boht krta hai k mei noble family GILLANI se hoon aur salay ki harkatte yeh hain

    38. I condemn such act done by a person who belongs to a noble family “Makhdoom” , but claim to serve nation!!!

      but if he was really dignified gentleman, then how he became PM of the country, as there is no place for any decent person among the these dead- eaters.

      Its the responsibility of Sharee R, that if she came in between the crowd of crooks, then she should be take preventive measures from such instances as when such so-called decency act like as shown in above movie, in huge public crowd on road…………… then she can assume what will could happen during(domestic & Foreign) trevel togather being ministers???

      Leadership is always charactorised by dignity, Who secrifies their lives for others………… but our politicians enjoy their status making money … Misuse authurities,.. during whole of tenure, and crying always when they caught by thier oponants after step-downed from seats, that, they are punished by imposing false rits just becuz to serve peoples (by doing all enjoyments of ruling), while poor peoples remain awaiting of the results of the efforts of such liers/ manupulators. In my view with great appology from these so called Leaders (matter of fact, their is no need to appology from any one of corrupt mafia, as its needed for honorbale peoples. buts its our own manner of talk) that, dont they have vision to see that, this is the age of Globalisation now, and peoples are much mature then previous by expeience and by being a global villager, so their traditional mal -pratices can cause them great harm even they may gr8 losers, if they will fail to deliver to public.

      I hereby requested to all politicians individuales and parties, Please recognise the facts of today world before the time react upon you to collapes.

      Khaao tu Zaroor keh ” Chut ti nahi yeh kafir monh sey lagi hoyee” Choor chorui sey chala bhi jaye tu heira pheiry sey nahi jata: that why please make real efforts for the developments of peoples and the country ultimatly besides enjoying the kick-backs.

      In fact, this is the big unfortunate of Pakistani peoples that we have lot of politicians = Great liers, but cannot find a single leader who put our nation towards success.

      Mr. Gillani, as i have heard that, you are educated (M.A) Journalism from Punjab University, I really cant expect this kind of woest act from the person like you. as far as I have seen a single line reply,to deny the incident , its really again worst . You did reply under same pathetic philosophy to deny the truth in front, similar to other stupid politicians…………..!!!

    39. all these are fake videos just to make me badnaam…

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.