PAKISTAN BANGLADESH, SRI LANKA RECOGNIZE YADONG “ARUNCHAL PRADESH” AND AKSAI CHIN AS CHINESE TERRITORIES
Pakistan does not accept India’s claim to Yadong “Arunchal Pradesh”. Pakistan supports China’s claim to Yadong “Arunchal Pradesh”.
Those who had trumpeted the growing economic cooperation between China and India were disappointed when China again brought up the issue of Arunchal Pardesh and claimed it as Chinese territory. It is pedagogical to remember that China in 1962 claimed that 33 Chinese sheep had been kidnapped by India and if the sheep were not returned, Chinese forces would invade “India”. The Indians first denied that any sheep had crossed the border. Then they gathered 300 sheep and sent them to China. China did not accept the Indian sheep, because they were not the original Chinese sheep. China again demanded the immediate return of the Chinese sheep. The Indians were unable to comply and China invaded and defeated the Indian forces.
Chou En Lai at that time, asked Pakistan Foreign Minister Bhutto to attack and liberate Kashmir. However President Ayub Khan did not attack and Pakistan lost a golden opportunity to liberate Kashmir. When finally Ayub Khan did attack in 1965, it was too late and India was able to attack the international border–the Americans had assured Ayub Khan that India would not attack the international border in Lahore and Sialkot. The war ended in a stalemate.
After the Chinese defeated the Indian army, they withdrew their forces, but did not give up the claim to Arunchal Pradesh.
China frowns on India’s claim to Arunachal By Jawed Naqvi
NEW DELHI, Feb 8: China has not approved of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s recent claims that the border state of Arunachal Pradesh belongs to India, Press Trust of India said on Friday.
In a report from Beijing, the news agency quoted Chinese officials as telling Indian diplomats that it was not proper to make such a comment when the two countries were engaged in crucial talks over their boundary dispute. It quoted unnamed sources in Beijing for the assertion. However, there was no official reaction to the report.
PTI quoted the sources as saying that Beijings reported protest over the prime minister’s visit and his comments in Arunachal Pradesh was informally conveyed to the Indian Embassy by Chinese Foreign Ministry earlier this week.
“Officials on both sides were tight-lipped about the issue, which has the potential to turn into a controversy here,” PTI added.
China has been claiming that entire Arunachal Pradesh belongs to it and the two countries are holding talks to resolve the dispute.
Dr Singh, during his maiden visit to Arunachal on Jan 31, had said that the state was “our land of rising sun”, in a clear message to China that it belonged to India.
Chinese claims Arunachal Pradesh as its own territory which has been nagging the ties between the two countries for long.
“The issue gets flared up when the Chinese troops at regular intervals intrude into the Indian territory to demonstrate their claim on the land,” the Indian news agency said.
India has, however, been seeking to play down these incursions by saying that these were a result of “differences in perception”.
Special Representatives of the countries are working on possible solutions along the Political Parameters and Guiding Principles signed in 2005, PTI
Pakistan does not accept the Indian claim to Aksai Chin. This area is Chinese
Pakistan accepts Taiwan as a part of China.
Rupee News also launches a campaign to correct world maps:
1) Azad Kashmir is not disputed territory.
2) The Northern Areas of Pakistan are not part of Kashmir. They were amalgamated into Pakistan by President Zia-ul-Haq.
3) Aksai Chin is Chinese territory. Aksai Chin was solved as a border dispute between China and Pakistan and ceded to China.
4) Occupied Kashmir is disputed territory. Kashmiris occupied territory and has to be shown as such.
Map of China Correction Campaign on World Wide Web
– Correct the Wrong Maps of China on World Web Sites
The Correct Map of China
The Map below roughly shows a correct Map of China. But not all maps of China on the World Wide Web are correct. Many are unfair to China.
Please pay attention to 4 parts in a map of China, as shown in the 4 circles in the map above:
A. Ali Area (Aksai Chin Area) in Tibet has always been under the administration of Xizang(Tibet) local government, the British wanted to seize this part, and tried to sign an treaty with the Tibetan local government, however the document was illegal and was not carried out by the British themselves. Only later after they left India the British started to publish maps showing that the Aksai Chin was claimed by the British. India, once a colony of the British and suffered a lot from the British control, after gaining its independence, however, didn’t hesitate to try to control other people’s country at all. Now, in many maps published in UK, India and other countries, they still either put a label include the “Indian claim” just as the map below or still put this Aksai Chin area under India. This is a big mistake.
B. Xizang Province’s Southern part borders with India. This border dispute is the biggest land dispute all over the world. However, this part shown in most western maps is included in India and it is mainly the so called “Arunachal Pradesh” by the Indian. This part of area dispute is again created by the British during the British Indian time. The actual line of control now follows roughly as the MacMahon Line, which was again an illegal treaty between the British Indian governor and the Tibetan local government. Anyway the British didn’t do their part they promised to the Tibetan local government in the treaty, so for long time the British didn’t publish this line at all in their maps. After they left India the British published this map and India started to invade to Tibet land according to this map. This area is Chinese territory, it was invaded by the Indian from 1950s to 1962. However, China, for the consideration of world peace, has always been trying to seek a peaceful resolution of this dispute. The Indians also invaded and seized about 2000 sq km of land of China south of Yatng (Yadong) City of Tibet, bordering Sikkim (another Kingdom which was invaded by the Indians and was turned into an Indian state). Many respected map publishers in the world have put a “Chinese line of Claim” which is the real traditional border line between China and India in their maps published. However, many of the maps published on the internet just ignores this part and simply put this area under the India. This is not acceptable and is not respecting the fact at all.
C. Taiwan Province is recognized as one part of China, however some maps colors Taiwan differently from the mainland China.
D. Nanhai Zhudao (South Sea Islands), including the Dongsha Qundao (Pratas Islands), Xiasha Qundao (Paracel Islands), Nansha Qundao(Spratly Islands), and Zhongsha Qundao(Macclesfield Bank) and the adjacent seas has always been Chinese territory since as far as Han Dynasty (2000 years ago). The South China Sea countries invaded this area, especially the Nansha Islands and they seized most of the Islands for their security and economic purposes. Everyday they are stealing the oil from Chinese territory seas. China has always been seeking resolutions to this problem by using peaceful talks. China has no interest in other countries’ land, but if one day when war breaks out because of Nansha Islands, China is just doing her own duty to protect its territory from other invaders.
The Wrong spread map of China
Can you do anything to help to correct the wrong Chinese maps spreading on internet?
Yes, you definitely can! When you see a wrong China map in internet, we hope you can write to their webmaster or the person in charge, tell them that their map is wrong. You can also tell them why their map is wrong. They can ignore one person’s suggestion, they can ignore 10 people’s suggestion, but they have to take it into consideration when thousands and thousands of us ask them to change. We can also form organizations to organize this campaign and continue this campaign until it succeeds. This is how the Koreans changed the name of “Sea of Japan” to “Sea of Japan (East Korea Sea)” on most maps published these days.
this is funny coming out of a [pakistanis] who is not true muslim. i mean you a “CONVERT.” i feel so ashamed when whites mistake me for you [pakistanis] and hindus. you all are just [edited] to us.
i mean i don’t even see any similarity between an egyptian and a fluke [pakistanis]. you [pakistanis] give us a bad rap. terrorist [edited].
I think people like should look at the food shortage and human rights issues in your so called ‘Pakistan’, world’s worst place! I would rather call it ‘Gutteristan’. Always try to enter into Indian territories and return back home black and blued by the strong Indian forces. Ask your soldier’s do they even know how to pull the trigger? I read that Pakistani forces are so illtrained that in the event of an encounter they tend to kill their own soldier’s! Poor fellas!
So, my ‘friends’, its better you protect your so called territory or else 1971 is not that far.
Mr. “Stevensen” Have the decency to use your own name and be honest about it. Its you agian Ram Chand..
India as world power- Part one
Superpower India part 2
Reading the same old Indian story books I see. Pakistani fighters defeated the USSR, liberated Azad Kashmir and Norrthern areas from the British/Indian armies, defended itself from a force ten times its size in 1965 and these same fighters from the same gene pool have denied quiet to ISAF in Afghanistan.
Jaipur slow burn. Gujrat blowback. Indian crockpot explodes.
After you give soem rights to the 250 million Dalits (http://rupeenews.com/2008/05/15/dalit-slaves-in-india/), and the 150 million Muslims, send us a note, and we will publish it.
ON the 3 century plan to exterpate Indian poverty
Indian balkanizing. Nazalite insurrection widening cracks in deep cavities
After being ruled for a thousand years..that is ONE THOUSAND..in arabic numerals (1000) Mr. Stevensen has some gal to say what he did.
India is as much a country as the equator–Sir Winston Churchill
250,000 forces arrayed on the Pakistani border after the attack on the Delhi parliament could not cross an inch.
160 million Muslims will create additional “Pakistans.” A battle does not decide the result of the war.
1971 was a civil war, and had nothing to do with India. Read this and weep
Bengalis want Bangladesh Pakistan confederate structure–RAW report
Bangladesh is a greater threat to India today and works with Pakistan to liberate the seven sisters and Arunchal Pradesh. Nepal and China will sone be liberating the swathe of territory from the Nepalese border to Andhra Pradesh.
Bhutto said we would fight for a thousand years.
The speech Mr. Singh should have given
Also see:
http://rupeenews.com/2008/02/29/the-inevitable-pakistan-afghan-union-by-by-abid-ullah-jan/
One last thing…batt keh rahe ga hindustan, kashmir banaiga Pakistan
The writer of this article is totally [...]. The truth is that Aksai Chin is illegally occupied by China, Arunachal Pradesh belongs to India, Azad Kashmir is not actually azad but is under illegal occupation of Pakistan. Northern Areas do not cease to be part of Jammu & Kashmir just because Zia ul Haq amalgamated then with Pakistan. Northern Areas automatically belong to India as they are a part of Jammu & Kashmir. I know it must be hard for Pakistan and China to digest these facts, but their hopeful thinking does not change reality.
A true product of the temple education. Thank you for letting us know about your ignorance of facts.
Of course, all countires of the region–China, Nepal, Lanka, Bhutan, Sikkim, Maldives, Mayanmar, and Pakistan are wrong. Only Bharat has seen the light of truth.
dear moin saab,
u alwats mention temple education, i wpnder where u for that from it shows ur ugnorance about bharat, we do not have temple education, temples do not run schools here, u can check withnur contact in india if u have any
regarding china raising the issue abot AP , its a gamebiing palsyed between usa china india and japan.
as far as AP is concerned the pious dalai lama too said its part of india
richie
The Dalai Lama has no lucus standii in the matter of South Tibet–he has already accepted China’s control of Tibet. “Till the 60s Lasha used to collect taxes from South Tibet (Zang Nan (Bharat ocupies it and calls is AP). The real Lama is in Tibet-China. The one you are referreing to is an agent of Bharat and reviled in China.
“Temple education” refers to the religious indoctrinatino that you receive about “Akhand Bharat”, about Mother India, about the borders of “Bharat”, about “partition”, about “Buddhism being part of Hindusim”, about Jainism being part of Hinuism”, about “HIndusm being the original inhabitants of South Asia”, about the IVC being Hindu”. These are all religious concepts that have crept into the Bharati education system. Whenever we discuss politics with our freinds from Bharat within seconds they begin spouting religious dogma–to prove that “Qandhar” (a city formed by Alexander) was part of Bharat or why Pakistan should be part of Bharat.
Temple educaiton aslo refers to the creation of mythical character and inclusion as “history” in the schools. For example there is no proof that Shoka ever existed. His name was first mentioned by John Princep. No other local or Greek texts ever mention him.
Temple educaiton refers to the demonizaiton of all those that opposed the Indian National Congress–Bose, Ambedakar, and Jinnah and their portrayl as villians.
dear moin
u will be surprised, to know very few people if any still talk abot akand bharat, it may be just spoken in RSS, most people dont even know what akand bharat is, everybody accepts pakistan,
regarding greek text ect they are not an athourity on it,
regarding jinnah, no one debates he was a good leader who set out to achive something and did, though he was not very happy with the outcome, (moth eaten pakistn) as he said
i admire him, as a strong leader the only thing i am agaist was his direct action (though it was a way of putting pressue on congress) bec many innocet ppl died of all reloigion
just bec congress is ruling ect u may think how much suppot nehru or gandhi has. u are so wrong
nehru was very emotional, he did a lot of good thing for india, an made lots of mistakes, he was human, but no one can accuse him of being a religious bigot
regarding gandhi many here do not like him, he was a fool, u know the joke pakistani write bad things about him, but he had threatened to go on hunger strike when the indian govt refused to give money to pakistan which was pakistani dues
regarding temple education remmeber india is run by secular govt inspite of secular votes being split during election
and bjp on religious cannot even get a simpke majaority
ciao
Richie
The RSS strongly believes in Akhand Bharat. The BJP also believes in Akhand Bharat. Jaswant Singh’s latest book is all about Akhand Bharat. In your angrier moments you have also wished fro the demise of Paksitan, and ranted about incorporating Pakistan into Bharat. Most of your posts are about how Pakistan should be broken up.
Though Kalhana did a good job, there is a huge gap. Bharatis have not written their own history. There are no texts about history. Religious texts do not substitute for historical records. John Princep was one of the first ones who began documenting the history of the regions. Greek texts are a good record for the Bactrian, Kushan and Gandhara periods. After all the heelization of Buddhism occured under the watch of the Greeks.
Here is your temple educaiton susbtituting as “history”
Please read Tilak R. Sikri in the Washington Post captioned “”India’s Survivors of Partition Begin to Break Long Silence
Hindu leaders agreed on partition of the subcontinent, as they thought and hoped that the dismemberment of India would be a temporary arrangement and reunification of India was a matter of time. History says that the riot of 1947 was masterminded to divide Bengal and Punjab, which were Muslim majority provinces at that time. Riots would not have occurred if they were not politically motivated. Neither innocent people would have been displaced or massacred; if Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister and his preceptor Gandhi would not had set a pre-condition that division of India “must mean a division also of Bengal and Punjab.” (See Nehru’s letter written on May 23, 1947, to Ashraffuddin Ahmad Chowdhury, the Congress President of Tripura, now Comilla, and district.) Nehru also did not keep secret the goal of his demand
There was not direct Action Day–as propogated by the Indian National Congress. This was simply a way to demonize Mohammad Ali Jinnah. The Kolkota riots were orchsrated by the INC to improve the status of the fakir so that he could then fast and show how great a man he was. This also game them a reason to partition Bengal and Punjab. http://www.zimbio.com/Bangladesh/articles/184/Religious+riots+1947+architects
Please do not mention the myths in Bharat taught as “history”. This is a joke al right–A false joke made up joke on false history and fake facts. Gandhi’s fast is also one of those Urban Myths to demonize Pakistan. He actually threatened war on Pakistan. He asked the Government of Bharat to wage war on Pakistan. Read all about it on the Nobel Peace Prize site. This was the last straw why the Nobel Peace Prize committee refused to award him a Nobel Peace Prize. There is lenghty criticism of Mr. Gandhi by the Nobel Peace Price Committee on the fake Non-violence of Mr. Gandhi. He supported all the wars–Boer, Kaffir (a tribe in Africa), Zulu, WW1 and WW2. All his support for wars forced the Nobel Peace Prize Committe to cancel his application. I bring this up not dengrate mr. Gandhi to to show that the history that is taught to you guys in Lucknow is false–it is the history of the Indian National Congress propogated through a Socialistic system which excls in Propoganda.
Here are some facts about the rioting and the fake fasting.
Tracing the roots of the 1947 riots:The roots of the riots in 1947 date back to 1906:
At the request of the Muslims of Bengal, in 1905, Lord Curzon announced the partition of Bengal. It was the beginning of of the Muslim awakening from the long slumber of self-pity and “reveling in the glory of yester year“. The British wanted to divide Bengal, to allow the Muslims some sense of self rule.
The Muslims formed a majority in all of Bengal (which included Bengal, Bihar and Orissa). East Bengal, present day Bangladesh was a Muslim Majority area and West Bengal at that time included both present day Orissa and Bihar where also Bengalis would become minorities. Bengal was the epi-centre of Indian Nationalism. Bengali ideas influenced whole of India. The Muslim Bengalis Waqar ul Mulk, Mohsin ul Mulk had led a campaign for Muslim rights.
According to the 1941 census 53.4 per cent of the Bengalis were Muslims and the rest Hindus, with a minuscule proportion of Buddhists and Christians thrown in. The province was divided into five administrative divisions, which were further subdivided into districts, as follows : Presidency division, consisting of the districts of 24-Parganas, Nadia, Murshidabad, Jessore and Khulna and the Presidency town of Calcutta ; Burdwan division, with the districts of Howrah, Hooghly, Midnapore, Bankura, Burdwan and Birbhum ; Rajshahi division, with the districts of Rajshahi, Pabna, Malda, Dinajpur, Bogra, Rangpur, Jalpaiguri and Darjeeling ; Dacca division, with the districts of Dacca, Faridpur, Barisal and Mymensingh (the largest district in British India) ; and Chittagong division with the districts of Chittagong, Chittagong Hill Tracts, Noakhali and Tipperah. Apart from these districts of Bengal, the people of Sylhet district of Assam, adjoining the Tipperah and Mymensingh districts of Bengal, those of the princely state of Cooch Behar adjoining Jalpaiguri and Rangpur, and a large number among the people of the princely state of Tripura, and among those of the districts of Manbhum nad Singhbhum in Bihar also largely spoke Bangla, and therefore were Bengalis. A map of the erstwhile province of Bengal, as it existed till the midnight of 14th August 1947 is at Fig. 1. The Bangla-speaking areas outside Bengal are also shown in the same map.
There was a vague and unofficial division of the province into three parts : East, West and North. West included the Presidency and Burdwan divisions ; North, the Rajshahi division ; and East, the Dacca and Chittagong divisions. There were substantial differences in the geography and the culture of the three parts. The West, particularly Burdwan division, had no navigable rivers, and some parts of the division were semi-arid ; however, the division had very large reserves of coal in its Ranigunge coalfields which had sired a large number of heavy industries in the region, including an integrated steel plant at Burnpur. The North was bounded by two great rivers, Padma and Jamuna (different from the Jumna or Yamuna which flows by Delhi and Agra ; this Jamuna is the Bengali incarnation of the mighty Brahmaputra of Assam). The region was criss-crossed by a number of swift-flowing tributaries of the two rivers. The East, as opposed to the two, was a low-lying flood plain, being a delta created by three huge rivers : Ganga, a snow-fed river, rechristened after entering Bengal as Padma; Brahmaputra, ditto, Jamuna ; and Meghna, a short but wide river fed only by rain, but from some of the rainiest places in the world, including Cherrapunjee. Certainly the major rivers, and practically all their tributaries and distributaries were navigable right through the year. In fact the usual means of locomotion in British East Bengal used to be the country boat, the nouka.
To oppose the partition in 1906, Swadeshi movement came into action. The RSS already mobilized used this as an excuse to create mayhem. Under presrrue of the Swadeshi movement and Hindu mahasaba Lord Curzon cancelled the partition of Bengal.
dear moin,
regarding direct acation, and bengal riots, as u say muslim were a ,ajority in bengal, and evn in punjad for that matter,
with a majority inbengal and the province ruled by shuhawary , with police under his control , how can the riots be engeneerd by non muslim, and for what benifit when they would be loser,
u say bjp/rss think in term of Akand bharat, but the point i m making is are they ruling, they cannot even get a simple majaority, last time they were in power was with a coliation, of dozens of parties, with a limited programme,
if everybody in india dreamt of akand bharat they would win with a thimping majority
regarding the fakir, he desreves what he got he was being to good and now npt appreciated by anybody
reagrding joing india soon after partition i beleive many beleived it, everybody thought it was temporary, as people forced to leave on either side always thought they would go back,
ask teh refugees in pakistan the old people, no one could beleive that suddenly one day they were foreingner in their own land
regarding RSS its membership is falling, u have to shearch for a rss person, its a dying breed
“Rich”: Once again if you had read the article you would not say what you did in your reponse. What did the rioters gain? They gained the parition of Bengal and Punjab. The fake fasts by “The Naked fakir” hid the true instigators of those who had in effect created the partitions of Bengal and Punjab.
The BJP did rule Bharat a few years ago. The stuff that went on in parliament two years ago is surely a matter of record. Even if it is not in majority it has a huge number of seats and it is one of the largest political parties in Bharat.
Even the Congress believes in Akhand Bharat. Read the wrotings of Nehru, Indiara Gandhi, Gandhi and those that still lament the so called “parition”.
Ask the five million Muslims of East Punjab (Gurdaspur and Ferozepur) who were massacred and asked to leave their homes–just becuase Nehru wanted Kashmir
Indians get formal education in schools, colleges, universities and specialised institutions. It’s [...] that need to work on improving their educational institutions. Madrassas don’t impart much needed knowledge that is required to be a part of a civilised society. By the way, Mr. Moin (illiterate) Ansari, Sikkim is a state in India and it will remain with India whether China and/or [...] like or not. Looks like the mullah of your madrassa needs to work on educating himself instead of misinforming his students like you that end up becoming terrorists. By the way, I’m not a Hindu, but have to admit that unlike Islam, it’s a great religion that believes in peace, not violence. Islam needs to adopt the good teachings of Hinduism.
Editors Note: Please do not use deragotory languague or you will be banned.
Your temple education is self evident in your response. For a Non-Hindu you are doing really well. Your use of racial epiteths that are used for Indian, Pakistanis, Bangaldeshis in the UK is evidence of your lack of knowledge. By using racist comments used by the Skinheads for Indians, you simple who your ignorance.
About your comment about the relgion of peace. Please expalin why Bharat has had wars with all her neighbors–Nepal, Lanka, China, Mayanmar, Sikkim, Bhutan and Pakistan. Please aslo expalin how Buddihism was exterminated from the land of its origins. And please don’t tel lus that Buddhi was Hindu–the Buddhists don’t accept that–neithr do the Jains. Please also explain how the religion of non-violence produced people like Gandhi..who supported all British wars–against The Zulus, Kaffirs, Boers, WW1 and WW2 and how the non-violence kills 10 million babies before and after brith…incarcerates 50 million Whte Widows in temples, and enslaves 450 million Shudras, Dalits, and Untouchaables.
According to the Prime Minsiter of Bharat–Mr. Manmohan Singh, The naxal insurgency rages in 20 out of 29 states and 40% of the land mass of Bharat is in the hands of the Naxals. Assame is in full revolt and Kashmir doesn’t want to be part of this paradise that you mention.
http://rupeenews.com/2008/02/03/why-did-buddhism-disappear-from-the-south-asian-subcontinent-summary-of-brahmin-atrocities-that-destroyed-buddhism-in-the-subcontinent/
The use of apprropriate amount of ruthlessness eliminated Buddhism from South Asia.
In order to overpower their opponents, the Brahmin strategy was: saam, daan, bhed, dand…
BRAHMINS GAVE DAUGHTERS: In my over three-decade study of Brahmin scriptures and their history, I found that though Brahmins used all sorts of ways to finish their enemy, they used dand to crush the defenseless people like shudras/Dalits. The Indus people too were virtually defenseless. So the Brahmins used dand against them. They used daan against the mightier enemy to win over the English and Mughals, they offered them every price i.e. daan including their daughters.
Saam, the deadliest and the surest strategy, was used to destroy our history and culture.
Saam is the deadliest of the four. It has been the most effective and a never fail way to finish the strongest enemy whom they cannot crush by dand nor buy through daan.
HOW BUDHISM WAS DESTROYED: During the Maurya era, Budha Dhamma was the mightiest enemy of Brahmins. It had almost wiped out Brahminism. At that time our Indus kingdom was in full bloom. The excavation of the Indus cities prove that every city contained a stupa. Seals of dhamma-chakra are found in plenty. In one of the cities even a headless statue of Budha was also found. Seals depicting worship of Bodhi Pipal tree have also been found. The whole Indus kingdom had turned into Budhist state.
At that time Brahmins under Pushyamitra committed regicide of Emperor Varihdarth and genocide of Budhists. But the Brahmins did not succeed in fishing the Budha Dhamma by dand. Therefore, they adopted the sure strategy of sam. Under this strategy, the Brahmins took their first step by declaring the Budha as one of our gods. As a next step the cunning Brahmins joined Budhism as bhikkhus.
A Brahmin like Kumarila Bhat, Nagarjun in the garb of bhikhus injected Brahminic venom into the veins of Dhamma. Tales of Jatak were distorted, simple Dhamma was infected with complex rituals. Brahmins led the Dhamma to Tantarikism. In the garb of bhikhu, they committed heinous sins. The end result: Dhamma vanished from its birth place.
The saam is persisting even today.
RADHAKRISHNAN’S MISCHIEF: The Brahmins took centuries to complete their job. The most dangerous part is that even today they are using this strategy.
Mischievous “scholars” like Dr. S. Radhakrishnan feel no shame in declaring that the Budha was born a Hindu and died a Hindu.
The Brahminist (Kayasth) Vivekananda feels no shame in depicting Budha’s moral values as that of Brahminism.
RSS fellows shout that Babasaheb is their leader, Budha is their god. Brahmins have no hesitation to join an exclusive Dalit party like BSP under this saam niti. They even go to the extent of claiming that the constitution too describes Budhism under Hinduism. http://palashscape.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/but-how-does-media-treat-dalits-and-the-issues-which-concern-them/
SUMMARY OF BRAHMAN ATROCITIES THAT DESTROYED BUDDHISM IN INDIA
1) The Divyavadana (ed. Vaidya, 282). The most important of the murderous Hindu bigots who carried out their systematic campaign of violence against the peaceful followers of Lord Buddha was Pushyamitra (184-48 B.C.), the founder of the Shunga dynasty. For details and refrences do see BELOW
2) Goyal [430] “The culprit in this case was Toramana, a member of the same dynasty as the Shaivite Mihirakula who did “immense damage to the Buddhist shrines in Gandhara, Punjab and Kashmir.” For details and refrences do see BELOW
3) Mihirakula is said to have razed 1600 viharas, stupas and monasteries, and “put to death 900 Kotis, or lay adherents of Buddhism” [Joshi, 404].
4) The Aryamanjushrimulakalpa tells us that Pushyamitra “destroyed monasteries with relics and killed monks of good conduct.” [Jayaswal, 18-19]
5) As Goyal [394] notes, “According to many scholars hostility of the Brahmanas was one of the major causes of the decline of Buddhism in India.”
6) The celebrated Tibetan historian Lama Taranatha mentions the march of Pushyamitra from Madhyadesha to Jalandhara. In the course of his campaigns, the book states, Pushyamitra burned down numerous Buddhist monasteries and killed a number of learned monks The archaeological evidence for the ravages wrought by Pushyamitra and other Hindu fanatic rulers on famous Buddhist shrines is abundant.
7) The Brhannaradiya-purana lays it down as a principal sin for a Brahmana to enter the house of a Buddhist even in times of great peril.
8) The drama Mrchchhakatika shows that in Ujjain the Buddhist monks were despised and their sight was considered inauspicious.
9) The Vishnupurana (XVIII 13-18) also regards the Buddha as Mayamoha who appeared in the world to delude the demons. Kumarila is said to have instigated King Sudhanvan of Ujjain to exterminate the Buddhists.
10) The Kerala-utpatti describes how he exterminated the Buddhists from Kerala.”
11) The Chinese traveller Yuan Chwang (Huen Tsang), who visited India in the seventh century records the oppressions of Shashanka, the king of Gauda, who was a devotee of Shiva.
12) Yuan Chwang’s account reads, “In recent times Shashanka, the enemy and oppressor of Buddhism, cut down the Bodhi tree, destroyed its roots down to the water and burned what remained.” [Watters II p.115] He also says that Shashanka tried “to have the image (of Lord Buddha at Bodhgaya) removed and replaced by one of Shiva”.
13) Another independent account of Shashanka’s oppressions is found in the Aryamanjushrimulakalpa, which refers to Shashanka destroying “the beautiful image of Buddha” [Jayaswal, 49-50].
14) Another prominent seventh century murderer of Buddhists was Sudhanvan of Ujjain, already mentioned in the quotation from Goyal above as having been supposedly instigated by Kumarila Bhatt.
15) Madhava Acharya, in his “Sankara-digvijayam” of the fourteenth century A.D., records that Suddhanvan “issued orders to put to death all the Buddhists from Ramesvaram to the Himalayas”.
16) Even after the Islamic invasions of India, Hindu bigotry and hatred for Buddhists was not subdued. According to Sharmasvamin, a Tibetan pilgrim who visited Bihar three decades after the invasion of Bakhtiaruddin Khilji in the 12th century, the biggest library at Nalanda was destroyed by Hindu mendicants who took advantage of the chaos produced by the invasion.
He says that “they (Hindus) performed a Yajna, a fire sacrifice, and threw living embers and ashes from the sacrifice into the Buddhist temples. This produced a great conflagration which consumed Ratnabodhi, the
nine-storeyed library of the Nalanda University“. [Prakash, 213]. Numerous destroyed Buddhist shrines were converted into Hindu temples after their destruction.
17) Ahir [58] notes that “The Seat of Buddha’s Enlightenment was in the possession of a Hindu Mahant till 1952.
18) Similarly, at Kushinara, where the Buddha had entered into Mahaparinirvana, the cremation stupa had been converted into a Hindu temple, and on top of it stood the temple of Rambhar Bhavani when
Cunningham discovered the site in 1860-61.
19) Among the shrines which still continue to be dedicated to Hindu gods mention may be made of the Caityas of Chezrala and Ter in Andhra Pradesh which are now Shiva and Vishnu temples respectively.
20) The temple of Madhava at Sal Kusa, opposite Gauhati in Asam, was once a sacred shrine of the Buddhists. …
21) And the famous Jagannatha temple at Puri in Orissa was also originally a Buddhist shrine.
22) Similarly, the Vishnupada temple at Gaya was also once a Buddhist shrine.” As Rajendralal Mitra notes in his famous work of 1878 [quoted in Ahir, 59] the feet of Buddha at Gaya were rechristened the feet of Vishnu and held as the most sacred object of worship in the new Vishnupada temple.
23) According to the records of Hieun Tsang and Kalhana’s Rajaatarangini, Asoka the great repented, converted to Buddhism (273-232 BC) and did a lot for Buddhism. Asoka renounced violence, and renounced his religion after the Kalinga war, and he became a Buddhist. During Asoka, Buddhism had become the state religion. The Brahmans did not like him, and many historians think the Brahaman opposition to Asoka led to the destruction of the Muyarian dynasty.
24) In Glimpses of World History Jawahrlal Nehru says the following about the Kushans (emphasis is mine and not Nehru’s): ” This Kushan Empire is interesting in many ways. IT WAS A BUDDHIST EMPIRE, and one of its famous rulers-the Emperor Kanishka-was ardently devoted to the dharma…the Kushans were Mongolians or closely allied to them. From the Kushan capital there must have been a continuous coming and going to the Mongolian homelands, and Buddhist learning and Buddhist culture must have gone to China and Mongolia…the Kushan Empire sat like a colossus astride the back of Asia, in between the Greaco-Roman world in the south. It was a halfway house both between India, and Rome, and India and China. The Kushan period corresponded with the last days of the Roman Republic when Julius Ceaser was alive, and first 200 years of the Roman Empire
25) THE HINDU KASHATRIYA HINDU AND BUDDHIST WARS
Jawarhalal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says (Page 103 and 104) “Chandragupta proclaimed his holy war “against all foreign rulers in India. The Kashatriyas and the Aryan aristocracy, deprived of their power and positions by the aliens (Kushans), were at the back of this war. After a dozen or so years of fighting, Chandragupta managed to gain control over Northern India including what is now called UP. He then crowned himself king of kings. Thus began the Gupta dynasty. It was a period of somewhat aggressive Hinduism and nationalism. The foreign rulers-the Turkis and Parathions and other Non-Aryans were rooted our and forcibly removed. We thus find racial antagonism at work. The Indo-Aryan aristocrat was proud of his race and looked down upon these barbarians and malachas. Indo-Aryan States and rulers were conquered by the Guptas were dealt with leniently, But there was not leniency for non-Aryans.
26) Jawarhalal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says “Chandragupta’s son Samadugupta was an even more aggressive fighter than his father….the Kushans were pushed back across the Indus…Samadugupta’s son, Chandragupta II was also a warrior king, and he conquered Kathiwad and Gujrat, which had been under the rule of a Saka or Turki dynasty for a long time. He took the name
Vikramaditya…..The Gupta period was a period of Hindu imperialism in India. There was a great revival of old Aryan culture and Sanskrit learning. The Hellenistic, or Greek and Mongolian elements in Indian life
and culture which had been brought by the Greeks, Kushans and others were not encouraged, and were in fact deliberately superseded by laying stress on the Indo-Aryan traditions. Sanskrit was the official court language. But EVEN IN THOSE DAYS SANSKRIT WAS NOT THE COMMON LANGUAGE OF THE PEOPLE.
The spoken language was a form of Prakrit….Kalidasa belonged to this period ……………. Samadragupta changed the capital of his empire from Pataliputra (Peshawar) to Ayodhia. Perhaps he felt that Ayodhiya
offered a more suitable outlook–with its story of Ramachandra immortalized in Valmikis epic.
27) HINDU BUDDHIST CONFLICT
Jawarhalal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says “The Gupta revival of Aryanism and Hinduism was naturally not very favorably inclined towards Buddhism. This was partly because this movement was aristocratic, with the Kashatriya chiefs backing it, and Buddhism had more democracy in it; partly because the Mahayana form of Buddhism was closely associated with the Kushans and other alien rulers of northern India….but Buddhism declined in India…Chandragupta the first was a contemporary of Constantine the great, the Roman Emperor who founded Constantinople. “
28) HINDU IMPERIALISM SAILS TO THE FAR EAST AND DESTROYS THE MALAY CIVILIZATION
The years of ANO DOMINI saw the beginning of Hindu imperialism outside India. Just like the Ferocious Aryans destroyed the IVC, these Hindu invaders destroyed the 2500 year old civilization of the Malay peninsula and imposed a foreign culture upon the peace loving people of the far east. Local temples were destroyed, people were enslaved, and the local language was abolished. Being polite, Jawahalal Nehru in the
understatement of the century writes in his book Glimpses of World History says:
Jawarhalal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says “These colonizing excursions started in the first century after Christ and they continued for a hundred years. All over Malay and Java and Sumatra and
Cambodia and Borneo they went, and established and took Indian culture with them…..In Burma and Siam and Indo-China there were large Indian colonies. Many times even of the names they gave to their new towns and settlements were borrowed from India-Ayodhia, Hastinapur, Taxila, Gandhara…No doubt Indian colonialists misbehaved wherever they went, as all such colonialists do. They must have exploited the people islands and lorded it over them….Hindu States and empires were established in these eastern islands, and then Buddhist rulers came, and between the Hindu and the Buddhist there was a tussle for mastery. It is a long and ..story………mighty ruins still tell us of the great buildings and temples …..there were great cities…Kamboja, Sri Vijay, Angkor …”
29) During this time Fa-hien visited India to study Buddhism (399 AD) and found “gaya wa waste and desolate“. He gives a detailed account of Buddhist persecution by the Brahman Aryans.
THE ARYAN HUNS INVADE THE IVC. SUN WORSHIPPING and MAHAYANA BUDDHISM PROSECUTED
With the decline of the Guptas, the nomadic tribes of Central Asia called the Huns invaded India. Their leader was Tormana (500 AD). Jawaharlal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says:
“Skandagupta, the fith of the Gupta line had to face this Hun invasion…gradually they spread all over Gandhara and the greater part of Northern India. THEY TORTURED THE BUDDHISTS AND COMMITTED ALL MANNER OF FRIGHTFULNESS”….There must have been continuous warfare against them, but the Guptas could not drive them away. Fresh waves of Huns came …”
‘30) Jawaharlal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says:
…Torman installed himself king . He was bad enough, but after him came his son Miharagula, who was an unmitagated savage and fiendishly cruel. Lalhana in his history of Kashmir–the Rajatrangini–tells us that one of is Miharagula’s amusements was to have elephants thrown over the great precipices into the valley below”.
31) Jawaharlal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says:
The treatment of men was sometimes worse then that of animals (some of the animals like cows were actually revered because they were Gods). Lower caste Hindus had a misrable life. Other historians have commented that the treatment of women was even worse, specially women of lower castes, they were considered the “property” of the upper caste Hindus, to be molested and/or raped at will. In many cases the new bride had to stay a night with the village Brahman before she was married off. Kashmir converted to Islam during this time period. It was cruelty like this that led to the whole sale conversion to Islam. The new religion offered them equality and saved them from the Brahmans.
32) Jawaharlal Nehru says, “Soon however the Hun power weakened in India… the Huns have been defeated and driven back, but many remain in odd corners. The Great Gupta dynasty fades away after Balditya.
33) HUNS DEFEATED. HARSHA VARDHANA TRIES TO REVIVE BUDDHISM
Jawaharlal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says:
“The Huns killed the Raja of Kanauj and made his wife Rajashiri a prisoner. Thereupon Rajashiri’s brother Raja came to fight the Huns and bacme an emperor (606-647 AD). The Chinese traveler Hiuen Tsang visited India at this time, he gives a very harsh account of the conditions of India, and writes extensively of the persucution of Buddhists. Harshas ancestors were sun worshippers, however he was also attracted towards the Mahayana form of Buddhism. The Brahmans were very displeased with him and even conspired to kill him. Harsha spent time and money on arts and literature, and drama, and was probably the last great Buddhist emperor of India. He extensivle wrote of the atrocities com itted by the Hindus
against the Buddhists in India.
34) Jawahalal Nehru in his book Glimpses of World History says ” Harsha was a keen Buddhist. Buddhism as a separate faith, had weakened greatly in India, …he was a pious Buddhist, and he came to visit the sacred places of Buddhism and to take with him the scriptures of the faith .”
35) THE ARYAN RAJPUT INVASION
The death of Harsha ushered in an era of anarchy again. The Rajputs were the invaders this time. This era is called the Rajput era. According to Tod, the Rajputs were the descendants of Sakas, Huns, Ushans, Gujaaras
etc.
36) According to Rajatarangini of Kalhana which forms a major source of our history, Duralabhavardhana founded a new royal dynasty about the middle of the 7th century. Lalitaditya ascended the thorne in 724 AD and he conquered large areas of India and brought it under Kashmiri rule. After him (750 AD) the power of Kashmir receded.
37) Jiyapida, the grandson of Lalitaditya tried to revive the reputation of the Karkota dynasty. The Karkota dynasty was replaced by the Utpala dynasty about the middle of the 9th century. The Rajputs were true Hindus and patronized Hindu religion and culture in all of India.
The following is for the negationists who have been trying to conceal the
record of the Bloody Sword of Hinduism in India. The massacres and oppression perpetrated by Hindus out of religious hatred for Buddhists in ancient times are a matter of the historical record. Yet, for reasons best known to themselves, negationists like Mr. Rajiv Varma have been trying to conceal the hideous, blood-stained record of Hinduism.
The truth must be told. After the enlightenment of Gautama, the Buddha, in 483 B.C. his message and his teachings spread across the face of India and Asia. Everywhere, they encountered hostility and religious persecution from Hindu rulers and priests. The conversion of Ashoka, who ruled over much of India in the third century B.C., did much to counter this. After Ashoka’s death, however, the campaign of violence against Buddhists by Hindus began in earnest.
The most important of the murderous Hindu bigots who carried out their systematic campaign of violence against the peaceful followers of Lord Buddha was Pushyamitra (184-48 B.C.), the founder of the Shunga dynasty.
The Divyavadana (ed. Vaidya, 282) tells us that this king resolved to nnihilate the teachings of the Buddha. He destroyed stupas, burned monasteries, and killed monks as far as Shakala, where he made the
infamous declaration: “Whosoever gives me the head of a Shramana, him I shall give a hundred gold coins.”
Wow! Non-violence should go only so far.
moin saab,
u forget rawalpindi, north west ect
killing were on both sides, and it started in rawalpindi,
regarding partition boundries it was the job of the brits,abd everybody involved accepted it, including jinnah,
though gurdaspur and ferozepur had a slight muslim majority
regarding bjp they had said if they come to power they will build themandir, but did they bec they do not enjoy the support of the majotity
u will not understand democracy, everybody has a right to put foward their views and idea and garner support, even if the ide is a bad one and harmful, and people are the ultimate to decide what they want
bengal was partitioned before too by the brits, so everbody knew if the country was divided muslim majaority will go to pakistan , and that was done,
it was accepted by themuslim league too,
remmeber even a muslim majority district of sylhet in assam was given topakistan, it was a hundu majaority state u do not complain about that ?
or chitaging, or khulna
everybody lost something duriing partotion
hindus sikhs lost themost as they owned most of the and and bussiness in west punjab, though they were a minotity
moin saab no hands were clean during the partition so do not take a moral high ground
i just finished reading an interview of amuslim in lahore how he was asked to kill and throw the non muslim out as they were promised by a police officer a isalmic state would be established , and his attack on a gurudwara, and now how he is dissapointed , he runs a nan shop in lahaore, i can send that article tou, written by a muslim,
many were guilty of crimes on both side,
regardng akand bharat what congress support ? its never an election menifesto, its a dead issue
like i said u will not understand democracy, govt in india cannot take unilateral decision, and still expect to win election
This is what we call classic temple educaiton and Bharati indoctrination. Here we go again with hubris and patronizing attitude towards everyone else. You ‘can’t understand” is the height o bigotry. You eke out a living in Lucknow and are trying to lecture others about what you think is “democracy”. Is this a joke. In the next 20 years you cannot get the educaiton that the editors of this site have. Please don’t be condescending. Its rude.
The world knows about “democracy” in Bharat. When you release the 450 million Dalits slaves, then talk about Democracy. The world remembers the bags of money in Lok Sabha. You Tube records the money given to the “members”.
The partition of Bengal was canceled in1906 becuase of Hindu agitation. If Bengal was secular then Hindu Bengalis would have joined their Muslim Bengalis in a greater Bengal. Why not?
Gurdaspur and Ferozepur were Muslim majority areas. There was no sense in massacring all the Muslims and then forcing Ferozepur to join Bharat. Many trians came from Bharat to Pakistan with bodies only. No trian went the other way in the same manner.
HIndus and Sikhs were rich in Rawalpindi they had guns and guards–they left in style. Muslims wer cut to pieces while trying to go to Pakistan.
Every day Akhand Bharat is an election issue. The BJP kicked out the former Defense minister because of what you guys call “partition”. Do you think people are blind. Did you not hear Adhvani, Moid, Thakery, and Arun Gandhi speak?