Sex Life of Indira Gandhi of India: Indian Matahiri- Indira’s tryst with seduction

Venus de Milo. Louvre Museum.

Venus. Image via Wikipedia

The Indian Matahiri, The promiscuous Indira Gandhi: A tryst with seduction, and inveiglement. What lures the willing males to the black widow?

Who tops the list of amorous licentious women? Puissance has its own allure. Power the ultimate aphrodisiac makes one seductive and desirable. Many have used power to charm and seduce. Was Helen seduced or was she the seductress? Move over Matahari, and the Greek enchantress Venus. Cleopatra, you are nothing. Forget the sirens who tried to tempt Odysseus away from his journey. Who has the best Matahari skills?

Venus de Milo you have met your match!

Greek mythology Aphrodite: Indira Gandhi was the grand seductress

Ignore Aphrodite and leave the Roman Godess of Love in the dust.

The Roman techniques of seduction are passe. The Aphrodite is now in ruins but the knowledge lives. We have a new lady who knew more about the aspects of seduction than any of the real Goddesses of Greek, Roman, or Vedic mythology.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter |  Notizie di Rupia |  PAKISTAN LEDGER  DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate to: Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape Bookmark and Share Add to TechnoratiRSS feed: | RUPEE NEWS | December 27th, 2007 | Updated October 10, 2011. (Updated pictures which were lost).

Rukun Advani|(Rukun Advani is the author of  Beethoven Among the Cows and runs Permanent Black, a publishing company in New Delhi.”)

It is now evident the Grand seductress of all was Mrs. Indira Gandhi who as part of her religious Brahman training was adept at the art of the Kama Sutra.  Indira used her training to seduce many men. Like father like daughter:

Sex Life of Nehru: Menege De Trios:-Tryst with Homosexuality:-Love triangle Edwina, Nehru and Lord Mountbatten changed history

After all it is in the grand tradition as described in the Mahabharta. Draupathi in the story had 5 husbands. As in Braham temple custom, did the Nehrus get formal training in the art of sex and seduction? Certainly seems like it. Nehru seduced bother Edwina and Lord Mountbatten and his daughter Mrs. Gandhi used sex to her advantage and to move up the corridors of power.

Indira Gandhi was a tough cookie coming from a very high profile family in India. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto said that Indira Gandhi was not a very good student at Berkley. By all accounts circulating in the media Mrs Indira Gandhi had a list of lovers. There are the known ones:

1) “Remington Randy” her father’s typist: Mathai Merely (M. O. Mathai author of  “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age and “My Days With Nehru”, 1979)

2) Her Yoga Teacher: Dhirendra Brahmachari

3) The Foreign Minister: Sardar Swaran Singh

4) Dhinesh Singh

5) Mohammad Yunus author of the book, ‘Persons, Passions & Politics’

6) Frank Oberdorf (A German teacher on the staff at Santiniketan) The new biography is indeed a remarkable story of the woman in Indira, controversially focusing on her intimate side—from her first love, a German teacher at Shantiniketan, to her long pre-marital relationship with Feroze Gandhi and then Mathai, Dinesh Singh and Dhirendra Brahmachari.

7) She was into strong aggressive types. There are rumors that Indira Gandhi had an affair with Marshall Tito 

To mold Indira according to his aspirations, Nehru sent the young Indira to Shantiniketan, the school of the great poet, Tagore. Indira was expelled from the school at Shantiniketan by Tagor for her “wrong” habbits. Santiniketan is a small town near Bolpur in the Birbhum district of West Bengal, India, approximately 180 kilometers north of Kolkata. It was made famous by Nobel Laureate Rabindranath Tagore. The town housed Visva-Bharati which became a Central University in 1951. Indira Gandhi was one of its more illustrious students and was known for her after hour activities at the University.

Source: Indira: The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi By Katherine Frank, Various authors,  plus, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?211174 , http://www.hinduonnet.com/2001/04/29/stories/13290463.htm


Indira Gandhi (1917-1984) was known as a feisty young woman and a Uber-Hyper leader. Indira Gandhi was the only child of Kamla and Jawaharlal Nehru. The young Indira was found in bed with her German Teacher at Shantineketan–Frank Oberdorf. She always had a big libido, probably inherited from her father who had a line of affairs, the most famous with Un-Lady Edwina Mountbatten. Stanley Wolpert and other have provided proof that Jawaharlal Nehru was gay and he consorted with the gay Viceroy of India Lord Mountbatten. (Nehur’s tyrst with homosexuality. Nehru dated both Ediwina, and Lord Mountbatten.Menage de trois impacted independence).

Indira had many lovers when she was young.  She was friendly with Mohandas, and may have participated in his infamous and perverted Bharamacharya sexual experiments–where Mohandas Gandhi slept naked with young 12 year old young girls and married women. Sex life of Mohandas Gandhi, his failures and sexual perversion.

Indira Gandhi had the developed instincts of an animal, she always responded to people with her skin” Singer-writer Sheila Dhar (Mrs. P. N. Dhar), who knew Mrs. Gandi well

 

Feroze Gandhi with Indira

Indira finally settled for one Feroze, someone who was docile and would interfere with her desire for other men. Some say she was pregnant when she wanted to marry a young man Feroze. Due to caste issues, she ran into problems. Mohandas adopted Feroze so that he could have the last name Gandhi. This made it appear that she was marrying a person with the last name Gandhi. This is a very strange episode because Indira already had a famous last name “Nehru”. The Gandhi nomenclature had more to do with religion than anything else. Her belligerence with world leaders is well known. She constantly tangled with Henry Kissinger and they were not even on speaking terms. While in power Indira Gandhi liaisons were pretty much an open secret to those who had access to the corridors of power in New Delhi.

“Wolpert had always possessed the most authentic credentials for being unfailingly second rate. This book suggested that Nehru’s many wild oats were not sown exclusively among womankind: he had also favoured mankind when young. Wolpert’s creative enthusiasm for the multiple exercise of Nehru’s crotch, which had failed to intrigue earlier biographers like S. Gopal and Michael Brecher, caused him to forget that there happens to be a boundary between speculation and fact. His book was temporarily banned in India: “stopped at Customs for inspection”.

Unlike her father, who himself would never have banned Wolpert, Indira Gandhi was no Voltairean liberal. During her lifetime no one would have dared openly accuse her of wanting men in bed. P. N. Haksar and P. N. Dhar, both strikingly handsome Kashmiri Pandits who served her with integrity and distinction and have written fine memoirs, analyze her emotions with perception but say nothing about their boss’s private life. In fact the most perceptive observation about Indira Gandhi was once made by the singer-writer Sheila Dhar (Mrs. P. N. Dhar), who knew Mrs. G. well enough to notice that “Indira Gandhi had the developed instincts of an animal, she always responded to people with her skin”. The political animal that was Indira Gandhi has long been known and done to death: there have been biographies by Pupul Jayakar, Zareer Masani and Inder Malhotra. It is high time someone gave us an insight into the human animal and showed us her feet of clay.

http://www.hinduonnet.com/2001/04/29/stories/13290463.htm

Frank dwells at some length on the rumours of Indira Gandhi’s affairs with “none other than her father’s squat and moon-faced secretary, M.O. Mathai.” She writes: “Admittedly it was Mathai himself who was the primary source of these rumours. He boasted openly of his liaison with Nehru’s daughter, both at the time and for many years after.”

Frank, however, says there was “definitely a certain attraction” between them, quoting Nehru’s biographer Sarvepalli Gopal to say that “Indira Gandhi encouraged him beyond normal limits.” She also says that ‘She’, which Mathai withdrew, surfaced in the Eighties, five years after Mathai’s death, “when Indira’s estranged daughter-in-law Maneka Gandhi circulated it among a small group of Indira’s enemies”.

Indira’s Yoga instructor and silent lover Dhirendra-Brahmachari

While Brahmachari was the silent lover, Dinesh Singh had no qualms about playing up rumors of an affair.

Frank writes: “The ‘She’ chapter contains such explicit material that even if Mathai had not suppressed it, it is doubtful whether his publishers would have taken the risk and proceeded to publish it. Mathai describes Indira as ‘highly sexed’ and includes among other salacious details the claim that she became pregnant by him and had an abortion.” A disillusioned Mathai had a strong motive to lie but Frank says that people who knew them well, “including B.K. Nehru, who is a reliable source and no enemy of his cousin (Indira), feel that the ‘She’ chapter contains more fact than fiction”.

M O Mathai wrote in his book titled “She” that he was Indira Gandhi’s lover

So open was their relationship that in ‘She’ Mathai claims to have been afraid that Indira’s careless behavior would alert her father. But “Delhi buzzed with rumours” about their relationship. In Parliament, Feroze Gandhi was teased that Mathai was Nehru’s real son-in-law. “Indira, significantly, did nothing to quell the rumours of the alleged liaison,” writes Frank.

Book:Indira: The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi

Subsequently, Indira Gandhi wrote to Dorothy Norman, her lifelong confidante, that she had taken to yoga taught “by an exceedingly good-looking yogi”—Dhirendra Brahmachari. She wrote that “it was his looks, especially his magnificent body, which attracted everyone to his system.” Dhirendra was probably no brahmachari: a raid on his ashram in Kashmir after the Emergency yielded, among other things, a vibrator! If she had a lover as prime minister it would have to be him. “Brahmachari was the only man to see Indira alone in her room while giving her yoga instruction, and he was the only male with whom she could have had a relationship during this period.”

To her men Indira was quite a catch—and perhaps that’s why they encouraged rumours about their relationships with her.Congressman Dinesh Singh had this tendency as much as Mathai. “Indira relied on Singh and conferred with him at all hours. Inevitably, there were rumours that he was her lover, rumours which Singh himself encouraged.”Mrs G’s String of Beaus. A new book chronicles Indira Gandhi’s loves and gets rave reviews in the UK , Sanjay Suri in London. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?211174

Here is a sketch of at least  three:

http://www.qbtpl.net/images/Dhirendra%20Brahmachari.jpgControversy was the second name of Dhirendra Brahmachari. He was mentioned in the press during his hey days as the Rasputin of India. He was a charismatic yoga teacher who befriended the Nehru-Gandhi Family. He was also the personal tutor of Indira Gandhi. It was rumored that he had an affair with Indira gandhi, which might be quite possible as he was a handsome healthy man. He had an open access to Indira Gandhi’s house when she was the prime minister of India and many of the sycophants around Indira were quite jealous of Brahmachari’s proximity to Indira Gandhi. Kushwanth Singh has mentioned a lot of incidents of his encounter with dhirendra brahmachari. Kushwanth singh devotes an entire chapter in his book ‘God and Godmen of India’ for Dhirendra Brahmachari:

(http://drvasu.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/dhirendra-brahmachari-sukshma-vyayama/)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2155/2515582939_dd91bf87d1.jpg?v=1211552807Mr. Sardar Swaran Singh, Minister of External Affairs of India (from 27 June 1970 to 10 October 1974)

Mathai Merely: There is much information available on Mr. M. O. Mathai who befriended Mr. Nehru and then became one of the most powerful men in his office. Mr. Merely has said some very nasty stuff about Mrs. Indira Gandhi.

(http://books.google.com/books?id=0eolM37FUWYC&pg=PA205&lpg=PA205&dq=Nehru%27s+typist&source=web&ots=KfkLh_u1TS&sig=oB_BiKqIHbZ3ULE2dFPgnfZZxSg&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result#PPA207,M1)

This is what Khuswant Singh says about Indira Gandhi.

  • There is nothing spectacular about her rule.
  • She was incapable of tolerating any criticism and she picked up an aversion to some persons because she thought they were challenging her, among them Jayaprakash Narayan, a good, honest man. She couldn’t stand him because he was a challenge to her as the leader of the country, especially as people grew disillusioned with her rule. There were problems, droughts, challenges and Jayaprakash Narayan had emerged as a leader.
  • During her reign, corruption increased to enormous levels. She was really very tolerant of corruption, which was another negative mark against her. She knew perfectly well that some of her ministers were extremely corrupt, yet she took no steps against them till it suited her.
  • If she knew someone was corrupt, she tolerated him but if it suited her, she used the same corruption charge to get rid of him. She really had no strong views on corruption, which went sky high during her time.
  • Also, she felt uncomfortable with educated, sophisticated people. So you have the rise of people like Yashpal Kapoor, R K Dhawan, who was a stenographer who worked in her office, Mohammad Yunus, who just hung around her.
  • I believe this was because she had no real education.
  • She went to Shanti Niketan, then she went to Badminton School abroad, then to Oxford. Nowhere did she pass an exam or acquire a degree.

Indira Gandhi was an enigma. She hid her insecurities behind a mask.

Khuswant Sing says “I think that bred a sort of inferiority complex of not being recognised as an educated person. She would pretend to have read a lot of books. She spoke French, which she picked up when she accompanied her ailing mother Kamala to Switzerland, which went in her favour. There were pros and cons but there was this sense of insecurity when it came to highly intelligent people and people with clear records. She felt more comfortable with second-rate people”.

  • How did her insecurities, about which much has been written, affect India?
  • In her insecurity, she destroyed the institutions of democracy. She packed Parliament with her supporters with loyalty being more important than ability; she superseded judges; she corrupted the civil service. Favouritism became a great sport with her.
  • She also knew how to use people against each other and was quite a master of that. She would patronise somebody and when she thought he was getting too big, instead of appointing him to a senior post, she would appoint his close associate, knowing this would create a rift between them.
  • The best example is of V P Singh. It was his elder brother (Santa Bux Singh) who believed he would be made minister but instead she picked V P Singh, the lesser qualified of the two brothers, which only created enmity between the brothers. She would do this with calculated skill and in the bargain cause enmity between brothers, split up families.

In the long run it was not good for the country to play such games as she did. Few journalists interacted with Indira Gandhi the way Khushwant Singh, doyen of Indian journalism, did.” As editor of the now defunct The Illustrated Weekly of India and later The Hindustan Times, he was witness to some of the most historic moments in Indira Gandhi’s 16-year-long rule.

Mars and Venus

Did the young Indira Nehru (maiden name) eagerly and actively participate in Mohandas Gandhi’s “Bharam Acharaya” pedophilia “experiments with truth” where he would sleep naked with young women,  including his niece Manu?

 

..the list is long…read on for salacious details.

In 1964, the year of her father’s death, Indira Gandhi was for the first time elected to Parliament, and she was Minister of Information and Broadcasting in the government of Lal Bahadur Shastri, who died unexpectedly of a heart attack less than two years after assuming office. The numerous contenders for the position of the Prime Ministership, unable to agree among themselves, picked Indira Gandhi as a compromise candidate, and each thought that she would be easily manipulable. But Indira Gandhi showed extraordinary political skills and tenacity and elbowed the Congress dons — Kamaraj, Morarji Desai, and others — out of power. She held the office of the Prime Minister from 1966 to 1977. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Independent/Indira.html

There was much to write about during the years that Mrs. Gandhi in power.

It is an indication of the intellectual condition of the Congress Party that its old horses, who are very hoarse and very old, are in a flutter about the fact that Mrs. G. may actually have had an enjoyable sex life. My instinct is to applaud, but this just will not do. Even in an era accustomed to scurrility, sleaze and Shobha De, the Indian Caesar’s daughter should be seen to be chaste, Hindu and properly womanly. Whereas, if the stories told are true – and in such matters every substantial accumulation of rumours substitutes for proof – Indira Gandhi may even have been a bad case of epitomising the brilliant parody one-liner against Hindu hypocrisy which says caste no bar lekin sex baar-baar. Mrs. Gandhi had, it seems, nearly as much love for the pleasures of her residential bed as of her prime ministerial chair. The Kissa was as much Kursi Ka as Palang Ka.

Her list of hits is impressively long. A Parsi husband who turned philanderer, a scandal-mongering Malayalioldenough to be her father’s typist (he was once appropriately called a Remington Randy), a yoga teacher who degenerated into a physical instructor, a poodle Foreign Minister who never stepped far from her Home Ministrations – how wonderful to learn that even as she was shackling her country with authoritarianism, she was unshackling her libido at home. What a rip roaringly wonderful and motley crew of purdah paramours our Rushdiean Widow seems to have had. Our hearts go out to poor R. K. Dhawan. How awful he must feel to be left out of this litany of lovers. Can we hope for a memoir by him which regales us with proclamations of his non- innocence? Can we hope that Mrs. Shobha De’s publishers have given her an “undisclosed sum” as royalty advance for her next potboiler on a subject which seems so entirely tailor-made to suit her well-polished talons?

Anyone with half an eye can see that Indira Gandhi’s life can be made, beyond the politics and jingoistic nationalism, the very stuff of sex drama, of Babban Khan’s Punjabi farce “Chaddhi Javaani Buddhe Noo” (which translates roughly as “The Old Chap’s Turning Horny”), of the carnivalesque Restoration Comedy tradition of parodying the aristocracy, of the “lewd” literature of subversion which has such strong popular roots in so many of the country’s regional languages.

Though it is now too late, the material within Frank’s biography could even have been made, for instance, into an Italian romantic film starring Gina Lollobrigida as the lovely Indira, Marcello Mastroanni as Feroze, Edward G. Robinson as the seductively ugly M. O. Mathai and Anthony Quinn as the rugged yoga teacher. Surely Sonia Gandhi, liminally poised between India and Italy, could have been persuaded to script such a film? The finances would naturally have been provided by a joint venture set up between the Quattrochi Family and the Sangh Parivar.

The Guests of Honour at the first screening would have been Khushwant Singharmin arm with Maneka Gandhi. What scenario other than the private life of Indira Gandhi could possibly give such an equal measure of delight, for such diverse reasons, to secularists and feminists, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP)?

By art alone might such contraries be fused, enmities overcome. As exponents of the comic tradition – from Aristophanes to Shakespeare to Swift to Rushdie to Yes Minister to Spitting Image to R. K. Laxman to Jaspal Bhattito Black Adder – have shown, the literary inflation and consequent deflation of politicians into caricatures via comic art is the only certain method for the ordinary citizen to get even with those who exercise everyday power over us, to make us feel that our ordinariness at least transcends the insanities of their politics. Those who love the exercise of power fear ridicule even more than they fear retirement. Mrs. G. seems to have feared it most of all. In this seems to lie the psychological roots of the Emergency.

If the Congress Party were less stuffed with hypocritical geriatrics it would realise that in this epoch, when Kaliyuga has gone global and formed a multinational joint venture with the bold and the beautiful, with liberalisation and liberalism, the world of vice has, in large sections of urban India, been turned upside down into the world of virtue. If you want to be politically correct, sexuality and hedonism in the woman now betoken female power. The idea of womanly virtue, of the fallen woman, has fortunately no more stability than the Berlin Wall. It may remain generally embedded as a patriarchal ideal, but everyone knows that the winds of gender equality in sexual matters have been blowing hard and chilling the traditional Indian male’s privates into a deep recession.

Yes, there is no doubt about it, Frank has done us a favour by making Indira Gandhi roll out of her Cleopatra rug, by making the skeletons in her bedsheets come tumbling out with her. It is time we took the politics out of Indira’s life and started to democratically look her straight in the face. What if Katherine Frank has got minor dates and details wrong? The next printing will sort those out. Meanwhile, how delightful to know at last that Mrs. G. was only as human as any of us, that the peccadilloes for which Jawaharlal Nehru was moralistically castigated merely inaugurated a tradition which continued and flourished with his daughter. As we await the future biographies of Rajiv and Sanjay, Sonia and Maneka, Varun and Priyanka, we can only pray that this tradition of a rich and varied sexuality is being actively maintained even now by India’s immortal First Family. Rukun Advani is the author of  Beethoven Among the Cows and runs Permanent Black, a publishing company in New Delhi.”

By 1973 the decline had begun. This was just the beginning of the end for Indira Gandhi.

…1973, Delhi and north India were rocked by demonstrations angry at high inflation, the poor state of the economy, rampant corruption, and the poor standards of living. In June 1975, the High Court of Allahabad found her guilty of using illegal practices during the last election campaign, and ordered her to vacate her seat. There were demands for her resignation.

  • Mrs. Gandhi’s response was to declare a state of emergency, under which her political foes were imprisoned, constitutional rights abrogated, and the press placed under strict censorship. Meanwhile, the younger of her two sons, Sanjay Gandhi, started to run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom, and earned the fierce hatred of many whom his policies had victimized. He ordered the removal of slum dwellings, and in an attempt to curb India’s growing population, initiated a highly resented program of forced sterilization. In early 1977, confident that she had debilitated her opposition, Mrs. Gandhi called for fresh elections, and found herself trounced by a newly formed coalition of several political parties. Her Congress party lost badly at the polls.
  • In the second, post-Emergency, period of her Prime Ministership, Indira Gandhi was preoccupied by efforts to resolve the political problems in the state of Punjab. In her attempt to crush the secessionist movement of Sikh militants, led by Jarnail Singh Bindranwale, she ordered an assault upon the holiest Sikh shrine in Amritsar, called the “Golden Temple”. It is here that Bindranwale and his armed supporters had holed up, and it is from the Golden Temple that they waged their campaign of terrorism not merely against the Government, but against moderate Sikhs and Hindus. “Operation Bluestar”, waged in June 1984, led to the death of Bindranwale, and the Golden Temple was stripped clean of Sikh terrorists; however, the Golden Temple was damaged, and Mrs. Gandhi earned the undying hatred of Sikhs who bitterly resented the desacralization of their sacred space. In November of the same year, Mrs. Gandhi was assassinated, at her residence, by two of her own Sikh bodyguards, who claimed to be avenging the insult heaped upon the Sikh nation.

(http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Independent/Indira.html)

Ek Shoti see love story: Indira Gandhi

WILL THE FILM ON INDIRA SHOW HER AFFAIRS? What else could the main opposition party in center have thought of than to have a full-length feature film on its late leader Mrs. Indira Gandhi? The film has made headlines right from the day it was announced that veteran journalist, television personality and littérateur Kamleshwar is writing a film script on the life of late Congress leader who stayed as prime minister of India for a very long time. The latest news is that Manisha Koirala who shot to fame for her controversial film Ek Chhoti Si Love Story , has been selected to portray Indira Gandhi on the silver screen. This was formally announced in Mumbai very recently. The film titled Indira Gandhi-A Tryst With Destiny will roll in the beginning of the next year and will be released worldwide by the end of the same year. This happens to be 100th film for its writer Kamleshwar.But it is the second film for producer Nitin Keni who last made Gadar-Ek PremKatha with director Anil Sharma

Manisha Koirala Ek Choti see love story

Rukun Advani singlehandedly built the Oxford University Press academic section for 18 years and made OUP one of the most respected and prestigious publishers in India. Then, suddenly, he was asked to leave. Now he and his wife, Anuradha Roy have started their own publishing house called Permanent Black. With their first book, Amitav Ghosh’s The Glass Palace just out, Advani speaks to Shoma Chaudhury about OUP, academic publishing, Indian writing in English, and his plans for Permanent Black.

 

Also on this site:

Sex Antics of Monhadas Gandhi:

Sex stories of Mohandas Gandhi, his failures and Sexual perversion/

Nehru’s tyrst with Homosexuality and Bi-Sexuality

Nehur’s tyrst withhomosexualityor experimentation. Nehru dated both Ediwina, and Lord Mountbatten.Menage de trois impacted independence

Sex in Space: The details

Sex in Space: Did Elena cosmonaut Kondakova and Valey Polyakov carry on carnal cosmis coupling? Did Astronauts Jan Davis and Mark Lee Cyber consumate their marriage in the 62 mile high club?

ARTICLES ON MOHANDAS GANDHI:

http://www.mohandasgandhi.wordpress.com

OTHER ARTICLES:

If you liked this post, say thanks by sharing it

Top Comments
  1. Ali Khan · 5 years ago
    Moin, Let me correct you here, U are wrong when u said women representation is 21% its no where near 21% it FAR Beyond 21% its 33%. and guess what if you add civil administration it goes close to 38%. I think you need to give some info to your visitors about Pakistan’s Name… Where is the Word B from Bengal or bangladesh in there ? I hope you will get the idea…. Oh, By the way just to let you know.. there is No tribe in Pakistan which still lives in jungles and eats other humans. next time if some on shows up.. tell them this.. Five cities don’t make a country its every part and city town and village that counts. Regards Ali Khan
  2. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago
    The sex life of Indira Gandhi is well documented by various Indian authors and international historians. Her various lovers wrote articles about her with intimate details.
All Comments
No comments yet for this post. Be the first and comment above!
  1. Mehrunnisa Salam · 5 years ago

    You are such [abuse edited] who does not even have any regards for the personal life of any leader. There are no proofs with you of whatever you have written on this page. It just smacks of cheap publicity and nothing else.

    You forget that it was Indira Gandhi who destroyed Pakistan by breaking it into two and virtually ruining the whole ‘two nation’ theory. It was she who made India such a power in 1970 and 80s that whole of South Asia was known as Indian backyard.

    The problem with Pakistan is it is still immensely feudal. You cannot even imagine of a female politician who can come up in national politics on the basis of her capability. Even in the case of Benazir Bhutto, its you kind of cheap worms, who make stories that she had illegal relationship with Rajiv Gandhi and other scores of people.

    The need is change your mentality. Pakistan is already [abuse edited] your kind of dogmatic, orthodox, back-driving people. We have got a new chance to build a new Pakistan which will be away from all musharrafs, yahya khans and other idiots. Which will have no place of fanatics, fundamentalist, male chauvinists, and people like you who almost sound like Mehsud, the killer of benazir.

    Have some shame, not for you, but for your country, for your female family members. This kind of article brings no fame for you but destroys the name of Pakistan and brings shame to us kind of people, who are showed by our western friends, that this is the level of debate which goes in Pakistan.

  2. moinansari · 5 years ago

    Your “high class” comments are a vivid display of the mentality behind the pornographic comments.

    ..so it’ its you again Ram. At least have some honesty and use your real name Ram Chandra.

    Rupee News has more than 2000 articles in the database. About a dozen or so deal with sex and the sexuality of leaders. You have chosen to read one of them. Rupee News is not Pakistan based. We are an international site with a significant readership in the USA, Middle East and India. Your outburst against Pakistan is amazing. We were discussing Indira Gandhi here, not any other country.

    The sources of the story on Indira Gandhi are all “Indian” (Rukun Advani is the author of Beethoven Among the Cows and runs Permanent Black, a publishing company in New Delhi..etc etc.”). Please take your objections to the Indian press and Indian authors. Her promiscuity shows us her and your class. We simply repeated public knowledge.

    Indira Gandhi did nothing. She simply took advantage of acivil war. She is hated by the Sikhs and larger portions of the “Indian” population.

    If Ms. Gandhi had done anything to the geo-policcal situation of South Asia, Bangaldesh would have folded into “India”–it did not and remains a greater threat to “India” than before. Read the 1940 Lahore resolution before repeating 8th grade notions about the 2 Nation Theory. After being ruled for a 1000 years, 1971 may not give you much solace.

    Let reality intrude. Pakistan has a higher per capita income GNP than India. Perhaps when you finish reading you “Indian” story books you can learn some real history. Pakistan has 21% of its parliament which is female.

    Millions of baby girls are killed in “India” before and right after brith at at the death of their husbands.Please see treatment of women in “India”

    Also, please read some facts about India’s future.India is superpower? Part 1

  3. Maheshwar Chaudhary · 5 years ago

    Indira was a brave girl who married with other cast and made an example that cast is nothing main thing is morality. we are only whuman. we save all.
    thanks

  4. Ali Khan · 5 years ago

    Moin, Let me correct you here, U are wrong when u said women representation is 21% its no where near 21% it FAR Beyond 21% its 33%. and guess what if you add civil administration it goes close to 38%.

    I think you need to give some info to your visitors about Pakistan’s Name… Where is the Word B from Bengal or bangladesh in there ?

    I hope you will get the idea….

    Oh, By the way just to let you know.. there is No tribe in Pakistan which still lives in jungles and eats other humans. next time if some on shows up.. tell them this.. Five cities don’t make a country its every part and city town and village that counts.

    Regards
    Ali Khan

  5. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    Thank you for your feedback. I like your site.

    Ali Khan: 21% is for National Assembly. If you add the local bodies it is more because the local bodies are mandated at 33%.

    Those who have read the history of the Subcontinent…know better.

    Why we Created Pakistan? http://rupeenews.com/2007/11/27/why-we-created-pakistan-the-pakistan-ideology/

    http://rupeenews.com/2008/04/24/there-was-no-partition-for-britain-indian-empire-included-somalia-iraq-burma-singapore-etc-for-the-french-india-included-vietnam-indo-china-for-the-dutch-india-included/

    http://moinansari.wordpress.com/files/2008/05/continent-of-dinia-and-dependencies.jpg

    If you had read Chaudhry rehmat Ali’s “Now or Never” or if you had read the article on Pakistan, Dinia or you knew Pakistani history you would know that Chaudhry Rehmat Ali proposed several states in the Subcontinent and Bengal was called Bangistan. Pakistan was the moniker for the Norhtwesterns states. Hydrabad was called Osmanistan. Chaudhry Rehmat Ali’s plan was proposed as the Lahore declaration which also porposed several states.

  6. Sidharth · 5 years ago

    Well i was filled with rage after reading so much about Indira Gandhi. but after reading your reply to one of our mavericks from India i cooled down. if an Indian writer these sort of things about Indira than why to blame this site. Guess we have to put our own house in order first. I also agree with Nehru – Lady Mountbetten connection, unfortunately it is a fact but we Indians find it hard to swallow. Look where that affair has brought us, A constant enimity with Pakistan on Kashmir. I dont know all this about Indira Gandhi is right or not, but since it is coming from an Indian auther and the book is published in Delhi, i have no choice but to keep quite and bow my head in shame….

  7. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    Mr. Sidharth:

    Thank you for your valuable feedback.

    There are articles about Non-Indians on this site too which may fill others with rage, on Bill Clinton, on French First “Lady” Carla Bruni, on the current prime minister of Pakistan Mr. Gilani, about Pakistani politician Kashmala Tariq. This has nothing to do about any flag or nationality. The articles on Mrs Gandhi as well as Mr. Mohandad Gandhi are based upon Indian authorship–and in the case of Mr. Mohandas Gandhi on the wirtings of his grandsons.

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts with Rupee News.

    We look forward to seeing you back and more dialogue.

  8. aslam · 5 years ago

    respected mr moin ansari
    you r the one who is un vailing the dark side of ” gandhi jee[bapu}” earler i ahd respect for this man in my esteem but now after his reality is exposed i think he shall be awarded worst corrupt politican award
    urs truly aslam

  9. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    Gandhi supported the British wars, extended colonialism was a Seargent Major in the British Army, and volunteered to be the Recruiter in Chief for te Viceroy sending thousands of Indians to war and death supporting the crown.

    In his personal life, according to his grandsons and a host of other reliable authors, he was an adulterer, and carried on incenstuas relationships with his grand neice and regularly beat up his own wife. He slept naked with tow women evry night to test his reaction–one of them Manu his grand niece.

    The Birlas promoted him as an icon. The fakir has no clothes. He has been unmasked.

  10. aslam · 5 years ago

    SUBJECT: REBUTTAL TO ’71

    Respected Mr, Akhbar Navees

    … u r a lead role for journalists we admire your style of work — unveiling the monstors behind the the so called “great politicans”. You must go on because you r doing unique work (very different from other type of journalist) or news makers..

    ..one of your curser who has condemed you.
    Mehrunnisa Salam, on May 9th, 2008 at 5:48 am Said: “You forget that it was Indira Gandhi who destroyed Pakistan by breaking it into two and virtually ruining the whole ‘two nation’ theory”

    She is a hater of Pakistani because her ancestors were slaughered by Muslims warriors.

    I want to give her a example about the Muslim past. Koenraad Elst the Dutch historian quotes Professor K.S. Lal’s “Growth of Muslim population in India“, who writes that according to his calculations, the Hindu population decreased by 8O MILLION between the year 1000 and 1525. INDEED PROBABLY THE BIGGEST HOLOCAUST IN THE WHOLE WORLD HISTORY. (Negat.34) musliz zindabad also hindu genbocide in 1971

    Thus the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000, was followed by the annihilation of the entire Hindu population there; indeed, the region is still called Hindu Kush, ‘Hindu slaughter’.

    The Bahmani sultans in central India, made it a rule to kill 100.000 Hindus a year.

    In 1399, Teimur killed 100.000 Hindus IN A SINGLE DAY, and many more on other occasions. Koenraad Elst quotes Professor K.S. Lal’s “Growth of Muslim population in India”, who writes that according to his calculations, the Hindu population decreased by 8O MILLION between the year 1000 and 1525. INDEED PROBABLY THE BIGGEST HOLOCAUST IN THE WHOLE WORLD HISTORY. (Negat.34)”

    …or she has been affected by hindu genocide 3 million kiled in bangladesh even then these Hindus try to raise their voices against Muslims they have learned nothing from past

    …if she posts hate message about a democratic country then she must also await for message which shows more hatredism
    aslam

  11. Shital · 5 years ago

    Just melodrama and superflous use of english showing proficiency to impress “Garib” nawabs of your country.

    Speaking bomblastic and writting fake words is long histroty of Paki[istan] politician and journalist and writtist.Really pas masters.

    i havn’ observed any qualities of biased journalism in your all articles.

    one would wonder in some articles you are poised Pakistan’s millitary affairs and implications , that I can understand but interlining Indian leader’s private life and unearthing some plagiarism of someone’s book doenN’t bothered India and World.

    You say that has been written by Indian books. Ok but that doent mean is it informed well ?. Still you dont’ understand pitfalls ? how poor ? hahaahh. No wonder well documentation is often true.

    Mr Moin , as a educated person ,why one should bother about your pesudo lump kinetic model which is absoultely baseless and some times no words

    I can understand only if as a full time unemployed person can very well hyphenate there rivals with there culture with political tenure.

    Your comparisions of Shri late Indira Gandhi, and Khajuraho temples (some deities-in which you have least knowledge and cognizance about there presence) and Indian heroins (sudden magically appearance) and transwestern galactic (some what vatican miano) statues from blala bala museum and all in all is showing you have generated baseless and perfunctory sense . and I think it would be really helpful articles to appease your peoples and Ombudsmant

    And one thing “to symbolise and epitomize Gold you dont’ to say oh this is Gold” As per to say truth you need only one who should listen truth and say truth.

    From Indus vally epoch to India Gandhi and beyond India is and Indian Generations least bothered about these falls prosecutioans and allegations. Because in India correct histrory channeled throgh mature education.

    Good Gripe water for your generation.

    JAI HIND

    Your referance and statics is absolte blunder and

  12. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    The sex life of Indira Gandhi is well documented by various Indian authors and international historians.

    Her various lovers wrote articles about her with intimate details.

  13. sandy · 5 years ago

    ur website indicates ur distorted mental state and bia ed thinking. history indicates that pakistan nefer existed when bharat was known as ‘golden bird’. before 1000 bc , hindus ruled this and neighbouring parts of the world. though muslims rulers killed smany hindus and converted so many, had more than one wife with lots of children , still hindus are in majority in this region. together with buddhist of neighbouring countries, which have links to hinduism, are in majority. as far as differentiation to be carried out then there divisions in islam also . people who feel proud in saying that their community massacred so many people, then they should not call themselves muslims as islam or for that matter any religion teaches killing people especially women and children in cold blood. hindus have survived so many attacks by outsiders as they are tolerant society.only tolerant will continue and stiff will break. people who feel insecure only do all these acts. if ur site is so keen in quoting books of different authors who hve no sense of respect fr others then u must quote ‘salman rushdie’ & taslima nasreen’ s books. u will feel how it pinches. so lets stop mud slinging and be genuinely unbiased, propagate love not hatred. few so called truths which hurt people ‘s sentiments must b avoided fr the interest of society . at last ‘ I won’t might being Born in any other religion or country till I am living peacefully, propagating love and helping the needy with tolerant atmosphere around.’ I don’t know what I was in previous birth and what I wll b in next. what’s d aim of so many people to come to this world. Mind u got doesn’t reqiure any Body’s praises or help fr his act but requires people to spread the teaching for a betterment of society. I know all this is too idealistic but no harm in trying and understanding as we don’t know we will go frm this world in some road accident or disease . I thank god fr giving me this wisdom before its too late. I and so many others in india don’t mind saying pakistan or islam jindabad, but india and hinduism , sikhism, buddhism, christinety also jindabad. thank u

  14. Sreeni · 5 years ago

    Well said Sandy.

    If we start digging shit, we get shit!

    Let us focus for the constructiveness and goodness for one another.

    Sreeni

  15. bePositive · 5 years ago

    Hi,

    Sex life of anybody is a personal affair of him/her, and best known by him/her only. Other’s has no right to poke their nose in it like a looser.

    I don’t know what [deleted] you are trying here to prove.

    Ridiculous article.

  16. sandy · 5 years ago

    mr moin, I am disappointed that u didn’t comment on what I said. if u feel there is a little bit truth in what I said and as Musalman whose ‘mussalam hai jiska iman’ stop spreading hatred and refine articles on ur site may b delete which is not reqd or whose coent is not helping anyone and just satisfying false ego and complex of few. who did what and why, should not b so important and we must concentrate what we can do for the society’s future in this world of globalisation, or else cming generations will never forgive us for spoiling the world. I personally feel that their is no fighting among religions but few maniacs are instigating people. Talibanis blew off buddhas’s statues in afghanistan but they don’t hve any problm with China or Srilanka who follow buddhism. Few Pakistanis are against secular state india, with muslim president, because of hvng hindus in majority but they don’t mind close relations with Nepal which is a proper hindu state . why these double standards . I don’t know when people will understand these things. hope soon or else ….Aum shanti shanti shanti. Ameen. God Bless.

  17. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    the criticism of Indira Gandhi has nothing to do with any flag or nationality. We have criticised Mr. Gilani as well for his possible inappropriate behaviour.

    This article on India as a World power was written by CyberGandhi of the Dalit Network. He is a Dalit. We will convey your comments to him. If he wants to respond to you he will.

    We agree with you and will gladly sing Shanti with you. However the policies of India are spreading terror in two Pakistani provinces, and killing Kashmiris on a daily basis.

    India has occupied Pakistani territory, Kashmir, Manvadar, Junagarh, Siachin and Sir Creek. Return these and there will be peace between Pakistan and India.

    We love Indians and Hindus. We will continue to condemn thone within India who spread ahte ad bigotry towards the peaceful people of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sikkim, Sri Lanka, Mayanmar etc.

    Your characterization of Pakistani sentiments is misplaced. Indian “secularism” has been discussed at length on our site by Dr. Chochal, Dr. isha Khan and others. India secularism is a farce. tokenism does not matter

  18. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    Your message will be conveyed to the lovers of Indira Gandhi who made the public revalations about her

  19. sandy · 5 years ago

    Thanx a lot Mr Moin for agrreing to some of my comments. even I condemn anyone spreading hatred against our friend pakistan including few of my country men. but is it justified that because of few maniacs on both sides the innocent people who want to live peacefully with eachother suffer. ound reality is people from both country’s like eachother. we admire wasim akram, ghulam ali, adnam sami and junoon a I believe sharukh khan, dhoni and laloo prasad is admired by pakistanis. I told earlier also, its a humble effort from a ‘ aam admi’ and I don’t expect miracle to change d scenorio in few days, damage done over a period would take a lot of time and effort. I don’t know what proof you want to prove india’s secularism apart from what is on record. but then its upto people to decide . if u don’t mind then may I ask u that what are u or ur site doing to get the two countries and their people closer. as far as india spreading hatred then I must say it just individual perception . in the same way ISI is also spreading terrorism in india because of which innocent people including muslims are being killed . if ISI or few pakIstanis think that few polcy maker in india are responsible for chaos then must target them and not innocent people, ladies and kids. there would be so many mistakes committed in history but we can not correct them. what hitler did that doesn’t mean people of germany would be punished by d whole world. if taimur or aurangzeb killed so many hindus then that doesn’t mean we will start killing today’s muslims. that w
    s history and there were muslims like dara shikoh, akbar and bahadur shah jafar. at last , regarding states , land and making country bigger in size I would just say what last badshah of hindustan I’d before departing from this world -’ kitna hai badnasseb jafr dafn ke liye, do gaz jamin na mil saki us kuch-yaar main !ultimately nothing is ours and we all require only do gaz. is duniya ka ‘ khuda hafiz’ My last comment. bye.

  20. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    Thank you for your kind comments and feedback.

    We agree…If 350 million Hindus were killed in the Mahabharta (source Mahabharta) wars and millions during the Kaura Panda wars, and if Buddhism and Hinduism was exterminated from Hindustan by the Brahamins, it does not mean that Buddhism should be reinstituted as the primary religion in the land of the Ganges. (http://rupeenews.com/2008/02/03/why-did-buddhism-disappear-from-the-south-asian-subcontinent-summary-of-brahmin-atrocities-that-destroyed-buddhism-in-the-subcontinent/)

    We appreciate your thoughfulness and the time you spent in sharing your valuable ideas with rupee News.

    Namashkar

    Editor

  21. sam · 5 years ago

    Mr moin if u people are so much interested in discussing some body’s sex life then I am sure u and friends family members sex lives would b more interesting who get married within family and keep multiple wives. so stop encouraging these type of articles or b ready for some gud conversations. if u don’t delete this article then I promise u lot of sex stories on ur site.

  22. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    Based tracking, “Sam” and “Friend” are the same person who are posting multiple messages under different names

  23. junaid saleem · 5 years ago

    just one point.
    indira’s ghandhid’s husband was not a parsi. He was a Muslim.
    Feroz gandhi is portryaed by old congresmen ((including M K Gandhi) as a parsi so that her children, Rajiv and Sanjay are not classed as half Muslim

  24. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    Junaid: Thank you for your comments. We have covered this topic in one of the articles on Gandhi. You are right. The quote in this article is not ours.

    Best Regards,

    Moin

  25. Rani · 5 years ago

    Hi Moin bhai, salam-val-e-kum,

    I had one doubt after reading this blog. Could you please confirm that this indeed is a parody site mocking those people who unilaterally decide to “invent” facts and theories to spread hatred and animosity among the gullible people of two countries which have shared the same culture for thousands of years.

    P.S.: I never saw any source apart from your own parody site’s old posts, it will be a favour if you can post,in your reply, the links to sources of some of the “facts” that you have mentioned.

  26. Akhbar Navees · 5 years ago

    WAS and Namashkar.

    Every artilce has numerous sources. Discussing the successes and failures of Gandhi has nothing to do with building bridges of harmony and are not contradictory.

    Thank you for your feedback. Your comments were marked by the system as spam.

    Rupee News is unbiased in criticisng and unearthing facts about leaders from around the globe. We have articles on the French First lady, about American presidents, abot US Senators and about Pakistani PMs and also Pakistani parlementarisn.

    Why would Indian politicians be exempt from criticism and why would you feel that these articles would create animosity. Is Moroji Desai drank Urine, how does that creat fueds between countries? If Clinton slept with Gershon, does it create tnesion with Moscow? If Gilani groped Sherry how does that create animosity with India. If Indira slept with the typist, how does that create hatred with Pakistan?

    If you want to see some really good stuff on bigotry, please see hinduunity.org

    The sources of all articles and information is always listed in the article. Obviously reading is a art. If one reads the articles one can see the sources which are very clearly listed.

    Nehru: Stanley Wolpert, M.J. Akbar, and a host of writers listed in the article
    Gandhi: BT SIngh, Bose, Saigorni Naidu, and two recent books by two Grandsons of Gandhi, as well as South African archives
    Indira:Rukun Advani is the author of Beethoven Among the Cows and runs Permanent Black, a publishing company in New Delhi.”
    Gilani: We would let the video do the talking
    Clinton: A plethora of news reports all listed in the article
    Urine Drinking: Indian Telegraph
    Indians eating rats: BBC

    ….and so on and so forth

  27. santhosh · 4 years ago

    PEACE BE UPON YOU

    majhab nahi sikhaatha
    aapas mein bair rakhna
    “no religion tells to fight ”
    these are famous words of a poet who migrated to pakistan from india
    nothing more to say
    than to understand.
    “pothi padi padi jag mua pandit hua na koi
    dai akshar prem ka padai so pandit hoi”
    -sant kabir says one who read a lots of books never became a scholar but the one who understood the two and half word (in hindi) love is the real scholar.
    HATRED BEGETS HATRED
    and there is no real muslim left over in the world
    IF WE WERE TO UNDERSTAND FOLLOWERS OF QURAN AS MUSLIMS
    arab names dont make anyone a muslim
    i pity you all those
    who live a false life

    insha allah
    LET KNOWLEDGE BELONG TO ALL

  28. Akhbar Navees · 4 years ago

    Namashkar, Namastay, Shalom, Salaam and Hello: God Bless you for sharing this wonderful thought. Those who spread hatred are our common enemies.

    However we are not sure why this subject is being brought up on a simple discussion about Mrs. Indira Gandhi who happened to be the PM of “India”. A similar pice has been written about the French leader, a US President, and the Pakistani PM.

    May God Bless you for bringing Kabir into the lives of our readers.

    We join you in your crusade against hatred and bigotry.

  29. SP Gupta, Sainik School Gopalganj, Bihar, India · 4 years ago

    We can paint the map of the Earth as per our whim and choices but the Earth can not be defaced because it has its nature, character and reasons.

  30. Hindu · 4 years ago

    mr. ansari,

    after i read your write ups and replies given by you to the protestors and supporters of this article , I appreciate a good human being in you.

    majority of people from both countries do not realise it that pakistan was created intentionally to sideline the anti british sentiments after the freedom from their rule for over 200 years, it was a carefully planned strategy and many of our leaders who were educated in uk acted like their representatives and divided india and pakistan.

    had pakistan , bangladesh and india been united , today, who could have dared to look upon us.

    and now forgetting everything we are fighting like dreaded foes ? I do not know how many generations would it take more to remain like this?

    I must whole heartedly admit that all our gullible people were made fools and continue to be made even today

    that is one of the reasons by britain and usa gave away citizenships to all intellectuals of india and pakistan during 1955 – 1970 so that these intellectuals become their supporters and do not foment hatred for them in their motherland.

    i hope people reading my comments may try to abuse me and call me names , but I do not mind as far as they read and understand my comments.

    It was finally because of nehru and gandhi that india was divided and after that indira divided bangaladesh for which pakistan still nurses a lot of hatred for india and hence the current problems

  31. Andaleeb · 4 years ago

    Gosh I dunno how that Indira Gandhi managed; she wasn’t exactly a looker and nor was her father. I guess it must’ve been ‘power’ itself then.

    I always wondered why her husband had a Muslim name. What hypocrisy if it was true that he was a Muslim. Where does that leave her as a ‘virtuous Brahman woman’ [cough, splutter]?

  32. Esther Trojan · 4 years ago

    Hatred is your word.
    Nehru had one daughter – Indira Gandhi. World knows what she is. She was born a Hindu, Married a Parsi, her one daughter in law is a Hindu other one a Christian. Family is cosmopolitan.
    Indira Gandhi was man enough to break Pakistan, that is history. And every Pakistani is smarting under the surrender of their 98,000 troops.

    Mohd. Ali Jinnah had only one daughter – what happened to her. Bombay Dyeing is their flagship enterprise. Never visited her fathers illegitimate (sic) creation. Research and write an article on that.

  33. Roy Roberts · 4 years ago

    The article on Ms. Gandhi was written by an Indian and a Hindu.

    Since we are trading insults, let me do the usual ritual…

    Mahmud of Ghazni didn’t have a daughter. He destroyed Somanath and set the path for the 3 battles of Panipat and ten centuries of Islam in Bharat.

    Looking down any graduate from “computer coolie college” can type anything.

    Go out and look up–in Delhi, Hydrabad, Kolkota, Lucknow or any city–you will see minarets and symbols of the 1000 year Muslim rule–one from which you can never escape. On 14th August the scion of an illigitimate RAW was killed on 15th August 1975 and the patriots buried the Rakhi Bhani and Bharti dreams deep into the Bay of Bengal. One lost battle does not make a war! According your current PM, Bangladesh today is the biggest threat to Bharat–in West Bengal, Assam, Orissa, Bihar. Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world and in Bharat! The inevitable awaits your fate!

    Mohandas Gandhi had a son who converted to Islam and repudiated the religion of his father and his farcical drama.

    The reality of Bharat a failed state cannot be hidden by the pelvic gyrations of Pornywood–a dysfunctional conglomeration of 360 states where 450 million live in slavery, 150 million Muslims die in abject poverty and 75% Bhartis live in penury worse than Sub Saharan Africa—According to a hunger indiex, Bharat the Superpower ranks slightly below Burkino Faso. The Blue water navy was unable to stop two dingies painted orange!

    Hatred is not my word.

    I just report the facts. You are the one who hates!

  34. amrit · 4 years ago

    the article is truth about Indira Gandhi,nothing to get annoyed.
    She was corrupt

  35. Pingback: Peepingtom of Pakistan « Conflict, Security and Peace

  36. voltege · 4 years ago

    3 Requests for you Mr. Moin,

    #1) you mentioned about Wolfert’s Biography on Indira, which is banned in India. Can you please write an article about it? I m curious to know what has been written in it?
    #2)
    same way a close associate of Indira wrote a book called ‘behind the power corridors..’ (some similar name) , that book too, is banned in India, so please do find what he said in that book.
    #3)
    do enlighten us with such articles on her other members of family
    Rajiv-Sonia: her son, Daughter in law. &
    Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi : her grand-children

  37. rich05 · 4 years ago

    i dont understsnd u, why bring this issue after she had died and cannot defend herself and even if she did sleep arounf it was her private affais, same with gandhi his sleeping with girls ecet ect were is provate affairs

    what matter was indira was a strong PM who even screwed the USA and they hated her bec the pak generals would kiss their feet and here was a lady who cared to hoots and did what she had too

    about affairs latest is benazin was supposed to be sleeping with Imran, sherry raehaman with zardari, generalTikka raped countless womens, so wher does this lead,

    bec i beleived the only brave leader u guys ever had was benezar bhutto , she came leaving all the luxurious life know that she could be killed by sunni terrorist, but she came hats off to her a very brave lady who cares who she slept with that is for the pimps to keep track of

  38. Akhbar Navees · 4 years ago

    Not sure what “you guys’ and other stuff means. This is simply a book reiview of the literature available on Indira Gandhi who was a leader of the Indian National Congress and an important figure. Obvioulsy the article is very popular and thousands have read it. It sheds ligh on the darker side of Mrs. Gandhi.

    Not sure why you are discussing unrelated events and Benazir Bhutto here. Not sure what religion had to do with her…Your emotional outburst do not achieve anything, will be ignored, and are water off a duck’s back.

  39. Richard · 4 years ago

    If all this information then Indira is a sexual pervert. If its true that Nehru was a gay or bi sexual then I am not surprised that India had so many problems and that people like him associated with othersexual perverts and people that called Hitler their friends. What gives these sexual perverts the right to claoim dominance in Indian politics? I think without such creatures India will be e better place and mor eordinary people will be able to move out of this grinding poverty. All the Gandhi’s are wealthy beyond measure. Who knows exactly how much MK Gandhi accumulated in wealth and where did he hide it? Is it hidden in Pakistan?There is no doubt in my mind that people must be told the truth and researchers must find out whether or not Gandhi hid wealth in the UK, Switzerland or pakistan.

  40. Rasheed · 4 years ago

    I am not a Christian. I am not a Hindu nor am I a Buddhist. A matter that has always bother red me is what makes Muslims think they are free to criticize any other religion or their leaders with total freedom. What also makes them think they should take personal offence when someone criticizes their prophet? If he is a real prophet why does he need some human being to defend his name? Why cant he use supernatural powers to deal with people who criticize him? I read a site where people calling themselves Muslims use despicable and vulgar language. They threaten to kill and maim anyone who criticizes Islam, yet they go ahead and criticize other people’s religions. What utter rubbish is all this? If you criticize someone else or their belief and you expect them not to react, they why are you reacting the way you do when what you believe is criticized?

    I don’t want a million quotes thrown at me; I can also read, write and understand.

    Also many people know how to fight. Many people know how to kill; many people are willing to die to defend themselves. I want us all to be reasonable and stop trying to be clever.Its definitely not helpful

  41. amagdav · 3 years ago

    This is the worst researched article I have read…It is after all the internet. I am Persian ( Dont wish to be called an Iranian) and have lived for 60 years after my teens. You Pakistanis are denying your Aryan roots even though you are sitting on the best evidence of that civilisation ( in ruins- and negleted – Mohan ja- Daro – etc.) You are from a civilisation that is more than 5;000 years before Islam . Islam is a Semitic Religion that has sprouted from Christianity which had sprouted from Judaism. Judaism and Hinduism are the root religion of the modern world. ( I am a Zoharastrian by the way) From the Judaic law we have Christianity, Islam, Sufiism, Ismailis, Dawoodia,Bahais etc etc …AND the other is Zoharastrian ( Aryan – Indo Aryan Religion) and Hindusm that lead to Buddism,Zen Buddism etc. Islam is an Alian Religion in the South East Asia. It is only 1,500 Years old and it is the religion born out of Desert conditions and life od the desert nomad. Did you know that 90% of Saudis who are more than 70 years old were born in a Tent.Which means that within our life time within this century – almost 90% of the forfathers of Saudis were born in a Tent.- Except the Wahabis ( The tribe that was installed as Rulers by the british & Americans after they defeated the Turks out of the SA. ( read your history- Lawarance of Arabia et al. )….The strange thing is It is Only Christianity and Islam( with all its branches) that go out to the world with a view of converting others to their religion. The Jews and the Hindus and the Zoharastrians dont wish to convert anyone…..You have to be born in to it.There are only two countries who were established on the grounds of Religion in living memory . ( Israel and Pakistan) – and both have serious problems !! Please count how many presidents ( and change in Govt. have there been in Pakistan – by NON- Peaceful means….And if it was not for the strong Jewish Lobby in the uSa and west Generally – Israel could not survive!! …On a broder front looking at all the countries that have been converted to Islam have constant turmoil…Algeria, Morocco, Egypt, Tunisia, Nigeria, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iran,Yemen, saudi Arabia ( nothing without USA Support – just waiting for a coup) Pakistan,Afganistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonasia . There is no real democracy in the countries mentioned – not like India.which has more muslims than Pakistan , has Jews, Christians,Zoharastrians, Buddists, etc etc etc …The day Pakistan welcomes and allows the freedom of worship ( like india does ) to all religions and creeds than and then only you can call yourself civil society. Even in a very Islamic country of mine ( Iran) we have Sikhs, Armenians, Zoharastrians, Hindus, Assurys, Azaris, etc etc .. they are free to live there and are never threatned.If the Pakistan Govt. does not play its Politics right then you are doomed as a nation. Why? – There are aready Maps of what future Pakistan would look like . Fragmented and broken up.. Balucistan, Sind, Waziristan, etc…The Oil Cartels want Baluchistan to be in their control and after bribing the Afganis they can attain their great ail and objective of getting a pipeline for Oil and Gas from Kazakstan, Turkmanistan, and neighbouring landlocked countries to the north.!!!! BE CAREFUL!!! VERY CAREFUL! Dont be a pawn in the great game of the west.!! The best option for the region is to have a FEDERATION OF STATES – COMPRISING IRAN, AFGANISTAN,PAKISTAN INDIA AND BANGLADESH ( AND SRI- LANKA) – jUST LIKE THE EUROPEAN UNION. — STRENGTH IN UNITY. COMMON FOREIGH POLICY,CURRENCY,DEMOCRACY – UNIVERSAL ADULT SUFFERAGE- AND SAME FEDRAL LAW. ( AS NO ONE CAN BE ABOVE THE LAW- POLITICE OF THE LAST 18 MONTHS IN PKISTAN MUST HAVETAUGHT YOU A BITTER LESSON)… ALL NATIONS DERIVED FROM THE INDO- ARYAN RACE…EXCLUDE ALL ARABICSPEAKING SEMETIC RACE . THIS WILL BE OUR ONLY SALVATION- IT IS NOT BEYOUND RESONABLE ASSUMPTION THAT THE WST AND USA IN PARTICULAR WILL ATTACK IRAN FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH STRATEGIC NEEDS.
    GOOD LUCK TO YOU ALL
    HAMID – YOUR NEIGHBOUR.

  42. Akhbar Navees · 3 years ago

    Hamid–Another product of the Bharati temple indoctrination. Pakistan history begins 150,000 years ago on the banks of the Soan where the first Pakistanis roamed–then in the oldest agricultural civilization on the planet in Mehargarh–then in the heart of Pakistan–the IVC–the latest avatar of the IVC is of course Pakistan resurrected as a political entity–what has existed for 7000 years as a political reality

    You say you are Iranian and don’t know the basics of Islam spouting Hindu illeteracy about Muslims—Islam is not 1500 years old. Adam. Moses and Abraham were Muslims–Prophet Muhammad simply republished deen e ibraheemi (religion of Abraham).

    You mention maps–there are maps for Bharat too and also great ECO maps of Pakistan if you care to look.

    Like Mark Twain said–the rumors of my death are a bit permature…mind the balkanization of Bharat..will Shiv Sena ask for the Hindu republic of Maharashtra? How long can Delhi keep Assam and Kashmir? Will lthe Maoists and Naxals over run Delhi one day like they over ran Khatmandu? How quickly can the 450 million Dalits and Untouchabales convert from Hindusism to Christianity or Islam–leaving a rump Hindu capstone which will have to fend for itself against Muslims and Christians who will be in majority.

    It is very diffciult fro Bharatis to see themselves in the mirror. Temple indoctrination creates the thinking that you adhere to–which is far removed from reality.

    A Hinduized Zorastrian is worse than a Mahasabah Hindusit–he is confused and doesn’t know fire from water. Have you seen Parzania? Do you know about Cowasjee?

    We crticise and eulogize all countries. We write about great Indians and bad ones. We do book reviews. We castagate the Saudis, as much as we criticize the Gulf countries. We are unbiased and an equal opportunity site. Some of the most escerbic critcism is against Mr. Zardari and Mr. Sharif–not to forget Mr. Khan.

    No thank you–we do not want a union with Bharat–we tried it and it didn’t work.

    Pakistan is constructing the biggest wind farm on the planet, and building a rail system from Islamabad to Istanbul for $20 billion. Roads and rails are being built to connect Islamabad to Dushamabe and Ferghana linking up the ECO with a web of physical networks–to suppliment the inner unity.

    Whether you welcome or don’t welcome the unity–it is inevitable and going to happen. Once the US leaves Afghanistan in 2011, the ECO will become one of the biggest realities of the world.

    Another example of the great temple indoctrination–with no clue about Pakistan but determined to use the keyboard.

    Like Mark Twain said–the rumors of my death are a bit permature…mind the balkanization of Bharat..will Shiv Sena ask for the Hindu republic of Maharashtra? How long can Delhi keep Assam and Kashmir? Will lthe Maoists and Naxals over run Delhi one day like they over ran Khatmandu? How quickly can the 450 million Dalits and Untouchabales convert from Hindusism to Christianity or Islam–leaving a rump Hindu capstone which will have to fend for itself against Muslims and Christians who will be in majority.

    We have our own economic union to look too. If you had bothered to read about Pakistan you would know that Daimer Bhasha and Neelam dam are under construction. Pakistan is constructing the biggest wind farm on the planet, and building a rail system from Islamabad to Istanbul for $20 billion. Roads and rails are being built to connect Islamabad to Dushamabe and Ferghana linking up the ECO with a web of physical networks–to suppliment the inner unity.

    Whether you welcome or don’t welcome the unity–it is inevitable and going to happen. Once the US leaves Afghanistan in 2011, the ECO will become one of the biggest realities of the world.

    PS: We do not accpet any free advice from anyone…so you can save it. When we need advice we pay for it and get it from professionals we trust.

  43. amagdav · 3 years ago

    Aga Ansari,
    Zanoonay English a mann messay tho kheli khoob nist. Zaboon a Farsi maan behtari control doraam. What I am saying is that my english is not as good as yours so please excuse me for not expressing the right sentiments in my comments, I am not critizising Pakistanis- only the people in power there and the power brokers. There are too many power brokers in Pakistan/Iran/Iraq and even India. Hindu muslim conflict, the untouchables, Shia Sunni conflict in Pakistan, Iran, Iraq and syria. unless we the people get together without any conditions and pre- conditions we have no chance…..We will be divided and ruled…The british demonstrated that very well in the last 200 years – worldwide!! In addition there is the vested interest of the provincial governers ( traditional adminstrative authorities) who do not wish to give up their ‘thrones’ and are still playing as king makers and peddling their influences at the expense of the ordinary people. in national and local elections! The distribution of wealth in our countries needs to be looked at. The Zaamindars are Zaamindars whereever they are…There is of course the thorny issue of Corruption at almost every level of Government and adminstration. This is so in Iran/ pakistan/and most of the middle-eastt countries.Also one would be hard pressed to define a democratic elected Governments in our countries. Thankfully Pakistan has rules that allow women to be free and educated and occupy high offices. Fortunatly this is now being eroded in Iran and most of the ME countries ( not north African countries) . It is really unfair to exclude 50% of the population ( women) in giving them any say in the affairs of the country. I have 2 sisters who have given up working as Medical doctors due to the restrictive rules in Iran. A woman doctor is not allowed to treat a male patient and vice versa. What a joke! Fortunatly both of them will be immigrating to France and Germany ( where they studied).

    I hope you are right in your analysis of the future of your country and the region in general. As for me I am not very happy about what is in store for Iranian people. They deserve better. Men and women! After all My mother and my sisters are women.

    On a final note … Pakistan is a young sovreign country of just 65 years old . That is just a nano second in th etime line of history. If you say that your country ( pakistan had a history of 7,000 years – ( fine) but waht about the million Hindus who lived in what is pakistan now and left for India after partion…Dont they share the history of the region – same as you….or are you just equating Pakistan as a secular muslim state! VIZ: You can only share the history of the Indus valley civilisation if you are a muslim! That sucks.! The real people of Iran are the Zohrastrians ecen though most converted to Islam. We are a minority in our own country and are not given due regards as the original persians of the land.The Zohrastrian population is dwindling ..with the majority of us in india who went there as refugees. I was in India 3 years ago for a Zohrastrian meeting and I found the Indians ( Hingus and muslims) very friendly and supportive with no critizism levelled at my community…. unlike Iran.
    Now you know where I come from. Perhaps you can see the issues of Nationality and nation building from my point of view.
    Regards.
    Hamid.

  44. Akhbar Navees · 3 years ago

    Your veiled and not to veiled criticism of Pakistan betrays your Bharati biases–you are a product of the Bharati indoctrination. Your version of events is not the history of Pakistan.

    The Pakistan Civilization is 7000 years old. It was not Hindu.

    The first Paksitani roamed the Soan River 150,000 years ago.

    The Pakistani Mehergarh Civilzaiton preceded the Pakistani Indus Valley Civilization.

    Pakistan is the magnet of the ECO, building a community of Muslim states West of the Indus. There are several thousand Zorastrians in Pakistan enjoying a good life. Zorastrians are good people who have participated in philinthropy and educaitonal institutions in Pakistan. There has never been any ill feelings between Zorastrain Pakistanis and other Pakistanis.

    If you want to discuss Pakistan, yo uhave to dump your Delhi biases.

  45. amagdav · 3 years ago

    I dont know which history book you have read but the info and the coments yo make are very wrong……The language of the Area up to 3000 years ago was Sanskrit….NOT URDU OR Punjabi or Hindi or Persian or for that matter English. You must have read the history of the area in Sanskrit to be able to speak about it with such conviction! The Oldest written texts in the world is is Sanskrit which is a root language for Persian, Arabic, Sindhi, Hindi, Gujarati, Baluchi English, Romany, etc etc etc ….All the ancient writings of Iran ( Nail or Mickh writing – is derived from Sanskrit– Perhaps you should visit Iran – Hamadan specially to see the writing on the granite slab by the Achiminian kings…which is the earliest declaration of HUman rights. …..All the religious books of the Hindus are in sanskrit going back 5,000 years and not in Urdu or Arabic. The Arab invasion of Iran completly destroyed all the buildings and literature of Iran ( mostly Zohariatrian) I am Glad that you finally accept that Adam, Abraham, and Moses are ‘Muslim’ – which means you and the Jews are first cousins! because the jews adoped and wrote about them before Islam was thought of. —-Your views is not only Miopic but riddled with innuandos and reveals your maturity when you refer to Zorastrians as ” Zorastrians Pakistanis” and not just Zorastrians! By that I suppose you would call a Jew born in Pakistan ( I an sure there were few of them) as jewish Pakistani! …I dont know what position you hold in this web set : whatever it is you are doing them any Credit or good.! ………..I have visited pakistan several times ( During the Shah’s time and even Khomeni – albit all as a member of the iranian Govt. team dealing with energy resources..I have yet to meet someone like you ! So bnlinkered and devoid of understanding og ancient History.
    I hope you enjoy your life because you are living a life of a Zealot,conflict,internal strife, Hatred of others – Life has to be better than that! .. To quote Khalil Gibran ” Ther was once a man who was angry and upset because he did not have a pair of shoes – till he ventured outside and saw a man with no legs.” There are countries and people elsewhere in this world who are far worse off than people in pakistan, Iran. India, the middleeast, Iran etc….Rewanda, and sub- sahara africa comes to mind…( somalia, Sudan, Mali, ethopia etc etc etc ..

    Enjoy your life!

  46. Akhbar Navees · 3 years ago

    Your inane assertion that Sanskrit is the oldest language of the world–is assanine–the oldest language was not Sankrit at all. Pardon me but your narrative is devoid of any references, where we have submitted tons of references on our IVC article. The Phonecians did not speak Sanskrit, nor did the Chinese, or the Egyptians or the Mesepotaminns or the IVC people.

    Sanskrit came later–mush much later.

    Your verision of history is the Hindu version of event which have been debunked my millions of around the world and by 170 million Pakistanis. Your temple indoctrination tells you that Sanskrit existed 5000 years ago—whereas the only civilization that existed in South Asia 5000 years ago was the Paksitani Civilization (aka Indus Valley). The Indus people did not write or speak Sanskrit. Their language was pictogrpahic written right to left. The IVC people ate beef, did not worship the Hindu pantheon (Ram, Sita, Arjun, ganesh etc). The Indus Pakistanis had nothing to do with the Ganghes Civilization.

    If you had read the article you would have seen doznes of references to archeologists.

    Of course there are Zorastrian Pakistanis who thrive in Pakistan. Their religion is Zorastrianism, and their nationality is Paksitan. Not sure what your point was on that

    Your base of knowledge is very dated–and there is an overwhelming body of evidence against the theories of Max Mueller. Sankrit was an import into South Asia–and it has no link to Arabic under any linguistic theory of the world.

    If the revelation that Moses and Abraham was an ephiphany to you, then you know nothing about Islam. Bakar Eid is the celebration of Abraham’s convenant with God–and the Quran clearly says that Abraham was a Muslim as was Moses and David and Adam.

    You chose to leave these comments under the wrong article–this article deals with Mrs Gandhi, not the IVC.

    Your personal comments have been ignored as they just who the shalloness of the person who wrote them

    We are enjoying life–you chose to interrupt it with insults. You visited our site…we did not force you to come and read the facts. If you had wanted to stick to your own paradigm, you should have continued to visit Siffy News–you should stay there—it is within your comfort zone.

  47. swap · 3 years ago

    This is most worst site i have seen till today
    indira is ideal symbol of dedication, and sacrifes by her
    r great.U pakistani living a mind of looser in 1971 war
    Such a sites can not blamed indira but it can show
    ur narrow mind full of faults

  48. You are a failed lover? · 3 years ago

    From depression why are you trying to malign in public. Sex is a secred thing which our ancestors
    enjoyed. We inherited the instinct from our animal predecessor and all the healthy people of the world like to enjoy the power. See the good deeds of a person. Private things are private why are you trying to turnish the image of great indian prime minister.
    Better if you have to think think about the sex life of you and your wife. If you can try for 1000000 ladies what is very common to pakistanis

  49. Akhbar Navees · 3 years ago

    Hunh!

    This is a book review. Please take up the issues with the Bharati author of the book.

  50. Akhbar Navees · 3 years ago

    Sex is a sacred thing–agreed, sexual promiscuity, sleeping with your father’s friend, and infidility to the spose shows the character of the person.

  51. goodman · 3 years ago

    you peoples show up your true colours,,no wonder why your nation is still at where you started!!fiirst clean your dirty mind,,,if you can,,,

  52. Akhbar Navees · 3 years ago

    Which “peoples” are you discussing–probably the ones that wrote the books on Indira Gandhi? Right? The artilcle is a book reivew of a book written by an Indian. Which nation are you talking about. Dirty is as dirty does. Mrs. Gandhi slept around. It is a matter of record–many Indians have written about it in varous books and articles. She even slept with her father’s friend.

    We simply report the news.

    The other nation is way ahead where is started from–after it became free of Brahmanism.

  53. human · 3 years ago

    you seem to be smart here.. rest all are just fighting

  54. aravind · 3 years ago

    All this , just because Indira defeated Pakistan in the India- Pak war of 1974 , and 93000 Pakistani soldiers surrended to Indian army !!!!!

  55. The Editors: Code of conduct: We request Civil discourse. No Abuse, profanity, or CAPS. Read this before commenting · 3 years ago

    The original article was written by an Indian and this article is based on a book

    There was no war between Bharat and Pakistan in 1974. All your comments are based on false data.

    There was a civil war in 1971.

    When you were writing this, you were inside looking down at the keyboard. Go outside Look up–you will see the tall minarets and domes a fresh reminder that you were ruled by Muslims for a thousands years–even your country is named by the Arabs who called it Sindh and Hind.

    We appreciate your chagrin, but look at the map of Bharat and you will also see Ahmedabad, and other cities which will continue to provoke you.

    West Bengal will be a Muslim majority area in a decade or so and joint Brihot Bangaldesh.

    The Hindu Republic of Mharashtra will have Hindu Rashtra, and Gujerat will assert its Ram Raj

    The Maoists who control almost half the districts or 40% of the land mass will take over Delhi in 15 years and the fifty states will be sovereign.

  56. aravind · 3 years ago

    What a laugh. That there was a war between India and Pakistan in 1948, 1965, 1971,1998 and all of which India won convincingly. And this is already known officially all over the world.

    India is already more than 85% Hindu along with other dharmik communities which is steadily increasing as well.You don’t have to worry about us.

    The name of the country is Bharat,which is used in all INdian languages. HIndustan and Bharat are also used as other names.

    We are not idiots to bother about trifles like this,

    Only ancient heritage minarts and mosques are preserved in 85% Hindu India , mainly because of their heritage value.

    Muslims have their own mosques and minarets, and we allow it , in the name of tolerance and acceptance, which are values of HInduism or the Sanatana Dharma, as we see and encourage the Divine in all other religions, as per the teachings of our sages.

    Truth is one; sages call it by different names.

    – Rig Veda

    Allah is also an another name for God in Hinduism, and one of the Upanishads itself is named Allopanishad.

    There are many Hindu names for capitals in INdia, and we are not going to make a fuss over a few muslim names or Christian names.

    There is a road in Delhi which is named in honour of Kemal Ataturk, after independence.

    Vasudeiva Kudumbhakam — The whole world is one family.

    – Rig Veda

    West Bengal is a Hindu dominated area, which is highly dense as well. Nothing is going to affect that status as the hindus are the vast majority over there, and most hindus from bangladesh are also returning back due to persecution by islamic fundamentalists .

    The Maoists are just over 12000, in 1 billion 300 million strong INdia, and of which many have surrendered to Indian security forces and also to religious figures , and is doing great proactive work for the development of the tribal areas constructively. I myself know a few of them.

    All this maoist stuff has only resulted now in iron clad rules for combatting corruption and better administration and infrastructure in rural areas, which can defeat maoism without a single shot against them, and will also ensure development of rural areas which will add further to India’s economic growth, which is the second fastest in the world.

    It has also greatly enhanced the quality of the internal security forces.

    There you have India in a nutshell.

    However i must sincerely and honestly say, I have genuine compassion for u guys as I know the scene in Pakistan pretty well.

    I have read the quran myself (have a copy of it ), and when Islam itself states respect for other religions, I can’t understand why pakistan is still obsessed with the kaffir issue , when Allah itself is seen as a name for God in Hinduism as per the teachings of Sri Ramakrishna, Shirdi Sai Baba , Kabir and Guru Nanak in Sikhism.

    The greatest Jihad is the jihad against oneself. — Prophet Muhammad ( peace be upon him)

    This is the central teaching in Islam. External jihad conducted without the above in place, is a war against Allah Himself.

    Hope u guys keep this in mind.

  57. The Editors: Code of conduct: We request Civil discourse. No Abuse, profanity, or CAPS. Read this before commenting · 3 years ago

    Please do not teach us Islam, and we neither have the inclination, nor the time to learn Hinduism. Thank you but no Thank you.

    The Iron clad stuff jsut resulted in Maoists controlling 40% of Bharat.

    Your temple indoctrination about Pakistan is not not credible.

    Where did the Kaffir issue come from? Typically you are jumping all over the place. Stay calm and focused–you should be discussing the subject at hand

    If Bharat won the war in 1948, where did Azad Kashmir, Alsai Chin, Giglit-Baltistan come from?
    If Bharat won the war in 1965, does have anything tangible to show for it?
    If Bharat won the 1971 war, which Pakistani territory does it hold?
    What about the defeats of Bharat in 2002 and 2008 when it huffed and puffed on the border and then went away.

    PS: Rupee News does not accept free advice. When we need advice we pay for it. Thanks but no thanks.

  58. Abdallah Jan · 3 years ago

    [...] I will not comment on any body’s private obscenity. However I do appreciate your responses to commentators, I think you are doing a good job of putting them on the defense.

    It is really astonishing with all the filth that India shows in its entertainment Industry, as part of Indian Kama Sutra culture, why the objectors object if an Indian P M is exposed of what she practices what the culture preaches?

    As for the Indian Parsi, he is angry as hell since they were expelled by the revolutionary forces, as a revenge, due to them taking sides with MI5 and CIA in over throwing Muhammad Mussadegh and replacing with Shah. They are also actively spouting nonsense in western countries. They lie, and I have noted the lies he spouted as to the origins of Islam.

    He Alleges that Islam evolved from Christianity, that itself evolved from Jadaism. It seems he is either ignorant or a complete LIAR, to mis-inform the readers about the messages brought down by the chain of Prophets (pbut).

    Judaism like Christianity is a man made religion. Moses (pbuh) never called his people as Jews or Judaist. He called them by ‘O people of Israel’. Israel being name given to Prophet Jacob (pbuh) 2nd son of Prophet Isaac (pbuh) and not territory. Likewise Jesus (pbuh) never called his people as Christians, but called them ‘Helpers’ in way of Allah. He did not preach new religion, for he himself followed the Law of Moses (pbuh). He never asked the Helpers to preach to non-Jews. He said ‘go not the way of Gentiles, but to the lost sheep of Israel’. So what happened that Jews rejected Jesus? The Jews were expecting two (2) Messiahs. One priestly, and other, with Law in one hand and, sword in other, to defeat the Romans and free Jews from Captivity. When the Rabbis and Pharisee asked him, ‘are you the Messiah?’ Jesus replied in the negative because he knew they are asking for kingly Messiah or ‘The Prophet’ or ‘That Prophet’ that will enforce the law of GOD.. Upon hearing the reply, they asked, ‘Pray tell us master, if you are not ‘The Messiah’ from what tribe he’d come?’ Jesus replied; “If I tell, you would not believe me, but verily the Praise Worthy (Muhammad) would come from the tribe of Ishmael”. The Jews started rebuking and pelting Jesus and accused him of false prophet, since to them, every Prophet has to come from tribe of Isaac. The Essenes, Nazerenes, Maccabees, Pithon and Afghana tribes (Helpers) at once came to Jesus rescue and pushed back the angry Jewish crowd. The above tribes (Helpers) later migrated to Khorasan after Jesus ascension, rather to live in captivity and named their new home as ‘Afghanistan’.
    Saul of Tarsus aka apostle Paul (The founder of trinity version of Christianity) hated the Helpers and did his utmost to persecute the early followers. He was very loyal to chief Rabbi of the Temple. They thought unless the Jews adapted the puritanical Judaism, they would never be able build the Empire the likes of Solomon Empire ruled by an Israelite Prophet, which they lost due to rebellious nature of Jews.
    They classified Jesus and his followers as rebellious. But when the Chief Rabbi daughter Popea, who was promised to Paul, ended up in Nero’s bed, he made a U turn and concocted a new religion by mixing some Torah and lots of ancient mystery Egyptian Pagan religion that became the modern Christianity. His target was the Mediterranean people, who had no objection in replacing their god-head Zeus with the god-head of Jesus provided the Sabbath is changed to Sunday. This new doctrine called Jews as Christ Killers. Rabbi daughter a learned Jewess, now queen put Nero against the Pauline Christianity that burned his City and blamed it on Christians. Later on when Constantine took hold of Christianity, he took his wrath on Jews. So Paul was instrumental in putting Jews against Christians and vice versa. Until Islam took hold of Palestine and brought peace in the region. There is absolutely nothing common in Islam and Christianity. Islam rejects the fundamental tenets of Christianity. So the angry Parsi is absolutely lying that Islam evolved from Christianity.

    The Jews and the Hindus has some common rituals, among them is cow worship and swastika. The Jews pay a handsome price for gold red cow, the likes of the golden calf that they constructed when Moses was up on Mt. Sinai (Jabl-Al-Lawz or Jabl-Al-Musa in S. Arabia) receiving the Torah. This is the Calf that they will sacrifice upon completion of the 3rd Temple that they plan to build after dismantling Al-Aqsa (Allah Forbid). The swastika was the symbol of Khazar or Ashkenazi Jews of Germany.

    Both these nations enjoy obscenity as far as sex is concerned. When Moses came down from Jabl-Al-Musa and saw his people dancing naked and indulged in adultery and fornication around the Golden Calf. He supplicated Allah for it’s and people destruction. Sure enough the Lightening destroyed Calf and lewd people around it. What people survived was force to consume the golden dust of calf, that to this day diseased them mentally.

    The prophet of Islam had this to say about Nation and Women. “Best is the Nation that has the most women”. This makes India as the worst Nation in the face of the earth.

    India murders one million female children at or after birth annually.
    India burns 30,000 young brides/year, due to non-fulfillment of in-Laws demand for dowry.
    Indian culture does not allow 30 million widows to remarry, but are used for prostitution.
    Indian kidnaps female children one every 45 second, to be sold as child bride to much older man or sometime to multiple men of same family. And this is due to shortage of women.

    By virtue of its deeds and policy, India will self destruct.

    Any way, I like your style Moin and Saed.

    Assalmu-Elekum

  59. The Editors · 3 years ago

    Brilliant Analysis–thank you. Very nicely done.

    Which Parsi did you identify?–we didn’t quiet get the name.

    http://www.white-history.com/hwr17a.htm

    When we visited Rome we saw the real Madonna, and Child from the Roman legend (Isis and Horus), and the Greek holy mother and child (Greek mythological character, Dionysus, as a holy child) which was adopted by Christianity. The Greek god-man Orpheus-Dionysus, who rose from the dead in that culture’s mythology.

    We wrote something similar to your narrative–which describes the context of Christianity–hinted upon by Dan Brown–but described at length by Michael Baigent in “The Jesus Papers” (the book on which Brown based his novel). You will enjoy our article Prophet “Muhammad in the Christian Context”

    http://rupeenews.com/about/muhammad-in-the-christian-context-concentrating-on-the-commonalities-between-the-abrahamic-faiths-the-arian-influences-on-islam-the-muslim-influences-on-martin-luther-locke-and-jefferson/

    Looking forward to your posts on this site and also on http://www.Musalmantimes.com

  60. Abdallah Jan · 3 years ago

    @ Editors
    The Parsi I referred to is Amagdav.
    Thanks for referring me sites that was a refreshing reminder of what I already know. Ali Akbar is the author of ‘Israel and the Prophesies of Holy Qur’an’, published by Seraj Publication somewhere in England (1963) that has talked about the origin of Christianity. In the book he has mentioned about god-head of Osiris and others. He claimed to be Sunni Muslim. But when he wrote about Jesus (pbuh) being buried in Kashmir, I overlooked all his work, since it’s the Ahmediah that claim Jesus died and is buried in Kashmir.
    By power of ALLAH, Judas was crucified instead, and upon the close of Friday evening, next day being Saturday (Sabbath) the Jews had to bury him. Some of Jesus disciples resuscitated Judas, since he was not completely dead. Thinking he is really Jesus they helped him escape along with Mary Magdalene to France where Judas married Mary Magdalene. They may have traveled to Kashmir, and could have had children, and Judas could have died in Kashmir and buried. ALLAH knows better.
    Later on I came across multitude of books by different authors that talked about the Mythology of different god-heads, and origin of Christianity. The most influential among them is Osiris and his wife Isis. They had two sons Horus and Set. This is very spicy subject, perhaps some other time I would write in detail the other mythologies that has spouted from the Mythology of Horus and Set. Horus occultation in respect to the Ad-Dajjal, the voyage of some of the Sahabas to Island (England), meeting with Jassassah, coming down to Shi’ah belief of 5 year old Imam Mahdi in Egypt disappearing and coming back in future age. Why should we believe or not believe in these mythologies, that gives credence of Hindu and Buddhist belief system of re-incarnation. And if we do believe in these mythologies then why oppose the Israelite claim of the Last Messenger to come from tribe of Israel.
    Using Qur’an and Sunnah as THE STANDARD all the Mythologies crumbles to dust. Though there are many Ayah (sign), but specifically the verse 9:30 that states:
    “ And the Jews say: Uzair (Ezra) is son of Allah, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allah. That is saying with their mouths, resembling the saying of those who disbelieved aforetime. Allah’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from truth!”.
    “Resembling the saying of those who disbelieved aforetime.”……….Jews had to assimilate with Romans to prosper financially. Thereby they compromised the puritanical form of Judaism and assimilated some of Pagan belief in its system hence the term ‘Hellenization’. The Romans took Zeus as their god that in turn was plagiarized from the god-head of Osiris of Ancient Egyptian Pagan religion (3000 B.C.). Where all these mythical god-heads (Osiris/Dionysus, Adonis, Attis, Zeus, Bacchus, Mithras, Krishna, and Aztec to name few), had similar bibliography, as that of, Jesus of Mystery (Modern Christianity). They were all born on 25th Dec. of Virgin birth. Died on cross, buried for three days and arose from the dead to ascend to heaven. Their returned is expected to save humankind. They all walked on water, fed thousands of people with a loaf of bread, healed sick and blind and turned water into wine. They all called him son of god and by some as god himself in flesh. They all believed he died for the sins of mankind, and who so ever believe would be saved from Hell. This is what the ayah is saying, “resembling the saying of those who disbelieved aforetime”.
    During the inauguration of Suez Canal, the French Masonry presented the Statue of Isis to Egypt to be stationed at the canal that was scornfully rejected by Egypt. The same statue than was presented to U S A and is now what you have is Statue of Liberty.
    Baphomet the goat deity that is worshipped by the ruling elite of the world has something to do with Horus. Its author Aleister Crowly, the English double agent, who had one to one conversation with Baphomet (or may be Jinn) in Egypt, so it is alleged. It is possible that Satan may have coupled with Osiris human mother and produced a hybrid child ‘Osiris’. I had refuted these claims until I read a Hadith concerning ‘Mugharribun’ the hybrid child that has strain of Jinn. This work is also written in ‘Intruder’, by Budd Hopkins. ALLAH knows better.
    Your site has lot of useful information that is to my interest. I’ve stopped watching the main news media since 2000. LIES and all LIES. The news media from Pakistan is also compromised. Al-Jazeera is also compromised. Indian news media is a joke and obscene. In fact there is not an outlet in the world that is unbiased or not controlled by special interest group.
    Assalamu-Elekum

  61. rhvankar · 3 years ago

    A foolish son see his mother nacked seen,all are in this artical is flse only animated vision are used along with ku koirals photos,you can not hear mothers word,the act,not finished,due to our effrts not good for that act,donot praper this type let,honerablegrave digging works,at us,some news said lord issuu was gay> be silent pl.they sleeping for decorate our future,this type internal matter do not disclsed in writing and with photogarphes it is very bed for present autmoshprs,

  62. wildpigeon · 3 years ago

    Condoms too big for Hindu men..This news is getting alot of coverage on BBC’s front page for past almost 4 years now …poor Hindus..No wonder their women running after Pakistani lads..

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6161691.stm

  63. jpb · 3 years ago

    All religion especially islam is mythology and a complete waste of time. Science is the key to understanding life. Very few discoveries that have benefited humanity have emanated from clerics. Clerics usually are the first to condemn new discoveries. If there is a God, that God is nothing like any man has ever described. Religion has killed many more people that it has ever saved.

  64. The Editors · 3 years ago

    Islam is the only religion where concrete evidence exists of the original books, manuscripts, and clear evidence of Prophet Muhammad, his writings, his treaties and his progeny.

  65. alansaralhaq · 3 years ago

    I am puzzled what diod they ever see in Indira – she looks like dame edna in the UK. For those of you who do not know of the British Celeb – she’s a He, a man dressed up as a woman.

    So she banged a few men – get over it India after all she’s only kept up the principles of your faith system.

    For the record 1971 was a stale mate, India could do no more.
    But the toll on East Pakistanis was unbareable for West Pakistan and so for the sake of our brethren a bold decision was made.

    You will one day have a strong Islamic Bangladesh cleansing their land of Bha-Rat-i miscreant.

    Bangladesh is destined to be an Islamic Nation and will forever share commonality with the widre muslim world.

  66. coldnemesis · 2 years ago

    “She is a hater of Pakistani because her ancestors were slaughered by Muslims warriors.”

    Didnt the so called liberal administrators on this page see the comment? This man goes on to boast about how many ‘Hindus’ were killed in India, not realising that at the time these massacres took place, his ancestors were Indians. For all he knows, their Hindu mothers might have been dragged into Mughal harems to produce Muslim children. Such vain hatred. Sadness.

    Man! Who here thinks Pak existed before 1947? The fact that Sanskrit and Tamil are among the oldest languages has made some people itchy in the wrong places and it is for them to evaluate why. Read: Inferiority complex.

    So the deal with Indira is that she whooped some ass in 1971 and left a nation feeling emasculated at the hands of a woman? Why wont they, if theirs is a land that treats women like minority. One only needs to read about government inaction in case of rapes, where the benefit of doubt is always accorded to the guilty. Shame. It must really burn a few asses that a woman can lead a nation successfully and live a life of sexual liberty and independence, something women in Pak are going to dream about for the next few centuries. And ts not their fault. Try and dodge that!

    For all those labouring under the misapprehension that Pak is a great and magnanimous nation need to do a little more reading abt the deaths in East Pak by the Pak army. Then again, Im sure the relevant sources have already been silenced. Talk about a military coup in a democracy.

    Indians in general would love to know their neighbours better, more so today, and the opinion was shared.. or so I thought. I guess even the most well-read or liberal Pakistani is branded with such base feelings for India for no good reason. Maybe its time for the nation to grow up and make some tangible progress instead of quoting govt-suggested figures!

    [Editors] Kindly do not patronise commentators by saying things like the write-ups are not biased. If that is true, who died to make you king such that you think you have the right to to make a moral judgement about anyone, regardless of whether they are Indian. Did you know any of these people personally? Are you of the opinion that they had absolutely no contribution to society? The pen is a mighty instrument. Kindly learn to appreciate its value. I respect that a certain amount of research has gone into the writings, but a story is woven like a writer would have it. There is no excuse for irresponsibe writing.

  67. Rupee Wala · 2 years ago

    If you had the brains to read–you would have noticed that the article on Ms. Gandhi is based on a book report and the sources are all Bharati. It has nothing to do with Pakistan. However we did notice your vitriol and will of course respond to it.

    BTW: Hundreds of thousands have read the article and enjoyed it.

    The 5000 year old Pakistani IVC: Pakistan existed 5000 years ago as the IVC and 7000 years ago as the Mehergarh Civlization. During the time of Hazrat Musa the Pakistanis were called Melhullans, from Mallah (sailor). The map of the IVC llooks like the map of Pakistan. It is. It is the map of Indus Valley 3500 years ago. This is the map of the Indus Valley Civilization which existed 5000 years ago on the banks of the Indus. This represent the Indus Pakistanis (see Indus Saga by Ahtizaz Ahsan, and Professor Dani’s prolific writings). The IVC was not Hindu. They buried their dead, wrote a non-Sanskirt pictographic language, ate beef, did not know the horse, were not vegetarian, wrote right to left, did not know the horse (No Arjun), and did not worship any of the Hindu pantheon (Arjun, Agni, Mithra, Nag). This map shows the Indus Valley Civilization which traded with the Muslim Moses in Mesopotamia. Pakistan is the latst Muslim incarnation of the IVC. The Indus people banded together to live together as they had lived together for thousands of years. This was the contract once the Britain left. Bharat never existed as a united country–What Partition? Bharat never existed as a nited country–Pakistan did for thousands of years. The original IVC thrived only on the banks of the Indus when Bharat was jungle. (http://moinansari.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/pakistan-existed-5000-years-ago-as-ivc.gif)

    >>There is no excuse for irresponsible writing

    And we had to bear your rhetoric (Yawn Yawn), as if we hadn’t heard this before–as if you were saying something unique!! Its the same rehash from HinduUnity.org and the rest of the Bharati papers which comete among themselves to be more Pakistanphobic.

    Still crying about losing to the Muslims and being ruled by them for a thousand years!!!

    Pakistanis in general have a pretty good idea of what Hindus are all about–certainly we don’t need any introductions. Do us a favor, take care of the Muslims in India instead of worrying about Pakistanis.

    >>military coup

    Wasn’t Indira’s emergency a martial law too? Just curious!

    Your temple indoctrination will tell you the false stories. However reality is different. Bharat is a failed state with 40% of the landmass under the control of the Naxals, the seven sisters of Assam almost independent with no central control, Kashmir in open revolt and 75% of the population of Bharat is living under $2 per day—50% of its survives on less than $1.25 per day.

    Here is Shining India:

    Violence Update in Bharat
    From Jan. 1989 to September 30, 2010
    Total Killings * 93,471
    Custodial Killings 6,975
    Civilians Arrested 118,424
    Structures Arsoned/Destroyed 105,877
    Women Widowed 22,742
    Children Orphaned 107,382
    Women gang-raped / Molested 9,962

    Pakistan is a not a physical space–it is an ideology of liberation from the hegemony of the Brahmans and the imperialism of Delhi. Pakistan has shown the way. 40% of Bharat is in the hands of the Naxals. Assam, the seven sisters and Kashmir are in open revolt. More and more parts of Bharat now seek liberation from Pakistani. The 450 million Dalits, Untouchables, Scheduled Classes and Tribals will liberate themselves in what Dr. Kancha Ilaiah calls “Post-Hindu India”. Bharati “progress” is an anomaly based on forced “outsourcing” which occurred during th Bush Administration. Ohio has already banned outsourcing–which is prescient foreteller of trends to come. As soon as the US elections near, outsourcing will be made part of history–essentially seriously impacting Bharati growth.

    Muslims all over South Asia are angry at Ayodhya–this is a powder keg of discontent which has no escape valve. The reconstruction of the temple which again tell the Indian Muslims of their second class status. No one can blame Pakistan, Thailand, or Portugal for your blunders–this will blow up. No one can blame the ISI then.

    The only thing a temple indoctrinated Bharati can do is harp upon 1971–forgetting August 14th, 1974, when the Indian agent was killed, and his body thrown in the streets for days–the Indian Rakhi Bahni sent packing back to Delhi.
    Most Indians are extremely proud about the export of its terror to Pakistan in the 70s. If the Indian sponsored LTTE terrorists had been successful in creating a Hindu Tamil state in Lanka-these very same people would have been ecstatic. If the Delhi sponsored terrorists had been successful in creating the Chakma Republic Indians would be overjoyed. If the Bharati sponsored terrorists had been successful in creating the republic of Tibet—Delhi would be in high heaven. Bharatis are very proud of the terror tactics of the Mukti Bahni–which had recruited 80,000 Hindus (General Manekshaw’s biography). The Mukti Bhani dressed as Pakistani soldiers ravaged Muslim Bengal—blaming Pakistan. Then Bharat sent terrorists into the Chittagong Hill tracts into its former ally. Delhi cries like a baby on terror in Mumbai—but Bharatis are very proud of sending armed terrorist into a sovereign countries in Nepal, China, Lanka and Pakistan.

    Coolies: You are looking down while you are typing. When “computer coolies” feel like chest thumping about 45000 Pakistani soldiers and 45000 civilians look up from your keyboard and go outside–whichever town you live in, Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkota, even Banaras–and look up…the towering Muslim minarets and the huge Islamic domes will remind you of 1000 years of humiliation. A battle is not a war–a viper injured is more dangerous than a viper alive.

  68. zahirhai · 2 years ago

    Thats really a very differently informative information you give Mr. [Editor].

    There are a thousand links to the history taught globally I can provide you with, I bet. please provide me with some links that throw any light on the History of Pakistan the way you tell it. (that history of Pakistan is 1,50,000 years old), as if that be the case, it is among the most classic establishments, most of us are unaware of it’s grandeur.

    I donot go for cockfights in blogs. If you propose, or propogate something, please attach your references alongwith. Remember, with the right to speak, comes duty to listen. With right to learn comes duty to teach, with right to know, comes duty to share.

    I will take things one at a time.

    Life of Indira Gandhi: Well, I believe she was given the respect and designation for all she did for the nation, and not what she did in her personal life. And till a person is good at what he/she is required to do, we need not question their unobserved-then, aspects, specially after they have long gone.
    A quick reference
    http://www.answers.com/topic/indira-gandhi

    About the Argument:
    I will not go on the tangents of old inscriptions and history books, first I would request you to accept something only after you have read, or known both the sides. And a willingness to know more makes us sane human beings. So please, instead of giving sharp remarks(as u have done in here), I request you to try and see their side of the picture. Who knows you both are only looking at one side each, of a big mountain-like issue.
    Today, people with power, or hunger for power, t of way to do anything to convince people towards their own benefit. Hence I would request you, if you come across anything that is stimulating, aggravating and creates a sense of decisive strength in you, PLEASE PLEASE crosscheck the info from the places you should, can, and must. Many people emotionally deflect us towards the directions that benefit them, in power, in politics, and we, unaware and awwed by their halo, dont realise our activities.

  69. The Editors · 2 years ago

    Every article is referenced and researched with sources cited prominently. The book review of Mrs. Gandhi lists all the sources. We have a personal library of more than 500 books and you see the research published after about 20 years of research.

    If the best you can do is to site answers.com then we rest our case. Our articles go a bit beyond the Disneyland version of events.

    In the past few weeks 3.5 million visitors have visited just this site. Our readership is growing exponentially. Our articles are posted all over the internet and on discussion groups like Pak.defense, Bangaldesh.def, Lankans, US, European, Dutch and the Bharati Defense boards. We are read in China and Malaysia. Obviously there is interest in our writings

    Of course you don’t agree with our opinions, but that is up to you. Our purpose is not to convince you in any way.

    The history of Pakistan is gleaned from Dr. Chatterjee, Ahtizaz Ahsan, Romilaa Thapar, Ahmed Hasan Dani, Jawahal Lal Nehru, Kalhana, Mohandas Gandhi, Stanley Wolpert, Maualna Mohammad Azad, Rajmohan Gandhi etc. If you have any specific questions, we will be glad to answer them.

    Our articles are posted on the BJP site too!!!

    We have seen the other side, and see them everyday on Sify and Hinduunity.org and Times of India. We simply respond and provide a fair and balanced picture on our sites.

    We reserve our acerbic comments to those who are abusive to us or our site.

  70. Pingback: Pakistan: The narratives come home to roost « Indus Asia Online Journal (iaoj)

  71. Pingback: home » Blog Archive » 3quarksdaily: Pakistan: The narratives come home to roost by Omar Ali

  72. Pingback: home » Blog Archive » 3quarksdaily: Pakistan: The narratives come home to roost

  73. Shishir · 2 years ago

    oops it should “slightly exagerrated” ,boy do I feel like a Pakistani!

  74. alansaralhaq · 2 years ago

    Sieving through your drivvle.
    I wish to remind you 1971 was a stalemate and read Dead Reckoning by Sarmila Bose.

    Bangladesh have had enough of the treacherous League and is destined to. Become an Islamic Nation.

    I think rupee wala sums it up well on who we are before 1947 a different ethnicity, people and culture to you and your kind. Prior to 1947 there was NO blinking nation called India but only a British Colonised Empire known as British India and go beyond the British and you were known as Hind and you people were Hindhis.

    That was a golden age of Islam in Hind the region easy of the Indus and we ruled over a third of this region. Go beyond this and you will have MONTH history recorded history that Hindh was a homogenous unified nation other than your blah blah blah that really takes its origins 200 years ago when the British saw you as their proxy against a rich and powerful Islamic empire.

  75. alansaralhaq · 2 years ago

    Couple of typos 3rd from bottom reads you Will have NO recorded history of what you infer.

    And we were never part of the ppl culture and religion east of the Indus.

  76. alansaralhaq · 2 years ago

    If I felt like an Indian I will whinge and whine and talk about a NON Existence history and big it up so much that I will begin to believe it as the truth.

  77. rohit from bhopal · 2 years ago

    seems ridiculous…. all that stuff that this article has in it.

    it annoys me that how could someone envy so much of this LEGENDARY leader of India and write all this crap.

    maybe someone’s NOT got a woman as great as HER in his country.

    And maybe that’s what you are raised to talk when you envy.

    BUT BELEIVE ME….. No country in this world neither in the past nor in the future will ever be blessed to have a leader like THE GREAT AND LEGENDARY Ms. Indira Gandhi. I’m proud to be born on her soil.

  78. Akhbar Navees · 2 years ago

    We simply report the news—you can worship the nympho

  79. vj · one year ago

    haha, what a joke this article is?
    I am wondering till what extent a planned propaganda can go?
    Answer to all questions is simple, Abdul kalam is still honored and millions are his followers and considered as a role model in India. See where AQ Khan is…….
    India is a land of rich tradition and it’s still respected by whole world because of its secular principles and democracy. USSR was India’s friend and still russia is India’s friend. Whereas US was Pak’s friend and now both are fighting like mouse and cat. This shows the difference.We didn’t use our friendship for shortterm benefits. We invested on it and we are mutually reaping the rewards.
    Give respect you will surely get it.
    When you were spending your valuable time for the above cheap propoganda, 1 billion strong indians are working at their level for national growth which is well reflected by 8% national growth.
    Choice is yours, think whether you should spend your valuable time in digging your own grave or constructing your country by working hard in a right way. The latter will only earn respect from others.

  80. Akhbar Navees · one year ago

    If you had read the article, or had the ability to read, the article is based upon books written on Mrs. Indira Gandhi–all references are given.If you have any beef with the fact please take it up with the authors.

    AQ Khan is revered in the entire Islamic world. Of course not by the enemies. Who cares about the enemies?

    Why lecture us on “respect”–attack the authors of the books. Maybe you can send them inot exile like M.F. Hussain?

    Azad was a showboy who made all the wrong decisions, and was removed from office by the Congress after he had been used and abused. He wrote reams against Nehru and Gandhi in the exceprts of his book which was published 25 years after his death.

    Now you can go back to spamming our site under various fake names.

  81. Raj · one year ago

    Have some common sense. How gullible can you people be to believe such lies. First of all Mahatma Gandhi is no pervert. If he had those kinds of hobbies he wouldn’t of been able to have the entire coutry follow him plus attract alot of international journalists to interview him. It is known Nehru had an affair with Edwina Mountbatten at the time he was a widower for more than 10 years. Indira Gandhi on the other hand served as her father’s unofficial secretary since the time she came back from England. Sometime during this this time she also married Feroz Gandhi which Nehru opposed initially but accepted due to Mahatma Gandhi supporting them and giving his blessings. During thist entire time she has been back she was serving as Nehru’s right hand after Feroz died she became full fledged in politics taging along her sons Rajiv and Sanjay. Sanjay Gandhi showed interest in politics early on and remained by his mother’s side as her righthand till his death in 1980. His older brother Rajiv at this time abandoned his piloting career in oder to be by his mother’s side at her time of need and he himself now became involved in politics. Four years later Indira Gandhi was assasinated and Rajiv Gandhi became prime minister. Indira Gandhi since the time she came into power till the day she was assasinated she always ruled with an iron fist. She was very decisive and aggressive at times. Becase of her ruling style she had more enemies around the world than friends. One is an obvious enemy and one is very influntial unlikely enemy (not anymore) and some within the country. She freed Bagladesh from Pakistan oppression which till this day still hold a grudge.

  82. Akhbar Navees · one year ago

    “Raj”: If you had the ability to read, or if you had read the article you would have seen that the article is based on solid books written by Indians. You should take your beef up with your fellow Bharatis.

    You need to update your knowledge.

    1) Nehru had an affair with Edwina while she was in India. Lord Mountabattan died in 1984. She died before him and Neru sent a ship to offer condolences.
    2) The article is unique in that it is not about the life story of Mrs. Gandhi–only certina aspects of her life as enumerated by the authors listed
    3) Mr. Mohandas Gandhi was repudiated the 109th Congress of the United States of America for his racism. The Nobel peace committee to give him a Nobel Peace Prize because of his exhortation to wage war on Pakistan.

    All this is in the article

  83. Alansaralhaq · one year ago

    Do you thik Nehru gave her syphillis?
    Or did he give that to Mountbatten.

  84. Akhbar Navees · one year ago

    Both!

    Mountbattan was gay–and killed due to his homosexuality related issued.

  85. Alansaralhaq · one year ago

    Irish unlike Indians were not homo’s therefore Mountbatten was very frustrated lol :)

    What he would have done for a bit of Nehru in Ireland

  86. Akhbar Navees · one year ago

    Actually Nehru was *** when he went to the British Public schools. I forget which one it was Harrow or Eaten.

    Funny thing. Stanley Wolpert was writing his biography and Sonia Gandhi gave him all his letters. Apparently no one had read and scrutinized all the letters. Wolpert found out lots of stuff about Nehru’s homosexulaity in the letters. Sonia withdrew her permission to publish the letters. So Wolpert who already knew the truth had to dig up other sources to show the true nature of Nehru.

    The book is worth reading.

  87. sparsh · one year ago

    Leave all……
    Face the truth…… Pakistanese are not respected in any nation of d world. Go to d world power U.S. or USSR n tell u r frm pakistan n a muslim….. n u all know wat happens next wid u…. such is d image of ur country.
    Wat hav u givn to d world…. terrorism n fear. Pakistan is known as d land of terrorists…..
    N ur biggest saviour is d fact dat dis book is written by an Indian author…. leave dat n now defend urself.
    Any no. of ur clues cant hide d fact wat nation u belong to…. v Indians are well above u….. in everything.
    ACCEPT D FACT DEAR…. I KNOW TRUTH HURTS!!!!!!

  88. Akhbar Navees · one year ago

    Really? Is this what they teach you in your temples? I remember quite differently!–Try wearing an Indian flag and waling in Australia–or wearing your Saffron dhoti and red dot and visiting downtown Kabul.

    I suppose your flamebait is supposed to prove something?

  89. alansaralhaq · one year ago

    A poor attempt to deviate from the topic at hand.

    As a Kashmiri from Pakistan in the UK I have had no such problem you mentioned. See British/ European people are quite intelligent they reason to logic and attempt to understand and are not blinded. yes sure they were blinded in hate after 911 but much has water has flowed under the bridge and they have used their skills of logic and reason and have many questions of their own to ask Bush, Blair and groups.

    I easily mix in with my colleagues but our 2 native Indians find it hard because they just don’t fit in. Indians prop up Bollywood to the world but real Indians do not look like Bollywood in reality Bollywood actors look like Pakistanis – the sad irony.

    Lets face it even Indira did not like the typical Indian man but liked the men, west of the Indus even though she was nothing fanciful.

    Now take your deceitful sorry little … and spread your mischieve elsewhere.

    I bet if she had a choice over you a sad little dhotiwala and me she would have chosen me ;).

    What do you think – since we are deviating from the topic are we not..

  90. Akhbar Navees · one year ago

    Since most Pakistanis are tall, and fair, and some have blue eyes–they look more like Southern Italians or Spaniards…it is the Bharatis with their dhotis and turbans that face more racial epithets.

    Didnt we read a letter from someone in China last week where the Chinese hated the 7th floor where most of the Bharatis resided.

  91. alansaralhaq · one year ago

    Not sure – but if it were I do not blame the Chinese because it would smell right with these bhajan monkies.

  92. Abdallah Jan · one year ago

    @ sparsh; Seems you are living in fancy world. No wonder you ugly pro-genies of ugly monkeys, ugly rats and ugly crows loves to imitate western white world in your stupid dresses and movie making, yet fail to imitate in diet and not eat Steaks or Prime Ribs or Beef Stews.

    Many a times while going to stupid Indian stores here in U S A my family are the attraction, to them ugly stinking Hindus. Once the owner ( lady ) of the store asked my wife, why is that Pakistani looks so fresh and cheerful while the Indians always looks dull. My wife answered that she does not know.

    I told my wife she should have answered, because we are Muslims, and that we worship ONE GOD and not 330 Million, thus we have ‘noor’ on our faces.

    I am blue eyed and fair in complexion. In my youth, women use to stumble when I passed by and they would get very nervous addressing me.

    During an introduction, at American University in D C, a friend introduced me to someone. This is so and so, but he does not talk much. She replied, ” with his looks, who wants to talk “.

    Hindu men at the university were very jealous of Pakistanis. Even the Hindu girls were more comfortable with Pakistanis, as alansaralhaq has pointed out, ” I bet if she had a choice over you a sad little dhotiwala and me she would have chosen me ” and that is the fact.

    As for your comment, ” tell u r frm pakistan n a muslim “.

    Purposely I have started wearing the Arabic long shirt and shalwar with a white cap. The respect I get is tremendous.

    Many times while traveling long distance we stop to eat and pray. We have prayed in 7-11 stores, MC.Donald, Wendy’s, and other restaurants on the highways where the managers were happy to oblige us. Many times we prayed off the highways and cops just passed by. Do you wonder why….?

    The Americans have found out that Muslims are I N N O C E N T. And now they are after Israelis and Hindus. Hindus are involved in giving out a false report ( NIST ) on WTC. So is the case with Aafia Siddique, a Hindu was the lead prosecutor and falsely put her in jail on fabricated and concocted charges.

    Your comment, ” Wat hav u givn to d world…. terrorism n fear. Pakistan is known as d land of terrorists “.

    F O O L the world has already awakened and they know who the Terrorist are, and it is certainly not Muslims. Go look yourself in the M I R R O R and you will see one.

    Your wet dream, ” v Indians are well above u “. It seems that you are ever ready to lay flat on the floor in worship when you see a rat crawling. Or when a monkey enter your house. Or when a snake zzz’s through your compound. Or when a lizard comes out from its hole. Or when you see a Pashtun ‘ L I N G U M ‘ that is why all the INDIAN stars (Male) are from same tribe and your women folks are ready to lie flat on the floor for them. Your idiots Hindu men dream of becoming as one of them. So knowing that they are Muslims and from the same area that is under Pakistan, then explain the above wet dream of yours.

    As for the rest of your garbage see my above postings of last year.

    Will you now face the truth that you are really stinking ugly crow and hated by all the world. Crow shall remain a C R O W no matter how much it tries to imitate a Peacock. So have a nice dream C R O W.

    Assalamu-Elekum

  93. Ashwin · one year ago

    US is now thinking of separating Baluchistan from Pak. Great News, We will have a new map of our 150000 years old Pakistan. Anyway, we Indians, respect all religions equally. Surely, we would love to see your new maps where Baloch, Sindh are separate. We do hate Pakistanis that is why Bangladesh came in to existence. We do support Baloch people right of Plebiscite………..After all Baloch people have suffered a lot despite being a naturally rich state.

  94. Akhbar Navees · one year ago

    Bharat has sowed seeds of hate in Nepal, Lanka (ltte Terror), East Pakistan (Mukti Bahni terror and later Rakhi Bahni terror), Bangladesh (Chittagong Hill Tracks Terror, and Rakhi Bahni terror)), China (Lama terror), Pakistan (TTP terror), Nepal (kingdom terror), Bhutan (state terror)

    Flamebait ignored. We write this to educated the thousands of readers who visit our site–especialy the young ones who may not have access to unpartial history.

    Your analysis is faulty– two Congressmen do not make up the USA!!!

    >>We do hate Pakistanis that is why Bangladesh came in to existence

    Bhartis are always proud of terror against Pakistanis that supported the Mukti and Rakhi Bahni which were responsible for the massacre of 1 million civilians in Jessore. After Bangladesh your BSF killed hundreds of Bangladeshis. Bangladeshis are now taking over Assam and Bihar, and you hate them. You also are supporting the terrorists in the Chittagong Hill Tracks against Bangladesh. Your love for Bangladeshis is self-evident in West Bengal which kills Muslim Bengalis on a daily basis

  95. srinivas · 11 months ago

    Private life of an individual is his own ,no one has nothing to do with it.But the individual is a Leader and misusing power for his needs ,it has to be condemned.Humans feel bad if some one talks bad regarding our leaders,but if its truth it should be publisiged.so that as a citizen one can think twice before casting a vote.
    please write articles on present political leaders merits/demerits.

    And the other word is religion.Discipline is what is impartant.The FACT is its AFTER ALL A CONCEPT by experts TO CONTROL THE PEOPLE.Different regions adapted to suit their styles/nature. GIVING BIRTH TO VARIOUS RELIGIONS.Kindly expose babas/bhagwans/matajis and others who are looting people in the name of god.

    Simple be good, do good, live life as much as u can.Its ur life,only one life.

    Be alert always.

    Thank you all.

  96. Akhbar Navees · 11 months ago

    We simply reported what his grandsons were saying and have written in his book.

    If one is set up to be an icon of non-violence and good behaviour than it is OK to question his claims of celebacy and bad behaviour–especially if those actions interfered with the independence of South Asia.

  97. Naam mei kya rakha hai…?? · 11 months ago
  98. Nagendra · 5 months ago

    Pakistani Muslims are very frustrated. They bought a domain for about 10USD a year to get their frustration out. Hinduism is oldest religion of the world. Do you guys think you can harm Hinduism?

  99. David · 5 months ago

    Great articles. Better than watching a porn. Will you write an article about the life and sex of famouse people who lived in 1500 AD. Thanks.

  100. Akhbar Navees · 5 months ago

    Please read the autobiography of Mohandas Gandhi “My experiment with Truth”–this article is based on that

  101. Pingback: Is US occupation the mother of all terrorism in Pakistan? | Brown Pundits

  102. Anil Dogra · 4 months ago

    Hi there!

    The site is good, content is good. Talking bullshit about Mrs. Gandhi is something undigestible. Who doesn’t have two lives??? If one is not Rama how could someone expect someone else to be RAMA!!! Rather than looking at the weightage of what good was done, why are we publicising personal life matters.

    It is a good site but i would request not to be concerned of the personal lives of anyone if you cannot digest it. Just see what good, wise and with courage was done!!

    Regards,
    Anil Dogra

  103. dusha · 2 weeks ago

    You guys have forgot to mention that Mrs. I.Gandhi has had an affair with the former Yugoslavian President Marshal Josip Broz ,,Tito”
    .

  104. P K Naidoo · 2 weeks ago

    She was filthy ***** of India…… and so-called mother of so many Indiian………….hahahaahhahaaa

    I am when people blame other they don’t need any proof and when these daring people wrote against Indira then they need proof.

  105. Alansaralhaq · 2 weeks ago

    Nagendara,

    You were not a religion until the British defiend your history (Turning myths into history essentially a LIE). You have hundreds of strains and variations and were never a faith or a united faith, beleive as you wish.

    Jiss ka wajood hi nehin tah woh baat karta hain itihas ka, Hindus and INdians remain insignificant in the pages of history as they were yesterday as they are today.

    When were you hurt to be harmed as a people, our kind brought you decency, education, culture and etiquette and turned a backward wayward sub continent to the richest and greatest continent on earth.

    When a Hindu like you make such bravardo comments I have one reply.

    App ki Zubah mein Tahmeez naam kay shab nehin tay, Hum nay app nay Tahmeez di.

    Even today in Hindi you use Tahmeez.

    Monotheism is the oldest form of religion – fact and perfected monotheism is Islam and organised monotheism began with Abraham pbuh.

Follow Rupee News on Twitter


Recent Articles

Join Rupee News Twitter Stream

Calendar of Postings

December 2007
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Categories

Archives