RUPEE NEWS: Recording History, Narrating Archives, Strategic Intellibrief Analysis: Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | اخبار روپیہ

| RUPEE NEWS | August 16th, 2008 | Updated Feb. 13th, 2009 | Moin Ansari | معین آنصآرّی | Fidel Castro has been engaged in a war against the USA since the 60s. He was initially supported by the USA to put pressure on Mr. Batista. Saddam Husein was supported by the USA in his war against Iran. He was eventually hanged by those who had earlier supported him. The list is long, Batista, Pap Doc, Marcos, Suharto–the world map is littered with dictators US sponsored dictators. Many of those that the world thinks of terrorists were either freedom fighters or supported by the free world. Bin Laden is one such example. There are many other. Extricating US out of its “Vietnam”: Holbrooke to get an earful from Pakistan

While the usual gaggle of sycophants and media hive-minders — along with some ordinarily perspicacious analysts — tell us that Barack Obama literally changed the course of human history by disgorging a great load of thrice-chewed cud about nuclear disarmament in Prague this week, the high-tech drone war the great hero of peace is waging inside the sovereign territory of America’s ally, Pakistan, is helping drive tens of thousands of people from their homes and killing civilians almost daily. Talking Peace in Prague, Dropping Bombs in Pakistan, Hard Rain Keeps Falling By CHRIS FLOYD

When Freedom Fighters turn “Terrorist”

One man’s terrorist, another’s freedom fighter (Link from LGF).

India intelligence: “‘the aim of RAW is to keep internal disturbances flaring up and the ISI preoccupied so that Pakistan can lend no worthwhile resistance to Indian designs in the region.”

…“Terrorism” is a description of a means, a method of deliberately attacking or threatening to attack civilian targets in order to achieve political goals. “Freedom fighting” is a description of an end, as a freedom fighter’s goal is national liberation. An individual could participate in “terrorism” and “freedom fighting” simultaneously, because one word describes means, while the other describes ends. To say that a Palestinian suicide bomber is not condemnable as a terrorist because the bomber’s cause is national liberation is to argue that the end justifies the means.”

No one is allowed to create a state within a state. Most Pakistanis supported the military operation against those who were holed up in the Red Mosque. What most of us didn’t know was that Mr. Ghazi was a patriot and fought for Pakistan and against the USSR in Afghanistan. As the very least Mr. Ghazi was a “ghazi”, at his worst he was a “rebel without a cause”. In NWFP, Baluchistan the patriots were responsible for the creation of Pakistan as well as the liberation of Azad Kashmir and the defeat of the USSR in Afghanistan.

As each passing week of the American drone campaign brings yet another harvest of civilian deaths, more and more Pakistanis are radicalized, and the government — the nuclear-armed government — grows ever more shaky…Thus the attacks ordered by Obama in Pakistan are escalating the threat of exactly the kind of nuclear instability that he decried in Prague.  Talking Peace in Prague, Dropping Bombs in Pakistan, Hard Rain Keeps Falling By CHRIS FLOYD

Why is it that patriotic Pakistanis in WANA, FATA, Dir and Chitral have turned against the army and are fighting the forces of Pakistan. The answer is complex.

“American drone attacks on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan are causing a massive humanitarian emergency, Pakistani officials claimed after a new attack yesterday killed 13 people. The dead and injured included foreign militants, but women and children were also killed when two missiles hit a house in the village of Data Khel, near the Afghan border, according to local officials.

“As many as 1m people have fled their homes in the Tribal Areas to escape attacks by the unmanned spy planes as well as bombings by the Pakistani army….

“So far 546,000 have registered as internally displaced people (IDPs) according to figures provided by Rabia Ali, spokesman for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, and Maqbool Shah Roghani, administrator for IDPs at the Commission for Afghan Refugees. The commissioner’s office says there are thousands more unregistered people who have taken refuge with relatives and friends or who are in rented accommodation. Talking Peace in Prague, Dropping Bombs in Pakistan, Hard Rain Keeps Falling By CHRIS FLOYD

There has been the Indian angle in Baluchistan. The Indian consulattes have been using the Baluch “nationalist” terrorists to create problems for Pakistan and malign the patriotic Pakistanis. Mr. Hamid Karzai, threatened by the “talibaan” has several times issued veiled threats against Pakistan. The Red Mosque and other related matters are part of the Indian-Afghan nexus supported by other anti-Pakistan forces which may want to threaten the government in Pakistan to relieve pressure on Kabul and Srinagar Osama Bin Laden turned against his benefactors. Pakistan’s legitimate interests?

In considering the ramifications of Obama’s escalation of the drone war, we understandably tend to focus on the individual attacks themselves: pinpoint, quickly in, quickly out, over and done with. And even if we denounce the inevitable “collateral damage” when a house or group of houses is destroyed, or when the wrong target is struck, the small scale of each individual attack still leaves the impression of a contained, localized phenomenon. But this is a gross distortion of the reality. For the purpose and nature of a terrorist attack is not just the destruction of an immediate target; the point is to engender widespread fear and chaos: Where will the next strike come? When will it come? Who will die next time?

(And make no mistake: a drone assault on an isolated, defenseless village is a quintessential terrorist attack, designed to induce terror, punish the enemy and force change by deadly violence. It is in no way comparable to any traditional notion of honorable combat. It is simply industrialized, corporatized, computerized slaughter.)

So the effects of Obama’s drone war are not limited to the few houses destroyed here and there. The attacks have spawned, or greatly added to, a humanitarian catastrophe that remains largely hidden from the world — and certainly from the well-wadded Western “liberals” who cheer Obama’s savvy toughness in the “good war” on the Af-Pak front. As The Times reports, almost a million people have been driven from their homes in Pakistan’s Tribal Areas to escape the American drones, and the bombs of Washington’s Pakistani proxies: Talking Peace in Prague, Dropping Bombs in Pakistan, Hard Rain Keeps Falling By CHRIS FLOYD

The story of Afghanistan and colonialism begins a long time ago. British tried to take up White Man’s burden in Afghanistan. It suffered badly in Kabul and could not hold it. NATO Lessons: 1880 UK defeat at Maiwand-Afghanistan. Today ISAF is making the same mistakes as the British did a century again. Is NATO committing suicide in Afghanistan? There is a powerplay going on. …the CIA assassination. The US has considered every possibily. However the most obvious one escapes the $80 Billion think tank industry in the USA. Saving the Pashtuns of Afghania from Afghanistan. Eradicating the Pashtun plight and ending occupation.

The CIA faces its toughest test yet to prove wrong the suspicions of many within the Pakistani strategic community that some of the terrorism exported from Afghan soil into Pakistan has direct or indirect support from Washington.

The immediate test centres on Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of the bandits who present themselves as Pakistani Taliban. The Americans have begun some cosmetic drone attacks on Baitullah’sterritory and there are reports Washington has agreed to launch a joint operation withPakistan against this bandit. The purpose is to assuage Pakistani concerns about the US role. In July last year, Pakistan’s military leadership confronted senior CIA and US military commanders withevidenceshowing Washington indirectly protecting anti-Pakistan terrorists on the ground. This newspaper broke that story on Aug. 5, 2008, with a front- page headline, “US told not to back terrorism against Pakistan.”

Mehsud is a good example. This bandit and his former leader and associate, Abdullah Mehsud, pioneered the attacks on Chinese interests in Pakistan, which was the first thing Abdullah did after being released from Gitmo in 2003. Interestingly, he was not handed back to Pakistan despite being a Pakistani citizen, but was released to Afghanistan where he went back into the custody of the US military and the Karzai government. Abdullah was killed when Pakistani security forces caught him sneaking back into Balochistan from Afghanistan, where he most probably was meeting his handlers. How he financed, armed and sustained a 25,000-strong militia remains beyond explanation. This militia continues to have quality arms and generous funding.

Until now CIA drones have never targeted Abdullah or Baitullah or any other militia that is committed to attacking Pakistan. During the operations in Bajaur, our soldiers were reportedly stunned at one point to see close to 600 well-armed terrorists come in from Afghanistan, fight the Pakistani military and then escape across the border. The CIA never attacks such “terrorists.” There has been a meteoric rise in the number of anti-Pakistan militias and fighters within our tribal belt since 2004, complete withreligiousbrainwashing justifying the killing of Pakistanis as a first priority. This has coincided with the launch of terrorism in Balochistan and northern Pakistan, the area between Gwadar port and the Chinese border. The CIA’s footprints, Thursday, April 09, 2009, Ahmed Quraishi. The writer works for Geo TV. Email: aq@ahmedquraishil.com

Indian imperialism using RAW to destabilize all neighbors. According the latest reports, after losing Swat, and his three closest colligues, Mr. Baitul Mehsud has proposed negotiations with the government of Pakistan. The government now has negotiated with all the major protagonists, and if successful the threat from Mr. Baitul Mehsud is about to be neutralized. In the meantime the Spring Offensive has begun with an attack on Kabul. Mr. Karzai escaped, but the attack in the forbidden city of the “Mayor of Kabul” has a huge impact on Afghanistan. The way the security ran from the scene shows that the Kabul regime is a house of cards ready to fall. America has to rethink India policy.

Hands off Pakistan is the slogan on the Pakistan news media. Selective amnesia of Americans. Pakistan is the most mistreated friend of America. The post Benazir era must be different. The USA has often treated Pakistan as a colony. Kissinger threatened Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. Bhutto the father of Benazir said it most elequently. Pakistan first: The devastating affects of appeasing India and kowtowing to the USA. Mr. Kissinger and US policy still threatens Pakistani leaders. Perhaps Mr. Kissinger living in the 70s should face the new realities. Waving goodbye to American Hegemony.

Convincing the US Tin ear–of the Pakistani point of view . There is a diconnect. The American Ambassador behaves like a Viceroy. Mr. Boucher behaves as if he ownes Pakistan. Low Level US officials visiting Islamabad think they are part of the American Raj. Americans are from Mars. Pakistanis are from Venus. An obsequous Ameican press is unable and or unwilling to report the facts in Afghansitan becuase truth may tarnish the Plan for a New American Century (PNAC http://www.pnac.com/). It seems that the loud blowhorn trumpeting a version of the war drowns the voices of reality. “Truth”, as always is the first casualty of war. It seems there is an agenda of some news outlets. Holbrooke facing Khyber poltergeist & Ganges hobgoblin: Mentioning “K” word is faux pas or deliberate provocation for Delhi

“are playing Russian roulette with America’s future with their bigoted anti-Muslim rhetoric. Muslims may constitute as much as a third of humankind by 2050, forming a vast market and a crucial labor pool. They will be sitting on the lion’s share of the world’s energy resources. The United States will increasingly have to compete with emerging rivals such as China and India for access to those Muslim resources and markets, and if its elites go on denigrating Muslims, America will be at a profound disadvantage during the next century.” Juan Cole

A majority of precocious Americans have clearly voiced disquisitions against the doltish and vindictive votary propagating a divisively daphenous demagogy. The world has presented copious monographs against a deleterious Neocon philosophy used as an excuse to wage The New Crusades Against Islam (TNCAI). An exegetical examination will show that the furtive condotierri supportive of Blackwater and other mercenaries has evinced shame to America.

These are the areas controlled by the Taliaban. The areas under nominal NATO control are the Non-Pashtun areas.

The shrinking ISAFistan

The increasing Talibanistan

The shrinking Karzaiistan restricted to North West Kabul

The picture in Afghanistan is grim for NATO. NATO has made deals with some of the forces. That is why 3000 additional troops are being dispatched to Afghanstan. Mr. Baitullah Mesud was somehow recruited to wage war against Pakistan instead of Afghanistan.

Pakistan is the most abused ally of the US: “Pakistan is not given proper credit in the USA”-General ZinniPakistan’s interests in Afghanistan have been ignored. An anti-Pakistan government in Kabul does not bode well for a trusting relationship between Washington and Islamabad. India a secret, and not to secret player in Afghanistan–Jawayria, Malik, Bases, Lashkargarh, Qushila and others

What are the circumstances that the Afghans Taliban who are so concerned with the elimination of foreign forces in Afghanistan broke into two parts? The main thrust of the Taliban is in Afghanistan.

Taliban Statement issued on Jan. 30th, 2008. “We have been fighting for Afghanistan’s independence against foreign aggression since 2001 [when the Taliban were ousted] and the Afghan nation has a lot of hopes resting on us. That’s why they have stood with us against the foreign military might. They are not supporting us to fight with Pakistan, but to fight against the US-led NATO [North Atlantic Treaty Organization] forces and liberate Afghanistan,” Zabihullah Mujahid said. He said the Taliban had already issued a statement disowning Baitullah on their website (http://www.alemarah.i67.org).

However a small splinter group led by Mr. Mehsud has now turned its guns on Pakistan. Why is Mr. Baitullah Mehsud with his new organization “Tehrik e Taliban” now attacking Pakistan? These rhetorical questions were asked for effect.

SUFI MUHAMMAD: He leads a peaceful group called Tehrik-e-Nifaaz Shariat Muhammadi group (TSNM). He is the Father-In-Law of Mulla Fazalullah. Muhammad Sufi Saeed led a march of thousands of local people in Swat soon after the agreement and is now trying to persuade his son- in-law Fazlullah to accept the terms.

Key Taliban leaders in Pakistan:

BAITULLAH MEHSUD: Head of the newly formed Taliban Movement of Pakistan. He has been named by the Pakistan government and the CIA as the man behind the Dec. 27 assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. He fought in Afghanistan against the Soviets in 1980s; alongside the Taliban in the 1990s and against U.S. and NATO troops after 2001. Now taking aim at the Pakistan military. From the Mehsud tribe of South Waziristan, near the Afghan border where Western intelligence suggests Al Qaida is regrouping.

MAULVI FAZLULLAH: Uses an illegal FM radio station in Pakistan’s picturesque Swat Valley in the northwest to rally supporters to his rigid brand of Islamic rule. Followers have burned down CD shops, girls’ schools and launched dozens of suicide attacks against Pakistani police and military. Commander in the Taliban Movement of Pakistan.

Pakistani cleric Maulana Fazlullah, who has waged war against the authorities in the Swat Valley for 20 months, has “reservations” about a peace accord between militants and the government, a spokesman said.

Fazlullah is leading a rebel group loyal to the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, which is based in the northwestern tribal region and is fighting security forces in areas along the border with Afghanistan.

FAQIR MOHAMMAED: Based in northwestern Pakistan’s Bajour Agency, he is considered a close ally of al-Qaida’s Ayman Al-Zawahri. Part of the Taliban Movement of Pakistan but also a key member of the Movement for the Implementation of Mohammad’s Sharia Law. He has sent hundreds of young men to fight in Afghanistan and has been implicated in dozens of suicide attacks.

SADIQ NOOR: Powerful leader in North Waziristan, where followers have battled Pakistan’s military and provided assistance to the Afghan Taliban across the border. He is closely aligned to Afghanistan’s Jalaluddin Haqqani, a key eastern Afghan commander who coordinates activities between al Qaida and the Taliban.

MAULVI GUL BAHADAR: The leader behind the deeply flawed September 2006 agreement with the Pakistan military that gave breathing space for the burgeoning Pakistani Taliban. Based in North Waziristan. Source: Associated Press

The Pakistani Taliban in North Waziristan have already agreed on a ceasefire with Pakistan, and are expected to make an announcement to this effect within a few days.

In an interview with this correspondent on satellite phone from an unknown location, Afghan Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said that when the Pakistani Taliban began fighting against the United States and other allied forces who had occupied Afghanistan, they were united. But subsequently, he said, Baitullah and other Pakistani militants had started fighting the Pakistani military and “we have cut all ties with them and openly disown them”.

He said the Taliban have a clear-cut policy of not fighting with any other Muslim country, especially with Pakistan, in any manner, and that they are strictly against fighting the Pakistani military. Syed Saleem Shahzad. Asia Times Jan 30th, 2008.

As stated in detail on other posts on this site, there are various external factors which has allowed this situation to develop. That expose and article on the connections is the most popular article on this site.

The Maps tell a good story.

America’s on-going war on terror Saturday, January 26, 2008, Rahimullah Yusufzai

Almost every winter for the last few years, there is talk of a spring or summer offensive by the Taliban in Afghanistan but somehow it has never materialized. Usually the US and Nato military commanders and the Western media highlight the threat of new and bigger attacks on their forces in the southern, southwestern and central Afghan provinces. And it so happens that the US-led coalition during this period launches its own anti-Taliban military operations or sends additional troops to the war-ravaged country.

Last year just before spring, US and NATO forces launched a major anti-Taliban offensive in Kajaki district in Helmand to secure the site of an irrigation and hydel-generation dam. Military action also took place in Garmser district in Helmand to push Taliban fighters back into the desert and disrupt one of their important supply lines. Earlier, NATO forces spearheaded by Canadian troops had conducted military operations in Panjwai district, which had become a staging-post for Taliban attacks dangerously close to Kandahar city. One could describe these operations as an attempt to pre-empt the Taliban spring offensive. On their part, Taliban have learnt a bitter lesson not to launch big frontal attacks as it makes them vulnerable to retaliatory air strikes by the US-led coalition forces and increases the risk of casualties. That is the reason for Taliban commanders not to plan and undertake big attacks at the time of spring or any other season. Instead, they seem to be concentrating on an increase in guerilla attacks when the warming of weather on the eve of summer allows their fighters better opportunities to operate.

Obama to unveil new policy: Marshal Plan & end to bombing raids in Pakistan

Peek into Obama’s brains: Bruce Reidel on Pakistan

Growing consensus in the Obama team: Much of Pakistan’s problems originate in Afghanistan

Obama advisor Weinbaum predicts total Afghan policy review: Sees focus on talks & Reconciliation

Afghanistan: Gen. Petraeus’ Pakistani advisers: Indians jittery

Obama adviser Weinbaum gives deep insights into new Afghan policy

This winter the US has decided to send 3,200 more troops to Afghanistan for the specific purpose of tackling any new Taliban spring or summer offensive and meeting the shortfall that NATO forces face in dangerous places such as Helmand province. Some 2,200 American soldiers from the Marine Expeditionary Force would operate for seven months in Helmand to reinforce British troops deployed there under NATO command. The remaining 1,000 marines would deploy in the eastern Afghan provinces bordering Pakistan and become part of the 12,000 American troops engaged in the “Operation Enduring Freedom” independently of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).

The fresh deployment of US troops in Afghanistan has been described as American “mini-surge” as it is a small-scale version of the Iraq “surge” that he ordered in early 2007. Though the number of troops being sent to Afghanistan is small, it looks significant if viewed in context of the buildup of American and NATO forces since October 2001 when the US military invaded and occupied the country and toppled the Taliban regime. With the arrival of the additional 3,200 American soldiers, the US troops’ level would rise to more than 27,000. This is more than six times higher than the number of American soldiers who were in Afghanistan at the time of the battle for Tora Bora in December 2001. The need to deploy more troops was obviously due to the resurgence of the Taliban and the worsening security situation. It also proved wrong the US military authorities led by the then defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld who resisted calls for expanding American or allied forces at the time.

The NATO-commanded ISAF has also registered an increase in the number of troops it has deployed in Afghanistan over the years. They now total more than 40,000 and are drawn from 38 countries, including 13 non-NATO and 25 members of NATO. The ISAF was originally required to provide security in Kabul and its surroundings but has now taken responsibility for the whole country, particularly in the volatile southern, central and western provinces.

One major reason for the US to send additional troops to Afghanistan is the refusal of NATO members to meet the shortage of about 8,000 soldiers to secure some of the more dangerous areas in the Taliban strongholds of Kandahar, Helmand and Urozgan. NATO military commanders have been making requests for the additional troops for months now without getting a positive response. The deployment of the 3,200 soldiers, that too for seven months, would partially meet the NATO demand.

In fact, the Brussels-based think-tank, the Senlis Council, and other organizations and experts have estimated the need for increasing the foreign troops’ deployment in Afghanistan to at least 80,000 to tackle the growing Taliban-led resistance. There is no chance that NATO members would be willing to contribute that many troops due to fear of political fallout of deployment of their soldiers in such a volatile place as Afghanistan and owing to commitments elsewhere in other trouble-spots in the world. Some of these countries including France, Germany, Italy and Spain are even not ready to lift the strict restrictions they have placed on deploying troops in dangerous parts of Afghanistan or carrying out combat missions. Most of their soldiers are operating in the relatively safer northern provinces.

With deployment of the fresh American marines, the strength of the foreign forces in Afghanistan would reach 55,000-plus. But it isn’t enough to secure a vast country that has been at war for three decades and is now experiencing a renewed phase of fighting that is different from the past due to the use of new and more destructive weapons by the US and its allies and unheard of tactics such as suicide bombings and improvised explosive devices by Taliban. The Afghan National Army is now 60,000-strong and growing but inadequate training, less attractive salaries and heightened risks have been causing demoralization and desertions in its ranks. Due to the shortage of ground forces, the US and NATO forces rely heavily on long-range artillery shelling and bombing by jet-fighters and gunship helicopters on Taliban positions. This invariably results in civilian casualties and displacement and makes it even tougher for the coalition forces to try and win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people. The “collateral damage” resulting from such arbitrary military operations has political fallout that is contributing to the unpopularity of embattled Afghan President Hamid Karzai and his government. Karzai’s appeals to the US to curb airstrikes against Taliban militants have mostly fallen on deaf ears.

Organizations and individuals who previously were strong supporters of President Karzai are now publicly expressing dissatisfaction over his government’s performance. The UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, in a recent report submitted to the Security Council noted that there was public dissatisfaction with the Karzai government’s effectiveness, deteriorating security situation and slow pace of reforms. Former US ambassador to the UN, Richard Holbrooke, told a conference in Brussels a few months ago that NATO risked losing the war in Afghanistan because of a “tremendous deterioration” in the popularity of President Karzai due to corruption by government functionaries, particularly those involved in drug-trafficking. Canadian foreign minister Peter MacKay was quoted as saying at the same conference that the fate of NATO’s operations in Afghanistan could reach a “tipping point.” He should know because more than 70 Canadian soldiers and a diplomat have been killed in Kandahar and deployment of his country’s troops in such a dangerous, Taliban-infested place is deeply unpopular with the Canadians. And the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) delegation head in Afghanistan, Reto Stocker, pointed out that delivering humanitarian aid and monitoring the situation of civilians in the country had become increasingly difficult due to the growing violence in the hitherto peaceful western and northern provinces.

It is fairly obvious that the US government’s “mini-surge” in Afghanistan with the deployment of 3,200 troops at the advent of spring would largely be a stop-gap measure aimed at reducing the impact of a possible increase in Taliban attacks. It isn’t meant and it cannot achieve military defeat of Taliban. In fact, eliminating the Taliban now appears difficult. A better option, which some Western government officials and analysts are gradually advocating, would be to co-opt the Taliban and bring them into the political mainstream. This would have to be a long-term project but it cannot be launched until the military option is discarded.The writer is an executive editor of The News International based in Peshawar. Email: bbc@pes.comsats.net.pk

Osama bin Laden has repeatedly stated his hope that the U.S. will get sucked into a ruinous, debilitating conflict in Pakistan. India intelligence: “‘the aim of RAW is to keep internal disturbances flaring up and the ISI preoccupied so that Pakistan can lend no worthwhile resistance to Indian designs in the region.”

Kabul: The Final assault begins. How long can NATO hang on? Does Obama have the courage to implement the real solutions to Obama’s Vietnam (Afghanistan)

Selective Amnesia of Americans: Pakistan is the most mistreated friend in the world

Fixing AfPak expedites the inevitable union between Pakistan and Afghanistan

The Algeriafication of Pakistan, the Egyptianization of Bangladesh may will yield Iranian type of revolutions

Islamabad Pakistan Marriot: What was the US Marine role?

• Pakistani Cheese for Western “whine”. Invoices for services rendered.
• http://rupeenews.com/2008/01/28/pakistani-cheese-for-western-whine-countering-do-more-mantra-selling-pakistan-too-cheap-tit-4-tat-diplomacy-countering-requests-with-formal-invoices-and-charging-market-prices-for-service/
• Wish list of Pakistani people
• Invoice for Defeating terror, Securing Pakistani Nukes $150 Billion per annum
• Kissinger and other Americans threatened Pakistan
• The Taliban was a construct of the CIA. Rohrbarker
• Perhaps Mr. Kissinger living in the 70s should face the new realities. Waving goodbye to American Hegemony.
• Trilaterals triangulating in Pakistan

Kabul: The Final Spring Offensive? End of NATO? UK Brig. Smith: “We’re not going to win this [Afghan] war”
Failure and Defeat in Afghanistan: Inevitable Frustration & misdirected Payback for ally Pakistan

US Charge of the Light Brigade into Pakistan is a US failure and has to stop
Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan run by Taliban Huge Migraine for India Facing the Khyber poltergeist & Ganges hobgoblin
NATO war: UK 1880 defeats in Afghanistan
Cambodiazation of the Afghan war
Rescueing the Pashtuns of Afghania from Afghanistan

Unite! Erase the Durand Line The only solution is the inevitable confederation between Pakistan and Afghanistan

The graphics depicted below show the best solution.

Noticias de Rupia | Nouvelles de Roupie | Rupiennachrichten | новости рупии | 卢比新闻 | Roepienieuws | Rupi Nyheter | ルピーニュース | Notizie di Rupia | PAKISTAN LEDGER | پاکستاني کھاتا | DefensebriefsIntellibriefs Translate to: RSS feed: Save/Share |